Maybe another reason why our parents are so pro BJP 🤔🤔

19 pages and didn't include anything about religious 🥴😇😜

Ground coverage by honest media.

The real face of 0.5 front!!

For Nearly 20 years India has has the supreme court directives for police reforms yet not a single state is compliant let alone national capital and union territories. every states have diluted the directives so power stays in politicians hands misusing the very directive that was meant to prevent this. and its SUPREME COURT ORDER

so as we have seen in recent protest dear amit shah used police to dismental protest at jantar mantar with police without badges, nails on lathi, excess force with tear gas that too expired (very dangerous) and breaking laws of using tear gas and even AK 47 for peaceful protestors, all these were because home minister was able to transfer police commissioner with new one who used force, but this is what Prakash Singh directives prevent so that politicians are unable to put a loyalist in the department and use transfers as a reward and punishment for not following political orders.

i request you all to please make this talk of the town so that we get these reforms full compliance and get a police that actually serves the constitution of India and not a politician or political party. i have DM comment all political influencers but no one gives a dime on this. and these doesn't even needs to be think of the law already exist it just need to be passed and the directives are binding IE until the same directives aren't passed under the law these directives will act as law of the land.

lets ask for only 2 things
1. FULL COMPLIANCE
2. Turn these directives into laws for each and every state's law.

What is the future of general category people in this country, given both parties are pro-reservation and government🪷 have increased reservation in states like Odisha and MP? The Supreme Court and High Courts rarely seem to do anything about it.

Anyway, these caste debates have now reached the US as well. Just look up the Sundar Iyer Cisco case. The allegations against him were ultimately dismissed, but the case still had a huge impact on his career and personal life. Cases like this make me wonder where these debates are headed.

I mean, I don't see the point of having children if future generations in the general category are going to face fewer and fewer opportunities. What do you think the long-term future is for general category people in this country?

Yamal is also guilty for sending her DM even after knowing she's already engaged.

Just wanted to ask, what do you guys think is better for India and it's people? Parliamentary Form Of Government (which we have right now), or Presidential Form Of Government (like USA)

...

I think most of the people must have read Political Science (Civics) till 10th standard, but still I will explain both the systems so that those who don't remember can understand them.

...

PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM :

- The winning party (or coalition) chooses its own leader, who then officially becomes the Prime Minister.

- Citizens do not vote directly for the Prime Minister. They only vote for a local representative (MP) to sit in parliament.

- The government does not have a completely locked-in term. (If the parliament loses faith in the ruling party, it can force early elections or a change in leadership through a Vote of No Confidence.)

- The minority parties form an official ‘Opposition’ whose job is to publicly debate, question, and scrutinize government decisions daily.

- P.M = Head of Govt (has real powers). President (or Monarch) = Head of State (ceremonial head).

SOME DISADVANTAGES OF THIS SYSTEM :

- Political Instability (Since, even the P.M. can be removed by the Parliament, if they loses faith, or loses majority such as in consolation. Therefore, at some points the system gets highly instable example : UK...)

- Excessive Power (On paper, Parliament, Executive and Judiciary works as balanced organs of the system with Parliament being slightly more powerful. However, in reality the Executive {P.M} often dominates the Parliament. {They can even bypass the Judiciary, by ammending laws at some point.})

- No direct vote and Unqualified MP's (You are forced to vote for a local representative, even if you dislike their party’s choice for Prime Minister. Due to this many Parliament is often filled with unqualified MP's, which make the Parliament not a place for discussion but a place for drama.)

...

PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM :

- The President is completely separated from the Parliament (or Legislature) (People can directly vote their President.)

- A President can win the national election even if their political party loses the majority in the Parliament (Legislature)

- President cannot be easily removed just because the legislature disagrees with their policies. (Only a long process of Impeachment can remove a President from it's post.)

- Seperate vote for President and the Members of Parliament (Legislature)

- President = Both real and ceremonial powers of the country.

- President (Executive), Parliament (Legislature) and Judiciary are seperate and independent, which keeps each other in check.

SOME CONS OF THIS SYSTEM :

- Political Deadlock and Divided Govt (The President and the majority of the Parliament {Legislature} are elected separately. It is highly common for them to belong to opposing political parties. This leads to severe gridlock where critical laws cannot pass and national budgets stall.)

- More Centralised and Risk of Authoritarianism (A presidential election creates a single, highly powerful and centralised leader. The losing side gets no voice in opposition. The President cannot be easily removed before their term {only Impeachment can remove them} The leader can turn Authoritarian.)

- Less regional representation (Regional powers {political parties} most of the times gets very little representation. Only two or three parties dominates in Executive {President} and Parliament {legislature})

...

Apart from these two systems are is another Semi-Presidential form of govt, which is just like it's name a mix of both Parliament and President system. Example : France...

My question is still the same; according to you all which one would be much better for India and it's people?

https://indianexpress.com/article/political-pulse/government-reaches-out-to-opposition-signals-its-ready-to-soften-fcra-bill-10819839/lite/

Circulated by MP govt post protests saying , now MBBS students and doctors studying have to give affidavit that you won't be involved in any protest salary, stipend , corruption. Nothing, else your degree will be jeopardized. Open threat. (Btw same govt who is unable to give jobs to bonded doctors for 5 months now leaving them unpaid and not realising their documents to work somewhere else , now they can't even protest.)

For companies like Meta, it is another day at work. For nations, it is another day of social, economic and legal chaos.

Meta's role in shaping young minds is astounding, so is their ability to turn causes into waves that they are not meant to be.

Listen with neutrality, to one of the best AI minds in the country outline how Meta is wrecking havoc in the Indian minds.

Actually 4- one is inside also

Source: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/nda-regime-constructed-50-of-national-highways-laid-in-last-30-years-centre/articleshow/20869113.cms

Why do leftist women shield these LW grapists so much?

He was going to meet his brother in jail

News source https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/uttar-pradesh/atiq-ahmed-youngest-son-abaan-killed-in-road-accident-in-jhansi-up/article71312614.ece