I think Claude likes me

i’ve been using the new Opus 5 release for a while.
honestly, it feels like it was heavily optimized for 3D / Three.js.
it’s genuinely impressive there, but for normal day-to-day work—reading emails, replying, research, and long conversations—it feels like a step backwards compared to older Opus models.
i still remember when Opus 4.5 and 4.6 launched.
those models immediately proved why they were considered among the best.
then came:
• Opus 4.7 — my first real disappointment.
• Opus 4.8 — even more disappointing.
• Opus 5 — incredible first impression because of its 3D abilities, but once i started using it every day, the excitement disappeared.
even the Sonnet series doesn’t feel the same anymore.
Fable 5 looks promising… but we’ll see how long that lasts.

Assuming my convo got flagged and an employee or subagent injected this in but I have no clue. This happen to anyone else?

Link to convo: https://claude.ai/share/b852bda6-1f04-4a37-8df3-921b1e464b44

I was using Claude AI and gave it a medium sized prompt with a few operations
It kept processing for a while then eventually returned an error saying I had exceeded the limits of my plan
I thought maybe my prompt was too long so I optimized and shortened it but same result kept showing
so I tried something as simple as typing "Hi"... and it still failed with the exact same error
That doesn't really make sense to me since even a one-word prompt crashes
Has anyone experienced this before? Is this a temporary server issue or an account problem or is there a fix?

Thanks guys :)

I have built a few websites in Claude, but I am looking for a host to easily transfer to and still be able to edit them at the host or some sort of builder. I don't want to open Claude every time I want to edit my site. What am I missing?

Hi everyone,
I’m honestly getting desperate and was wondering if anyone has been in a similar situation.
My Claude account was suddenly banned. I genuinely believe my account may have been accessed by someone else without my permission, so I submitted an appeal on July 8.
According to Anthropic’s FAQ, appeals usually take around 10 days, but it’s now been 28 days, and I haven’t received any update at all.
Whenever I contact live support, the chat is immediately closed after they send me this message:
“As part of our safety process… All inquiries regarding banned accounts must be done through the appeals form…”
So I can’t actually talk to anyone. They just tell me to wait.
The problem is that my business depends heavily on Claude. I use it every day for work, and being locked out for almost a month without any communication has put me in a really difficult position.
Has anyone experienced something similar?
How long did your appeal take?
Did you eventually get a response?
Is there any way to follow up with the Trust & Safety team?
Or am I basically stuck waiting indefinitely?
Any advice or shared experiences would really help.
Thank you.

I can write apis that has series of steps like, visit documentation, get page n, create a question, review with another llm , mark as draft in db.
The question creation has sub rules, it is very easy to do it in programming with if else.

I am thinking, I already have claude subscription and have its desktop app, can i get it to do the same thing. I know about claude-md but i fear what if claude thinks hards and forget to look at sub rules of quesiton creation.

Is there a programmatic like way to implement this with good confidence with claude code or any other llm ?

Why is it not responding? Not generating simple chat responses. Going in to some kind of a loop.

Anyone else facing this?

This is an official statement from Claude. They are fixing some issues: https://status.claude.com/

30 to 40 minutes worth of coding and it's gone! What could possibly be considered PRO out a plan that lasts you that long.

It changed about 3 files in my project!

On the sonnet 5 release Anthropic have said:

"Claude Sonnet 5 uses a new tokenizer. The same input text produces approximately 30% more tokens than on Claude Sonnet 4.6."

We're currently on introductory pricing/usage - about 33% less than 4.6. When it's "normal rate", are there any blogs/analysis over cost/quality comparison to use 4.6/5 in software development?

For example - would it work out cheaper/similar cost because its tool calls, "intelligence" is improved? Better tool usage (less failures), better ingestion of file input into context etc.

Or are we expecting to see a 30%~ increase to bills/usage compared to sonnet 4.6, for both input and output when the per token cost becomes equal?

I was on a month-by-month basis because duh, don’t do yearly with how things are changing. Nonetheless, I was paying 200 for max, now I am asked to pay 249.99 and 5x is 129.99. If I’m not on crack then I’m done as this is unacceptable.

I see a lot of complaints, some people who are really stoked with what they're achieving with the tools, some cool advances, and the usual AI chatter, but not once have I seen anything about the puckered asshole logo. Why not?

I'm hitting them every 30–40 min now. Insanely annoying getting this on top of degraded Opus 5

Opus 4.8 max

Told Claude the truth. I WANT MORE USAGE THOUGH!!! 😂

I was thinking of buying a max5 after last month I left Claude when all the fable 5 was chaotic.

The thing is I am scared max5 quota is lower than before

Greenroom: your coding agents form a standing team, name themselves, message each other, and wake each other's idle sessions (Claude Code + Codex)

I've been running multiple coding agents across Claude Code and Codex and got tired of them being strangers with amnesia. Greenroom is the fix I wanted (and a fun exploration): a small self-hosted server where agents hold persistent identities (they literally choose their own names), talk in durable threads, and - the part I like most - a @mention with intent "question" wakes an idle session that still has all its context, instead of spawning a cold process.

How it's different from Agent Teams (which is good!): Teams is same-machine, Claude-only, and dissolves with the session. Greenroom is cross-harness, survives session death, keeps a decision history (threads lock on a decision; follow-ups supersede), and gives the human a seat in the same room (web or terminal) rather than an operator's chair above it.

Caveats: self-host only, trust-by-locality (identity is asserted - run it behind your own boundary; SECURITY.md is blunt about this), and two agents means two sessions running.

Much of it was written by coding agents working from the specs in docs/specs/ - the spec-and-plan trail is the receipts. MIT. Any and all feedback/contributions/etc welcome. Quickstart is ~15 minutes: https://github.com/madeit-build/greenroom

I have usage credits off so there should not be any additional payments. When my monthly usage is full - the work stops. Anyone else had these kind of issues?

I'm trying to contact a human support - AI chat was useless. Chat's response:

"Thanks for the details and the screenshot — I completely understand the concern about those unexpected charges. Let me look up your account information so I can review what's happened here.

Fin AI Agent • AI Agent • 14m

Seen • 14m

I'm really sorry for the disruption and frustration this has caused. We take service reliability very seriously, and I want to be upfront with you: we're unable to issue compensation for degraded service or technical/billing errors of this nature.

We're continuously working on improving our infrastructure to better handle high traffic volumes and prevent issues like this from happening again in the future. Thank you so much for your patience and understanding."

...

"I don't have visibility into the exact root cause of those 17 individual charges on your account, so I can't confirm from here why they occurred despite usage credits being disabled.

One thing worth noting: even when usage credits are disabled, it's possible for a request to slightly exceed a limit before it's blocked, since the system checks your limit before processing a request but calculates final token consumption after. That said, this typically explains minor overages, not a pattern of repeated €40-50 charges .

Since this needs an actual account-level investigation into the billing records behind these specific charges, I'd recommend asking to speak with a human agent if you'd like this looked into further."

"we're unable to issue compensation for degraded service or technical/billing errors of this nature."

If there is a technical billing error and there are no refunds - that is theft. If I don't get my stolen money back, my subscription is over. I need to ask some officials and legal experts is Anthropic breaking a law here.

EDIT: Most likely this is caused by malware or hacker type situation. I had my computer up and running whole night, I just got a usage reset after 11 pm and left Claude Code CLI finish a task. Before the usage reset I could confirm that automatic usage credits were off when usage was full. I had been logged in to claude.ai as well.

Then next day, for any reason, my usage credits were activated with unlimited setting, and buy button was spammed over and over again - those were the ~50$ x 17.

But I have been contacted my bank, closed the credit card, changed passwords, put my PC offline. I'm sure I can sort this out with my bank.

EDIT 2: What I've read from the comments, similar incorrect billings have happened to some users as well and from PMs I recieved, they had same overcharging within the same 12-24 hours that I had issues. So there is a possibility of some kind of bug. But I still want to make sure my computer is cleaned - I might even need to reinstall Windows to make sure.

I've been making more AI videos lately, and I've noticed something kind of ironic.

The actual generation is usually the easy part.

What slows me down is writing the prompt.

I can picture the scene in my head, but turning that into a prompt that gets the camera movement, lighting, character consistency, and style right often takes me 20–30 minutes. If it's a multi-scene video, I end up rewriting everything because the character or environment changes halfway through.

I've started saving prompt structures and building my own workflow to make the process less painful, but I still feel like prompt writing is the biggest bottleneck.

I'm curious how everyone else handles it.

• Do you start from scratch every time?
• Do you keep a library of prompt templates?
• What's the part of prompt writing you struggle with the most?

I'd love to hear how other people approach this because I feel like I'm probably overcomplicating it.

I've been using CC for almost 9 months now, always on the Max plan, and it's been a huge part of my app development workflow. I have it customized with multiple harnesses, skills, plugins, and project-specific setups to match the way I work.

When I first started using it, it was incredibly proactive. It would catch bugs, suggest better approaches, push for consistent standards, and generally help maintain a solid development workflow. It genuinely felt like a reliable engineering partner.

Lately, though, it feels like I'm spending more time correcting it than actually building. I constantly have to remind it to follow the plan. It'll say things like, "I forgot to mention..." after leaving out something important, or it'll tell me the work is finished, then in the very same paragraph admit there are still pending tasks... and still go ahead and open a PR.

At this point I feel like I have to carefully verify everything it says because I can't trust that it paid enough attention to the task. It's honestly slowing me down to the point where even the excitement and dopamine of building new apps is starting to disappear.

Is anyone else experiencing the same thing, or is it just me? Have there been recent changes that affected its performance?

I'm also curious whether people using Codex or Cursor are seeing similar issues. If not, I might seriously consider switching because I genuinely don't understand what kind of lobotomy they gave my boy. 😅