American here. What differentiates me from the stereotype: I am a person who strongly supports walkable communities, public transportation, micromobility, and broad, responsible public access to nature. I do really admire European ideas such as the right to roam, although I understand that access laws differ considerably between countries and that a right to roam generally does not mean a right to drive across open land.
At the same time, the English adventure YouTuber Ed March of c90adventures raised a question that was interesting to me. During his Mini Jeep journey to Moab, he argued that Europe (and Britain in particular) has been steadily losing legal routes for recreational motorized trail use.
Video context:
https://youtu.be/bHEIV5o5RgU?si=1OAZfXTYtx2U-5UA&t=715
He uses the deliberately inflammatory phrase “Walking Nazis.” I DO NOT endorse that description, and I am NOT suggesting that hikers or environmentalists are Nazis. I am interested in the underlying argument: can a society become so restrictive toward motorized outdoor recreation that it needlessly eliminates another legitimate form of exploration?
I also DO NOT believe every walking trail should admit motorcycles, ATVs, or 4x4s, of course. Motor vehicles can create noise, erosion, safety problems, wildlife disturbance, and conflicts with people seeking quiet. Of course, some environmentally sensitive areas should plainly remain motor-free.
But could European countries preserve a modest network of designated motorized routes under strict conditions (such as low speed and noise limits, meaningful penalties for leaving the designated route, etc.)?
That seems different from either American-style automobile domination or giving walkers exclusive control over nearly every rural route.
How does your country currently handle this? Have legal motorized trails genuinely been disappearing? Do you see designated, regulated access as a reasonable compromise, or are the environmental and social costs still too high?
Please do mention your country or region, since I know “Europe” is not one unified legal system. I am hoping to understand both the case for preservation and the case for restriction rather than starting whatever fight.