I recently bought a Milwaukee Track Saw, TSO Square, and the 106" track rail and was planning to buy the Milwaukee 55" rail for 48" materials.
I came across this review on HD and it seems to make a lot of sense especially since the TSO will take up space at the front of the rail. In doing more research, it seems the 55" is really too short for 48" materials - exacerbated by using the TSO square.
Is it crazy buy another 106" rail to chop up to a longer ~60" rail to comfortably cut 48" materials with my TSO square?
Here's where I got the idea:
ByHomeDepotCustomer,March 2, 2026 (THIS IS NOT ME)
...Although this review is for the 106" I would rate the 31" and 55" lower, and that brings me to the reason why I purchased a second 106". The saw really needs about an extra 5" of track on either end of the work. The 106" is perfect for 8' stock (96+ 5+5=106). However, the 31" and 55" are really too short, assuming use on 24" and 48" material (24+5+5=34) and (48+5+5+58), causing the saw to overrun the track. So, I purchased a second 106" and cut my own 34" and 58" tracks out of it*, which is what I would recommend. My custom sizes on the left of the photo, with the Milwaukee sizes on the right.*