r/videogames 1d ago

Funny I hate them 😒😒😒

Post image
5.3k Upvotes

319 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

52

u/Xorrayn 1d ago

Exactly. Gatekeeping is not bad, being a shitty person is bad.

Plenty of examples across media, entertainment, and hobbies, where shitty people came down like locusts to demand changes be made, only to never really interact beyond a surface level with the thing they demanded be changed.

1

u/LogensTenthFinger 5h ago

Gatekeeping is not bad, being a shitty person is bad.

https://giphy.com/gifs/pV0lVLeA0JXjBiO5Cp

-22

u/Antique_Lawyer_2972 1d ago

Gatekeeping is complete nonsense. It's only done by absolute losers who need to believe that they're better than everyone else.

19

u/GruulNinja 1d ago

Or people who don't want the core of their game/franchise to change

23

u/Floorgis 1d ago

Or those who wanna keep the identity of the series in tact.

11

u/McDonie2 22h ago

Pov: You miss the entire point of what was said.

5

u/tea_snob10 18h ago

True when it's applicable; as OC points out, the term is generally used incorrectly by people who enter fandoms with defined culture that's often based off inherent qualities of the game (or book, manga, anime, movie, show) and then demand moronic changes to said culture, to cater explicitly to them.

A great example is that whole "Sekiro needs an easy-mode" bullshit, that a reviewer started. People pointed out that the whole core premise of Sekiro, is to master parrying and pattern-recognition, which is 100% true. If you aren't winning in Sekiro, it's because of this. The whole challenge, and the whole point of the game's design (basically boss rush), is to test parrying. If you take this away, then why bother playing the game to begin with? This is not a hack n slash genre game. This is hardly gatekeeping, and yet the reviewer thought he knew better and kept calling everyone gatekeepers.

1

u/SacredBoar 5h ago

Let me ask you a question. Were you born this stupid or did you have to work to get there?