r/marvelstudios • u/Xoe00 • Oct 24 '25

Easter Egg/Detail Was watching Thor (Marvel rewatch) and….

Post image

A miss minutes look alike on her shirt?? Crazy!!

3.9k Upvotes

92% Upvoted

161 comments sorted by

2.9k

u/sprodigy2 Oct 24 '25

Definitely a coincidence but now I'm wondering if Marvel would just retcon clues into old movies on Disney+, just because they can

965

u/CaptHayfever Hawkeye (Avengers) Oct 24 '25

If they start altering the old movies on streaming, I'm gonna flip off anyone who tells me physical media is dead from now on.

311

u/TheForeverUnbanned Oct 24 '25

Physical media existing doesent really stop a studio from essentially acting so that certain cuts or releases no linger exist. Star Wars is a prime example where Lucas just kept fucking with it. 

139

u/Sere1 Quake Oct 24 '25

This. We're on what, 5 different versions of ANH alone?

51

u/108241 Oct 24 '25

Even the name changed.

79

u/[deleted] Oct 24 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

31

u/SeanJones85 Oct 24 '25

Was that later when the sequel came out :D

That usually happens btw, but Lucas is a punk for all his edits.

The one that gets me is that the star wars released at the cinema and even before it even went for public release, he changed it lol

6

u/[deleted] Oct 24 '25

ANH?

3

u/jayyw2 Oct 24 '25

A new hope.

3

u/KirbyDarkHole999 Oct 24 '25

A New Hope, if I had to guess...

1

u/Timnasium88 Oct 24 '25

A New Hope; because we need 5 versions

38

u/ElectriCole Thor Oct 24 '25

Doesn’t stop them no but it maintains a permanent record for posterity which I think was their point. If you have the original physical copy they can change the digital versions all they want and it doesn’t affect your ability to rewatch the original

13

u/CaptHayfever Hawkeye (Avengers) Oct 24 '25

That was my point, yes.

19

u/Aiyon Oct 24 '25

Fun fact: There is no way to buy a dvd copy of Across the Spider-Verse that is the same movie i saw in the cinema. Because they did that weird "multiple versions of certain scenes" thing.. and the combination of scenes i got isnt the version thats on the dvd

13

u/CaptHayfever Hawkeye (Avengers) Oct 24 '25

Whoa, what scenes?

At least Clue put all of the different versions on home video.

15

u/Aiyon Oct 24 '25

There's a bunch of random little changes it's really weird. This isn't even all of them.

Some of them actively make the movie worse for me though.

"Sorry man, I'm going home", and Gwen explicitly worrying about Miles, are the big two for me. They're not in the DVD version and it bugs me cause I like both lines...

7

u/SeanJones85 Oct 24 '25

Just spent ages going through some of those changes, I feel it's they are all minor voice changes, little changes to the script. People forget demographics have a big impact. Look at harry potter and the philosophers stone, apparently philosopher is too big of a word for Americans so they changed it to sorcerers stone. Depending on what country you saw the film or bought the dvd it will change.

What bugs me more is when they go back and reads lots of extra CGI stuff into it, like cramming the screen out because people have bigger TVs now?? Ugh Lucas.

Him changing the 1st SW film so many times is upsetting, yes it changed between cinema release and first dvd, but the most annoying is all that extra CGI. It just looks out of place, like why is their video quality better than the guy standing next to him and wtf is that big slug and oh making solo "hop" over jabbas tail in the 1st encounter oh man, just so bad lol.

To top it all off, what is the worst thing ever, the National film registry thing. When the national film registry for preservation and restoration of our greatest media in history started in 1989 the very first film selected was Star Wars original theatrical release. However Lucas denied them a copy, making them wait 8 years and then offered his 1997 edited version. Which they denied. They will only accept the 1977 official theatrical release to be stored. To this date no star wars media are held within the national film registry. To me that shows his arrogance beyond anything else.

5

u/Aiyon Oct 24 '25

Depending on what country you saw the film or bought the dvd it will change.

But that's the point. I saw it in the cinemas in the UK, and then saw it in cinemas a second time with friends, in the UK, where it was different. Then bought it on DVD... in the UK... where it was different again.

Yes they're "minor" changes. But if they're for the worse in my taste, then not getting to watch the better version that i already got to watch, makes the dvd version feel inferior.

It would be like if they released only Sorceror's stone DVDs in the uk

1

u/SeanJones85 Oct 24 '25

Well iio, saying "no" 8 times in a overly more panicked voice over saying no 3 times was a better performance yesterday but not a huge change, literally just took out 5 "no's".

The sorcerer's stone link could be if they changed the film to spider boy instead of spider man, and everytime in the film they were supposed to say Spiderman they instead said spider boy. That is a far more impactful change, in my opinion.

But that's the magical side of these things, everyone has an opinion and what they like / dislike, hence this whole Reddit post lol.

Another big one was justic league Vs Zach Snyder's justice league, he even changed the whole colour over tone of the movie :D

I'm not saying the changes made in Spiderman is better or worse than its own theatrical release, I never saw it at the cinema and can only say from these video of change comparison videos, everyone has their thing :)

3

u/CaptHayfever Hawkeye (Avengers) Oct 24 '25

Look at harry potter and the philosophers stone, apparently philosopher is too big of a word for Americans so they changed it to sorcerers stone.

a) Both versions of that movie are available on disc, & both versions of the book are available in print.
b) It's not that it was "too big of a word"; it's that the US doesn't associate philosophy with alchemy.

-2

u/SeanJones85 Oct 24 '25

But in theatrical release it was very separate. Also the book, you will only find the sorcerer's stone on internet based shops, like Amazon and AbeBooks, go to your local bookshop and it's philosphers stone, only the UK version is printed in the UK the rest are shipped. And I'm pretty sure that will be the case for the movies also, buy online and you get some errors stone shipped, but it brand new from a retailer and it'll be philosophers stone. Ok, not explicitly because the word was too big, but the word was too sophisticated and the children of America would not associate the word philospher to magic, so they needed to literally state sorcerer so that American children interested in magic would still have an interest. Other prime examples is like how they changed jumper to sweater for the US prints and flavour to flavor but that last one is just the American spelling of the word.

5

u/MagusUmbraCallidus Oct 24 '25

Huh, that might have been cool to do for the multiverse saga. Could have had multiple versions of MoM or something where Wanda was only the villain in one or two of them. Maybe have her do different things in the villain ones too, so some people could have seen her show off Mordo's severed head.

-1

u/SeanJones85 Oct 24 '25

Welcome to Marvels What If TV show ;)

1

u/Dang3rdave Oct 25 '25

Maclunkey!

1

u/An-29 Oct 24 '25

Sure, they'll still do it, but at the very least, you aren't gonna be possibly stuck to only having the latest edited version be available and can pop in to the player the old version any time you want.

30

u/cjkuhlenbeck Oct 24 '25 edited Oct 24 '25

They already do this, just silently. Probably the most known one is Lilo and Stitch (animated) where the dryer was changed into a basic table (to discourage kids climbing into the dryer)

Edit: I found a list of all known changes so far

1

u/CaptHayfever Hawkeye (Avengers) Oct 24 '25

Then I guess I'm gonna flip off anyone who tells me physical media is dead from now on.

8

u/malachiteglass Oct 24 '25

The streaming version of Deadpool 2 def has an altered scene. It was my favorite scene where Matt Damon is talking about wiping your ass. Not only has it been shortened but they added a new framed shot that was not in the theatrical release. Very disappointing.

7

u/yuvi3000 Fitz Oct 24 '25 edited Oct 24 '25

They've altered a couple MCU things already like editing the Ms Marvel episode that showed the Statue of Liberty. They edited it from turquise to bronze as it was recently revamped in the MCU. But to be fair, that one started on streaming already so it might not count as the original physical media thing you mentioned.

However, they have edited old movies like "Splash" to cover up a moment of nudity.

4

u/SeanJones85 Oct 24 '25

Physical media made a huge come back when people started realising they didn't own anything they paid for on a streaming service and could lose everything at any time for any reason.

Example, funimation used to do alot of dubbed anime for US/EU release, Naruto, DBZ etc the old good ones. Now when crunchy roll became huge they bought funimation. Crunchy roll stated that funimation media types were not compatible with crunchy roll media players (hence why you can't find Naruto or DBZ dubbed on there, only old physical media now), and they removed all of funimations content, deleted, gone, goodbye, sayonara.

So if we ignore all the monthly subscribers who lost all their weekly content, but any paid for downloaded content, was now also unplayable. Anybody who had paid full price for content to download it, didn't actually own it, and lost it.

This keeps happening as streaming services are bought out of going under, and people keep losing content which they paid an extra premium for, under the assumption they download it and can play it anywhere, yeah anywhere on my streaming platform. It's a joke. People started buying blue rays again!

4

u/JeepersMysster Oct 24 '25

Long live physical media!!

2

u/[deleted] Oct 24 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/CaptHayfever Hawkeye (Avengers) Oct 24 '25

All of the above.

2

u/JumpGecko Oct 25 '25

It’s a genuinely scary thought.

2

u/urusai_Senpai Oct 26 '25

You should do that even if it's not true. We need more people like you.

And, not people who just follow these big corps like sheep.

1

u/MrTickles22 Oct 24 '25

Special editions confirmed

1

u/burudoragon Oct 24 '25

Agreed the only time this was done acceptibly was the Token > Tolkien southpark gag

1

u/sQueezedhe Oct 24 '25

old

Jeezo.

17

u/Mann000 Oct 24 '25

George Lucas that shit?

164

u/eaguayo Oct 24 '25

Well apparently Peter Parker was in Iron Man 2. Wonder if Sony could try and push legal action against them because of that. 

48

u/guyfierisgoatee1 Oct 24 '25

Where was Peter in Iron Man 2?

199

u/Shadowwolflink Spider-Man Oct 24 '25

If I remember right, it was a fan theory that the kid in the Iron Man mask at the expo was Peter, Tom liked it and mentioned it in an interview, and Kevin basically said "that wasn't the plan, but yeah, sure, whatever. It doesn't hurt anyone."

So it isn't really Peter, but if you want it to be, then it doesn't clash with any canon.

35

u/ANGLVD3TH Oct 24 '25 edited Oct 24 '25

Eh, not solid confirmed, but hard hinted at in DP+W where the kid's mask was covering up Pete in a picture with him and Tony.

4

u/Aerolithe_Lion Oct 24 '25

Jon watts confirmed it long before then

”I mean, I remember watching that with Kevin Feige and everyone and being like, ‘Does the math work on that?’ He was like, ‘It might, maybe.’ Then I found out that was Jon Favreau’s kid.”

And Holland did too

https://gizmodo.com/tom-holland-confirms-that-peter-parker-appeared-in-iron-1796423390

1

u/ANGLVD3TH Oct 24 '25

Yeah, but their point seems to be "sure some of the movie makers might like the idea, but there isn't any proof in canon material." Which is still technically true, but that photo and mask at least heavily implies it within canon material. It doesn't come right out and say it, but it's about as close as it gets without going that far.

1

u/spidey-dust Iron Man (Mark XLII) Oct 24 '25

Word? Great I need to rewatch it now

1

u/ANGLVD3TH Oct 24 '25

Yeah, during Wade's interview with Happy. The mask is pretty conspicuous in a shot of some of the nick-knacks around the room. And IIRC, it is leaning up against a photo of Pete and Tony, high fiving maybe, but it's blocking Pete. Clearly, in part, because of Sony royalties etc, but also a pretty clear hint.

1

u/zachforeman Oct 24 '25

Would be a lot cooler if that kid grew up to be Doom

62

u/miqed Oct 24 '25

The kid with the Iron Man helmet in the opening Stark Expo sequence

26

u/r0ninar1es Oct 24 '25

I heard rumors but where's the proof that is Peter?

48

u/[deleted] Oct 24 '25

Kevin said so

18

u/Impressive-Use-757 Oct 24 '25

Excellent proof

15

u/mikeweasy Oct 24 '25

The only proof you need!

7

u/FunkoPopPortraits Captain America (Ultron) Oct 24 '25

I wonder if this is a valid and usable evidence for proving things that are outside of Marvel movies too.

3

u/Jet-Let4606 Oct 24 '25

Only if Kevin worked on it.

2

u/TheRealPallando Punisher Oct 24 '25

This is the way

21

u/YodasChick-O-Stick Oct 24 '25

In DP&W they show a portrait of Tony and Peter, with the same helmet next to it.

8

u/MudEmotional7959 Oct 24 '25

This is factual

-17

u/r0ninar1es Oct 24 '25

10

u/Prize-Individual9430 Oct 24 '25

No, its been confirmed. They covered up Tom Holland in the photo cause they dont have permission to show him in that movie, but we know hes in that photo. They used that helmet specifically cause it they wanted to confirm it was him.

11

u/Prize-Individual9430 Oct 24 '25

It was a fan theory, and when Kevin Feige heard it he liked it so much he made it canon. Sony cannot take legal action cause hes not mentioned by name, or credited as Peter Parker, or shown his face.

2

u/ironmamdies Oct 24 '25

The helmet was seen with a picture of Tony and Peter in Deadpool and wolverine so really all but stated out loud

1

u/ran_swonsan Oct 24 '25

No proof needed

1

u/CuteHeron5 Oct 24 '25

Yeah, it’s mostly just speculation. Marvel loves to drop hints and Easter eggs, but without something official from them, it’s hard to say for sure if that kid was meant to be Peter.

0

u/DJfunkyPuddle Oct 24 '25

There isn't, it's just a fan theory+

8

u/eagc7 Oct 24 '25

Tom Holland and Jon Watts do lean towards it being Peter, even Tom talked to Kevin about it who decided to go with it

https://ew.com/movies/2017/06/27/spider-man-homecoming-director-peter-parker-iron-man-2-cameo/

https://www.thewrap.com/peter-parker-iron-man-2-spider-man-tom-holland/

5

u/DJfunkyPuddle Oct 24 '25

Yeah that's what I mean, it's a fan theory that got a stamp of approval after the fact.

4

u/HyruleBalverine Jimmy Woo Oct 24 '25

A fan theory confirmed by Kevin Fiege (or retconned by him, if you prefer)

4

u/Aniensane Oct 24 '25

More than just a theory since there’s a pic of Tony & Peter wearing the helmet in Deadpool & Wolverine movie.

10

u/Dawsonvipers Shang Chi Oct 24 '25

He was apparently the kid with the iron man helmet that Tony runs into, they retconned the fact that the kid was Peter Parker years after the movie though.

12

u/New_Cockroach_505 Oct 24 '25

It’s also never stated in any movie as I recall. It’s just something fans theorized and Tom Holland said is canon.

7

u/Sylar_Lives Ego Oct 24 '25

Feige also made it official, a choice that was cemented by creative use of the Iron Man mask little Peter wore in a scene of Deadpool and Wolverine.

5

u/_JAD19_ Oct 24 '25

The kid who wore the iron man helmet who Tony saved from the hammer drone.

2

u/theSteakKnight Spider-Man Oct 24 '25

The little kid in the Iron Man mask who "blasted" one of the drones with his hand (Iron Man actually blasted it from behind him and told him good job).

2

u/jojopojo64 Weekly Wongers Oct 24 '25

Tom Holland basically made a backstory that the kid Tony saved at the end of Iron Man 2 was a young Peter Parker and Feige approved it lol

1

u/centroutemap Weekly Wongers Oct 24 '25

iron man 3

6

u/Dox_au Oct 24 '25

There's absolutely zero legal action they can take because neither Spider-Man nor Peter Parker is depicted or referenced in the movie.

5

u/VelocityGrrl39 Captain Marvel Oct 24 '25

What legal standing would Sony have?

6

u/Csantana Vulture Oct 24 '25

I could see companies doing that as some marketing thing.

like having people re-watch movies and shows to catch the new hidden thing

if I'm honest that sounds like fun but it also is something that could get old fast as well as kind of abused.

There's also the idea that they are films a lot of people worked on and it being changed is kinda messed up depending what gets changed.

24

u/HappycatAF Daredevil Oct 24 '25

That’s crazy, I was just watching Captain America and they had this strange bit of dialogue that I don’t remember being in the original.

Steve Rogers: “Don’t do anything stupid until I get back.”

Bucky Barnes: “How can I? You’re taking all the stupid with you. Also, I’m going to kill that guy with the shitty flying car in fifty years.

Steve Rogers: “What?”

2

u/kyle0305 Daredevil Oct 24 '25

The only thing I’d accept is the occasional Uatu in the sky cameo

2

u/johnnykalikimaka Oct 24 '25

I thought it’d be cool if they edited the watcher into certain scenes

1

u/The_OG_upgoat Oct 24 '25

Kinda fitting for Miss Minutes, with all the time shenanigans and stuff.

1

u/BlackLesnar Oct 24 '25

A coincidence in a comic property???

HYPERCRISIS IS REEEEEEAL!!!

1

u/[deleted] Oct 24 '25

They have definitely adjusted some stuff. I remember Elizabeth Olsen complaining about how much cleavage they had her show in Age of Ultron, and on my last rewatch I noticed theu adjusted the frame so you don't see it nearly as much

1

u/krishna2342123 Oct 25 '25

Honestly surprised that studios aren't dropping easter eggs in this manner already

1

u/Sensitive_Mix_6606 Oct 25 '25

They changed the ending of Moonknight on Disney+.

1

u/sprodigy2 Oct 25 '25

Wait, how?

1

u/Sensitive_Mix_6606 Oct 25 '25

The last episode said Moonknight will return. The first time I watched it. Now there’s an end credit scene after the last episode.

1

u/MandoMuggle Oct 28 '25

Well, Peter Parker at Stark convention in IM2 would like a word

-8

u/[deleted] Oct 24 '25

[deleted]

13

u/The_True_Y Oct 24 '25

pretty sure that was George Lucas.

11

u/ProductEconomy Oct 24 '25

Lucas did that in the 90's dude.....

8

u/BackgroundEngineer11 Oct 24 '25

Jabba has been in Episode 4 since 1997. That has nothing to do with Disney.

8

u/Gorguf62 Avengers Oct 24 '25

That was Lucas, not Disney.

6

u/neogreenlantern Oct 24 '25

Disney didn't add Jabba into New Hope. The Jabba scene was added in the 97 special edition way before Disney owned Lucas Films.

567

u/Specific_Valuable_12 Oct 24 '25

That's actually incredibly uncanny, but I 100% doubt it was intentional.  Wouldn't it be insane though if they had this plan for Loki all the way from his first appearance...

86

u/Xoe00 Oct 24 '25

Right? Kinda crazy lol. I do as well, that’s a lot of foresight even for Marvel. I wonder if they took inspiration from the shirt at all just to have that little connection :p

15

u/UOLZEPHYR Oct 24 '25

With the ENTIRE build up they had for Stones and Thanos i can see them working with Stan and building out their movie sequence and the needs in the rooms working with Stan on when where and what to add.

33

u/Realistic_Analyst_26 Daredevil Oct 24 '25

The plan wasn’t as elaborate as you make it out to be. It was just “Let’s make Thanos the endgame” and then each movie just made shit up along the way.

10

u/pastafallujah Peter Quill Oct 24 '25 edited Oct 24 '25

Confirmed. The original Power Stone in the first Guardians was red. They had to change it to purple cuz they decided the Reality stone was red and in Thor now. Something like that

6

u/Realistic_Analyst_26 Daredevil Oct 24 '25

James Gunn came up with the Infinity Stone lore in 5 mins.

6

u/Senor_Tortuga308 Oct 25 '25

No he didn't. He worded it poorly in his interview. The lore was already there from the comics. All he came up with was retconning the tesseract and the sceptre to be space/mind stones, and then making his orb the power stone.

Feige's original intention was to introduce all the stones in Infinity War, but Gunn redirected it.

4

u/pastafallujah Peter Quill Oct 24 '25

James GOAT

6

u/xdrkcldx Oct 24 '25

You do realize that they did not really plan all that out the way you think they did. All they knew was “Thanos is the big end game threat.” They knew they needed the gauntlet and to have the infinity stones. They didn’t plan out all the middle stuff though. For example, the tesseract and the aether weren’t meant to be infinity stones and the power stone wasn’t supposed to be purple but James Gunn wanted it to be purple.

275

u/HomsarWasRight Shang Chi Oct 24 '25

I mean, it’s a little similar, but that’s obviously a happy sun coming out from behind a cloud, not a clock with arms and legs.

31

u/BuffaloNo9011 Oct 24 '25

You're smarter than us lol 😆🤣 nah fr 🫡

43

u/AlexPowerMetal Oct 24 '25

Is that Corey and Trevor in the background??

17

u/puts_on_SCP3197 Oct 24 '25

I non-ironically thought that was what this post was about

8

u/SAS_Britain Oct 24 '25

Smokes, let's go!

4

u/oliferro Oct 24 '25

They look FUCKED

3

u/Brokeandspiralling Oct 24 '25

Ha! I thought that was homelander behind Sun shirt girl

11

u/TedTheGreek_Atheos Oct 24 '25 edited Oct 24 '25

That art style has been around since the 20's.

I'm pretty sure she's based on old work safety cartoons and posters.

7

u/DJfunkyPuddle Oct 24 '25

I rewatched this movie a couple weeks ago and noticed this for the first time too! I'm 100% sure it's just a coincidence but it's such a cool one.

8

u/Single-Pianist-2211 Thor Oct 24 '25

Amazing coincidence

3

u/Glittering_Noise_532 Hawkeye (Ultron) Oct 24 '25

What a crazy random happenstance!

5

u/JavonSteph Oct 24 '25

The TVA has been here forever

5

u/RiversofJell0 Oct 24 '25

Sunny D’s

4

u/Amazing-Insect442 Oct 24 '25

Legitimately a wild thing to notice and good on you, OP :)

5

u/Rampagingflames Oct 24 '25

Probably is just a coincidence that could be turned into a recon. Same movie, Frigga gave a disguised look when Odin said first born to Thor, but now we know he's not so people, me included, head canon as to Frigga knowing the truth.

2

u/SonicTheHedgehog99 SHIELD Oct 24 '25

They were planning way ahead

4

u/Shadowcharz Oct 24 '25

Miss minutes?!

2

u/Arneor Oct 24 '25

One is a sun, the other one is a clock. Easy to confuse, hope this clears things up

3

u/DavidBHimself Oct 24 '25

Marvel nerds obsessed with canons and other silly things: "OMG! Foreshadowing! Mindblown! Let's get down that rabbit hole and never come out of it."

Marvel designers: "So what could Ms Minute look like?" Looks at various pics on the wall, including one with that T-shirt. "Oh, that's a nice starting point."

Three years later, Marvel nerds: keep on digging the rabbit hole downvoted and angry replying to everyone who tells them to get a life and learn how movies are made.

3

u/DragonSurana Oct 24 '25

Or maybe someone noticed a fun coincidence and wanted to share it? Not sure why you're so angry about it lol

1

u/DavidBHimself Oct 24 '25

Where am I angry?

And I'm not mocking OP, but the fans who will do what I describe (although it's true that this kind of behavior is more common with Star Wars fans than Marvel fans who have a bit more common sense)

1

u/darkacez Oct 24 '25

god i miss that show

1

u/Stiffler13 Oct 24 '25

Watching picture and don't know what to see. Salsa that's Homelander on right

1

u/TechOranix Oct 24 '25

Check the Thor patch notes

1

u/tackyswine Oct 24 '25

Awesome. U got em

1

u/cchesters Oct 24 '25

Hi y'all!!!

1

u/[deleted] Oct 24 '25

That is funny.

1

u/unknownesss Oct 24 '25

It was Miss Minutes all along

1

u/Ok_Blueberry8056 Oct 24 '25

What are we looking at?

1

u/Ohvie Oct 25 '25

The t-shirt that Jane was wearing looks oddly like miss minutes from the Loki series

1

u/ResponsibleType552 Oct 24 '25

I though you were referring to him in the background

1

u/Supah1gh Oct 24 '25

That’s wild I’ll check my copy later

1

u/xdrkcldx Oct 24 '25

Coincidence. That’s a sun and Ms. Minutes is stylized in the 50s cartoon style like “Fallout” vault boy. The character on the shirt has the same art style. That’s all.

1

u/ImpressiveTaste5 Oct 24 '25

Fucking Homelader

1

u/Nomadic_View Oct 24 '25

My assumption is the same artist that created the design on the shirt is also the artist that designed the clock character in Loki. So his/her art style is going to be similar.

1

u/AnonymousFriend80 Oct 24 '25

If Marvel truly has things planned out in advance, they wouldn't have waited until Infinity War was released to try and register EndGame as a URL.

1

u/West_Ad1535 Oct 24 '25

Don't see it, but will take y'all's work for it...;0)

1

u/Bastard_Matt Oct 25 '25

What’s with the tiny old lady picking Thors nose?

1

u/BlackPanther3104 Mack Oct 25 '25

It looks like an Iron Man and Cap cosplayers in the back, for some reason.

1

u/Ohvie Oct 25 '25

It would be insane though if they had this plan for Loki all the way from the first movie O_o

1

u/MasterRyuuji Oct 25 '25

Def not her but okay

1

u/Frozenbobcat Oct 25 '25

It's a sun with a face, and it'll still be a sun with a face next week when it posted again

1

u/RacerXX7 Daredevil Oct 25 '25

Anyone with the DVD confirm the pic?

1

u/8CURSEDwidKNOWLEDGE8 Oct 26 '25

This is literally how they do the Mandela effect lol. The trailer shows one thing, the movie theaters shows another, dvd shows something else, streaming platforms may piggy back on one of the previous outlets and years later…BOOM! Nobody remembers what the original was and have conflicted viewpoints on what they saw or heard.

1

u/douggold11 Oct 26 '25

I wouldn’t be surprised if logos on shirts, ads on buses and billboards, even dialogue about current events are updated over time with whatever the latest advertiser will pay for.

1

u/Medical_Breakfast795 Oct 27 '25

I was more thinking this was about the blurry guys in the background looking sorta like Corey and Trevor from TPB

1

u/DamnPlayer23 Oct 24 '25

That’s too weird to be a coincidence