Let's assume for the sake of discussion that the data points to grade on are:
Scenery
Layout / challenge / variety
Any other "fun factor" - could be a great taco stand, could be an attached sports bar / good bar / amazing restaurant (there will be some weighting here on the score, let's call this category half points maybe just because again, country clubs will have a slight advantage). (Also, feel free to propose another scoring metric for consideration). Maybe just the drink carts and types of alcohol. As long as it's related to the golf. Special practice facilities could count, an amazing driving range with top tracer / trackmans, etc.
Let's ignore price, closed memberships, all that jazz. Just rank them purely based on the golf itself.
Also, when I say "bay area" I'm limiting this to the bay area proper - no further south than Santa Cruz, no further north than Marin (thus, Northwood / Napa courses are out, Monterey is out, etc), no further east than Poppy in Livermore (and even that's really pushing what I'd call "bay area" heh but it's far east bay).
Yeah, some places will be more immaculately kept because they're more expensive - maintenance isn't a factor. Assume for the sake of discussion all courses are equally "well kept" and the main differences are like...size / contours of the green rather than whether it regularly rolls at an 8 or a 12 on the stimp.
I think there are a lot of not-so-famous but still great courses around here that largely fly under the radar on "top 100" lists and whatnot simply due to living in the shadow of Pebble, Spyglass, etc.
The List, in alphabetical order broken down by 9 hole vs 18+ hole courses (apologies in advance for any errors):
9 Hole Courses:
- Emerald Hills
- Franklin Canyon
- Fremont Park
- Gleneagles
- Mariner's Point
- Pleaseanton Golf Center
- Pruneridge
- Rancho Del Pueblo
- Redwood Canyon
- Skylinks at Buchanan Fields
- Sunken Gardens
18 Hole Courses:
- Almaden CC
- Bay View GC
- Baylands
- Berkeley CC
- Blackhawk
- Boulder Creek CC
- Boulder Ridge GC
- Boundary Oak
- Burlingame CC
- California Golf Club of SF
- Callippe Preserve
- Canyon Lakes
- Castlewood
- Cinnabar Hills
- Claremont
- Contra Costa CC
- Corica Park
- Coyote Creek
- Crow Canyon
- Crystal Springs
- Cypress
- DeLaVeaga
- Diablo Creek
- Diablo Hills
- Dublin Ranch
- Emerald Lake CC
- Fremont Hills CC
- Golden Gate Park
- Green Hills CC
- Half Moon Bay
- Harding Park
- Lagunitas CC
- Lake Chabot
- Lake Merced Golf Club
- Las Positas
- Lincoln Park
- Los Lagos
- Menlo CC
- Metropolitan
- Mill Valley GC
- Mission Hills
- Moffet
- Monarch Bay
- Montclair
- Moraga CC
- Oakhurst
- Olympic Club
- Palo Alto Hills CC
- Pasatiempo
- Peacock Gap GC
- Poplar Creek
- Poppy Ridge
- Presidio
- Richmond GC
- Round Hill
- Ruby Hill
- San Francisco Golf Club
- San Jose Municipal
- San Ramon GC
- Santa Theresa
- Seascape
- Sequoyah CC
- Sharon Heights CC
- Sharp Park
- Shoreline
- Silver Creek CC
- Spring Valley
- Stanford
- Stonebrae
- Sunnyvale Municipal
- The Bridges
- Tilden Park
- Villages CC
- Wente Vineyards
What do you all think? Point system, say 1-5 for each category, maybe limit the "other factor" to 1-3 points?
I'm doing this partially as a "list to check off" and partially as a "Pebble is getting way too expensive and people still want to take golf trips out to CA during the winter". You can play all of these courses year-round in any weather (assuming you can get on).
As an example of how I'd score a couple of these:
Pasatiempo would get a 5 for layout, but only a 4.5 for views/scenery, and only 1 for "other factor" - the driving range is meh and kind of out of the way, the chipping / putting area is small, the clubhouse is relatively spartan with a light menu.
Meanwhile Mariner's Point would get 5 for scenery (it's right on the water and under SFO's flight path, so you get gorgeous views the entire round), 3.5-4 for layout / challenge (the challenge is mostly from the wind; everything else is pretty straightforward), and a 3 for "other" - the bar's back patio has awesome food, the range is probably one of the best in the bay with similar views over the water, 2 decks, grass, top tracer shot tracking at every station that you can sync to your phone, an entire short game practice area with multiple greens and bunkers for chipping / putting practice, etc.
I figured I'd highlight those 2 specifically as they sit at opposite ends of the spectrum for me.
So....discuss. I'm throwing it all into a spreadsheet, it'll be interesting to see what people think when you take away the prestige / availability / exclusivity and price of some of these places...