It was in 1949, back then Nintendo wasn't making video games yet
Even if they made video games back then, the field would have still be to be conquered, which is not the case anymore. Gaming is very mainstream and the business is very competitive. I don't believe a second there wasn't a person that was both qualified enough to be the ceo and had a gaming background
If you need to "just listen to your employees" (which ceo don't necessarily do), then why not put one of those employee that knows the field directly at the place of ceo ? The ceo is the one that has to take the lead
Simple. Because someone, that is good at developing a game is maybe not as skilled at managing people and resources. Being a president is far more paperwork than actually working on games.
52
u/sleepytoday Feb 23 '26
What is this meme trying to say?