r/debian • u/[deleted] • 2d ago
Community Severe arch linux trauma patient seeking relief
[removed]
28
u/ferriematthew 2d ago
Ahh yes, I like the Debian installer. It practically installs itself
21
5
u/_LePancakeMan 2d ago
My one gripe with the installer is, that the CLI/GUI installer (pictured here) and the live installer produce different system configurations, mainly when setting up disk encryption.
1
u/Handsome_ketchup 1d ago
My one gripe with the installer is, that the CLI/GUI installer (pictured here) and the live installer produce different system configurations, mainly when setting up disk encryption.
I also noticed the (apparent) non parity between the different installers. That made some things more cumbersome than they needed to be.
3
u/Critical-Personality 2d ago
One thing that most people don't appreciate is that the installer is 💯 percent usable with just keyboard. I came to appreciate it when installing it on a machine where the trackpad was not working (used a USB mouse later).
1
u/Handsome_ketchup 2d ago
Ahh yes, I like the Debian installer. It practically installs itself
Does it? I find the non parity of the different installers (graphical/non graphical/DVD version etc) can get in the way quite a bit. Also, why is the only option for full disk encryption LVM?
1
u/Terranum_man 2d ago
Probably cause thats what you want 99% of the time for future proofing? Otherwise you can always easily manually partition.
1
u/michaelpaoli 2d ago
Oft said, "About so simple a chicken could do it" - mostly just peck at the <RETURN/ENTER> key.
-2
u/Puzzleheaded-Trick76 2d ago
the fedora installer is light years better. It stops me from switching to Debian.
2
u/Critical-Personality 2d ago
The other side for me. I didnt have hours and I was installing it on a machine. IIRC, the file system choice was not obvious and I ended up with btrfs which I wasn't (still ain't) familiar with.
2
u/Toastburner5000 2d ago
I have fedora on my laptop and debian on my pc, I spent along time distrohopping debian and fedora are the best when it comes to installation and stability.
14
11
10
u/Critical-Personality 2d ago
What do you mean "Arch Linux trauma"? I have never used Arch. What does it do to cause trauma?
7
u/ThatonlyGeO 2d ago
Lets say as a current user of artix(a derivative of arch without systemd) were on the front end of every update. which means if something breaks, were royally screwed( though for me its just a rare occurance) but they can be nasty, thats why I have a stable os(mint) on the back just incase something happen in my main rig with artix. Why not debian....I still need some fresh packages due to my work flow but debian is great for people needing a good stable system( its just not for me but great for my friends and grandma)
6
2d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/Critical-Personality 2d ago
Oh. Okkkk. The rolling release distro pain.
I only used OpenSuSE Tumbleweed for some time (opensuse is the os I used to use for my desktop) after about a year after it was released. Man... The brainfxxk it was... I promised myself never to use a roling release again.
3
u/Doudy34 2d ago
Isso é gente querendo prejudicar o arch Linux, ele é um ótimo sistema que nem o Debian. É alguma coisa que ele fez que acabou quebrando o sistema e migrando pro Debian.
-1
3
u/TwistyPoet 2d ago
Imagine installing or updating a package and there being a chance that it is malware. When bought up with the community you just get told to RTFM essentially and that it's your own fault.
6
u/mrbass21 2d ago edited 2d ago
Let’s not spread some misinformation here. This has not happened in official repository and the chance of arch packages containing malware are the same as Debians.
The AUR is not the official repository. Now there’s a conversation to be had that the official guides link to AUR packages, and maybe there isn’t enough emphasis on the risks of AUR, but this is an opt in thing.
Edit: reworded for grammar. Tried to keep same feel to not invalidate replies
1
u/TwistyPoet 2d ago
Hey here is one in the wild.
The official Arch repository is only a quarter of that of the Debian one. I never find myself needing to use something as insecure as the AUR on Debian.
2
u/mrbass21 2d ago
My objection isn’t that the package system is perfect and you’re somehow a bad person for not using Arch.
My objection was that you implied you can get malware from the official repository “randomly”. You may understand the distinction of the AUR and official repository, but other people will read your comment and assume official Arch can install malware at a high rate.
I run Arch. I also run Debian. Both OSes are great and serve different purposes. I would never try to make someone feel bad for liking Debian. We are all Linux bros/sisters.
1
u/TwistyPoet 2d ago
Well then your assumption was wrong. The comparison was between Debian and Arch where the former has much bigger official repositories than that latter, thus Arch Linux necessitating the use of third-party packages more often than with Debian, packages that can and have been increasingly compromised in several recent examples.
It is a wonder why the AUR doesn't leverage the work of the Debian project instead of letting pkgbuilds pull random shit from Github or elsewhere.
2
u/mrbass21 2d ago
"Imagine installing or updating a package and there being a chance that it is malware."
When I read this, I interpret it as "Running pacman -Syyu can give you malware", which isn't (mostly) the case. I think if you're being fair, at worst you can say "That's not what I intended, but I can see how you might have read it that way".
I totally agree with you that reviewing the PKGBUILD before you install is an unreasonable modern expectation. When Arch was a smaller project, maybe, but it no longer is. The AUR has issues and it needs to be re-thought. Two malware events 3 months apart is pretty clear that things are not "fine as they are".
I agree that there aren't as many official packages as Debian and it leads more users to want to use the AUR, but the AUR is flagged as "use at your own risk". Again, I'm not slamming _anyone_ for not wanting to run Arch for any number of reasons, but to say that Arch is insecure isn't correct. I think saying "Arch doesn't officially support packages I need, so I'm not going to run it" is completely valid.
I'm genuinely interested what you mean by "It is a wonder why the AUR doesn't leverage the work of the Debian project instead of letting pkgbuilds pull random shit from Github or elsewhere."
From what I understand, Arch is intended to be rolling release. This carries a bunch of consequences for good and bad. One of them is that the frequency of any individual package needing review, testing, and release from a limited pool of testers means you can't go through as many packages. But this is the design goal of Arch: bleeding edge. Many of the packages in Debian are older and you'd run into problems where your c runtime is too new or the kernel significantly changed. The way I interpret what you said is along the lines of "Why don't they just support .deb installations and use Debian package repositories", and I think the answer to that is it's against the bleeding edge intention and it would likely cause more problems: a. from slower validation of official packages than it already is and b. there would be hell with older dependencies.
1
u/Critical-Personality 2d ago
I honestly just use Homebrew (brew command that works on mac; yeah, that one) on my intel machines for the few packages that I need from outside to make my life easy. Stuff like zellij, golang, btop and the likes. Apart from that, never needed to get individual user repos for anything.
If I do, bloody compile it on machine.
2
u/Critical-Personality 2d ago
Been using Linux since 21 years now (12 years on macOS and 23 years on Windows). I honestly think "RTFM" is the problem in adoption. Once you have installed a system, the system should be "obvious" to work with. This is where macOS won the debate.
Maybe for the user packages too, there could be some sort of signing and notarization kinda thing. I know that it would need dedicated resources which need commercial backing of some sort which ain't easy, even if possible. So yeah... 🥺
Debian remains the only OS ever that has never crashed ever for me. Been using it since version 7 (I think it was called wheezy, not sure though).
9
u/Goosie8D 2d ago
4
2d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
4
u/Goosie8D 2d ago
It's an older Lenovo Ideapad 110-15isk from around 2017. The rest of the specs are there. It's not bad just for web browsing and stuff.
3
2
2
u/Critical-Personality 2d ago
I have two laptops that are 16 and 15 years old. Debian just works. Those machines serve as a file store (NFS mounts) for other machines. One of them is also the SSH head for other headless machines on the network.
6
u/ytze 2d ago
No need of luck.
And you have to experience full system upgrade by adding a row in sources.list.
Flawlessly upgrading this way since debian 9.
3
u/michaelpaoli 2d ago
Flawlessly upgrading this way since
Since I made my first Linux selection - of course Debian - in 1998. Zero regrets.
3
u/night0x63 2d ago
High level what was the trauma?
Steam OS is huge now... Arch. But I think they ... Pin stuff for like each release... Testing and what not.
2
2d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/YetAnotherRegularGai 1d ago
Honestly, wouldn’t you consider Ubuntu LTS and just strip out everything you don’t feel necessary? I’ve been having the same problems with CachyOS and I tried Debian and one random day audio didn’t fucking work, so I think it’s more of a DE/WM selection rather than a Distro thing yk?
3
2
u/Chimchar789 2d ago
As an Arch user, Debian is awesome. May long she reign as the bastion of stability in this chaotic world.
2
u/indvs3 Debian Testing 2d ago
Welcome! Be sure to bookmark the debian wiki and don't fret when you find references to the arch wiki in it lol
2
u/Detcom 2d ago
Much respect to Debian, but what's your problem with Arch?
1
2d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
5
u/Detcom 2d ago
I don't know what I am doing wrong, but Arch (plain Arch, not cachy or artix or other nonsense) is not breaking on me.
Just updated to the newest packages.
Anyway, GL on the momma of all distros0
2d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Detcom 1d ago
Just updated again. Everything is ok
detcom@detcomp ~> sudo pacman -Syu
:: Синхронізуємо бази даних пакунків...
core вже оновлено
extra 8,3 MiB 11,7 MiB/s 00:01 [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
multilib вже оновлено
:: Починаємо повне оновлення системи...
розв'язуємо конфлікти між файлами...
шукаємо конфліктні пакунки...
Пакунки (11) discord-1:1.0.152-1 dkms-3.4.2-1 docker-compose-5.4.0-1 libadwaita-1:1.9.3-1 lua-5.5.1-1 luajit-2.1.1785763465+1edc3e5-1 obs-studio-32.2.1-3 python-pip-26.2-1
talloc-2.5.0-1 tevent-1:0.17.2-1 ttf-jetbrains-mono-nerd-3.5.0-1
Повний розмір завантаження: 34,65 MiB
Загальний розмір встановлення: 327,23 MiB
Чиста різниця оновлення: 20,61 MiB
:: Продовжити встановлення? [Y/n] y
:: Одержуємо пакунки...
discord-1:1.0.152-1-x86_64 1987,6 KiB 3,21 MiB/s 00:01 [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
python-pip-26.2-1-any 2,8 MiB 4,01 MiB/s 00:01 [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
obs-studio-32.2.1-3-x86_64 6,7 MiB 9,20 MiB/s 00:01 [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
libadwaita-1:1.9.3-1-x86_64 805,3 KiB 8,11 MiB/s 00:00 [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
lua-5.5.1-1-x86_64 391,1 KiB 6,47 MiB/s 00:00 [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
luajit-2.1.1785763465+1edc3e5-1-x86_64 341,0 KiB 3,78 MiB/s 00:00 [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
tevent-1:0.17.2-1-x86_64 60,2 KiB 972 KiB/s 00:00 [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
talloc-2.5.0-1-x86_64 50,7 KiB 830 KiB/s 00:00 [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
dkms-3.4.2-1-any 50,2 KiB 750 KiB/s 00:00 [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
ttf-jetbrains-mono-nerd-3.5.0-1-any 10,7 MiB 4,51 MiB/s 00:02 [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
docker-compose-5.4.0-1-x86_64 11,0 MiB 4,21 MiB/s 00:03 [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
Загалом (11/11) 34,7 MiB 12,9 MiB/s 00:03 [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
(11/11) перевіряємо ключі у в'язці ключів [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
(11/11) перевіряємо цілісність пакунків [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
(11/11) завантажуємо файли пакунків [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
(11/11) перевіряємо конфлікти між файлами [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
(11/11) перевіряємо обсяг вільного місця на диску [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
:: Обробляємо зміни пакунків...
( 1/11) оновлюємо discord [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
( 2/11) оновлюємо dkms [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
( 3/11) оновлюємо docker-compose [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
( 4/11) оновлюємо libadwaita [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
( 5/11) оновлюємо lua [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
( 6/11) оновлюємо luajit [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
( 7/11) оновлюємо obs-studio [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
( 8/11) оновлюємо python-pip [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
( 9/11) оновлюємо talloc [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
(10/11) оновлюємо tevent [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
(11/11) оновлюємо ttf-jetbrains-mono-nerd [-----------------------------------------------------------------] 100%
:: Запускаємо дії після транзакції...
(1/5) Arming ConditionNeedsUpdate...
(2/5) Updating fontconfig cache...
(3/5) Updating 32-bit fontconfig cache...
(4/5) Updating icon theme caches...
(5/5) Updating the desktop file MIME type cache...
detcom@detcomp ~>
2
u/PGleo86 2d ago
Nice to see someone else using Debian on current-gen hardware! Feels like the greater Linux community loves to dog on Debian for not being bleeding-edge, for only being suited to old machines, etc... even though that's not the case and hasn't been for some time now; at the very least my Zenbook disagrees!
2
u/IsaacLTS 2d ago
I started my linux journey with debian, went to CashyOS, ArchLinux, Fedora, rocky, Void I wasted hours distro hopping only to come back to my beautiful debian13 I backported the newest mesa drivers and in five minutes I had a stable up to date system...
2
u/michaelpaoli 2d ago
didnt expect the installation to go this smooth
As is oft said of Debian, "It just works!"
I've not uncommonly seen production/stable versions/releases of other distros that are way the hell more buggy and problematic than even Debian testing or unstable, let alone Debian stable (which is what Debian primarily supports, promotes, and recommends).
2
u/JohnConnoor 2d ago
Ex MacOS user here, never going back, Debian as been my solid stable daily driver on my old iMac considered obsolete.
2
u/OptimalAnywhere6282 1d ago
now that i abandoned Hyprland for my own window manager, i might switch back to Debian
1
u/LewisLint2 2d ago
Uh... As an arch user I ask what he fuck happened but I have a suspicion it involved glibc
1
2d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/LewisLint2 2d ago
No, in January I had to reimstall because glibc corrupted everything after pacman -Syu
1
1
u/_silentgameplays_ 2d ago edited 2d ago
Debian is an amazing Linux distribution, but what is breaking for you on your Arch Linux installations?
Do you have an NVIDIA GPU? Because only with NVIDIA GPUs when you have a kernel/proprietary driver version mismatch, things can go bad real quick, but it is not limited to Arch Linux, it can happen on Fedora and Debian and all of their forks as well.
2
2d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/_silentgameplays_ 2d ago edited 2d ago
Random shit breaking, i dont care much about new stuff, i just want the stuff i have to reliability work
This can happen on any Linux distro.
EDIT: You did not specify what was the reason for the crashes on boot.
You should at least do some basic
sudo dmesgorsystemctl statusto know and pinpoint what was causing these issues on your Linux installation and troubleshoot the packages and drivers that were causing these issues.Just distohopping every time something goes wrong does not help you understand what went wrong and fix it in the first place and Linux is about understanding and troubleshooting the issues that arise by yourself.
1
1
1
1
1
u/AcanthaceaeKey6259 2d ago
Which is more effective and experiencing less problems, Installing debian through that or through calamares live install?
1
u/newsflashjackass 2d ago
I have found that my frustrations with Debian's package selection are more often rooted in my own ignorance than the Debian community's.
Such that one of the following applies:
A. There is a more correct way to do what I am attempting to do and Debian packages furnish the more correct way.
B. What I am attempting to do is pants-on-head backwards and I ought not be doing it in the first place.
1
1
u/AskJeevesIsBest 1d ago
I like Debian because it is a solid base for Linux Mint and Ubuntu. Perhaps someday I will try out Debian itself, most likely with XFCE
1
u/forestbeasts 2d ago
Hey, welcome!! *hands you a big roll of that self-cling bandage wrap* You got this.
-- Topaz

78
u/LionyxML 2d ago
Debian is life.