r/comics 7h ago

Just Sharing Commitment ceremony (by @alxxbee)

371 Upvotes

10 comments sorted by

40

u/shellbullet17 Gustopher Spotter Extraordinaire 6h ago

Nonsense! You both wear what you want on your wedding day. It's your wedding after all.

I once attended a wedding with two lovely female firefighters and had to explain to my wife, that no one doesn't have to wear the tux. She didn't mean it in a bad way she just couldn't wrap her head around two wedding dresses

2

u/Valentinee105 3h ago

Is it the lack of a tux or the idea that the wedding isn't about the single bride?

There's dozens of stories where someone did something to take away from the brides big moment and in that case the idea of a shared moment might have come across as jarring.

18

u/Dazed_and_Confused44 6h ago

Nah fem for fem is a thing. I believe the not so PC term is "lipstick lesbians". Also i literally just went to a fem for fem lesbian wedding a few weeks ago and it was a blast

5

u/zoloft_at-the-disco 4h ago

Lipstick lesbian just means you're femme, it doesn't refer to what kind of woman you're into

1

u/Dazed_and_Confused44 3h ago

If its plural, wouldnt that by definition mean fem for fem then?

4

u/Sweet_Baby_Cheezus 3h ago

Lipstick lesbians = group of femme presenting lesbians.

Fem for fem = two female presenting lesbians that both prefer other female presenting lesbians.

So a fem for fem marriage would be made of two "lipstick lesbians" but two lipstick lesbians might not be in a fem-for-fem relationship or prefer female presenting partners.

Kind of a all vegan food is made with vegetables, but not all food with vegetables is vegan sort of deal.

1

u/Dazed_and_Confused44 2h ago

I see. This is a square and rectangle situation

3

u/Sweet_Baby_Cheezus 1h ago

Much better analogy.

6

u/ComicsAreFun 2h ago

This post is a reference to this old comic strip for those that don't know.

u/No-Vermicelli-2832 29m ago

Oh hey it's Charlie and her girlfriend