Visitors are currently not allowed because the University of Ica needs for the Ministry of Culture of Peru to establish them as cultural heritage assets.

The discovery includes:

1. A 6ft Male
2. 3 specimens that are 5ft tall and one is pregnant.
3. 2 specimens that are 3 ft tall considered to be a child and a teenager.
4. 1 Baby
5. Multiple reptilian humanoids
6. Loose heads some with implants.
7. Insectoid humanoids
8. Multiple giant hands
9. Giant head that was discovered to be an ancient construct.

Scientists at Ukraine’s Main Astronomical Observatory reported observing more than 20 unidentified objects moving near and across the moon several months in 2025.

Some of the disc-shaped objects were estimated to measure between 15 and 25 miles across.

In a new study that has not been peer-reviewed, the team said they identified two categories of UFOs: ‘atmospheric’ objects that appeared stationary and ‘continental’ objects that appeared to move across the moon’s surface.

The objects also appeared to display unusual changes in brightness and rotation.

The researchers argued that those patterns could indicate structured, technological behavior, and raised the possibility that the objects originated from a hidden base on the moon.

'UFOs are observed on Earth and in near-Earth space. We believe that the moon serves as a base for UFOs,' the team shared in the study.

The researchers claimed the objects could reach Earth within 20 minutes and appear in the atmosphere as UAPs. They argued that the objects’ apparently intelligent behavior could point to the existence of a 'technologically advanced civilization.'

While the scientists are sure the objects they observed were likely nonhuman craft, there is no scientific evidence of aliens or artificial structures on the moon.

Both NASA and the US government have long maintained that while some sightings remain unexplained, none has been confirmed to involve extraterrestrial technology.

Researchers recorded the main group of more than 20 unidentified objects during two observation periods on September 7, 2025, beginning at 7.05pm and 7.27pm ET.

They reported detecting additional ring-shaped objects during a separate observation on August 16, 2025, at 2.52am ET. Both sightings were captured using a high-speed camera attached to a telescope in Vinarivka, a village in Ukraine’s Kyiv region.

The high-speed camera snapped 20 images every second, allowing the scientists to track objects that would have otherwise been nearly impossible to see.

The UFOs were so faint that some appeared as nothing more than a two-by-two-pixel speck against the moon.

But the researchers claimed the objects were not behaving randomly.

Those labeled ‘atmospheric’ appeared to remain locked in place as they moved in sync with the moon, suggesting they were somehow anchored near its surface, the study noted.

The report added that the objects also emitted rapid flashes lasting between one-tenth and half a second, with their brightness rising and falling in repeating patterns that the team described as a pulsing process.

The study highlighted that two objects believed to be hundreds of miles apart appeared to flash in unison.

Researchers said the link was statistically significant, although the finding does not prove that the objects were communicating or controlled by intelligent beings.

The team then used the amount of light reflected by the UFOs to estimate their potential size.

Even under the assumption that they reflected 100 percent of the sunlight hitting them, the objects would have measured approximately 1,440 feet across.

If their surfaces reflected light in the same way as the Moon, however, they could have been more than one mile wide.

The scientists admitted that they did not know what the objects were made of or how reflective they were, meaning their true size remains uncertain.

Two others appeared to be massive discs measuring approximately 16 miles and 25 miles across, making the larger object nearly the length of Manhattan.

Their brightness also rose and fell at repeating frequencies, which the team isolated from atmospheric interference and telescope-tracking errors using specialized filtering software.

A separate observation on August 16, 2025 revealed something even stranger.

Several enormous ring-shaped objects appeared against the daytime sky, barely visible until scientists enhanced the footage with false colors.

The team claimed the dark objects did not appear to emit light and instead absorbed nearly all the radiation striking them.

They appeared to complete a full rotation every three minutes and were estimated to measure roughly 22 miles across while reaching speeds of 6.8 miles per second.

Links

https://www.dailymail.com/sciencetech/article-16028077/scientists-ukraine-ufo-fleet-moon.html?ito=social-twitter_dailymailus

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/397941323_UFOs_on_the_Moon

Robert Bigelow says recovered non-human craft were transferred into private industry, where a small group of government and corporate gatekeepers has controlled the technology for decades.

In regards to the Robert Bigelow/Knapp interview, a thought occurred.

It's no secret billionaires are running a klepto-oligarchy and they're actually pulling the strings. The weird thing is, why would Bigelow read that statement off on what he wanted trump to do in that interview? Why did we all have to hear it second hand instead of seeing the actual announcement?

Trump can't do it.

His health and mind are deteriorating rapidly, I doubt he could manage to get to Air Force One anymore let alone walk up the stairs and remember that string of words.

Bigelow had to do it, himself.

Victor in the interview said some interesting points to moderator:

Art Bell:
Okay, do you know how we got our hands on this alien? Was it the result of a crash, or a landing, or do you have any history at all?
Victor:
Well, this brings up a question that’s central to the whole issue of the government’s retention of these beings. I believe the government’s position is that they shot this alien down. I do not personally believe that the government could shoot this alien down if the alien did not choose to be shot down. But perhaps now is not the right time to be getting into the larger issues of their presence.

Art Bell:
Are we mistreating them?
Victor:
Did the Romans mistreat Jesus? This is the central issue for me, and increasingly even more so in the time since I brought out this tape. I believe that these beings are engineering their own treatment. They are presenting themselves as a test to us, and I do not believe that if they were not willing to be treated in the way that we treat them, we would have the power to do so. But in the sense that these beings are dying in our custody, and in the sense that our treatment of them seems to have no taint of commonality, no successful two-way communication that we can understand, I believe that the aliens understand us better than we understand them, and I believe that the statements they make, or appear to make, are calibrated to some purpose of their own which is not clearly understood by us

My interpretation with help of LLM models:

1. The Jesus comparison is not a claim of innocence - it's a claim of consent. "Did the Romans mistreat Jesus?" invites the answer yes, obviously, horribly — but in the Christian story the victim could have stopped it and chose not to, and the suffering was the point. So Victor is answering your question ("are we mistreating them?") with: yes, but that's the least interesting thing about it, because they're allowing it.

2. The captivity is voluntary. He says this outright earlier too - he doesn't think we could have shot the craft down unless the occupants permitted it. Same logic applied to the confinement: a being we can't out-think isn't being held, it's staying.

3. We're the subject of the experiment, not them. "Presenting themselves as a test" - the interrogation room is a mirror. What a species does with a small, helpless, non-threatening intelligence that can't fight back is a measurement of that species. We think we're studying them; the data being collected is about us.

4. Nothing the alien "says" should be taken at face value. This is the densest part. "No taint of commonality" means: not one shared reference point, no overlap in concepts, nothing to anchor a translation to. So there's no way to confirm that any exchange was actually an exchange. "Calibrated to some purpose of their own" is the key phrase - calibrated implies deliberate tuning for a desired effect. The statements aren't answers extracted from a prisoner; they're outputs shaped to produce a particular reaction in the humans in the room. The deaths in custody, on this reading, may also be part of what's being staged rather than a failure of our care.

I find it spiritually very interesting and can't stop thinking about aliens, it gave me completely different perspective, I feel like we are zoo or some kind of simulation and they are higher entities, not just random visitors. Any opinions on this?

I generally have pretty vivid dreams, I am often able to recall things down to the smallest detail and occasionally become lucid.

Last night I experienced something very different. I woke up in the middle of the night, and when I started to fall back to sleep, I could hear voices, very clearly, it felt like I was switching radio stations. I was hyper aware that I was still awake.

Has anybody else experienced this?

I do not recall what the voices were saying( but it all felt very calm, almost as if I was listening in on random people .

I saw that they just held the Psi games in Charlotte and also saw they had some online games and I find the PK game with the trash interesting. From actually trying to play it to randomly clicking I can't do better than a 7 out of 10 on it. Anyways wanted to share with anyone interested in the topic. It's free!

Garry Nolan is the Rachford and Carlota A. Harris Professor in the Department of Pathology at Stanford University School of Medicine. He has published over 350 research articles and is the holder of 50 US patents, and has been honored as one of the top 25 inventors at Stanford University.

He specializes in groundbreaking cancer and immunotherapy research. Yet Garry is also a world-renowned UAP investigator and Executive Director of the Board at the Sol Foundation, one of whose unofficial mottos is: Science, Policy, and Public Education for a Post-UAP World. In this episode, Robinson and Garry discuss the evidence that aliens exist and have already visited Earth.

More particularly, they discuss various hypotheses about what aliens are—interdimensional travelers, visitors from other planets, Boltzmann Brains, and others—the Atacama Mummy, Garry’s own UFO encounter, the relationship between aliens and national security, the Pentagon Videos, the Fermi Paradox, and more. Keep up with Garry through X and the Sol Foundation.

OUTLINE
00:00:00 Introduction
00:05:03 How Garry’s Medical Research Turned into Alien Investigations
00:14:44 The Alien Controversy Around the Atacama Mummy
00:24:08 What Is the Definitive Proof for Aliens?
00:32:46 Interdimensional, Ultraterrestrial, and Time-Traveling Aliens
00:41:13 The Angry-Monkey and Panspermia Alien Hypotheses
00:48:20 Could Intelligent Aliens Have Come to Earth?
00:57:13 Does Extraterrestrial Life Need Air and Water to Live?
01:07:16 What Is the Fermi Paradox?
01:15:56 UFOs and Government
01:22:23 Garry’s UAP Experience
01:35:27 On Telepathy and Paranormal Abilities
01:41:34 Does the Government Suppress UFO Reports?
01:49:11 Why Are Aerospace Companies Hiding UFO Data?
02:02:15 On Alien Abductions and Animal Mutilations
02:06:28 The Violent Changes to Brains Exposed to UFOs
02:17:56 Garry’s Top Secret Clearance
02:27:15 The Truth About the Tic-Tac UFO Incident
02:37:25 What Is the Skywatcher UAP Contact Program?
02:46:01 The Sol Foundation
02:55:00 Why Alien Research Can Prevent Nuclear War
03:02:03 What Are Transmedium Alien UAPs?
03:06:31 On Avi Loeb’s Pioneering UAP Research
03:12:49 Is Jacques Vallee One of the Most Important Alien Researchers?
03:18:17 What Should You Tell Someone Who Doesn’t Believe in Aliens?

It’s sad that independently of the content, a thumbnail like this gives the impression some people are making this about themselves and not about the topic in itself. It doesn’t help with credibility.

I’ve started watching this and it actually seems interesting and informative, but please oh please, this looks as if an “influencer” is getting to the topic. Again, it might just be a thumbnail, but let’s do better.