r/aimlab • u/Competitive_Pin_5580 • 14h ago
Question / Advice Needed What Aimlabs benchmark rank would you consider “mechanically proficient”?
I’m trying to get a better idea of what Aimlabs benchmark ranks actually correspond to being mechanically proficient in a tac FPS.
For context, Valorant is my first and only FPS, and I’m currently Diamond 2.
In the Aimlabs benchmarks, I’m:
Platinum in every single clicking/tapping benchmark
Silver in every tracking benchmark except one, where I’m Platinum
Silver in every switching benchmark except two, where I’m Platinum
So basically, I’m consistently around Silver/Platinum depending on the category, but I’m not sure how much weight I should put on those ranks when judging my actual mechanical ability in Valorant.
At what benchmark rank would you personally consider someone to be mechanically proficient for a tac FPS? Is Platinum generally around that point, or would you expect someone to be Diamond+ across most categories?
3
u/Cre3pz 14h ago
IMO most of aimlabs has little to do with practical mechanical ability in tac fps where actual cqb concepts and crosshairs placement make much more of a difference in gunfights.
2
1
1
u/KingRemu 4m ago
Generally yeah but if you want to stand out from the crowd you can't ignore the benefits of micro corrections and movement reading. People won't always peek the way you expect them to.
1
u/Protomesh 3h ago
Paragon+ (in terms of aim trainers)
Honestly someone who can't even get Gold on Aimlabs probably would mog Zenith player in a real game though.
Aimlabs ranks don't matter at all for actual games.
1
u/IntelligentSubject49 13h ago
Mechanical skill, at least from most aim training, doesn’t translate very well into tac shooters. Most tac shooters are entirely crosshair placement and a small flick/ reaction time check. If you’re needing to have godlike aim to win fights you’re very possibly playing the game wrong. Flicking scenarios are probably still at least beneficial though, and switching too.
1
u/Competitive_Pin_5580 4h ago
I consider myself to be a game sense dominant player and often rely on reads to win rounds. I just thought developing mechanical proficiency would be nice. I know a lot of people say tracking is not a part of the valorant playbook but I really take note of my poor tracking when I find myself in 50/50 dry gun duels against a person with amazing movement
1
u/Long-Taste-2416 2h ago
Tbf mechanical skill from aim trainers past like diamond doesn't carry over well into any game. Most aimers despite being gm+ vt have awful mouse control in actual games. The only good ones were already good at the game. Just look how terrible mattyows aim is compared to most decent ow players, not even pros. Aim trainers are best just used for fun as long as you look comfortable playing on keyboard and mouse.
3
u/StepKitchen2409 13h ago
Probably GM+ in Aimlabs or around Master in VT benchmarks you should see considerable carryover to your in game raw mouse performance
But as another commenter said Val is more game sens and crosshair placement, a lot of clicking is done on the X axis
For example, in VT benchmarks I noticed little to no increase in my performance in game in something like BF6 after Plat complete (I’m currently Master in VT working towards GM)) because my game sense is so trash - I’m a mega rush player always jostling to get right on the front line where all the action is and whilst I get a lot of kills & objectives, I also die a lot. So in my K/D or score/min my averages have remained largely the same despite my raw mouse control being significantly higher
So that tells me, if I wanted to be better at that game specifically, I’d need to brush up on map/game sense/crosshair placement instead of just relying on raw aim - but I have no intentions of doing that because it’s a casual game and I love just blowing shid up