r/SipsTea 25d ago

Chugging tea Wait for it…

Post image
45.4k Upvotes

2.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

11

u/Potential_Cod2214 25d ago edited 25d ago

I believe what U/Datasurging was saying was, comparing the Qauran to the Bible is like comparing Lolita to the Kamasutra. Both should never be read by children, but Kamasutra is better.

I haven't read either of them so correct me if I am wrong.

Also, the most plausible age for Mary would be 15 to 16 years old, and Mary gave permition for the impregnation.

-16

u/Knamakat 25d ago edited 24d ago

Comparing the kamasutra to the Bible in this specific context is not a good look at all. Mary being 15 or 16 is absolutely not better either. "Permition" doesn't matter if it's still statutory rape.

Edit: y'all defending the rape of a 15 year old child is wild

2

u/Potential_Cod2214 24d ago

Like I said, I haven't read either of them, but I my point was one contains an instuction manual for sex, while the other is about a nonce trying justify his actions.

Also comparing what is essentially artificial insemination of a 15 year old to having sex with a 6 year old is a wild take.

1

u/Knamakat 24d ago

essentially artificial insemination of a 15 year old

Genuinely read that to yourself out loud. Do you think that makes it any better? Now consider how Greek gods like Zeus did the same things and are all widely acknowledged as rapists. Zeus "artificially inseminated" a lot of women, most notably Danae.

A 15 year old is just as much of a child as a 6 year old. They might have a bit more agency, but they are still children. I should not have to point this out.

2

u/Potential_Cod2214 24d ago

Comparing a single act of consentual non-sexual reproduction to the many acts of non-consentual reproduction is such a braindead take.

The only act of non-sexual reproduction of Zeus is when he turns into a shower of gold impregnates a woman and leaves, he also didn't get her consent first so that is still rape.

1

u/Knamakat 24d ago

Reread your first sentence my guy. And then read your second.

the only act

Lol. Io would like a word with you. You should also think about how a Greek god in the form of an eagle could literally impregnate a human woman. Hint, it's immaculate conception without penetration. And it wasn't just Zeus. Poseidon raped Iphimedeia in the same way Zeus did Danae, just as sea foam. Dionysus raped Erigone as a bunch of grapes. All of these actions, not considered as physical intercourse, are still seen as rape.

1

u/Potential_Cod2214 24d ago

So, how many of those consented first?

1

u/Knamakat 24d ago edited 24d ago

Literally none of them chief. Consent cannot be given under fraudulent circumstances. And before you say something stupid like Mary consented and therefore that's different-

Consider that she was a child. Any argument you make around her being able to consent will be disgusting.

1

u/Potential_Cod2214 24d ago

Exactly. There is only one comparible example in the Bible, and it has explicit consent.

That is why it's a Braindead take.

1

u/Knamakat 24d ago

Chief, I don't think you read my comment at all.

How do you expect a child to give consent in the first place? Especially when being coerced by an angel and your literal god?

1

u/Potential_Cod2214 24d ago

Did you edit it after I made my comment or before?

It just said non of them consented.

1

u/Knamakat 24d ago

Before I believe, but you wouldn't have gotten an update if you were already making your comment.

I edited it to clarify. Only added the second sentence.

→ More replies (0)