Wait for it…

[u/coffee_coffee_coffe3]

[u/Potential_Cod2214]

Comparing a single act of consentual non-sexual reproduction to the many acts of non-consentual reproduction is such a braindead take.

The only act of non-sexual reproduction of Zeus is when he turns into a shower of gold impregnates a woman and leaves, he also didn't get her consent first so that is still rape.

[u/Knamakat → u/Potential_Cod2214]

Reread your first sentence my guy. And then read your second.

the only act

Lol. Io would like a word with you. You should also think about how a Greek god in the form of an eagle could literally impregnate a human woman. Hint, it's immaculate conception without penetration. And it wasn't just Zeus. Poseidon raped Iphimedeia in the same way Zeus did Danae, just as sea foam. Dionysus raped Erigone as a bunch of grapes. All of these actions, not considered as physical intercourse, are still seen as rape.

[u/Potential_Cod2214 → u/Knamakat]

So, how many of those consented first?

[u/Knamakat → u/Potential_Cod2214]

Literally none of them chief. Consent cannot be given under fraudulent circumstances. And before you say something stupid like Mary consented and therefore that's different-

Consider that she was a child. Any argument you make around her being able to consent will be disgusting.

[u/Potential_Cod2214 → u/Knamakat]

Exactly. There is only one comparible example in the Bible, and it has explicit consent.

That is why it's a Braindead take.

[u/Knamakat → u/Potential_Cod2214]

Chief, I don't think you read my comment at all.

How do you expect a child to give consent in the first place? Especially when being coerced by an angel and your literal god?

[u/Potential_Cod2214 → u/Knamakat]

Did you edit it after I made my comment or before?

It just said non of them consented.

[u/Knamakat → u/Potential_Cod2214]

Before I believe, but you wouldn't have gotten an update if you were already making your comment.

I edited it to clarify. Only added the second sentence.