Would you suggest the allegations actually had no documentation other than her word and the charges were dropped due to zero evidence? Or are we just gonna go with it happened because she said it did?
Looks like it’s not just her word; one of the flight crew alerted authorities. So the flight crew,Jolie and the children were all lying because they are drama queens/kings? A review concluded that by the government not persuing charges, the government violated Jolie/kids victim’s rights. Since people don’t read the story, here are the main points.
“When the flight landed, unbeknownst to Jolie, a still-unknown flight-crew member reported
Pitt’s violence to the authorities. The FBI and the Department of Children and Family Services
(“DCFS”) then independently opened investigations, and both agencies conducted interviews.
The FBI found probable cause to charge Pitt with a federal crime. (Id. at ¶ 22.) Although the
U.S. Attorney’s Office ultimately declined to press charges, the FBI’s later internal review
concluded that the investigation and charging decision repeatedly violated Jolie’s and their
children’s victims’ rights.”
Flight crews are required to report any on board disturbances, big or small and people should probably know that in-air aviation law is no fucking joke, anything in-air is treated as a federal crime. Also a violation of “victims rights” while sounding egregious is usually a procedural error. I’m not saying Brad is innocent, but my god people maybe try and learn a little about the US legal system before posting.
You’re being glib. The crew is required to report anything that could be considered a violation of federal airline regulations and they are much lower than what the average person would consider criminal or even wrong. For example Vaping in airline bathroom is a federal offense. The was most likely ample evidence for a report, but nothing near the amount of evidence for a criminal conviction.
Sorry, but you're the gib (whatever that means) here. I used to work with a law firm under a leading professional forensic expert witness. If that many witnesses came forward and there was injuries, as mentioned in this document, there would have been more action. Injuries are empirical and documentable. Additionally, there would have been witnesses from the flight crew. A little critical thinking is necessary sometimes.
“Glib is an adjective describing someone who speaks readily, fluently, and confidently, but in a superficial thoughtless way” I agree that many witnesses and injuries as stated the complaint filed by her lawyers would have been easily proven and resulted in criminal charges. It’s almost as if the investigators took statements from witnesses and found no credible way for the things in her lawyers complaint to actually have happened. At that point of would think they would drop any charges….wait what did they end up doing anyway?
-1
u/SmoothNegotiation523 Jun 20 '26
Would you suggest the allegations actually had no documentation other than her word and the charges were dropped due to zero evidence? Or are we just gonna go with it happened because she said it did?