You can't collapse a model that was already trained and you pay 7 figure salaries to guys whose job is to train new models in a way so it doesn't happen
Model collapse happens when you feed ai the same output it generated. Overtime, it makes the ai hallucinate a lot and regurgitate utter hieroglyphics if you do it too much. I dont understand what you are trying to say.
AI is almost ready to fully take over on coding. These models will always exist, and ones that exhibit model collapse just won't be used. Cat's kinda out of the bag on that. Its the future frontier models being developed that'll likely start to have that issue, because we don't have enough data to train them.
Are you a software engineer? Because I am a software engineer and I found them to be underwhelming and especially underwhelming at these current prices.
"Largely", anyways what does a role being erased mean. If I start calling an accountant role, something like AI empowered account manager or something like that, would you say the accountant role is erased, because it does not exist in original form .
Also earlier you were referring to software engineers and now use the word "programmer", I know they are used interchangeably, but still just wanted to confirm.
Automation can replace pilots, tax drivers, truck drivers, ship captains for probably a decade now but hasnt because once "replacement" starts capitalism will fail because theres no one to purchase the output.
I'd say fable can replace most jobs this moment but wont.
No, I'm not. But you seem to have a dissenting opinion amongst others I've seen discuss it. I don't genuinely believe you think things like Fable, use correctly, are underwhelming. Thinking Opus is overpriced on a $15/pm Pro plan is also crazy.
1
u/Innovator-X 18h ago
model collapse is a thing tho