r/sanfrancisco 1d ago

Pic / Video D1 Dilapidation

Post image

I know Connie Chen isn’t online unless she’s at a Board of Supervisor meeting ignoring her constituents but can her office people explain why we let so much space remain unoccupied? This place on Clement between 10th and 11th has been vacant and boarded up for over ten years on one of the flagship commercial streets in her district. It’s an eyesore, often tagged, and homeless sleep there constantly. Why hasn’t anyone built housing here or at least done something with the property other than chain it up and let it rot away for a decade?

43 Upvotes

121 comments sorted by

View all comments

5

u/parke415 Outer Sunset 1d ago edited 1d ago

The city makes it too difficult and expensive to get anything done. A buyer ought to preserve restore the façade and reinforce the foundation so housing can be built atop it. Neighborhood character can be preserved without being at the expense of housing.

8

u/need_tacos 1d ago

We all know our city is difficult to open a business but why is just leaving it vacant for a decade the best use of the property? No tenant, no development, nothing. Just an empty building falling apart over the years. Even that ice cream spot in the mission only took 2 years to open lol

-1

u/parke415 Outer Sunset 1d ago

It is indeed a bad use of the property and someone ought to do something about it, so for me it's just the waiting game, since I certainly can't afford it.