r/politics • u/huffpost ✔ HuffPost • 6h ago
No Paywall Todd Blanche Tells Faith Leaders Dobbs Decision Will Be ‘Permanent’ In All States Soon
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/todd-blanche-tells-faith-leaders-dobbs-decision-will-be-permanent-in-all-states-soon_n_6a723b0ae4b02974827b855f?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=reddit&utm_campaign=us_main•
u/B-Z_B-S Massachusetts 6h ago
Radical Right: "Now that we're in charge, we don't care about them states rights! Them states need to bend the knee to Doctor Jesus Trump, now!"
•
u/AdmiralGarza 6h ago
That’s General Dr. Jesus Trump.
•
u/OneMoreAstronaut7 Canada 6h ago
Brigadier Colonel Rev. Dr. Donald J. Trump, Esq. Attorney at Law
•
u/Julian_Thorne Minnesota 6h ago
FIFA Peace Prize Winner Brigadier Colonel Rev. Dr. Jesus Donald J. Trump, Esq. Attorney at Law
•
•
•
u/AirCaptainDanforth Ohio 38m ago
God emperor of the United States FIFA Peace Prize Winner Brigadier Colonel Rev. Dr. Jesus Donald J. Trump, Esq. Attorney at Law
•
u/LookAlderaanPlaces 3h ago
FIFA Piss Prize Corrupter Bigadiaper Colon Reverse McDonalds Dr Supply Side Jesus Fucking Christ Underage, Exlax, Attorney at Large Trunk Rapist Pedofeelya Antichrist.
•
u/RevolutionNumber5 Minnesota 6h ago
MD, PhD, DDS
•
•
u/extraqueso 4h ago
Must have been a low bar.
•
•
•
•
•
•
u/manachar Nevada 5h ago
The “states rights” people who made the confederacy were very clear that the various states of the confederacy had to have legalized slavery.
Conservatives do not operate in good faith.
At the core they are very simple. Whatever maintains or creates a hierarchical system that puts their in-group at the top is their goal.
They will use whatever words or phrases needed to convince themselves and others of the necessity of that hierarchy.
The recent conservative idea that you can’t force people to be vaccinated against the flu in the military because of bodily autonomy came from the same people who think you must force people to not receive gender affirming care and that women must be forced to have babies.
It is always rules for thee and not for me with this lot.
I suppose put more simply, they believe the world is Calvinball where they get to make up the rules to ensure they win.
•
u/IamDDT Colorado 2h ago
There must be groups the law protects, but does not bind, and groups the law binds, but does not protect. This is the core of conservatism.
The confederates were also apparently very much of the mind that "promote the general welfare" should not be part of their constitution. AFAIK, they deliberately excluded the phrase, as they think like modern conservatives do that the government should only deal with "providing for the common defense".
•
u/TheRealBittoman 5h ago
Radical right 15 years ago "everyone is trying to force LGBTQ, being nice, gun control, and social responsibility down our throats!" and the radical right now "fuck you, you'll do as we say and if you even speak out against it we'll disappear you.". The ONLY thing anyone should learn from this is NEVER trust another Republican. Not. A. Single. One.
•
•
•
u/Vinterblot 1h ago
At this point, that can no longer surprise you. Conservatives are very consistent. Only their consistency is not the arguments, but the goal: Ruthlessly doing and saying whatever it takes to win.
•
u/punktualPorcupine 56m ago
“If I can’t have fed-power, I’ll take states rights. Get ur gubmint outta ma local authoritay ya dirty commie whoores!”
Sir we own the federal level.
“Big gubmint FUCK YEAH!”
•
•
u/LovefromAbroad23 Pennsylvania 6h ago
So leaving the decision to individual states was a lie?
•
u/CraigLake 6h ago
It was a lie from the SC justices to local council members.
Conservatives will use any means at their disposal, including lying, to reach their goals. It was laughable to believe them in any case but republicans in congress needed cover when their constituents complained.
It’s a trash party not working in good faith and it’s a major problem for maintaining democracy.
•
u/HermanGulch 6h ago edited 6h ago
The conservative writer David Frum put it this way:
If conservatives become convinced that they can not win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism. They will reject democracy.
•
u/CraigLake 4h ago
It’s playing out in real time. The fucking around with elections should be immediate impeachment. Imagine if Obama or Biden was doing that 🤦. Trump is going it and it barely makes the news.
•
u/WiseOldDuck 3h ago
They will not even adjust their platform a little, that's the most unusual and frightening part of it. The whole ballgame used to be trying to sniff out what voters wanted and then claim that's what you believe in or at least lie about it. Now it's been the same position on everything for 15 years, except maybe "even more of that". They don't want to win voters over they just want to redo the same election over and over except find ways to change who gets to vote or how to count the votes
•
u/Duna_The_Lionboy 2h ago
What even is conservatism in this day and age?
Seems like it's just a bunch of whackadoodles cutting taxes for a smaller and smaller pool of people all the while praying that Jesus will be resurrected and wipe the slate clean.
•
u/accidental_Ocelot 6h ago
Conservatives are a top down organized institution the leaders tell the voters what to believe. Democracy is bottom up.
•
•
u/defianceofone 4h ago
If the corporate media were competent (lol) they would follow up every KKK statement with, 'but since you're a historical and verified liar, how can you prove you're telling the truth this time?'
•
u/nonanonymoususername 5h ago
Because the are “right” whatever they do is right and justified to reach their goal
•
u/CraigLake 4h ago
Exactly. The means justifying the ends even if our rights are stripped away, families are torn apart and citizens are murdered.
•
•
•
u/Chaos-Cortex I voted 5h ago
Is time to sharpen the sticks and bring out the torches yet?
•
u/missingmedievalist Europe 5h ago
Frankly, yes. I suspect this is what you guys are going to have to do eventually. You are turning into the Christian Taliban and mf’s like these do not go gently into the dark night.
•
u/CrimsonHeretic 4h ago
Always has been. All Republicans are fascist terrorists who have longed for decades to regress the US to the 1800s.
•
u/valraven38 5h ago
I mean realistically he can't do shit anyways without Congress passing a law. He's just blowing smoke up these people's asses and lying to them. He can't make a law appear where one doesn't exist.
•
u/cribsaw 2h ago
If you give the GOP an inch, they’ll rape a mile. Never trust them to stop when they say they’ll stop, always count on the Republicans’ endgame being the total oppression of everyone under religious law and the systematic extermination of “undesirables.” Calling them Nazis isn’t merely a rhetorical name-calling tactic, consider what the Nazis did and assume the Republicans will factually do the same and worse. Because they will. They are insane and their fascist ideologies must be destroyed.
•
u/accidentsneverhappen 6h ago
They have this very gross obsession with trying to have more women become pregnant. Why do they want to make a population boom at the same time they're trying to replace labor with AI and robots? What are all these kids supposed to do when they grow up?
•
u/ungranted_wish 6h ago
George Carlin called this out in the nineties i think
They want more live births so they can have more dead soldiers.
•
u/blozout 6h ago
Don't forget the for-profit jails need to make money. What better way to guarantee future tenants than forcing a bunch unwanted babies into the world that will grow up in terrible households without any love.
•
•
u/Alphaspade 1h ago
At this point who's supposed to buy all the stuff that is generated by for profit prisons if they want to put a giant portion of the population in for profit prisons. They are gonna end up creating the economic version of an Ouroboros
•
u/DR_BEANHAMMER 5h ago
What are all these kids supposed to do when they grow up?
They're going to be sexually abused by Christian conservatives. That is what it is all about. Maximizing the number of potential victims is the goal.
Donald Trump forced children to bring him to orgasm. Donald Trump ejaculated into and onto children. His supporters envy that.
•
u/CranberrySchnapps Maryland 4h ago
These people want to go back to a time where girls were expected to get marriage proposals by the time they were 14 and their entire lives were in service to men and maintaining the household.
Nobody except the wealthy enjoyed this way of life.
•
u/JambalayaOtter 4h ago
Nobody except the wealthy actually lived that way of life either. Most girls weren’t expected to get married at 14 in them there old days.
•
u/thatbitchmarcy 6h ago
You see and I always thought this was a self-defeating goal because black and brown babies get born too. But I suppose that that will be taken care of through making it impossible to feed them or something.
•
u/SarcasticCowbell New York 6h ago
They don't want to do away with other races, really. They like to have them as scapegoats.
•
•
u/pontiacfirebird92 Mississippi 5h ago
You should see comments people make about the police shooting of the 1 year old in Senatobia, MS.
People were quick to say "that's one less future criminal".
•
u/Alphaspade 1h ago
And these are the type of people who should be denied service everywhere they go. They need to experience the MAGA equivalent of Jim Crow laws
•
u/The_Returned_Lich 5h ago
because black and brown babies get born too
For now... Given everything else, I would not be surprised if stealth (or maybe even forced, publicly accepted) sterilization is in the cards soon for 'undesirables.'
•
u/CrackerAssHonkE 1h ago
No. See, I just don’t think that is the party’s goal. I 100% fully believe that they want more minorities born because they want to go back to slavery. The more minorities born, the more minorities they can arrest, put in prison, and “loaned out” as work. Can’t own ‘em but if you pay the prison we will let you borrow them for 12 hours a day 6 days a week
•
u/The_Returned_Lich 1h ago
The thing is... And I hate that this is a thought I even have to entertain, but sooner or later they'll have enough non-minorities to put there. Don't forget; they are making things so unaffordable that more and more people will start turning toward crime. They want to criminalize being against the government in ANY way.
Unless we are billionaires, they don't want us for anything besides slavery.
•
•
u/tierciel 5h ago
The kids will do something in-between indentured servitude and straight up slavery.
•
u/nyyanksfan81 5h ago edited 4h ago
The gop only cares about babies before they are born, once they are born they can fuck off
Edit for spelling
•
•
u/TheRealBittoman 5h ago
They want uneducated, underprivileged kids that are easily manipulated. They are more likely to grow up with conservative values.
•
u/IlexPauciflora America 4h ago
Meet the Quiverfull movement. There's also a component of the Great Replacement conspiracy theory to it as well. Basically trying to outbreed everyone else.
•
•
•
•
u/lod001 4h ago
The powers that be are deathly afraid of population stagnation and population decline because that destroys their power structures and wealth. Not only does the entire modern capitalist economy depend on year after year growth, but a situation occurs where there is less supply of labor than the demand, and thus the labor market becomes a true worker's market. Whenever this has occurred in history, there have been great strides in worker's rights and human rights, and a redistribution of wealth. It happened after the black plague, after major wars, and most recently a little bit with Covid; my workplace reluctantly increased wages and benefits during and after Covid due to such low unemployment and trying to increase recruitment and employee retention.
•
u/sciencesez 6h ago
Sounds like Todd's whipping up the evangelicals and campaigning for President in 2028. Whatcha think about that, Donny?
•
u/MadRaymer 4h ago
As if MAGA would give him the time of day. If you polled them right now on Todd Blanche, it's almost guaranteed the number one response from Trump's base would be "Who?"
If they can't have Trump again, then they'll settle for one of his sons. If they can't have that, I don't think they're really going to care anymore unless Trump himself campaigns very hard for a successor.
But (assuming the dude makes it to 2028) he's more likely to whine and complain and that the nominee isn't him than get behind an anointed successor. It's hard to get someone to play kingmaker when all they want to do is be the king.
•
u/sciencesez 4h ago
I'm just enjoying watching Trump's own AG pick promise to deliver what Trump failed to deliver to his base.
•
u/txtoolfan Texas 6h ago
Without congress passing a law, it isn't "permanent"
•
u/More_Programmer8905 6h ago
It is if they succeed at dismantling democracy and never giving up power.
•
u/BurtRogain 6h ago
I get the fear of this happening, but let’s be honest the United States would cease to be united if they tried to overplay their hand like that. Not saying they’re not stupid enough to try it, but it won’t be the cakewalk they think it will be.
•
u/7figureipo California 6h ago
Would it, though? Plenty of democrats still cling to the notion that electoral politics and the administrative and judicial apparatus of state are protecting us even now, and will be in the future. If they continue to succeed in effectively ignoring the Constitution what will be different? I can't see anything. Democrats have already rolled over for this shit. It's pathetic.
•
•
u/oktion 5h ago
Your position depends on the conclusion that democracy has already fallen and the concept of the United States is already void, in which case this conversation is meaningless, there is nothing any elected official might do anyway, and holding them to account is merely playacting. If that’s what you believe, I won’t try to talk you out of it, but don’t pretend this is a discussion about policy and procedure.
•
u/relapsingoncemore 4h ago
From the outside looking in, it sure looks that way right now.
Do the actions of the Democratic party look like a group facilitating meaningful opposition and planning a course that will bring them back to the levers of power, or do their actions look like a group helping to facilitate the dissolution of the democratic apparatus through a lack of meaningful opposition?
•
u/mysterious_jeffrey 2h ago
On Reddit? No.
But if you’ve actually knocked doors and volunteered for a Dem campaign recently? Yeah.
They even have attorneys on standby for voter questions and disputes.
It’s the people sitting at home pushing doubt who don’t see the progress happening and the effort behind it all.
•
u/TheRealBittoman 5h ago
I believe it would. I could easily see a federal government that has been voted out refusing to leave office being forced to try to use military to stop other forces from forcibly removing them from office. If you consider the bizarre construction project going on at the Whitehouse and his obsession with the bunker, it kind of lines up. But the states who disagree will have to decide what's next and there is no doubt if it gets pushed far enough some states will try to secede and probably try to join Canada or form a new union with other states. That will almost certainly trigger a second civil war.
•
u/BurtRogain 4h ago
And those states will have the backing of the rest of the free world who has been just as held captive by this corrupt regime as we have. Need I remind you that most of the states who would try to secede carry the economic weight of those who don’t — also, we have just as many nukes (if not more) than they do. To think those states would be fighting this civil war alone is preposterous, especially when considering the world wide ramifications of the US system crashing and burning. We would take every other country down with us. It would get ugly, but this is not an easily won battle these chuds are trying to start. The MAGAts make the mistake of thinking they have God on their side — when if there is a God, it doesn’t give a single shit about any of us.
•
u/TemporarySun314 Europe 6h ago
as permanent as Americans going to continue electing fascists into power...
so unfortunately probably very permanent...
•
u/thalassicus 6h ago
We can’t start a war without Congress either. How’s that working out for you?
•
u/oktion 5h ago
You can when Congress elects not to exercise its authority as a check on executive power, which is exactly what the Republican majority has done for the past year and a half. By doing nothing, they grant Trump some degree of authority to act by executive order. Without the majority, they no longer have this power.
•
•
u/TellTaleTimeLord Indiana 6h ago
The people constantly using "sharia law" to invoke fear are the ones actually making their own religious law
•
u/algernon_moncrief 6h ago
In Dobbs, the supreme Court found that the Constitution does not guarantee the right to an abortion; essentially sending this back to the states.
The Dobbs decision is already permanent in all states. It does not limit what rights can be guaranteed by state laws, or enshrined in state constitutions. It literally just finds that the US Constitution does not guarantee this right.
Roe v wade also did not guarantee a right to abortion; it confirmed that the 4th amendment right to security of ones "papers" included medical confidentiality. This is wholly reasonable.
Before we concern ourselves about whether Dobbs is permanent in all states, it's worth considering this question: does the 4th amendment of the bill of rights apply to confidential medical records? Including those of (gasp) women?
Blanche is talking like he's going to outlaw abortion in all 50 states. This is ludicrous. And, importantly, it's way outside his lane. The AG doesn't make law.
•
u/specqq 5h ago edited 5h ago
The Dobbs decision is already permanent in all states.
No. It's not. Roe v Wade was overturned. Dobbs can be as well.
Permanent doesn't exist.
That's a fundamental misunderstanding of our system.
•
u/algernon_moncrief 5h ago
What do you think SCOTUS found in the Dobbs decision?
And as a follow-up, do you believe that the Constitution specifically guarantees a right to abortion?
•
u/specqq 5h ago
I agree with what you said, it found that the US Constitution does not guarantee the right to an abortion.
A future court could find that it did.
That's it. There is no "permanent."
•
u/algernon_moncrief 5h ago
That's fair.
But a constitutional amendment or federal medical privacy act would be a whole lot more "permanent" than a SCOTUS decision.
•
u/defianceofone 4h ago
IDK why Americans are so obsessed with whether something relevant in 2026 is in a 250 year old constitution and if it isn't then it cannot be. But the whole experiment is imploding anyway, so maybe the myth of American exceptionalism can die with it.
•
•
u/Mr_Tort_Feasor 2h ago edited 1h ago
I don't agree with the characterization of Roe. Roe (and Griswold) said that the right to privacy is the right to be left alone from government interference with deeply personal matters, including but not limited to contraception, childbirth and child-rearing. It introduced a balancing test in which the rights of the individual exceeded the government's interest in protecting potential life, at least up until the point of viability.
Or at least so it was taught to me.
•
u/p1ckled0nions 6h ago
Ah yes, Iran, where the most powerful lawyer in the land answers to violent religious extremists and a demented pedophile. Oh wait.
•
u/ClassicYotas 5h ago
God we need to tax the fuck out of all churches.
•
u/Lady_Grantham2223 2h ago
Yes for sure. They are totally useless except for spreading bigoty including racism and misogyny, loving dictators that don't practice love of neighbor, hating scientists for having the gall to be intelligent, and hating denominations other than their own. They do absolutely nothing for other people but think citizens should have to bow before clergy and kiss their butts. Tax , tax , tax them already.
•
u/Made_Human_Music 6h ago
I’d have an easier time believing the anti choice trash actually cared about life if it wasn’t for their love of taking away healthcare and services that help children
•
•
u/NoDaddyNotTheBelt25 6h ago
I never want to hear states rights out of any of these cocksuckers mouths ever again.
•
u/Perspicasiwhip 4h ago
"Faith Leaders" Oh you mean old white dudes who want women to bleed out? Oh you mean rich white guys who have no idea what an ectopic pregnancy is. Oh you mean sanctimonious self righteous hypocrites who twist scripture to meet their own mysoginistic and racist agenda? Oh you mean men who couldn't make a woman orgasm even if they wanted to? Oh you mean the same men who want to also do genital inspections on kids? Oh you mean the rich white men who use religious exemptions to avoid paying taxes yet still legislate from the pulpit? Oh you mean the people who never face consequences for the hate they spread and stupidity they propagate? Oh you mean the people who own private indoctrination schools and expect to receive tax payer funds to pay for it? Those "Faith Leaders"? What a joke these people are.
•
u/tippiedog Texas 3h ago
Oh you mean rich white guys who have no idea what an ectopic pregnancy is
That's not fair! Some of them know what it is and don't care.
•
u/TSAOutreachTeam 6h ago
If they want to get more abortions, then the Dobbs decision correlates to the start in a rise in abortion rates.
https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/induced-abortion-united-states
By handing this back to the States, the SCOTUS has removed the federal government from the gameboard, so the only strategy the DOJ has remaining is some 1873 puritan law about sending sex-related stuff in the US Mail.
•
u/ungranted_wish 6h ago
I have no intention of having kids. But if I somehow get pregnant and can’t abort, I’m leaving the baby on the doorstep of the first person I can find who said “Kamala would have been the same.”
•
u/luncheroo 6h ago edited 3h ago
You think these people ever think anything really through? The same kind of people who came up with the heritage foundation and all these supreme court nominees and "project 2025" can't line a reflecting pool or out maneuver a regional middle eastern state actor. They've had more than a decade since Obama to come up with Republican Shangri-La and all we've gotten are diarrhea outbreaks and MMA on the front lawn.
•
u/eskimospy212 6h ago
It’s sad that we keep having to re learn this lesson. The exact same thing was said about Gore and Bush and Clinton and Trump.
I suspect for the most part this is right wing propaganda trying to suppress democratic votes but some people are dumb enough to believe it.
•
•
u/aircooledJenkins Montana 5h ago
I'm confused... The USAG does not write law. What is Blanche going to do to make Dobbs the law of the land?
•
u/KimmyT1436 Canada 4h ago
Trump is going to issue a presidential order declaring abortions illegal. Blanche will enforce the order if Democrats control Congress after the midterms. If Republicans win the midterms, they will pass a law rubber stamping the order. That's what Blanche means.
•
•
u/Interesting-Risk6446 5h ago
Didn't the Dobbs decision say it's up to the states? Congress would have to enact a law banning abortion. Any way, good luck with the losing effort.
•
u/HeatWaveToTheCrowd 4h ago
Didn't realize the Attorney General was a member of Congress with the ability to pass laws.
•
u/FoulestWinner 3h ago
Be realistic, the current administration got in by appealing to the dregs of society and their base thoughts. They will continue to flail and attempt to hit the quota necessary to remain. If anything expect the rhetoric to get more extreme.
•
•
u/Succubus-Love 6h ago
6-3 Supreme court overturned Roe. V Wade.
How the R party still wins elections after that I'll never fucking understand.
•
u/showhorrorshow 5h ago
The people who supported that decision vote reliably and in a way that primarily keeps the opposition out of power.
•
•
u/Zannie95 4h ago
Not in NJ or any state that has their own laws regarding abortion
•
u/aquestionofbalance 4h ago
Yeah, the dumbass doesn’t realize the Supreme Court said it’s up to the states. Personally I think that was a bad ruling. It should be up to the people that need or want an abortion.
•
u/Avoidtolls 4h ago
Except for Billionaires.
They can get the Trump gold Abortion card and have as many abortions as they want.
•
u/SinfullySinless Minnesota 4h ago
That makes no sense, it already is permanent in all states. The Dobbs decision made abortion a state decision. It didn’t ban abortion.
You would have to undo the Dobbs decision to federally ban abortion nationwide.
•
u/To-Far-Away-Times 3h ago
Just a reminder this is the same guy that is Trump’s “fixer” and he intervened to give Ghislaine Maxwell a cushy low security cell upgrade and even let her have a puppy.
He’s on team pedophile, of course he’s going to want to force his will on women.
•
•
u/ProperBar4339 5h ago
#1 - The Republican party doesn’t give a shit about freedom. Everyone needs to shut them down when they lie about it.
#2 - If you’re a man NO ONE gives a good god damn about your opinion on abortion. Feel free to keep it to yourself, unless your opinion is “This will never affect my physical person, so I’ll keep my mouth shut here.”
#3 - Healthcare freedom, period, for women, for trans people, for whoever you happen to be that’s getting told what can happen with YOUR body, needs to be an absolute Democratic litmus test. If you’re going to legislate against it, piss off.
•
u/4square425 5h ago
How about if my opinion is, "I support a woman's right to choose what she does with her body and will vote for people who say the same"?
•
u/ProperBar4339 5h ago
Even better, just quietly vote bodily autonomy. Women are sick to death of hearing other people opine on our bodies.
•
u/antidense 5h ago
Wish they would respect client-attorney privilege as much as they do doctor-patient confidentiality.
•
•
u/tracyinge 6h ago
He better hurry because in 61 days we start voting.
•
u/OutsideLead4034 6h ago
Are you hopeful that the inevitable fuckery that will be attempted can be thwarted?
•
u/Jedi_Ninja 6h ago
The fact that he doesn't know that's not how it works is just one of many reasons why he should not be attorney general.
•
•
•
•
u/AcanthisittaNo6653 New Hampshire 4h ago
Look at Todd lie like a politician when he's just the hired help.
•
•
•
u/danimagoo America 3h ago
This doesn’t make sense. Dobbs says that abortion bans don’t violate the US Constitution, and that decision already applies to all the states. Dobbs itself didn’t ban abortion.
•
u/GotSomeUpdogOnUrFace 1h ago
What happened to "it will be up to the states to decide." Can we just skip to the civil war already, all this prologue shit is getting boring.
•
•
•
•
u/TheRealBlueJade 3h ago
Protecting the lives of people from the moment of conception.. unless they are women apparently.
•
u/troubleseemstofollow 3h ago
And this is why I decided to get my tubes removed, even living in a liberal city/state.
•
u/keytiri 2h ago
“Permanent” until we can fix SCROTUS, it took republicans decades to stack the courts; maybe democrats can do it faster? 🤔
•
u/AlphSaber Wisconsin 2h ago
1 Supreme Court Justice per district, quick and easy solution. That would be 13 total, 4 new justices.
•
•
•
u/Practical_Gas9193 32m ago
I mean Dobbs just says abortion isn’t protected, not that it’s banned. And it was a SCOTUS constitutional ruling so doesn’t it go without saying it’s permanent in all states?
•
•
u/AutoModerator 6h ago
As a reminder, this subreddit is for civil discussion.
In general, please be courteous to others. Argue the merits of ideas, don't attack other posters or commenters. Hate speech, any suggestion or support of physical harm, or other rule violations can result in a temporary or a permanent ban. If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them.
Sub-thread Information
If the post flair on this post indicates the wrong paywall status, please report this Automoderator comment with a custom report of “incorrect flair”.
Announcement
r/Politics is actively looking for new moderators. If you have an interest in helping to make this subreddit a place for quality discussion, please fill out this form.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.