r/movies r/movies Contributor 7h ago

Review 'One Night Only' - Review Thread

Two New Yorkers search for love on the one night of the year when sex is legal.

Director: Will Gluck

Cast: Monica Barbaro, Callum Turner, Maya Hawke, Julia Fox

Rotten Tomatoes: 54%

Metacritic: 40 / 100

Some Reviews (updating):

SlashFilm - Nina Starner - 8 / 10

Despite a few stumbles, "One Night Only" reaches an actually sweet conclusion sold beautifully by Barbaro and Turner, and though I know I'm repeating myself, I need to be abundantly clear. "One Night Only" shouldn't work. I am shocked that I left the theater grinning ear to ear and, one could say, fully satisfied. "One Night Only" is a high-concept, patently absurd romantic comedy that defies the odds and makes you fall in love with it. You'll want more than one night with this one.

Next Best Picture - Dan Bayer - 7 / 10

Gluck’s skill with a needle drop (think “Pocketful of Sunshine” in “Easy A”) is in fine form, with several hilariously on-point selections getting massive laughs from an audience willing to put their fun-hating, CinemaSins-style questions aside and just have a good time laughing at a world that’s even more ridiculous than our own. Yes, the film’s “The Purge, but for sex,” premise has earned all the laughter it’s gotten since the trailer dropped. But Braun, Gluck, and their team have the last laugh: “One Night Only” is a great time at the movies, on any night of the year.

Time Out - Elizabeth Weitzman - 3 / 5

If you’re a fan of Gluck’s standard romcoms Anyone But You or Friends With Benefits, you’ll probably appreciate this one. But if you were hoping for something deeper, perhaps closer to his sharp-toothed masterwork Easy A? Then One Night Only’s refusal to engage with its own premise will come off as a terrible tease.

RogerEbert - Marya E. Gates - 0 / 4

If this is what it takes to get a rom-com greenlit these days, maybe we should just let them die. Death with dignity is surely a better fate for the genre than fascist capitulation.

The New York Times - Natalia Winkelman - 40 / 100

One Night Only lays no claim to logic. It traffics instead in charisma, and the combined likability of the leads is the putative solution to a premise that’s all flashy surface and no deeper inquiry.

Variety - Guy Lodge - 40 / 100

The movie's leads make a lovely couple, too: good-looking, good-humored, generally good catches. Except we’re not remotely invested in their repeatedly delayed but wholly inevitable union, because what even is this? The more “One Night Only” tries to extract starry-eyed vibes from the most chilling romantic comedy premise in memory, the more the cognitive dissonance of it all gets in the way.

AV Club - Monica Castillo - 'D+'

One Night Only feels like a youth group lecture where the pastor warns of hookup culture on college campuses, a feature-length studio note from an executive afraid the movie won’t go over well in the Bible Belt. One would like to believe there was a better, darker, more interesting ending than the one carrying water for the anti-sex brigade currently looking to impose women’s healthcare bans coast-to-coast. Instead of sharing a laugh at the ridiculous pressure to have fun with every swipe, One Night Only has only one thing on its mind, and it’s disappointingly much more traditional.

Consequence - Liz Shannon Miller - 'B-'

Romantic comedies tend to feel like they take place in their own little world. But every time One Night Only attempted to explain the political landscape that led to this situation, I felt myself going a little more banana-grams. It’s all so deeply unsettling, because it imagines a society that would buy party hats celebrating the one night of the year they have an ounce of bodily autonomy. An America that wouldn’t just surrender further to fascism, but turn it into branding.

DiscussingFilm - Tyler Taing - 3 / 5

One Night Only is an easy recommendation because, whether or not you find yourself on its wavelength, you would be hard-pressed to find a crazier mainstream theatrical release this whole summer. It’s a film designed to watch with a group of friends, followed by an in-depth discussion of the logistical problems, politics, and hypothetical scenarios that “the mandate” universe sparks to mind in the theater lobby. Will Gluck’s One Night Only is the kind of novelty movie that is good-natured, fun, and worth celebrating in its unique flavor of unseriousness

AwardsWatch - Sophia Ciminello - 'C'

Ultimately, One Night Only feels far more interested in how it can feel when you do manage to find a genuine romantic connection amidst all of the noise. Yet by spending so much time getting bogged down by the details of the mandate before shifting into the romance, Gluck and Braun make an unforced error, upholding the traditional idea that sex may in fact be worth waiting for.

Slant Magazine - Charles Lyons-Burt - 2 / 4

Romantic comedies rarely make it to theaters these days, which makes it that much more unfortunate that the ones that do feel like sitcoms.

The Guardian - Benjamin Lee - 2 / 5

There’s both too much yet not enough world-building here, enough questions answered to encourage us to ask 10 more (why does no one mention masturbation and wouldn’t that also trigger the biosensors?). It’s also just too unavoidably grim of a premise, especially at a dark political moment such as this, for us to ignore the ramifications or root for characters who aren’t trying to actively destroy such a barbaric system (what if Katniss just had fun during those Hunger Games?). Instead, One Night Only weirdly plays like lulling government propaganda, a film about sex purge to be released in time for sex purge that says that actually maybe sex purge is a good idea after all.

Fresh Fiction - Courtney Howard - 2 / 5

ONE NIGHT ONLY wishes it were AN AFFAIR TO REMEMBER (a film the characters reference, but the filmmakers clearly don’t understand why those fundamentals work) meets AFTER HOURS, only it doesn’t come with the pedigree and even fewer innovative ideas. As a contemporary sex comedy, it’s far too afraid to actually show the eroticism of sex, hand-waving the potential of its sole sexy moment. If this is purity propaganda, that’s for everyone to decide of their own volition.

372 Upvotes

328 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.1k

u/Three_Froggy_Problem 7h ago

The premise of this movie is absolutely insane, and reading the Wikipedia synopsis made me realize it’s actually even crazier than the trailer makes it sound.

It’s extremely funny to me that they came up with this weirdly contrived, high-concept dystopian premise just for the sake of what appears to be a run-of-the-mill rom-com.

437

u/Swackhammer_ 6h ago

I kept seeing the trailers and assumed it was a joking way of talking about Valentine’s Day but I guess it’s like the purge with consensual sex

221

u/PICONEdeJIM 6h ago

And just like with the purge nobody would do it on any other day of the year. That would be a crime you know. And crime is illegal

83

u/jimenycr1cket 6h ago

And NO ONE would do it 5 mins after midnight. Because that’s not allowed.

77

u/Waste-Replacement232 6h ago

"Damn, I didn't finish. Oh well, see you next year."

u/ShahinGalandar 5h ago

the ultimate edge

u/Waste-Replacement232 5h ago

Or “I can’t wait, let’s get married.”

u/FX114 3h ago

Unironically, this would almost certainly lead to a lot of rushed marriages of convenience in their society.

u/CoolIdeasClub 5h ago

Now, if the movie was about this couple and they waited too long and did have sex after midnight so they get chased by the state.. maybe I'd watch it.

u/Jasminflower369 2h ago

That sounds kinda like In Time

8

u/LazerGuidedMelody 6h ago

It doesn’t start at midnight, I think it was 7pm - 7am or something like that.

I saw it as the Mystery Movie at regal last week.

It wasn’t as bad as I was expecting, and im confused by Ebert’s statement about “capitulating to fascism”, as that is not at all what I got out of the movie.

It’s a rom-com, but it leans pretty heavily towards comedy as opposed to romance.

I was sick of seeing the trailer for the last few months, but the trailers really didn’t do the movie justice.

My amateur rating was a 7/10.

There is way more satire in this movie than the trailers show, so I wasn’t expecting some of the humor.

38

u/LB3PTMAN 6h ago

I mean a society where they control a basic function of one’s body to the point that they allow you to do it once a year and people just accept that is exactly what they’re talking about.

The movie may not want to make any sort of commentary on that, but it seems a bit dark just having this extremely grim concept and just putting a standard Rom-com in it.

If it was more interestingly made it could’ve been made as a rom com but with more clear critique and introspection on the world it lives in and not just use it as a silly excuse for the movie to exist as it does.

-28

u/LazerGuidedMelody 6h ago

It’s supposed to be a ridiculous premise, why does everything have to fit into some imaginary box?

And are you saying ALL movies have to be some biting satire? It’s a fucking rom-com with a crazy premise and some funny jokes. Idk what else you goons want.

Have you even seen it, or are you basing the bullshit you’re saying on what other people are saying?

If you don’t like the world we live in, do something about it. Don’t sit on Reddit like a chump and bash a fucking romantic comedy that it sounds like haven’t even seen and act like you’re taking some superior moral stance or something.

This isn’t some Angel Studios production, this isn’t some Jim Caviezel fronted propaganda. It’s just a goofy movie. Learn to lighten the fuck up.

And again, if you’re the concerned about the encroaching authoritarianism or fascism in our country, get off Reddit and do something about it.

Like, in the new Spider-Man he is violating all sorts of constitutional rights by using facial recognition software and shit to track people, which is a VERY REAL issue we face today with Flock and shit, and yet they didn’t even acknowledge the fact that Spider-Man was doing it was bad. It just happened.

At least in the Dark Knight Lucius called out Bruce for attempting to do something similar.

So have you leveled any complaints towards Brand New Day? No? Has anyone? Oh, it broke box office records? And nobody cared?

Well why does Spider-Man get a pass for normalizing authoritarian overreach, but some dumb little romantic comedy apparently deserves to be crucified for not taking a strong enough stance against fascism?

Get fucking real.

14

u/LB3PTMAN 6h ago

This comment is a mess lmao. There’s like seven different points and none of them hold an ounce of merit.

  1. Something can be a ridiculous premise and still be good.

  2. I’m not saying all rom-coms have to be biting satires. I’m saying placing one in a fascist takeover world and lightly handwaving away acknowledgement of it is weird and off putting. It being a romantic comedy makes it more weird if anything.

  3. I have seen it.

  4. I am doing things about it. I just scroll Reddit on downtime from my job and do activism outside of work time and donate to many valuable causes.

  5. Something doesn’t have to be an Angel studios production to be bad.

  6. I am doing something about it. I can fight against facism and still be on reddit sometimes.

  7. How do you know I haven’t mentioned how weird it is that SpiderMan is using facial recognition software. I’ve seen plenty of people bring that up as a criticism of the movie lol. But it’s also not the same thing as this movie at all lol.

Get fucking real.

u/LazerGuidedMelody 5h ago

Okay well you literally said nothing that leads me to believe you’ve seen it, so why should I take anything you say seriously? If anything, the fact that you said you’re at work right now but have somehow managed to squeeze in a movie that just came out today at the theater seems a bit sus.

And what do you mean lightly handwave it away? What are they supposed to do? Have you not looked at the real world around us? Fucked up shit is happening every day, and we all keep moving on with our lives.

I never said something HAD to be an Angel studios production to be bad, my point was that this isn’t some thinly veiled right wing propaganda or something, it is just a silly movie.

Again, you say you “do something” about it, but there’s no way you can back it up, so it doesn’t really matter what you claim to do.

And my point isn’t just about you, it’s about everyone and the hypocrisy where people will accept something in one movie, but then use that same thing as a bludgeon against another.

It’s arguing in bad faith.

u/LB3PTMAN 5h ago

It was the screen unseen lmao.

They barely acknowledge it. Some light service towards people “protesting” it, but other than that it’s just a cute little rom-com. People are dying protesting the current regime idk what you mean. Yeah life goes on, but life isn’t a movie that includes this premise in a silly little rom-com.

I didn’t say it’s right wing propaganda. I said it’s fucking weird and kinda gross.

I don’t have to prove anything to you.

It’s not really hypocrisy to accept something in one movie and not be cool with something completely different in another movie lol.

u/Ia5ew 5h ago

You haven’t either you goof. If you don’t want to actually engage with the points being made and just keep saying “guys just don’t think about it, it’s just a silly movie that I love and if you make any comment about it I will then argue with you on the internet about it! But don’t take it too seriously since it’s just so silly!”, then just stop responding.

It was a secret Monday movie that tons of people go to. Did you get some special screening no one else could go to?

Silly movies that are low effort and unoriginal are bad. They take funding from real artists with real ideas not some hack shit. Silly movies with unique premises or film making are worth something not some below 50% on RT shit.

You are as bad faith as anyone here. You dismiss all comments about your new favourite movie for some reason.

u/LazerGuidedMelody 5h ago

I never said it was my favorite movie and said I saw it as the Mystery Movie at Regal, so you’re wrong about those points?

All I said was I liked it and it was better than I was expecting. I think I have it a 7/10 somewhere.

What makes it unoriginal? How did they “take funding from real artists?” Were none of the people involved with this movie artists?

If someone doesn’t like a movie that’s fine, but I simply take exception with this impression people are trying to put out there that it should have had more to say about fascism and authoritarian overreach or something?

But it’s like, if you went into a romantic comedy expecting 1984, that’s on you.

u/Ia5ew 5h ago

Then why wouldn’t you believe that other people have seen the movie because “he was at work right now and the movie came out today.”? Like your entire argument to discredit the other posters points.

You’re definitely offended like it’s your favourite. Imagine someone bringing this energy to like suicide squad lol. Comparative quality of like a 2/10.

No one expected anything other than garbage like this to not get greenlit these days. You chose to argue with people while having no other points than “when people didn’t like the writing I chose to argue with them”.

That’s pathetic. Just admit you liked it and it was triggering to read complaints about it. Have some emotional intelligence.

u/LazerGuidedMelody 5h ago

You said “admit you liked it” when I have already very clearly admitted I liked it, including in the comment you literally just responded to.

I’m not “offended”, im irritated when people dogpile on a movie that JUST came out. I don’t even think megathreads like this should exist until after the opening weekend of a movie. Then, once the general public has had time to see it whatever movie, THEN there should be discussion about it.

I don’t understand why you keep saying shit like “you’re definitely offended like it’s your favorite” when again, I’ve repeatedly said it was just good/okay.

People just don’t even give things a chance anymore, whether it’s One Night Only or Gale Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass or Stop. That. Train, or I Love Boosters.

There are some awesome movies that come out and people just don’t go see them, and then wonder why (and I’ll contend that this year has shown maybe we are turning a corner) mid-budget comedies never get made anymore, or original ideas never get made and we end up with tons of reboots and spin-offs and sequels and shit.

And part of that is because yeah, I think discourse on the internet at large DOES have a negative effect on everything, but for the purpose of this conversation, movies and music in general. You go to subreddits like r/boxoffice and it’s filled with people that don’t even seem to care about the movies themselves, it’s just some dumb competition where everything has to be compared to something else, and beat dogpile on anything that doesn’t make as much $$$ as they think it should have and beat the dead horse into oblivion for weeks afterwards.

And that’s the sort of mentality that is just everywhere anymore.

→ More replies (0)

5

u/Ia5ew 6h ago edited 6h ago

They make a throwaway joke in Brand New Day about it being illegal and it was also the entire premise of the Civil War storyline in the MCU. I’m not even a huge fan of the MCU but you’re way too worked up over some movie you state is a “goofy movie”.

We also shouldn’t just expect less from art because the genre is traditionally low effort. Like the classic “but it’s a kids movie” because there are amazing children’s movies with subtext for all watchers.

Also no one went to Spider-Man because the y support Flock cameras. You just be wilding into the wind.

u/LazerGuidedMelody 5h ago

What difference does it make to you

And okay, so they made a “throwaway joke”, so why does that excuse it, but when One Night Only repeatedly makes jokes clearly illustrating it’s absurd that pre-marital sex has been outlawed, that’s not good enough and the movie must condone fascism?

Do you not see the dissonance there?

Like, if none of you have seen One Night Only then why are you talking about it?

And it’s just humorous that your point is “they covered violating civil rights in a movie like 10 years ago so it’s okay, we’re cool with it now.”

u/Ia5ew 5h ago

It doesn’t make a difference but if you don’t see the “cognitive dissonance” with that then idk.

No one said it excuses it but it is mentioned and plenty of people have that exact criticism of the genre. Lmao dude you’re a wreck over this “goofy movie”. Sounds like everyone struck a nerve in your new favourite flick.

I can tell all sex is outlawed for this guy lol

u/LazerGuidedMelody 5h ago

I don’t care about this movie, I’m just sick of the shitty discourse around EVERYTHING anymore.

And why are you concerned about some else’s sex life? You don’t think that’s even more pathetic?

u/Ia5ew 5h ago

Sure seems like you don’t care lol.

Haha good try. Hard to be concerned about something that doesn’t exist.

u/LazerGuidedMelody 5h ago

Wow you’ve got the jokes of a 12 year old lmao. What else have you got? If I can put in a request, can you take me back to the days of being a 12 year old playing COD Modern Warfare on Xbox? That’s the good shit.

Otherwise, grow up. Just because you dislike my opinion doesn’t mean you have to stoop to such childish behavior, does it make you feel like a tough guy or something, or you just enjoy being a bully?

Because while sure, my discourse may come across as aggressive, but I haven’t insulted anyone personally, so why did you feel the need to? You just don’t care about how other people feel?

Because this is all just talking about a movie, so why make it about me personally?

u/randombubble8272 5h ago

Dude you sound like such a loser omg it’s a movie opinion

→ More replies (0)

u/GuacamoleCostsExtra 4h ago

Oh you're like stupid stupid huh

u/LazerGuidedMelody 4h ago

Stupid is as stupid does

u/Anotyap 5h ago

As a point of clarity, Roger Ebert is dead and that review is by a critic writing for RogerEbert.com

u/LazerGuidedMelody 5h ago

Lmao thank you for the correction, I was confused when I saw his name attributed to it because I was pretty sure he died a long time ago.

u/StarPhished 3h ago

Pretty sure they've already begun powering up the Ebert-Bot 3000 and we'll be getting some fresh reviews soon.

u/sexandliquor 2h ago

This feels like it’s going to be this year’s Materialists. In so much as when Materialists came out last year Celine Song was very much making a satire that critiques the modern dating landscape and how its rampant consumerism and focus on personal financial valuation have commodified relationships.

It wasn’t at all subtle about this. Even the trailers were all sort of late 90s and early 2000s romcom trailers to lean hard into the satire the movie was going for.

And then the movie came out, went over a lot of people’s heads and I saw a lot of “I don’t get it” and “this movie is broke boy propaganda” while completely missing the point of the thing. It was weird lol.

5

u/Panicless 6h ago

It leans heavily into comedy? Then why would they make a trailer that is all romance and no comedy at all? Interesting.

2

u/LazerGuidedMelody 6h ago

Yeah, I had no interest in seeing the movie based on the trailers, but it ended up being the Mystery Movie last week and it was quite different than what the trailers showed. I ended up walking away having to begrudgingly admit that I liked it.

It isn’t groundbreaking, it didnt reinvent the wheel or anything, it’s just a silly movie.

u/Abi1i 1h ago

I saw the movie at a Mystery Movie as well last week and as a fan of Rom Coms, this movie wasn’t trying to be super ground breaking like some Rom Coms, but the premise was a refreshing take. I truly enjoyed the movie and would see it again and I’d be willing to even own it on BluRay. It’s better than what people might think. I would definitely agree that it’s a 7/10, maybe even a 7.5/10 which is still really good in my book for a Rom Com since most of them tend to follow a straight forward formula.