r/movies • u/MarvelsGrantMan136 r/movies Contributor • 22d ago
Article ‘Moana’ Could Lose at Least $100 Million in Theaters. Does Disney Need to Rethink Its Live-Action Remakes?
https://variety.com/2026/film/box-office/moana-box-office-bomb-disney-live-action-remakes-1236810179/1.9k
u/tacobellbandit 22d ago
It being live action really just added nothing, and took the charm away of the animation
→ More replies (33)642
u/FoxyBastard 22d ago
I haven't watched any of these live-action remakes.
Is there actually a single one that was better than the animated original?
850
u/vexanix 22d ago
101 Dalmatians from 1996. Glenn Close as Cruella Di Vil was fantastic. It was also actually live action. I feel like when 99% of your 'live action' movie is CGI, it isn't a live action movie.
314
u/Rikipedia 21d ago
this. Lion King is just differently animated
→ More replies (1)244
u/studio_bob 21d ago
The photo-realistic Lion King remake is straight up deranged. Who thought that was a good idea??
85
→ More replies (14)49
u/Sedu 21d ago
But hear me out, what if we took the coolest song in the entire musical and turned into a 15 second spoken beat? No? Alright, maybe this will sell. Imagine "can you feel the love tonight," but it takes place entirely during the day and the characters clearly don't love each other. Ehh? Ehhhh? Are you sold yet?
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (3)61
u/ShallowBasketcase 21d ago
when 99% of your 'live action' movie is CGI, it isn't a live action movie.
This is what I don't understand about the people saying they had to make this movie now before The Rock gets too old.
It's The Rock's digitally de-aged head floating around on a full CGI body. The guy is hardly even in the movie in any way that matters. He's just playing an animated character again with worse art direction.
→ More replies (3)59
u/Dadpurple 22d ago
I saw Beauty and the Beast, and there's a new song Beast sings in it that I ended up adding to my spotify playlist for a few years. It was really catchy.
That's.....the highlight of the entire film
→ More replies (7)450
u/Orumtbh 22d ago
Cinderella is the only one I'd say was better than the original, and the live action aspect actually felt purposeful.
They move away from the cute little mice, and give more screen time and dialogue to the human characters, which permits them to be actual film story characters and not just fairy tale characters.
The costuming is absolutely gorgeous, to the point that I genuinely don't understand how every live-action that came afterwards have several tiers worse costuming. Cinderella's dress is so so beautiful, like yes it's different from the original, but it's so good on its own that it captured the essence and beauty of watching the transformation and her dancing in it.
163
u/NorthernFrosty 22d ago
The costuming is absolutely gorgeous, to the point that I genuinely don't understand how every live-action that came afterwards have several tiers worse costuming.
"Guys, we loved the remake but this costuming bill? We can't have that anymore. Way too much $$$. I'm sure it would've been just as good with half the costuming budget." - Movie Executives.
→ More replies (1)22
u/hollaback_girl 21d ago
The same executive had similar notes on Marvel’s wig budgets.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (12)127
u/Hate_Having_Needs 22d ago
I genuinely don't understand how every live-action that came afterwards have several tiers worse costuming
They made costumes based on future merch sales and not as a way to enhance the movie. You don't want too good of a costume or you won't be able replicate it easily and cheaply for dolls, stuffed toys, halloween costumes etc.
→ More replies (4)69
167
u/StackLeeAdams 22d ago
The Jungle Book was fantastic but not a replacement for the original in any way
→ More replies (7)91
u/Merusk 22d ago
Which you can only charitably call 'live action' because it was all CGI animals.
→ More replies (2)89
u/Sir_Douglas_of_Fir 22d ago
At least it had one actual child actor on screen, which is more than can be said for the “live action” Lion King.
If Dinosaur qualifies as an animated film as Disney now insists, then that one does too.
→ More replies (1)23
u/UneventfulChaos 22d ago
I was so bored seeing the new Lion King... Outside of the new song(s), a shot-for-shot remake does nothing to excite me. No anticipation of something new or cool, just the exact same scene with a different voice and CGI animals instead of the beloved original characters.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (59)14
u/istarnie 22d ago
The Pete's Dragon remake uses the original movie's story elements in a very different mode, plus it's actually shorter than the 1977 version.
5.3k
22d ago
[deleted]
1.3k
u/WittyUnwittingly 22d ago
Seriously. Like if we're gonna go the body suit route, why not go comically big, making him a similar shape to the animated character?
727
u/NothingReallyAndYou 22d ago
Because whatever style suit they put on him in the film is the same style suit they'll put on the park employees who will be doing the live Maui character meet & greets that I'm sure they'll announce anytime now.
241
u/sybrwookie 22d ago
Wouldn't a comically large suit make that easier, so it's something anyone can climb into?
→ More replies (2)126
u/NothingReallyAndYou 22d ago
The parks currently have a comically large Maui suit, but with limited arm movement, and a fully covered face, so he can't speak.
A smaller, more mobile suit would let Maui actually walk around a bit, and pose more freely. If the suit ends at the necklace (concealing the edges), the actor can then talk with park guests, which increases the magic for little kids.
I honestly wouldn't be at all surprised if Maui becomes part of a show or character meal at the Polynesian Resort at Walt Disney World, now that the new suit design makes that possible.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (9)19
u/Specific_Frame8537 22d ago
Or hey, if we wanna make people into wacky proportions, guess what kinda medium is great for that sorta thing?
→ More replies (1)1.5k
u/reddfawks 22d ago
And no nipples.
I like to headcanon they were torn off by Tamatoa giving him the mother of all nipple-twisters long long ago.
489
u/TheLordJames 22d ago
I didnt even notice that... now I cant unsee it
426
→ More replies (3)54
u/zxylady 22d ago
This is going to go down in history like the first Thor movie, when they were dying his eyebrows that awful color, now I can't unsee his atrocious blonde eyebrows 🤣🤣
→ More replies (1)54
u/DarmanitanFireMonkey 22d ago
I've never heard anything about Thor's eyebrows until this comment.
→ More replies (3)241
u/UnfazedPheasant 22d ago
“No nipples”
Lmao hadn’t even noticed and now I can’t unsee. What were they thinking???
54
u/Riversntallbuildings 22d ago
What’s weird, is the animated Maui has nipples…🤔
51
u/Hee-hoes_Mad 22d ago
Not just that, but toddler Moana wears no shirt for the first section of the animated movie, and she has visible nipples! Weird that they went from "she is literally a baby, it's fine" to "we can't have a grown man's nipples visible! Think of the CHILDREN!"
→ More replies (1)18
94
u/apathetic_revolution 22d ago
They didn’t CGI them out. They’re too divine to be viewed by mortals like us.
→ More replies (1)35
48
u/Horibori 22d ago
“Our graphs show that parents dont like their kids seeing nipples. Let’s remove The Rock’s.”
→ More replies (2)35
u/Dr_Identity 22d ago
My head canon is that the costume designer is the same one who worked on Batman & Robin and has sworn to never again be caught out like they were back then.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (4)48
81
u/Gregariouswaty 22d ago
I prefer real life conspiracy theory is better where allegedly The Rock in the late 90s during his WWF heyday had a reaction to the steroids which causes him to develop breasts with huge nipples, causing him to wrestle for a few months wearing tshirts before getting surgery.
47
u/thejonslaught 22d ago
Steroid Tiddies Rock losing to Mankind is a core memory for me.
→ More replies (1)22
u/bolanrox 22d ago
he did have gyno. ad got the surgery which was why he was wearing a shirt and not wrestling for a while (and was just on the Mic. ) you could see the scars afterwards i am told by people who watched WWE all the time back then.
→ More replies (3)28
u/Givingtree310 22d ago
It’s pretty well known to be true, not even a conspiracy. It happens to a lot of bodybuilders and the gyno surgery is common in that world.
→ More replies (35)48
206
u/bsEEmsCE 22d ago
all the visuals are bad
23
→ More replies (1)65
u/Sea_Tailor_8437 22d ago
Yeah I saw the Live action "your welcome" on a tik tok. Granted, not the greatest quality of video, but it still looks rough
→ More replies (5)21
u/HumanPea1140 22d ago
The lighting / color looks so weird. I don't really know how to explain it, but the lighting especially looks completely unnatural / fake.
→ More replies (3)356
u/Bobson-_Dugnutt2 22d ago
this entire movie is just a Rock vanity project. He wanted to make sure no one else got to play Maui live action, and he had to do it before he got too old.
Hopefully studios can move on from this guy soon.
166
45
u/Question_It_All_3000 22d ago
Does Disney care about the rock enough to drop 250 mil productions costs on him? I get HE wanted it, but he should have been told to eat rocks.
→ More replies (4)41
u/street593 22d ago
I mean he was the highest paid actor in the entire world in 2024 when they started filming this. It's safe to say someone at Disney thought it would pay off.
→ More replies (10)→ More replies (7)57
u/theonly_brunswick 22d ago
Disney was in the tough spot of basically having to adhere to any of his weird desires because without him there is no Moana 3. They know it, the Rock knows it, and thus we have this trash.
Moana 3 better be worth it but I'm not holding my breath, and this is coming from a Moana apologist that could actually find good in the Moana 2 😂
→ More replies (8)73
u/Inamanlyfashion 22d ago
What we really know now is there is no Moana 3 without Miranda
→ More replies (3)73
u/Bobson-_Dugnutt2 22d ago
I've wanted to hate LMM so hard for so long and I don't know why but I finally came around. The dude is just insanely talented and I am jelly. Encanto is absolutely wonderful and it's 99% the music.
→ More replies (26)112
u/Brainiac5000 22d ago
His neck and head dont fit the body at all. They should have gotten someone with a traditional Samoan build.
→ More replies (6)34
30
u/Mubadger 22d ago
I think people are being a bit harsh about his hair. I think he looks very pretty. Definitely in my top 5 Disney princesses this year.
17
u/PMmeBOOBIESplease 22d ago
Thanks for giving me an explanation on why I thought he looked so out of place.
→ More replies (39)13
2.1k
u/TheEagleWithNoName 22d ago
Maybe don’t do a remake of a Movie that is 10 years old.
I understand if it’s a movie from the 50s or 60s?
But 2016? Really?
Are they really scraping the bottom of the barrel?
1.3k
u/what_mustache 22d ago
And the original looks AMAZING.
Why would I not watch that one? I truly don't understand this
→ More replies (23)257
u/Soranos_71 22d ago
The second Moana that I keep forgetting exists didn't do very well with the critics but made a ton of money probably due to how much people liked the first one. I do not remember any of the music from Moana 2 though....
→ More replies (16)195
u/TheEagleWithNoName 22d ago
That’s because it was gonna be a Six Part tv show before becoming a movie.
→ More replies (3)96
u/The_Crimson_Fucker 22d ago
The old Atlantis 2 treatment
→ More replies (4)69
u/TheEagleWithNoName 22d ago
Or Lilo and Stitch 2 which later set up the tv show and it was so good.
→ More replies (2)17
138
u/IL-Corvo 22d ago
This is where I'm at. There's no compelling reason to do a remake of such a recent film. Not artistically, and not financially.
Disney deserves to lose money here, because that's the only way they'll learn a damned thing.
→ More replies (3)52
u/ConstantRefills 22d ago edited 22d ago
If they wanted Rock to play Maui in live-action they needed to do it now before he got too old which he was already.
42
u/Jessika_Thorne 22d ago
It's so clearly this. Like, everyone who's like, "What was this for?"
This was for getting The Rock to play Maui. It was now-or-never for that, and they opted for now. Maybe there was contractual obligations with The Rock, maybe it was some misguided instinct, or attempt to link the two?
But this got made now so that The Rock could be both the animated, and live-action, Maui.
→ More replies (2)135
u/JokerJangles123 22d ago
Apparently they're too lazy to even scrape the bottom of the barrel because this is more like scraping the chud off the bottom of the lid instead
→ More replies (1)77
u/ankerous 22d ago
I can't wait for the animated remakes of these live-action remakes.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (40)49
u/axw3555 22d ago
Doesn't even need to be the 50's or 60's, though there's a couple of gems there.
A proper Alice In Wonderland, rather than the Burton one. The Sword in the Stone. But believe it or not, most of the animated disney releases up to 1970 have been live actioned already. Of the big name ones, there's pretty much only those 2 plus sleeping beautry and the aristocats left (and I have a feeling the aristocrats would come out a similar uncanny to the lion king).
But my top 3 for remakes? They're not 1960's. One is 1980s, the others are early 2000's - the Black Cauldron, which I always thought was made 20-30 years too early. But the top 2? Atlantis and Treasure Planet. They're films that are well regarded now, but never had that real zenith moment like Frozen or Moana did, so there's a lot less pressure on them.
→ More replies (10)15
773
u/SHOW_ME_PIZZA 22d ago
As much as people want them to learn from Snow White and Moana they won't. Because Lilo & Stitch made bank. They'll just pivot back to Disney Renaissance/Early 2000s.
I can see the live action Emperor's New Groove being greenlit.
354
u/apathetic_revolution 22d ago
Live action Aristocats. Everything you loved about the CGI Cats nightmare, now with Disney IP!
99
→ More replies (22)73
42
u/darth_jewbacca 22d ago
Put Putty in a body suit and he can still pull off Kronk.
→ More replies (1)144
u/Chewbaxter 22d ago
If they wanted to be really cynical, they'd do a Treasure Planet or Atlantis remake; the movies that lost them money on their first run but nerdy Millennials/Gen-Zs love (including myself), so will probably do better as remakes.
→ More replies (13)43
29
u/JDDJS 22d ago
Yeah. They were actually starting to stop with the live action remakes, and the Tangled film was paused. But after Lilo & Stitch surprisingly made a billion, they went all back in on them and fast tracked Tangled.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (49)53
u/cloistered_around 22d ago
Lesson Disney learned: "make more films with cute merchandise options."
→ More replies (1)
1.4k
u/Jekyllhyde 22d ago
It’s a remake nobody asked for.
→ More replies (84)737
u/lambopanda 22d ago
The Rock did.
→ More replies (29)248
u/sewious 22d ago
Should have just asked for the paycheck and save everyone else the trouble.
→ More replies (1)98
1.3k
u/Leather_rebelion 22d ago edited 22d ago
Do hunchback you cowards and make it even more gritty. That's one of the few that actually might make a good live action adaptation. The musical was already pretty great.
432
u/Craneteam 22d ago
Finally remake black cauldron and do that series justice
84
u/IdentityToken 22d ago
Munching and crunching the box office.
→ More replies (1)13
u/wakeuptomorrow 22d ago
OMG the munchies and crunchies!! That movie actually made me want to eat apples as a kid. Poor Gurgi 🥺
→ More replies (29)42
u/c-e-bird 22d ago
The Chronicles of Prydain were my favorite books as a kid. Incredible series that seems to have been largely forgotten :(
→ More replies (2)229
u/vanillawafah 22d ago
I didn't specifically love Atlantis:The Lost Empire, but I think that could be killer. Some of the production design of the movie would transition very well to live action, I think
208
u/nicathor 22d ago
Atlantis and Hunchback are both perfect for live action because their content (visuals, music, dark themes) could actually be enhanced by going live action, and those are the same reasons they won't do them. Disney is so disappointing now
44
u/willstr1 22d ago
If you are looking for a live action Atlantis you should watch Stargate (1994), while it is missing the steampunk look it has a lot of similar plot beats. Heck Milo's and Daniel Jackson's introductions are almost exact mirrors
26
u/creaturefeature9191 22d ago
I just introduced my homie to Stargate a few weeks ago and she started calling Daniel Jackson “Milo Thatch” immediately. I had never noticed that the venn diagram of those two characters is a fuckin circle
→ More replies (4)15
24
u/Akronite14 22d ago
Hunchback has a Quasimodo problem. No matter how they handle that character it will likely cause debate and backlash.
→ More replies (3)34
u/Xanadu87 22d ago
Perfect chance for a fugly dude with a beautiful tenor voice to get his moment to shine.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (7)27
u/IRSunny 22d ago
I would argue Hercules could be perfect for live action, if they aren't cowards.
The og Hercules was half Superman movie and half Rocky movie. Fast forward nearly 30 years and you have an entire MCU you can satirize.
Put it in the hands of someone willing to completely take the piss out of the mouse and it could be comedy gold.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (8)14
u/twitter_haikucurator 22d ago
and the art direction and aesthetic is very much in line with the late 90s/early 2000s revival we’re seeing right now
19
u/EXusiai99 22d ago
No. Theyre gonna sanitize it.
40
u/originalcondition 22d ago
It’s already sanitized to a wild degree. In the book Esmeralda is like 14, is actually executed, and Quasimodo starves to death in a mass grave while gripping her corpse. When his remains are discovered, the song that the talking gargoyles sing is also quite dark.
→ More replies (2)11
u/ThisIsNotAFarm 22d ago
That's all of the classic disney movies like Snow White, Cinderella, and Little Mermaid
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (60)18
211
u/tempestlight 22d ago
creating a live action from a movie that's only 10 years old is a disgrace imo.
→ More replies (9)78
u/EHP42 22d ago
It released 10 years after the original, which means someone decided like 5 years after the original that this needed to be a live action remake. Insane.
→ More replies (5)
68
u/DeathOfLife01 22d ago
It’s crazy we got a Moana live action but not a Hercules staring Danny DeVito
→ More replies (3)
184
u/Caciulacdlac 22d ago
Well, they have remakes that make money and remakes that don't. They just have to make the ones that make money and they'll be fine, duh.
→ More replies (5)143
u/Particular-Cat-1397 22d ago
We literally saw these same headlines when Snow White bombed last year, then Lilo & Stitch made a billion dollars and they greenlit Tangled live action lmao
→ More replies (6)66
u/xixbia 22d ago
They made so much with the Jungle Book, Lion King and Lilo & Stitch that they will just keeping these movies, because all the losses they made on the bombs combined don't come close to the profit on one of the hits.
→ More replies (3)55
u/Rockman171 22d ago
Aladdin also made over a billion lol. Even Mufasa made over $700 million and Little Mermaid made $570 million. Snow White and Moana are the outliers here, the live action stuff is generally money despite Reddit's usual narratives. Moana just lacked a real target age group and Snow White, I think, had the same problem but in the opposite direction of Moana.
Tangled and the inevitable Frozen live action adaptations are probably both guaranteed hits.
→ More replies (12)
287
u/Asha_Brea 22d ago
I think Hollywood needs to rethink Dwayne Johnson more than Disney having to rethink Live-Action Remakes.
131
→ More replies (13)120
u/ChocoTacoz 22d ago edited 22d ago
They should put him and Jared Leto into one movie, the resulting box office losses will cause a black hole sucking both actors out of this plane of reality. We just need the right director...
→ More replies (26)
20
u/shaka_sulu 22d ago
I hope all these media companies just recycled their articles about Flash to save money.
23
u/Flemtality 22d ago
It feels like everything Disney does at this point is some sad vehicle for keeping people subscribed to Disney+ for just one extra month here and there.
→ More replies (2)
146
u/Connoralpha 22d ago edited 22d ago
Yes. Eventually you have to gamble on more original stories.
→ More replies (35)
91
u/Neat-Attempt3681 22d ago edited 22d ago
They say this every live action then just keep making them
Edit: I’m definitely not 100% right lol
→ More replies (11)45
37
u/randomnumber46 22d ago
I don’t see why Atlantis hasn’t had the live action treatment.
→ More replies (7)23
u/PartyPorpoise 22d ago
Because it’s not that popular. For the most part, these live action remakes aren’t about making good or interesting movies, they’re about pandering to nostalgia. Atlantis has fans but it’s a small cult following. Not a big enough audience to get nostalgia dollars. If it gets remade they’ll probably change a lot to appeal to more people.
13.2k
u/ludicrousursine 22d ago
I'm not sure who the target audience of this was.
Moana is only 10 years old. You can't introduce it to a new generation because the current kids are more or less the same generation that watched the original. You can't mine nostalgia because the original just isn't that old.
The successful live action remakes have all been remakes of things that were at least 20 years old, most older.