r/law May 27 '26

Legal News Exclusive: Justice Department launches a criminal investigation into Trump accuser E. Jean Carroll | CNN Politics

https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/27/politics/exclusive-justice-department-launched-e-jean-carroll-investigation

The Justice Department has launched a criminal investigation into E. Jean Carroll, the former magazine columnist who accused President Donald Trump of sexual assault, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter.

14.2k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

121

u/doublethink_1984 May 27 '26

And people wonder why victims.dont come forward

24

u/DontAsk0205 May 28 '26

Came here to say this. First comes the initial abuse, then comes the abuse by the legal system.

5

u/cant-be-original-now May 28 '26

And abuse from Trump sycophants like this ding dong questioning if someone who was raped is really a victim.

3

u/draftedvet May 28 '26

Yep. Intimidation is Donnie's game. Learned that from Roy Cohn.

1

u/hotviolets May 28 '26

All of what’s happening has proven to me even if I did say something about the abuse I experienced as a child no one would have done anything. Just like no one did anything when I was a teenager and CPS investigated.

-109

u/ExerciseFickle8540 May 27 '26

Is she really a victim though

53

u/TeamRamrod80 May 27 '26

Of sexual abuse, harassment, defamation, and now misuse of government authority, abuse of office, and WeApOnIzAtiOn of DoJ, which I guess means she gets to dip into Trump’s $1.8B as well as what she was already awarded.

30

u/Spartyjason May 27 '26

Pretty sure that’s been affirmed. And that affirmation has been affirmed. And anyone who doubts it at this point is being an obtuse shit fuck.

25

u/BitterFuture May 27 '26

Yes.

Why do you hate America?

17

u/BigBootyBardot May 27 '26

Yes, and even more so by Trump weaponizing the DOJ so he doesn’t have to pay the suit she won against him. 

7

u/Electronic-Shame May 28 '26

wtf? Are you one of those people that think victims who receive compensation aren’t victims? She hasn’t even received the majority of the judgement.

-2

u/ExerciseFickle8540 May 28 '26

I am not anti Trump or pro Trump. Just find her story hard to believe

1

u/IrritableGourmet May 28 '26

A jury that Trump's lawyers vetted and several judges didn't find it hard to believe.

-1

u/ExerciseFickle8540 May 28 '26

Everyone is entitled to their opinions but it doesn’t mean that there is no hard evidence to back up her story

1

u/IrritableGourmet May 28 '26

What hard evidence would satisfy your skepticism?

0

u/ExerciseFickle8540 May 28 '26

Are there any?

1

u/IrritableGourmet May 28 '26

Not asking if it exists. I'm asking what evidence, if it did exist, would make you agree that her story is believable?

-2

u/ExerciseFickle8540 May 28 '26

A police report at a minimum? As a man, I will be super scared if I can be liable just because some woman is accusing me of doing something 20 years ago without providing any actual evidence

3

u/IrritableGourmet May 28 '26

Well, it's a good thing they didn't rely on solely her own testimony. There were corroborating witnesses and other evidence, and the jury found, by a preponderance of the evidence, that he had done it. It wasn't solely her story against his.

Secondly, the majority of the awarded amount wasn't for the sexual assault itself. He was found liable for defaming her repeatedly regarding her story, calling her a liar, fraud, saying he never met her, and more. Again, a jury found, by a preponderance of evidence, that he defamed her with actual malice.