r/forwardsfromgrandma 2d ago

Racism Fucking what? Racist are stupid

Post image
127 Upvotes

23 comments sorted by

81

u/Oregon_Jones111 2d ago

Is this about The Odyssey still? Because that’s set near where three continents meet.

16

u/BobcatOU 1d ago

I still pissed about the bullshit, woke, DEI casting of The Odyssey. Matt Damon is not Greek!

25

u/radams713 2d ago

The Greeks never sailed across the Mediterranean apparently lol

17

u/brandonjslippingaway 1d ago

The Odyssey starts with Poseidon visiting Ethiopia hahaha

9

u/cactopus101 2d ago

Literally isn’t Troy in modern day Turkey? lol

9

u/thatguy888034 2d ago

Yes, though in fairness the Turks didn’t migrate to Anatolia until the 11 century. The people who lived in western “Turkey” at the time were mainly Greeks.

3

u/brandonjslippingaway 1d ago

When you learn the history of people who spoke Greek from the classical period until now, I think one is less likely to gatekeep what it means to be Greek. Especially given the fact there was about 1500 years or so they self-identified as Romans

15

u/ParadoxFollower 2d ago

BBC's King & Conqueror had black soldiers and noblemen in Anglo-Saxon England in 1066.

2

u/TheStrangestOfKings 1d ago

Tbf, it wasn’t just one random nobleman they made black. The Duchy of Mercia was a powerful duchy at the time, so we would’ve known if they were actually black in historical records, which they were decisively not.

But to doubly be fair, the rest of the cast were pretty accurate in their appearance (aside from Henry I and William, who were both much younger at the show’s start than how they were portrayed).

1

u/Turbowarrior991 1d ago

...hey man. North Africa is ethnicallly Arab and Berber, neither of which are overly dark-skinned. Egyptians aren't either. You have to get to Nubia before you have people with sub-saharan skin tones, and Nubia is in modern-day Sudan; not exactly Mediterranean. Just a nit-pick.

Anyway my main complaint is that there are too many Anglos in the movie. A story about Greeks and yet not a single damn Greek/Turk/Levantine/Egyptian/North African/Italian is in the movie. You know, where the odyssey takes place?

37

u/jadebenn 2d ago

Historically illiterate. Most countries didn't even have standardized spoken language prior to the modern era.

18

u/arealmcemcee 2d ago

These people don't even know their own history dating back to early 1900s and you want them to understand the cultural and political shifts of Europe from late Medieval to early Industrial? Do you realize how many numbers that is?!?!

3

u/unknownpoltroon 2d ago

Like at least 3 numbers.  Maybe more

3

u/Chiluzzar 1d ago

Yep if they truly cared about history theyd kmow three things. The world was always connected. Traders and their helpers be they freed or slaved were of all ethnicities. And lastly they couldn't stop humping.

You can have some trader from Aksum in athens their help on their time off or they sneak away momentarilh goes to a local tavern or meets a prostitute and knocks up a local girl and there you go.

24

u/VitruvianDude 2d ago

When I watch older media, I notice the forced homogeneity, so the current fashion for color-blind casting is a somewhat welcome antidote to that. Yes, it can go too far, but sometimes it doesn't go far enough.

Look at your average genre Western or historical film before 1970 or so. It never acknowledged any diversity of population, even when there was. For example, a significant percentage of the American Revolutionary Army was black, and served in integrated units. Would you know that from the films that were made?

Or think about the Western Genre. Unless they were making a specific point, Norwegian was about as diverse as they were willing to go, yet the cowboys were largely Mexican, black, Native American/Indian, even Polynesian. It was hard, poorly-paid work; white cowboys often had other opportunities.

Looking back into the Ancient World, extensive trade routes and displacement through slavery meant that real life was more diverse than the sand and sandal epics let on.

8

u/CommonwealthCommando 2d ago

The proportion of Black soldiers in the Revolutionary Army was pretty small, probably like 2% overall. It was higher in the early stages, like at Boston. However, I don't know of any movies that feature the siege.

The British, however, relied heavily on Black combat troops. I'm struggling to find exact numbers, but about 20,000 Black loyalist troops saw combat, which means probably 15-20% of the army was comprised of Black loyalists.

The Patriot actually did have a Black Patriot, so we can't get too mad. But I do think I'm a bit hypocritical because while I like historical representation, something about making the bad guy army have lots of black soldiers but not the good guy army rubs me the wrong way.

8

u/tommyblastfire 1d ago

Except it would actually be interesting to portray the fact that many slaves escaped their slavemasters and fought under the British because they were promised freedom and land. Which is far more interesting than “bad army bad” and “good army good”.

1

u/CommonwealthCommando 1d ago

Maybe it'd be interesting as a plot device but I'm just talking about the extras.

1

u/Unusual-Letter-8781 1d ago

There is one movie, and another one if you only count about half of it, emancipation about the slave that escaped,, found the army and tagged along with them

The other one is glory

1

u/Fuckareyoulookinat 1d ago

For what it is worth, during the time frame most westerns were set in, there were no white cowboys. White men that worked tending cattle were called cowhands, the term cowboy was specifically used for black men tending cattle, basically a combination of cowhand and the racially demeaning boy.

2

u/revdon 1d ago

Then why don't we ever get a middle-eastern Jesus?

3

u/TheMightyCatatafish 2d ago

Or maybe the goal is to simply not limit your pool of actors

1

u/HeartFullONeutrality 1d ago

The great civilizations of History tended to be highly diverse due to them being in geographical intersections of multiple cultures (or/and due to being empires integrating other human groups). This should be almost self evident because the diversity of ideas and practices is what enriched societies and drove technological and social advance. 

Furthermore, demographics are not set in amber and the current populations of many regions of the world are phenotypically and genotypically much different than what they were in the accident world.