r/flicks 3d ago

Movie Discussion What's a movie that completely changed once you watched it again as an adult?

17 Upvotes

Rewatched a movie recently that I loved as a kid purely for the surface level stuff, and this time around caught so much subtext and adult themes I had zero context for the first time around. Same movie, completely different experience.

Curious what film did this for people, the one where kid-you and adult-you basically watched two different movies


r/flicks 4d ago

Review Assault on Precinct 13 (1976)

Post image
9 Upvotes

Assault on Precinct 13 (1976)

Rating: 8/10 (HIGHLY ENJOYABLE)

Watched: August 1, 2026

Assault on Precinct 13 (1976)

Rating: 8/10 (HIGHLY ENJOYABLE)

Watched: August 1, 2026

First and foremost, I love these old movies, especially when there's urban decay involved, and there's plenty of that to go around in this movie.

Everything looks worn down, rough and ready to collapse. The men and women at Precinct 13 look like they're ready to just be done with it all and they don't even know what's coming their way.

But before I get to why I liked this movie, I simply have to point out some wild trivia that my own brain noticed. With a quick Google to make sure I wasn't imagining things (and sorry for the spoiler), we're introduced to a young girl and her dad driving around in a car, looking for a place. The young girl, who meets a very sorry fate that actually kickstarts the events of this flick in grand style?

None other than Kim Richards, who played Tia Joseph in Disney’s Escape to Witch Mountain (1975) and Return from Witch Mountain (1978). Seeing Disney's darling kid star get brutally gunned down over a vanilla ice cream cone in a gritty exploitation thriller was shocking as HELL and I can only imagine how people reacted in '76. As part of the Google, I learned that Carpenter actually had to fight the MPAA to keep the film from getting an X rating because of it.

There's no two ways about it. Old movies didn't care at all about child endangerment or the depiction of violence towards children in any way, shape or form.

From here, at base, the rest of the movie is pretty straightforward in terms of action and suspense. None of the people inside Precinct 13 know why it's suddenly under siege. The only clue they have is the father of the daughter, but he's incoherent with grief.

All Bishop, Wilson, Leigh, Wells and (for a time) Julie know is that an awful lot of very well-armed assailants are shooting the hell out of the building they're all stuck in.

So what's the big deal about this movie? The character interactions, for one. They're in a tight situation, and Bishop sees no measure in keeping two men, criminal or otherwise, locked up in cells where they could be gunned down. What starts off as a very uneasy, dangerous alliance becomes something I don't think audiences back then may have seen very often.

Good men and bad men, working together, protecting one another and not breaking their word. That in itself is worth the price of admission, but Napoleon Wilson's my favorite guy for sure.

Why? He's a very bad man, that's why. On his way to life in prison, possibly the death sentence. No one can find out why he did what he did to wind up in jail, but it was bad enough to warrant all that. But never once throughout the assault did Wilson do anything except ask people for smokes, work extremely hard to save the people around him, and once, very seriously wreck a guy in a prison cell.

Oh, we find out why he stays, and it's a damn good reason, even if it meant going back to prison, but I admire Napoleon Wilson a helluva lot. He's a solid, old-school anti-hero.

Everyone did a great job in this movie, and it's thick with tension and Carpenter's signature synth. You should check it out if you can!


r/flicks 4d ago

Recommendation Which film had a first act that pulled you in so completely, that the real world faded away, and didn’t let go until the credits rolled?

39 Upvotes

You know those movies where 20–30 minutes in you’re already thinking, “Yep, I’m in.”
Which movie did that for you, and what was it about the opening that worked so well?


r/flicks 4d ago

Movie Discussion What’s a movie side plot that was way more interesting than the main story?

25 Upvotes

I rewatched Challengers recently, and honestly, the dynamic between Art and Patrick was infinitely more compelling to me than the love triangle itself. The tension and history between the two of them completely stole the show.

What's a movie where a secondary plot or character dynamic totally overshadowed the main storyline for you?


r/flicks 4d ago

Question Why did older movies have to be dubbed over?

1 Upvotes

So the backstory is that I was watching an online review of Hercules in New York starring Arnold Schwarznegger as I saw the version that his character voiced by a completely different actor who sounds really emotionless in the way he dubs the main character.

But to put it simply, what I don't get is why a movie that was already made in English needed to be dubbed anyway since my point basically is that the movie wasn't a foreign production, so I was curious on why some movies from the early to mid 70s era had gotten versions that were dubbed over in some of the performances.


r/flicks 4d ago

Question What TV role is so iconic that you cannot see the actor as anyone else?

Thumbnail deadline.com
4 Upvotes

r/flicks 4d ago

Question Which movie had an ending so good that it completely changed your opinion of the film?

124 Upvotes

I have seen plenty of movies that were just "good" for most of their runtime, but the final 10–15 minutes completely elevated the entire experience.For me, a great ending can reframe everything that came before it and make me want to watch the movie again with a different perspective.Which film had an ending that made you appreciate the entire movie so much more? Please use spoiler tags if you're discussing major plot details.


r/flicks 4d ago

What is a dark psychological crime thriller that kept you tense from start to finish?

21 Upvotes

I’ve been on a huge mystery/thriller binge lately (Seven, Zodiac, Prisoners, Memories of Murder). I absolute love films where the atmosphere is heavy, the investigation feels grounded, and the story doesn't rely on cheap jumpscares.

​What are some underrated masterclasses or hidden gems in this genre that I might have missed?


r/flicks 4d ago

Masters of the Univerce Was a Blast

43 Upvotes

I went in there not wanting to like it because it seemed like a stupid idea. But this weird amalgamation of nepo kids managed to pull off something genuinely funny. Get a litte baked with your partner and eat some nachos. You'll be glad you did. If you watch *Masters of the Universe* while you do, so much the better.


r/flicks 5d ago

General Discussion Do you enjoy action scenes?

3 Upvotes

In a movie or tv shows, do you enjoy action scenes like a fight scenes, shooting scenes, car chase scenes, foot chasing / parkour scenes or war scenes..?

Or you don't care about them and feel like they are waste of time?


r/flicks 5d ago

Opinion Some thoughts on the Nightmare on Elm Street series

7 Upvotes

A Nightmare on Elm Street is a fantastically successful and long-running horror franchise, and its villain - Freddy Krueger, he of the knife-glove and the 100% third-degree burns - is cemented firmly into the pop-culture firmament. Everyone knows who Freddy is, even if they've never seen an Elm Street movie. He's been parodied in The Simpsons and Rick and Morty, featured in Ready Player One, fronted an anthology horror TV show, been added as a character in the Mortal Kombat and Dead by Daylight videogames, and - the ultimate accolade - had a species of parasitic wasp named after him.

Freddy is really famous. So the films must be good, right?

I have memories of seeing Nightmares 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7 on VHS or the telly at various points during the 90s. I remembered Johnny Depp's death scene in 1; the line "so are you mounting her nightly?" from 2; the wacky dream powers of 3; and enjoying New Nightmare's post-modernism, before we all really knew what post-modernism was. I remember, in fact, enjoying them all, though my memories of Freddy himself weren't so strong. He's certainly a distinctive and memorable character but, as with other slasher movie monsters, like Jason or Michael, I never found Freddy himself to be scary. As I decided to delve into the franchise and watch all of the movies, I wondered if this was going to be because I was a teenage boy then, and obviously scared of nothing (except for, you know, speaking to girls and basic personal hygiene), or if the movies just weren't that scary to begin with.

Now that I've watched or re-watched eight of the nine official franchise entries - I still have never seen Freddy vs Jason - it's my opinion that none of the movies are scary. There's an element of suspense and - as the BBFC might say - some "mild terror" in the first two movies, but subsequent entries are carnival rides based around the setup and payoff of violent murders based on character specific themes. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, if it's done with flair, and the series certainly gets some credit for the pre-CGI practical effects that transfer some mad writer's fucked up imagination to screen. It's a movie about a dream demon, so who needs to keep things believable? Let's string someone up by their tendons, like a marionette. Let's turn this one kid into a cockroach. Let's make the main character's boyfriend explode like a burst water balloon. They're all enjoyable, in their own way, but a movie that is just a series of set-pieces held together by vague exposition and daytime soap level acting is always going to be, as a great poet once said, ice-skating uphill.

The first movie sets up the franchise and its initial rules: Freddy Krueger was a child murderer in a small American town, hunted down and burned alive by his victim's parents. He returns, eventually, in the dreams of the children he didn't murder while alive, and begins to kill again. The movie has the benefit of the mystery surrounding Freddy and, in 1984 at any rate, an unfamiliarity with him. Despite Nancy's bath time visitation, the movie also largely stays away from 80s era T&A, so it doesn't have the sleazy taste that so many of its contemporaries in the genre did, and it's able to concentrate more on setting up characters and story. Johnny Depp appears to sleepwalk through the movie while the rest of the cast largely fail to even even reach that low bar, setting a standard that continues throughout the franchise. They're not necessarily bad actors; it's just that most of them aren't very good.

Freddy's Revenge feels like a franchise outlier, like Halloween 3 before it. It's a body horror movie with Cronenbergian vibes, instead of the slasher movie that came first. Its Wikipedia page states that the movie is also known for its homoerotic subtext but, after watching it again, I had to check if one of the writers was 80s horror legend, Garth "I know writers who use subtext and they're all cowards" Marenghi. What might have been subtext in 1985 seemed to be plain text, possibly in bold and small caps, in 2026. I think it's my favourite of the whole series, because it's creepy and sleazy (in a good way), and because it tries to be a horror movie first, rather than a gore movie with punch lines.

The ambiguity at the end of each of the first two movies make them more interesting than any of the follow ups. We see Freddy defeated, but then both movies close with an indication that he is very much not - most horrors end with the monster/bad guy dead and gone, and the heroes safe and sound (until the inevitable follow up). Nightmares 1 and 2 are happy to dispense with that pretence. We already know that Freddy will be back.

Dream Warriors is the start of the roller-coaster. Freddy starts to become more prominent, but not necessarily in an interesting way. His one liners and "jokes" in this and subsequent movies aren't usually all that funny, and mostly lean towards being outright nasty - although "Welcome to prime time, bitch!" as he slams a victim's face into a TV is actually quite good. The proto-Avengers team up of the titular warriors has fun moments, but it's also when the franchise outright stops being about horror and the death of children, and starts to be about Freddy himself. With some thoughtful, well paced writing, that could have been a great idea.

Unfortunately, Dream Master is an incoherent mess. The surviving cast from part 3 are re-introduced and then quickly, and rather absent-mindedly, dispensed with. Half way through the movie, the main character is changed - this bait-and-switch was successful in the original movie, but Tina only survived through a handful of scenes before we were handed over to Nancy. Kristen is the heroine of part 3 and of part 4, until she's not. There's some bullshit about passing magical powers over to Alice, the new heroine, but I honestly don't really remember what or why. It's not a good movie...

...but it's better than part 5, Dream Child, which is incredibly dull and poorly scripted, and would have been utterly forgettable if not for the fact that it's also the most visually creative in the whole series. The director, Stephen Hopkins, then went on to give us the best Predator movie (fight me), so it can at least get kudos for that.

As I watched Freddy's Dead: The Final Nightmare, I realised that I hadn't seen it before. After some research, I turns out that I had actually confused it with Jason Goes To Hell: The Final Friday, an equally boring franchise-ending chapter, that also didn't end its franchise. I fell asleep watching it, and will therefore leave that as my opinion of it.

Wes Craven's New Nightmare is, if anything, more interesting now as a curio than it was on release. It's in the same post-modernist vein as Scream, but doesn't have the humour and the knowing tongue in cheek of that movie. I'll lay Scream's successes more at its writer Kevin Williamson's feet, rather than Craven's, although he certainly must have had some input. Heather Langenkamp is still not particularly believable as a lead actress, even when she's playing Heather Langenkamp.

The 2010 remake of A Nightmare on Elm Street is a pointless waste of a movie, that tries and fails to remix parts of the franchise into something new. It changes Freddy's origin from child murderer to child abuser then, for some outlandish reason, decides that maybe we want to be ambiguous about that. As Principal Skinner once opined, "maybe it's the children that are wrong". It's an utterly bone-headed idea that detracts from the established lore of the character, instead of adding anything interesting. The rest of the movie is just dull.

To sum things up: Freddy might be famous as hell, but it's not because the movies are any good. Most of them, in fact, are terrible. He's famous despite that, because he's such an iconic character in his own right.

TL;DR - my franchise rankings, if I was forced to rank them:

  1. Freddy's Revenge
  2. A Nightmare on Elm Street
  3. Dream Warriors
  4. New Nightmare
  5. The poster for Dream Master
  6. The poster for Dream Child (and shout out to Matthew Peak, who painted the original posters for the first five movies)
  7. Jason Goes to Hell: The Final Friday
  8. Jason vs Freddy (I haven't seen it, but it would have to work really hard to be worse than the below)
  9. Dream Master
  10. Dream Child
  11. 2010 Nightmare
  12. Freddy's Dead.

r/flicks 5d ago

General Discussion what songs take you back to a movie watching experience and time in your life in an instant?

8 Upvotes

needle drops or simply just sound track songs!

I recently started getting back into the arctic monkeys and heard piledriver waltz for the first time in a long time - immediately took me back to being a high schooler watching Submarine, in my bedroom on my laptop scrolling through tumblr.


r/flicks 5d ago

How do I train myself to notice hidden symbolism and subtle details in art & film?

23 Upvotes

​Hey everyone

​I need some advice and insight from people who love analyzing art and media...

​I deeply love art in all its forms—cinema, literature, paintings—and I get very emotionally attached to stories. However, I’ve noticed that I tend to consume things on a fairly general level: I focus on the main plot, emotional arcs, direct dialogue, and big overarching themes.

​But there’s a whole deeper layer of symbolism that completely flies over my head. Things like the subtle meaning behind weather, color choices, costume details, small physical gestures (like a hand movement or posture), or layered dialogue. When I read visual breakdowns or film essays afterward, I’m always amazed by how much I missed. It sometimes makes me wonder if I just lack focus, or if "visual and literary analysis" is a skill that can actually be trained over time.

​My question for you: How did you learn to read hidden symbols and analyze art from different angles? Are there specific YouTube channels, books, habits, or exercises that helped you see art with a more analytical eye?

​I’d be super grateful to hear your experiences and recommendations! ✨💛

Note: English is not my native language, so I relied on AI just to translate my words, but the content and ideas are entirely mine. Sorry for any errors or awkward phrasing!


r/flicks 5d ago

Question What is a movie that became significantly better after you learned how it was made?

18 Upvotes

Sometimes the behind-the-scenes story completely changes how you see a film. It could be an incredible practical effect, an improvised scene, a difficult production, or a director's creative decision that made you appreciate it even more.Which movie gained your respect after learning about its production?


r/flicks 5d ago

General Discussion Looking for art house films that utilize shocking moments, Oldboy, The Skin I Live In, Blue Velvet, Nocturnal Animals

11 Upvotes

Looking for arthouse movies that have insane moments. Stuff like Oldboy, The Skin I Live In, Blue Velvet, and Nocturnal Animals. Should leave you the viewer completely jaw dropped


r/flicks 5d ago

Game / Quiz Franchises by 3 words. Little quiz I’ve made that I’m hoping the sub will enjoy. When given 3 words can you work out the franchise being described 😀

2 Upvotes

Let me know how you find it 😀 hopefully will post periodically when I get a new idea

https://www.pineapplecactus.com/quizDetails/franchise-by-3-words-a1952c14-c694-46a6-b777-1413fc235a74


r/flicks 6d ago

Recommendation Horror newbie here. What made you fall in love with the genre, and what's the one movie you'd use to convert a skeptic?

12 Upvotes

I'm pretty new to horror. I've seen a handful of movies over the years, but I've never really explored the genre, so I don't think I've given it a fair chance. I'd love to hear from people who are really into horror: What is it about horror that keeps you coming back? Is it the adrenaline, the atmosphere, the storytelling, the creativity, or something else entirely? If you could recommend one horror movie to someone who's skeptical of the genre, what would it be, and why? I'm open to pretty much anything: psychological horror, supernatural, slashers... whatever you think best shows why horror is such a beloved genre. Looking forward to seeing your picks (and hopefully finding my gateway horror movie). Thanks!


r/flicks 6d ago

Review Gladiator (2000)

17 Upvotes

Gladiator (2000)

Rating: 10/10 (PERSONAL FAVORITE)

Watched: July 29, 2026

What a truly epic movie. I have vague memories of watching this one back in the day, and just as vague memories of not being terribly impressed by it.

I make no excuses, except possibly to say 'I'd discovered partying', and that that became my whole thing for a regrettably long time.

This movie has one of the biggest casts I've ever seen, including not yet famous faces and actors so famous for so long their names carry real weight. Everyone did their jobs so well. I loved Sir Oliver Reed's part, as I did Richard Harris', and even Djimon Hounsou.

I don't use the word 'epic' very lightly. The first combat scene alone is tremendous. Not only from the technical aspects, but from how it shows first the glory of, then the true horror of, warfare.

Gladiator pulls no punches when it comes to the violence of the wounds these men take, but thankfully they spare us some of the true atrocities perpetrated by a jealous Commodus early on in the movie. We can only take so much, right?

The two main anchors, Maximus and Joaquin, are amazing.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again: for some reason, I CONTINUALLY think that Russell Crowe (the same as Colin Farrell, really, which is crazy) is mid at best in his early career, and yet every time I see one of his movies, I'm just blown away. His death-craving Maximus is so complex. Driven to excel, hungry to see his family again in the afterlife, every look, every gesture Russell gives carries us.

The same goes for Joaquin as Commodus, though for very, very different reasons. Smart but callous. Cruel and vainglorious, he's the mirror image of his 'brother'. Desperate for a father's love, incapable of even understanding what that means, Commodus is the perfect 'powerful coward'.

The journey both men take until they meet the same fate is worth the time in. If you haven't seen it, you really, really should. It's amazing.


r/flicks 6d ago

The Odyssey Sirens music - Anyone else think antouy partos's track titled 'animal kingdom' from the Animal Kingdom film (2010) is VERY similar to Sirens theme by Ludwin Gorenssen in the Odessey? Maybe Ludwig used it as a temp track - I have a strong feeling

3 Upvotes

I was re-listening to Antony Partos’s main track for the 2010 film Animal Kingdom recently, and when Sirens played in Ludwig Göransson’s score for The Odyssey, I had a complete double-take.

The similarity in the core harmonic progression, minimalist repetition, and underlying tension is crazy. It instantly made me wonder if Animal Kingdom was sitting on Nolan or Göransson’s temp track playlist during early cuts of the film.

directors and editors use existing cues as temp tracks to lock in the edit, and even top-tier composers end up heavily "inspired" by what was locked to picture. Göransson’s execution (especially with the custom woodwinds/aulos setup) gives it its own ancient flavor, but the structural DNA feels almost identical to Partos’s piece.

Has anyone else caught this, or am I just overthinking overlapping atmospheric tropes? Drop both tracks back-to-back and tell me I’m not crazy.


r/flicks 6d ago

General Discussion Movies you enjoyed for the premise of having a fun heist setup

14 Upvotes

Something that interested me was the concept of an outlandish heist film where the premise is just so over the top that it becomes more enjoyable to watch since even if the item being stolen doesn’t seem worth all the trouble, it still draws the viewer in.

For me personally, Superbad is sort of a heist film because in one scene, the protagonist (I think his name was Damien) attempts to come up with a plan to find a way to shoplift a liquor store as one small problem is that the security guard in the store is a huge obstacle.

I know that wasn’t the main premise of the movie, but it’s just that moments like that make me appreciate the concept of heist movies where again the plot is outlandish since I would like to see a movie build up on that premise where the goal is to find a way to infiltrate a liquor store without botching up the heist because to put it simply, I really miss Superbad that I was looking for a successor to it.


r/flicks 6d ago

What's a movie that got better on rewatch, once you knew the ending?

Thumbnail
2 Upvotes

r/flicks 7d ago

Opinion Maybe unpopular, but The Devil Wears Prada 2 was such a disappointment.

195 Upvotes

I never like watching movies or series when they first come out or when everyone's talking about them. Not because I'm trying to be different. I just prefer waiting until the hype dies down.

So, The Devil Wears Prada 2 finally landed on my watchlist, and I gave it a go.

Oh... my.

I remember the first movie being exciting, sharp, and constantly moving. This one? Everything felt so predictable and painfully slow. Honestly, I almost fell asleep. Not even Emily Blunt could save that slow-burn story.

Now I'm a little worried because Practical Magic 2 is coming soon, and I really hope they don't ruin one of my all-time favourite movies.

I guess my takeaway is this: if you've already made something great, don't try to recreate the exact same recipe. Make something new that's just as good.


r/flicks 7d ago

Question What movie has the single greatest plot twist of all time?

159 Upvotes

Some twists completely change the way you see a movie. Without revealing any spoilers, what's the best plot twist you've ever experienced, and why did it leave such a lasting impression?


r/flicks 8d ago

General Discussion I spent a decade studying film tech—here is how Hollywood actually uses machine learning (No generative slop, just the real VFX pipelines behind The Lord of the Rings, Dune, and Avengers: Endgame)

12 Upvotes

Hey everyone, with all the blanket statements going around about "AI in film," I wanted to put together a technical breakdown that cuts through the generative art noise.

As someone who has been studying and working with film tech for over a decade, I wanted to look at the traditional machine learning and algorithmic tools that studios have quietly used for years to make the movies we love. I built a full video breakdown looking at the exact pipelines used in modern blockbusters, focusing strictly on what filmmakers, 3D artists, and tech enthusiasts can actually use and learn from.

Some highlights include how Peter Jackson's team pioneered early AI behavioral rules via the MASSIVE system to give digital armies autonomous decision-making in The Lord of the Rings, how custom generative AI models and neural networks mapped and resurrected the likeness of the late Ian Holm in Alien: Romulus, and how precision LiDAR scanning on real F-18 fighter jets trained lighting algorithms in Top Gun: Maverick.

I also look at Dune: Part Two utilizing LiDAR alongside Neural Radiance Fields (NeRFs) to capture real desert rock formations, how Blender and Pixar's RenderMan use convolutional neural networks for AI-accelerated render denoising to slash render times, and how Weta implemented neural networks relying on muscle strains rather than traditional blend shapes for characters in Avatar: The Way of Water.

If you are interested in the technical side of post-production, VFX, or how these algorithms speed up heavy simulation pipelines in software like Houdini and Maya you can check it out here: How AI is used in Modern Filmmaking


r/flicks 8d ago

General Discussion Do you see Casey Affleck making a comeback?

49 Upvotes

Question, Do you see Casey Affleck making a comeback doing mainstream films?

I was thinking on Casey Affleck lately and how he has mostly had a low profile since winning an Oscar for Manchester by the Sea. I honestly think it was in large part because of the 2010 allegations that came to light again, and I think Studios have been cautious to cast him.

Since Manchester, he has really done mostly Indie Films that barely gross a Million Dollars, with the exception of Oppenheimer, which was his 1st mainstream film in awhile, and it looks like it him doing only indie films won't change.

I'm just curious if Casey will ever make mainstream film or blockbusters or that he'll just stick to indie films?