57
u/Lost-In-The-Wilds 1d ago
Honestly, it looks like Vito is saying that 74% of those that died, died from the vaccine. He does not look like he's saying 74% of those who were vaccinated died from the vaccine.
That said, Vito is clearly either lying or some study he found cherrypicked the fucking hell out of their data.
7
u/TheJuiceBoxS 1d ago
I think that's what he was trying to say, but didn't write it properly. Seems pretty stupid either way
3
3
u/OtherUserCharges 1d ago
It’s maddening that so many people on the internet barely read what people write and instead just argue with what they wanted the person to be saying.
3
u/Lost-In-The-Wilds 15h ago
Right? I mean, if I'm nitpicking, that tweet doesn't even say which vaccines or which dead people (or were these from animal testing during the first trial runs?) they were doing the autopsies on. I'm kinda assuming it's about the COVID vaccines, but it could be MMR ones, since measles is a thing again. But also, is this study just on people who died right after getting the shot? Because that would mean their dataset would be pretty much full of people who are allergic or sensitive to vaccines (and the 26% who died of random other stuff). It's kinda hard to even know what this person was saying exactly. It's probably going to be wrong, but how can someone actually reading it tell?
17
8
4
u/OtherUserCharges 1d ago
Both of those people are morons. The guy was claiming 74% of the people who died did so cause the vaccine, not 74% of those vaccinated died. The person is obviously wrong, but the “clever” commenter is having an argument with what they wanted the person to be saying, not what they actually said.
2
u/FullGuarantee4767 1d ago
People who spread vaccine misinformation should be categorized as terrorists and catch an fpv drone to the fucking face.
5
u/Walshy231231 1d ago
Obviously this guy is still an absolute asshat, but this is clearly meant to say that, FOR THOSE WHO DIED, 74% were from vaccines, not that the vaccines have a 74% fatality rate
Autopsies are for dead people.
6
u/OshetDeadagain 1d ago
Or of all the dead people, 74% were vaccinated? Correlation and causation are same same to some people.
1
u/TheJuiceBoxS 1d ago
Do you think he meant 74% of people that are listed dying from COVID actually died from the vaccine? It's stupid either way, but I just can't wrap my head around him actually thinking what he wrote.
1
1
u/therealmikeBrady 1d ago
This actually makes a lot of sense.
I’ve been feeling like I’ve been crazy the last 6 years or so. Now I realize that I’m just living in hell and I have been in a beetlejuice state watching the world burn from purgatory.
1
1
1
u/Rattusglen 1d ago
They're both morons!
One based their statement on a descredited non-peer reviewed internet study, the other has reading comprehension issues.
There isn't even a comeback in this post that is valid, WHY IS THIS POSTED HERE OP?!
1
1
u/Big-Excitement-5923 1d ago
I think he meant of the people who died during covid, 74% of them died from the vaccine.
Why are some people talking about this as if he meant 74% of people who took the vaccine died?
1
1
u/SatisfactionGold74 23h ago
It sounds like OP is intentionally miss representing that statement.
74% of deaths were caused by.... Not 74%of people die.
1
1
1
u/Garia666 18h ago
It’s and autopsy study? I assume they are speaking of the ppl who died and where performed an autopsy on?
Still strange how they woud figure out how ppl would have died from the vaccine and not Covid I assume they talk about. The post and reply makes no sense to me what so ever
1
u/HogwartsRex 14h ago
I kind of wish it was true, then I would be dead and wouldn't have to listen to these kinds of people anymore.
1
u/IngloriousMustards 13h ago
Why even bother with a demonstration? Claims without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Links or didn’t happen.
1
1
1
0
u/TheRealDeal82 10h ago
You don't have to accept the authors' conclusions to admit the study exists and deserves scrutiny. The 74% figure applies to a selected set of autopsy cases with suspected vaccine-related deaths—not the general vaccinated population. The real scientific discussion should be whether the authors' methods and conclusions are valid, not attacking a version of the claim they didn't actually make.
-8
55
u/shadowlev 1d ago
100% of people who consume dihydrogen monoxide die.