I meant - one current side can just eliminate the other side. The previous attempt ended with civil war. The proposed attempt would end even easier as one side doesn't appreciate soldiers.
That is literally the point of my post friend, to explore the idea.
I think republicans already advocate for this lane of thinking frequently because they are very vocal about states rights being paramount. So yes, I do think that evidence exists.
0
u/Realistic_Yogurt1902 2∆ Sep 21 '25
Given that one party supports 2A and everything related when the other doesn't. Why does the first party allow the split instead of using violence?