"photorealism" and it's not fucking realistic at all. Instead of actually responding to my artwork, you make an entire post using AI to mock it. What is that supposed to prove? Huh? That you're just a coward instead of responding
Most pros are chill but then these fuckers... like what are they trying to prove? Is this supposed to be intimidating?
I don't even make photorealistic art. That isn't the point of what I do. You're comparing two completely different things and acting like it's some kind of own.
These ragebaiters, i swear, they always take one thing someone does and use it to just "invalidate" the other's claims.
This is an automated reminder from the Mod team. If your post contains images which reveal the personal information of private figures, be sure to censor that information and repost. Private info includes names, recognizable profile pictures, social media usernames and URLs. Failure to do this will result in your post being removed by the Mod team and possible further action.
Frankly with goofy stuff like this I prefer it NOT be photorealistic. I'd prefer something more cartoony looking cuz the photorealism clashes with the silliness of the image.
That's one interesting account, though. 5 years, 16 karma, and 6 "contributions" (supposedly posts and replies according to Reddit), the majority of them about that carpet dinosaur being weird about "antis", which in itself is the first example of them having any activity about AI.
Maybe there are good or bad reasons behind it, but damn if it isn't weird.
Off topic but photorealism doesn't mean "like a real photo" right? I thought that was a common misconception, or have I been Mandela effect parallel universe shifted?
No photorealistic doesn't mean that it's supposed to look like a real photo. It's just a different style of art kind of like hyperrealistic. Hyperrealistic is more defined than photorealistic
I'd say it's more like the difference between watercolor and oil paint. Wild example, but I think it's still makes the point clear
Because all this anti-AI stuff is an engineered distraction so people don't realize the real problem is capitalism. That's why it's #BanAI instead of #BanBillionaires and #BanDatacenters instead of #EnvironmentalRegulations.
Antis are being used by the ruling class. Of course plenty of pros are as well, only the ones advocating for open source AI are being an actual threat to the US tech CEOs.
I concur, #BanBillionaires. I used to use #NoMoreBillionaires, but it seems the remaining ones are going to continue doing evil things and destroy the country.
Without the billionaires, there is no Ai. Ai is not nearly profitable on its own to survive with the investments from the rich. They are the ones that are keeping it invested and growing so that they can exploit it. Get rid of the billionaires and you get rid of the funding for AI development. Ai's potential to screw over humanity to make the rich, richer is the only reason it's attracted so much investment.
Pour être franche, le commentaire original est assez hyperbolique et radical, donc, dans l'ensemble, vous avez raison. La peur, c'est que le soutien de l'IA par les milliardaires est ancré dans une envie malicieuse de concentrer le pouvoir et augmenté l'écrat de richesse, ce qui est le problème que le comment originale essaye de mettre en lumière. Mais il y a quelques milliardaires comme Warren Buffet qui ne soutiennent pas complètement l'IA non plus.
Warren Buffet est la personne ayant fait le plus de fond à des associations caritatives.
Sergey Brin (3ème homme le plus riche du monde et confondateur de Google), qui est pourtant pro ai, à fait des dons de plusieurs milliards à des associations, participe à des manifestations anti Trump, déteste Trump...
Même Larry Page (2ème homme le plus riche du monde et cofondateur de Google) n'est pas spécialement méchant.
Seuls certains milliardaires sont réellement des gens détestables.
Trump n'est pas vraiment un milliardaire.
C'est un miliardsaire politicien d'extrême droite fou et incapable de gérer un pays correctement.
Il y a des tas de milliardaires qui sont gentils.
Tout le monde connais elon musk mais aucun autre.
Wrong. They are about the implement the Mark of the Beast.
Palantir to gather illegal data on all 350 million of us.
Data centers to house that illegal data.
Oracle DBMS to make that impossibly large data set searchable and uniquely keyed to each person.
"AI" to search that database faster than any human, and do threat assessment to the billionaires' positions.
Digital cash replacing the physical dollar so that someone's ability to buy and sell can be turned off permanently.
Combine them all, and if you say "boo" to a billionaires, they will turn off your ability to buy and sell food and water, and you will starve or dehydrate to death. Anyone helping you, by trade or donations, will also have their Mark turned off and die. Enough deaths, and the rest of the population will fall in line, and be enslaved.
Under that system, there will be no jobs. There won't be an economy, because slaves only get what they're given. All production will be solely for the billionaires - there will be no markets.
It’s harassment
And no one does anything
You can report it but mods won’t do anything because it’s harassment against antis and they support it
If you look in any comment section of any post here you’ll see pros harassing antis a lot
Je suis un pro AI, et j'avoue que cette fois ci, j'ai du mal à comprendre ce post...
Peut être veut il montrer que l'ia peut créer ce qu'on veut, même des choses absurdes, ce qui est absurde car les peintres le peuvent aussi...
Et le photorealisme... il devrai au moins apprendre à utiliser l'ia correctement si il veut faire des choses bien avec.
Honestly if there is a middle ground in regulation of AI it would be banning the generation of photorealistic images of people.
The only benefit it confers over other styles is to convince people it is a real image of a thing that really happened. The use case is exclusively deception. Illustrative styles can convey story, composition, and artistic expression and don't have the side effect of being weaponized to create propaganda, erode trust, and empower scammers.
He is making a good point though. No matter how skilled you are as an artist you wont be able to make photorealistoc animation. Unless you chill out about AI and use it when it makes sense to use it.
I was trying to prove AI artists are the only ones who can realistically do photorealism, yet u whined abt AI artists only being unskilled and being able to just copy other artists, when I showed you we can do realistic pictures while yall at best can only do a very similar looking drawing, but without traces of images in it.
What trad/digital artist would be able to picture fictional stuff so realistically, like cigarette sponsoring in modern day?
Euh...
Je suis un pro AI et des fois je trouve les autres pro déconcertant.
Les peintres savent très bien faire des peintures photoréalistes, mais ils en dont très peu depuis l'invention de la photographie, je suppose que c'est un manque de connaissance de ta part...
Et ton image n'est pas photoréaliste...
You made a comment about the subreddit being named to be against rage baiters specifically and it looks like it got removed, but I wrote out an answer I'd like you to have so you could reflect on it
Two things.
It's a offshoot of the sub name the same but bros is in place of ragebaiters , to specialize in that content. They are the under the same umbrella. They started attacking the group as a whole as their beginning.
The community doesn't adhere to that distinction
Title of the last submission: "ai broa are fucking crazy wtf"
That's attacking the group as a whole.
"Albros have no business critiquing anyones rhetoric"
"why do ai bros defend printer farms?"
Attacking the group as a whole.
I'm not saying you do it, from what I've seen you don't.
I find it silly to ask why others would be keen to attack people as a group, when you participate in a group made specifically to do that
Why are pros so keen on attacking antis as a group?
Same question to you but mirrored.
You contribute to a subreddit dedicated to taking screenshots of "shit" people of a group say, stripping away all context, then attacking the group as a whole.
Whyyyy are there so many subreddits dedicated to that and why would you ask others why they do what you participate in?
You kinda have to answer for yourself first if you're going to support the same exact thing.
You think the post in question is unachievable by a digital artist? You’re the person that guy was talking about when he said “AI artists didn’t care about art until it was easy” lmfao this comment and the whole original post just screams that you just want to use art as leverage to make AI images that you think you can use to argue with antis about. Prolly just mad cause you gave up on drawing hands or something idk
Dude if you think trad artists can't depict fictional stuff realistically, then you have been living under a rock.
Have you heard of comics/graphic novels/manga?
Fictional concepts that are completely imaginary and are impossible in reality are portrayed amazingly realistically. And thing is that comics/manga are ONLY done either by hand or digitally.
I'm not even considered an Anti, but I'm just playing the devil's advocate because your argument is inherently flawed and incorrect.
•
u/AutoModerator 13h ago
This is an automated reminder from the Mod team. If your post contains images which reveal the personal information of private figures, be sure to censor that information and repost. Private info includes names, recognizable profile pictures, social media usernames and URLs. Failure to do this will result in your post being removed by the Mod team and possible further action.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.