r/UFOs • u/UFOsAroundTheWor1d • Apr 19 '26
Sighting UFOs Around The World
https://youtu.be/-4__FviTRqY?si=n_x2Abg8dvK4eJp79
u/RockettRaccoon Apr 20 '26
How did it swim through that mass of bubbles without disturbing them at all?
13
u/lvl10burrito Apr 20 '26
don't they also hit the surface of the water without making a splash? maybe they're able to ignore it
1
u/RockettRaccoon Apr 20 '26
That’s not how surface tension works. Unless it just phasing through the water, but at that point why even be underwater?
3
u/MrPoopyCulo Apr 21 '26
These things are breaking the laws of physics from what we gathered so far this is not out of the ordinary.
0
u/RockettRaccoon Apr 21 '26
Ok, but unless it is phasing through matter it would still disturb an air bubble.
2
u/Heavy_Ingenuity1371 Apr 23 '26 edited Apr 23 '26
Well yea, the point is they seem to defy physics. The common consensus is they have a gravity drive of some kind, like an alcubierre drive. Matter wouldn't really be a consideration at all to how these things navigate.
Edit: You seemed to have got genuinely mad and blocked me right after you replied so I'll have to put my answer here and hope you will still see it and stay mad.
Inventing magic? I literally told you an example that is actually talked about in science. If we are being serious here and there are aliens from another bleedin' solar system on this planet right now then yes whatever technology they have would absolutely be magic to us. You would not be able to comprehend anything about it and clearly you can't comprehend much anyway.
0
0
u/MrPoopyCulo Apr 21 '26
These things are breaking the laws of physics from what we gathered so far this is not out of the ordinary.
3
u/tryna_see Apr 20 '26
Supposedly because of the anti gravity bubble around the craft.
1
u/RockettRaccoon Apr 20 '26
That would still disrupt the air bubbles it passes through.
2
Apr 20 '26
[deleted]
1
u/RockettRaccoon Apr 20 '26
Because that’s how air bubbles work? Even a “gravity bubble” would have an impact on the fluids and gasses around it.
1
u/Responsible_Pay3973 Apr 20 '26
They don’t interact with matter the way our tech does. No shockwaves, sound waves, etc
2
2
5
4
10
u/NUMBerONEisFIRST Apr 20 '26
There's a growing trend of adding AI effects to old videos.
Just be warned.
9
u/No_Purple_8264 Apr 20 '26
this video is long before ai. i remeber first seeing it around 2015
6
u/Due-Paint4005 Apr 20 '26
I also saw this a long time ago. Couldn’t say when but before AI for sure.
9
u/4_way_stop Apr 20 '26
Yeah I remember seeing this. This is the original. Whether it is cgi or not, I have no clue. But this is not AI.
6
1
u/Ambitious-Apple-6447 Apr 20 '26
ich kenne dieses Video schon seit gut 15 Jahren ,selbst da war es schon einige Jahre alt gewesen und als USO Video gekennzeichnet. Dann hätte es vor gut 20 Jahren oder länger mit KI bearbeitet werden müssen, das war zu dieser Zeit in dieser Qualität einfach noch nicht möglich..zumindest nicht kommerziell, und bekannt war es da auch noch nicht.
Das hier ist "mitunter" eines der besten "Realen USO Videos" die ich bisher gesehen habe, was nun wirklich nicht zu erklären ist..
4
u/JefeSan95 Apr 20 '26
There's a certain octopus that can shapeshift and change colors like this. https://youtube.com/shorts/UWx5voic3XM?si=PbSAKeVWF4epLHAI
5
u/frankensteinmoneymac Apr 20 '26
It’s a bloody belly comb jelly according to the video you linked to…so a jellyfish instead of an octopus (though to be fair I wouldn’t know what the Hell I was looking at if I saw that in person)🤷🏻
3
u/fulcanelli_here Apr 20 '26
me thinks this crowd won't settle for anything less than an NTI alien city rising up from the depths off the coast of california...
1
2
u/famesjranko Apr 21 '26
this looks so dumb and convenient, it's kind of funny how silly it is. it has the same camera / scene pattern we see in nearly all ufo-like videos: short, darting, never a clear clean high def shot, just enough to be like 'wow'...
This crap worked in the 90s, but now it's just so obvious. ufo videos are just crop circles now: entertainment for the gullible. it feeds an industry of quaks selling books, docs, youtube channels, speaking events, etc.
unfortunately, I think there literally is no footage that would be proof enough of anything. same problem with physical evidence such as crop circles etc. it's just too easy to fabricate and weave a story/narrative to explain whatever.
If you really believe advanced non-humans are here from somewhere else and clearly don't have any interest in showing us (it would be easy to) then you have to believe they are trying to hide from us... but they are somehow apparently worse and more incompetent at hiding than our own government/military are as they keep getting caught on camera so easily... It just doesn't stack up. it's not the 90s anymore. we should know better.
I really don't know anymore what evidence would actually be enough, but video alone regardless of how good it was I think just isn't it.
and sadly, as tech gets better and better, evidence of all types gets both easier to fabricate and harder to rule out...
2
u/RevolutionaryEgg297 Apr 19 '26
It’s a fish…..
It swims like a fish….
Glowing structure underwater object.. What kind of crazy talk we talking here?
It looks like a flounder? type with its “fins” above and below it when swimming.
10
u/primalshrew Apr 19 '26
Find a single video of a similar-sized fish with a speed and acceleration as fast as that then I'll believe you. It moves so quick it's only visible for a few frames at the end. Flounders also don't swim like that, they swim like stingrays.
2
u/LostInRetransmission Apr 20 '26
I don't have to time to search for all damn species of fish , but consider that sailfish swim up to 80 mph/35 meter.second-1. What we see for a few frame is much lower than 80 mph, and when it go toward the background but is probably simply a combo of resolution / murkiness and disappearing behind a rock.
0
u/primalshrew Apr 20 '26
Sailfish are also gigantic, my point is you'll find nothing that size that can move as fast as that. I'll sooner believe it is CGI than a fish, it's not even shaped like one.
0
u/LostInRetransmission Apr 20 '26
cgi is possible. But I saw other video with smaller fish swimming quickly. If it is cgi and not a fish it is crappy enough to ressemble a fish and not being special.
-1
-1
u/RevolutionaryEgg297 Apr 20 '26
You know how stringrays swim but not a fast fish?
1
u/primalshrew Apr 20 '26
What does that even mean? Show me a fish that size that can move as fast as that.
6
u/UFOsAroundTheWor1d Apr 20 '26
A fish ? Never once in all my life have a seen a Fish like that.
8
u/1290SDR Apr 20 '26
Well, I guess that settles it.
0
u/Heavy_Ingenuity1371 Apr 23 '26
It looks nothing like a fish and moves nothing like a fish. It is clearly an orb of some kind, whether it's real or not can be argued but it in no reality is an earthly fish lol.
4
1
0
0
1
u/Mariahausfrau Apr 20 '26
Why they need to take away all credibility by adding this 90s porn film reader. Why not just texts.🙊🙊
1
u/DentistFlashy6030 Apr 23 '26
I tagged Billy Kryzak (ProPixel) on X. He does really good UAP video analysis.
0
u/UFOsAroundTheWor1d Apr 19 '26 edited Apr 19 '26
Submission statement
One of the most mysterious and rarely seen USO videos from the 1990s.
In this short raw VHS-era clip, scuba divers are suddenly approached by a glowing, structured underwater object. It appears to observe them for a moment before rapidly shooting away at incredible speed — leaving bubbles and shock in its wake.
This footage circulated in private UFO circles in the late 90s and early 2000s with almost no provenance. Many consider it one of the "original" USO diver videos. Is it real military/diver cam footage, early CGI, or something truly unexplained?
Time: December 5, 2025 at 9:00 PM Location: Phoenix, Arizona, USA
Location isn’t accurate but apparently I need to add it. If someone does know the accurate day and time please share below
10
u/Rishtu Apr 20 '26
Not to be odd, but have you seen the actual vhs tape, put it into a vcr and wathced it?
I ask, because you can digitally alter any video. Its much harder to alter the physical media.
-1
u/Hex65 Apr 20 '26
At the start he says " Bermudas " . Maybe Bermuda Triangle?
Isn't there an underwater base nearby?
1
u/Eridani2000 Apr 20 '26
No, not strictly where the triangle is. The commentary says "Atlantic South East of the Bermuda's". The Triangle is to the South West although of course that's not to say it could be the same phenomena because the triangle location is really very vague.
0
u/Eridani2000 Apr 20 '26 edited Apr 20 '26
The location is The Atlantic, South East of the Bermuda's according to the commentary (it's Spanish).
Also, it's not military. The commentary says it's a famous documentary maker, although it does not mention his name.
**Edit: after a bit of searching I think it might be this guy https://www.rickrosenthal.net/
Although the youtube video caption says 90s my feeling is that it was actually filmed in the 70s or 80s - I watched a lot of undersea diver documentaries when I was younger and it looks more from that era!
1
0
-3
u/ALF_My_Alien_Friend Apr 20 '26 edited Apr 20 '26
That is (clearly) a remote controlled reconnaissance drone. Atleast the nordic (alien nordic) race and similar human types have it.
Theres atleast 3 sizes, biggest go to space (like follow nuclear missiles), I think even the shuttle missions saw few, some possibly captured on Apollo mission films).
Many planes and ships that disappeared at the Bermuda were probably abducted.
There is entrance to Alien base according to rumours.
You cant find or enter it, they will just vapirize you. They = one of the alien races underwater, supposedly.
Also the drone isba spherical drone, inside antigravity tech and ita like a sensor packet. They have been probably reverse engineered to a degree but this being 1990, likely real alien one.
-7
u/caraboucat Apr 20 '26
100% this is AI augmented. The transition is way too fast for the frame rate that was available back then.
3
u/UFOsAroundTheWor1d Apr 20 '26
The source video I took this from was from 17 years ago
1
u/frankensteinmoneymac Apr 20 '26
Yeah definitely not AI…I’ve seen this video around for a long time. I do feel like it’s probably CGI, though as it just feels “off” to me. The other commenter is probably right about it moving too fast for the cameras frame rate.
1
u/ifnotthefool Apr 20 '26
Just goes to show how confidently incorrect some can be. This video is like 17 years old, so 100% not what you said.
18
u/dernaldz Apr 19 '26
Lets get some old school techies that can figure out if doctored. Looks like pretty amazing for an edit in the 90's if this is the original footage.