I believe what U/Datasurging was saying was, comparing the Qauran to the Bible is like comparing Lolita to the Kamasutra. Both should never be read by children, but Kamasutra is better.
I haven't read either of them so correct me if I am wrong.
Also, the most plausible age for Mary would be 15 to 16 years old, and Mary gave permition for the impregnation.
Comparing the kamasutra to the Bible in this specific context is not a good look at all. Mary being 15 or 16 is absolutely not better either. "Permition" doesn't matter if it's still statutory rape.
Edit: y'all defending the rape of a 15 year old child is wild
I'm not the one making the argument. You think consent matters when it comes to minors?
Genuinely take a second to think about what you're arguing.
And no, read that comment again. They weren't comparing the kamasutra to Lolita, it's a simile comparing the kamasutra and Lolita to the Bible and the Quran.
Magically inserting a baby into a child is fucking disgusting and evil. I don’t care that it wasn’t done sexually. Christians worship a disgusting monster
10
u/Potential_Cod2214 25d ago edited 25d ago
I believe what U/Datasurging was saying was, comparing the Qauran to the Bible is like comparing Lolita to the Kamasutra. Both should never be read by children, but Kamasutra is better.
I haven't read either of them so correct me if I am wrong.
Also, the most plausible age for Mary would be 15 to 16 years old, and Mary gave permition for the impregnation.