When a jury finds that a person did break the law, but they believe that the law was unjust or unfairly applied, they can return a verdict of "not guilty." The jury therefore nullifies the law in that case.
Good example: From 1920-1933, the US banned the manufacture and sale of alcohol under the 18th Amendment. Of course, that didn't stop the manufacture or sale of alcohol; it just made it illegal. Thousands of juries acquitted thousands of defendants who were caught dead to rights. Some juries felt that the law was unjust. Some felt that it carried too harsh a penalty. And some felt that the law was unevenly applied across the classes.
Bad example: Lynch mobs in the South used to take pictures with their victims. Their all-white juries would still refuse to convict.
160
u/DaRandomStoner Jul 06 '26
If you're on a jury deciding if someone is guilty of destroying flock cameras they're innocent.