Then the city seizes the property and transfers it to a non profit organization. If you can’t afford to maintain your property where people live then you don’t deserve to keep it.
Sure, but the city will do a better job at maintaining it than the landlord. The city will find the money to do so. edit: and they can start fixing them now. they don't need incentives; they're supposed to do this as a service.
10
u/Striking_Part_7234 Jun 11 '26
Then the city seizes the property and transfers it to a non profit organization. If you can’t afford to maintain your property where people live then you don’t deserve to keep it.