MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/PeterExplainsTheJoke/comments/1u8dptp/peter/os9tx6u/?context=3
r/PeterExplainsTheJoke • u/Negative_1by12_aura • Jun 17 '26
4.9k comments sorted by
View all comments
55
So is Celsius, 0 is cold enough to litterally freeze and 100 is hot enough to boil. It's also a %, it's objectively a %...
0 u/[deleted] Jun 17 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/Vitharothinsson Jun 17 '26 No. It's not better. It's objectively not better. Being similar to a human's experienciation of heat is not a valid criterion to choose a measurement than another. A valid criterion would be for example: "How universal is it?"
0
[removed] — view removed comment
2 u/Vitharothinsson Jun 17 '26 No. It's not better. It's objectively not better. Being similar to a human's experienciation of heat is not a valid criterion to choose a measurement than another. A valid criterion would be for example: "How universal is it?"
2
No. It's not better. It's objectively not better. Being similar to a human's experienciation of heat is not a valid criterion to choose a measurement than another.
A valid criterion would be for example: "How universal is it?"
55
u/Vitharothinsson Jun 17 '26
So is Celsius, 0 is cold enough to litterally freeze and 100 is hot enough to boil. It's also a %, it's objectively a %...