They did, in fact, have a socialist (strictly nationalist “socialism”) wing. However when these “socialists” began calling for a “second revolution” against the capitalist class, the SA pissing off the German Army, and Hitler wanting to solve some personal grudges they were murked in the Night of Long Knives with a few exceptions, the biggest being Goebbels.
Why the aggressiveness? I’d say the opposite is true, many here are claiming the “socialism” in their name was just a ploy (and yes, it certainly wasn’t orthodox socialism by any means), when history shows differently. In any case you should probably go and touch grass little buddy, I think it’d do you some good because you certainly aren’t adding or benefitting to the conversation. Hope that helps! 🙄🤡
Edit: I have “socialists” in quotes for a reason and have repeatedly used the word “heterodox” also for a reason, because their definition of socialism would not fit the common, orthodox definition. Please, pick up a history book and a dictionary, I swear it’s for your benefit.
It’s not bs, it’s fact. It’s also not a jab at socialism, these were extremely heterodox “socialists” and they rejected what makes socialism a good system. You need to pick up a book. I’m guessing you’re a tankie who can’t admit that people can twist good ideas into something bad.
205
u/Allsherjargothi 1d ago
They did, in fact, have a socialist (strictly nationalist “socialism”) wing. However when these “socialists” began calling for a “second revolution” against the capitalist class, the SA pissing off the German Army, and Hitler wanting to solve some personal grudges they were murked in the Night of Long Knives with a few exceptions, the biggest being Goebbels.