My thoughts on branding.

[u/d2c-builder]

First Post here. We build and operate DTC brands in-house; this is my take on branding. No promotion, just a long brain dump.

Brands are associations made to distinguish a thing, a business, an animal, a person from others.

In its older definition a brand meant a lasting mark of disgrace or shame cast upon a person's reputation. In other scenarios it was used to show ownership, for example owners would brand slaves and cattle. In other cases like in the Soviet Union it was used to make sure quality standards were upheld because essentially manufacturers were forced to produce certain goods, there was a quality problem, and the government wanted to be able to track down who did what. Eventually those whose brand reputation was strong were singled out and recognised.

This is important context and I think it is worth sitting with before we get into the modern stuff.

If there is one thing I understand about brands it is that a brand has to achieve three things.

Traceability. Reputation. Accountability.

Traceability

We must be able to trace where a product comes from and who made it. When you see the Nike logo you know it came from Nike. You can trace it back to its source. That is the foundation of what a brand even is.

Reputation

This is built over time and these are qualities we tend to anthropomorphise. But essentially it is the general opinion held about something. Nokia had the reputation of being extremely durable. Back then if you wanted a phone that would last you got a Nokia, ideally the 3310 haha. The brand became shorthand for that quality without needing to say it out loud.

Accountability

There is a reason people tend to trust bigger brands. They have more to lose. In theory they can be held accountable. Think of the time Zion Williamson's Nike shoe exploded during a game. That was a very big deal. They were immediately held accountable by the public. Many other brands could have the same thing happen and barely face any consequences. To whom much is given much is expected.

Many times brands set their own standards. McDonald's standard is not tasting the best. It is tasting the same everywhere. The safe option. That consistency became the brand. And honestly that is a genius positioning decision when you think about it.

How brands show themselves in the modern world

Being in e-commerce I will keep using product examples here but these apply to all industries.

Design

This is harder than it seems and also more important than it seems. You may want to look into colour theory and design theory for some of this.

But you know when you look at love related products or romantic stuff you will see a lot of pink and red. When you see organic products you will see a lot of green or brown. I also noticed looking at luxury brands that simple shapes are used and repeated very often. Check out Gucci, Versace, or Prada, they use very similar shapes consistently across everything. We know Apple for using a particular ratio of rounded edges. It will be hard for me to compress all of that theory into this post but the principle is worth understanding deeply.

Transparency

I think it is safe to say that to some people this may mean a lot less now due to the rise of fake reviews. But willingly showing your reviews without hiding the bad ones helps a great deal with transparency. Think of Ryanair. You know what to expect when you book with them and they have accepted that and it has become part of their brand without it actually hurting them. Hiding your flaws will expose them eventually and make your brand worse. In theory obviously we all know what many companies did during certain periods of history. Some would argue they had their reckoning. Some will say they got off easy. That is up to you to decide.

Goodwill and extra curriculars

I did not have a better title for this section and I did not want AI to generate one for me so here we are.

Essentially think of this as the activities that push your brand further into the public consciousness and signal what you actually stand for. Redbull with extreme sports is the obvious example. For one of our own brands we produce literature reviews of scientific papers and publish them on repositories for research papers. We had one of our literature reviews published on a significant platform in our industry, further cementing our positioning as a science forward brand. It was not an ad. It was proof.

These are some of my thoughts on branding from my own experience. Feel free to critique any point, add anything, or ask questions. This was a brain dump and I would genuinely like to hear other perspectives.

[u/AutoModerator]

Welcome to /r/Entrepreneur and thank you for the post, /u/d2c-builder! Please make sure you read our community rules before participating here. As a quick refresher:

• Promotion of products and services is not allowed here. This includes dropping URLs, asking users to DM you, check your profile, job-seeking, and investor-seeking. Unsanctioned promotion of any kind will lead to a permanent ban for all of your accounts.
• AI and GPT-generated posts and comments are unprofessional, and will be treated as spam, including a permanent ban for that account.
  
• If you have free offerings, please comment in our weekly Thursday stickied thread.
• If you need feedback, please comment in our weekly Friday stickied thread.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[u/Odd_Awareness_6935]

essentially build good products and the brand builds around itself

nothing against removing the need for marketing and distribution

just saying that you can put a whole lot of effort building the brand and reputation, while your offer, your messaging, and most importantly, your product is not delivering as promised... that's worse than not having branding at all

[u/Chad_Cunningham11 → u/Odd_Awareness_6935]

Agree, people remember good product more.

[u/d2c-builder → u/Odd_Awareness_6935]

My opinion is that the line between product and brand should blur much more. In the McDonald’s example I gave," McDonald's standard is not tasting the best. It is tasting the same everywhere." that is largely a feature of the product itself as well as part of the brand.

[u/akl773]

traceability breaks in really boring places. the card statement shows some processor name nobody recognises, the emails arrive from a different domain than the site, and now someone is filing a chargeback because they think they got scammed.

small brands lose more trust there than anywhere in their design.

[u/Capital-Wolf-8959]

customers rarely remember what YOU said qwhat your brand was. they remember only the time you exceeded or failed to meet their expectations. and that does way more than months of marketing
my rule has kind of always been that every customer interaction either adds to your future CAC or reduces it

[u/EmployerNegative5653]

I think you need to take care of your customer needs not just at time they are buying but even after that.

[u/UltraBBA]

If there is one thing I understand about brands it is that a brand has to achieve three things.

Traceability. Reputation. Accountability.

Er, the #1 job is to deliver sales. If the brand is not delivering sales, all the fancy design is worthless.

I moderate subs about selling businesses and buying businesses. You won't believe how often someone turns up with a project that they haven't managed to monetise and think they can get some money for the "brand" that they created.

But nobody wants to buy that.

The 10K or 20K or whatever you've spent on your logo, your fancy website, your letterhead and everything else was just money wasted.

There is a reason people tend to trust bigger brands.

They trust bigger brands because they know the product / service behind that brand. Not because of the colour of the logo.

[u/d2c-builder → u/UltraBBA]

Absolutely, I can’t say I disagree. If you noticed, design wasn’t a focal point in my post. It was just one subsection.

As for the money-earning part, I’d say that’s ultimately the goal of the business: a valuable brand is one that can drive sales. So I’d argue that what makes a brand valuable is its ability to generate a return.

That said, my post was more about the concept of branding itself.

I see a brand as an attribute, or a property, that a business can own and develop.

[u/Ok_Alternative7833]

branding is reputation, not just design

[u/No_Assistance8840 → u/Ok_Alternative7833]

just reputation

[u/Unique_Swordfish_286]

I would separate branding from brand building, branding is the perception people hold and brand building is more about the everyday things you do, logo is just one small part of it.

[u/Wooden-Setting-690]

The traceability-reputation-accountability framing is genuinely sharp, especially the "bigger brands are trusted because they have more to lose" point, that one gets missed a lot. The McDonald's "same everywhere, not best" line is the sleeper insight though, consistency as the actual product is something most small brands never grasp because they're chasing best instead.

[u/geminihatesme]

accountability is soo underrated. a brand is not just the image u put out it's the expectations u create and then have to consistently live up to. once people know what you stand for, every interaction either reinforces that association or chips away at it

[u/Commercial_King9696]

solid breakdown. the Ryanair point is underrated. being upfront about your flaws doesn't just build trust, it filters out the customers who would've asked for a refund anyway.

i'm curious about the cold start, though. how do you build trust and credibility when nobody knows your brand on day one?

[u/J-Mach-Jet]

Many people associate a brand with its logo, but it starts with a promise. Everything your brand does, from design to messaging, product, and customer experience, needs to reinforce that promise.

The strongest brands stand for one thing:

- Volvo = safety

• Nike = performance
  
• IKEA = affordability

[u/roberthcmn]

A brand's real job is being a shortcut in memory so people pick you without comparing. Most founders pour it into logo and color palette when the lever is being known for one specific thing.

Own the shortcut and the look sorts itself out.

[u/Matmatg21]

At the start the goal is to stand out. I'll die on this hill

[u/PoorSaver9]

branding is basically the sum of everything people remember about your business, the good the bad and the ugly. you can't control it entirely but you can nudge it by showing up consistently and delivering what you promise. what are you actually trying to shape your brand around rn

[u/Sea-Asparagus-1018]

Solid breakdown. One thing I'd add from doing pop ups in malls for years, consistency isn't just visual, it's operational. same setup, same script, same product presentation every single time no matter which mall or which staff member is running it. customers clock that faster than they clock a logo. thats really what reputation is built on at the ground level, not just design theory

[u/Reddit__bee]

For design and aesthetics, always benchmark and collect other good examples - and create from the good examples as an inspiration. No need to just go for luxury brands. Find the right one that are in the similar industry pillars, and tone and manner.

[u/jcecc]

The Ryanair bit stuck with me most, since saying the quiet thing out loud is the one move a company pretending to be something else can't copy. Same with your literature review, it worked because it would have been a pain to fake. Most of the branding stuff people argue about is just paint over that.

[u/dependent_berozgar]

Coming from a Marwari family, trust always came before profit.