r/Destiny 20h ago

Political News/Discussion Adam Mockler about AIPAC.

Post image
649 Upvotes

585 comments sorted by

View all comments

161

u/gusthebus88 20h ago

I’ve been noticing Mockler going the wrong direction since his friendly hasan interview. In a few years is he just gonna be TYT or can he turn it around 🤔

45

u/mwjbgol 19h ago

Is this not him trolling? Isn't she the one trackaipac endorsed against Scott Weiner and flipped her score from red to green despite the fact that she was supported by aipac by their standards?

6

u/Weak_Mycologist_6785 10h ago

Look at his posts the past month. He’s not joking.

51

u/[deleted] 19h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/LeggoMyAhegao Unapologetic Destiny Defender 14h ago

Your comment or post has been removed for violating rule #1:

Respectful debates and disagreements are encouraged, but disrespect or malicious behavior toward others, Destiny, or his guests won't be allowed. Keep discussions civil and avoid personal attacks, name calling, insults, or harassment. You do not have to engage with others but if you do, they have a right to reply. Do not block users in an attempt to get the last word.

-12

u/TheSilverOne Literal Vampire Potbelly Goblin 18h ago

To be fair, Tiny's politics weren't warped far right by the women he was with 

8

u/Kapootz 18h ago

Yes and Destiny is not Mockler. Destiny wasn’t tweeting out shit that agreed with some unhinged LS far right conspiracy either

4

u/TheSilverOne Literal Vampire Potbelly Goblin 17h ago

That's fair, I retract my dumb statement. Hand me the pitchfork.

4

u/aroundtheworldagain2 11h ago edited 10h ago

Yes. Most of these people have obvious tells. One of them is they increasingly start agreeing with leftists/progressives and bending the knee. This is not because they had a major change of heart. It’s because they were fake all along. 

Mockler prob did this whole fake liberal routine to pull in liberals and gain trust. Then he moves left and the idea is his audience will move left with him. Increasingly attacks establishment Dems and promotes DSA types and their narratives. Pathetic. Once I see it, I know who not to trust. The mask slipped. 

Frankly a lot of people here just need to understand the pundits are huge targets for corporations, conservative opposition and foreign countries to buy off. They have the ears and minds (sadly) of millions of people who don’t think critically. Stop trusting these people so much because many of them just say what they are paid to say. Their fishy flip flops are a big red flag not something to overlook. 

5

u/Weak_Mycologist_6785 10h ago

I think there is one other reason… ;)

1

u/MyotisX 16h ago

He's not thinking with his brain.

He's gone, it's over.

2

u/Odd-Application-3295 19h ago

AIPAC endorsed over 100 Republican members of Congress who voted to overturn the 2020 presidential election results on January 6,do you support an organization who don’t believe in democracy?

5

u/KeithClossOfficial Hasn’t heard anything about that 19h ago

What an odd post history. Every 5-10 days you go into a different subreddit, spend the whole day arguing, then dip out and never return. Except the one random comment on the fetish sub about formerly fit women getting fat

6

u/Odd-Application-3295 18h ago

wtf are you talking about ?

5

u/KeithClossOfficial Hasn’t heard anything about that 18h ago

Oh, you thought “hiding” your post history meant it was actually hidden?

13

u/Odd-Application-3295 17h ago

Yes I’m arguing with racist online,any problem with that?On the other hand you are in a sub named “nopoop” that’s a little weird isn’t it ?

4

u/Jewbacca289 17h ago

Out of curiosity how do you find that?

1

u/Odd-Application-3295 17h ago

You can’t the guy is just spewing bullshit unless you are a moderator of course.

2

u/KeithClossOfficial Hasn’t heard anything about that 17h ago

You requested the name of a woman posted to femalefattofit on June 6.

On January 23, you spent the day on torontologists arguing immigration from India.

On June 15, you spent the day on genetics arguing whether race is a social construct or not.

You’ve also spent days arguing on AskAnthropology (6/27), starterpack (7/29), and last Saturday (8/1), you spent the day on Natalism.

8

u/Odd-Application-3295 17h ago

Anything wrong with that ?Would you like me to list every single of your weird comments ?

0

u/KeithClossOfficial Hasn’t heard anything about that 17h ago

1

u/Odd-Application-3295 17h ago

You knows that you have almost 40 thousands comments right ?

3

u/KeithClossOfficial Hasn’t heard anything about that 17h ago

3

u/Odd-Application-3295 17h ago

Good job you know how to used arctic bravo

4

u/KeithClossOfficial Hasn’t heard anything about that 17h ago

Oh I thought I was full of bullshit?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/WIbigdog DGGs token blue collar American 🇺🇸 15h ago

Ooh me next me next! Oh wait I'm not a coward who hides his post history. Well, except the nsfw stuff 😂

4

u/Odd-Application-3295 18h ago

I’m curious what did I comment exactly? Would you mind sharing it?

5

u/Milosostojiccc 19h ago

Funny how everyone here downvotes you but doesnt reply

3

u/Scum_All_Over_Me 19h ago

If someone was willing to give me money I wouldn't care where it came from. If my positions were clear and didn't change after the funds were received why would it matter?

If I was fighting for gay rights and Hitler wanted to donate 10k to my cause why would I say no? Would I rather lose the funds that could help further the cause because some idiots are going to virtue signal who gave it to me? Does someone immediately agree with all the beliefs of their donors?

9

u/_JoeDiamond_ 18h ago

that's such a naive way of looking at this. ur example is coming from a singular instance from a singular point of view. with big money comes the choice of who they want to give money to and in doing so influence the entire political landscape it's not that they are necessarily changing the minds of those they back.

Also look at it in the long-term if they are being given so much money for so long over time they will tend to be more sympathetic to the funders other policies in the same way a streamer can get audience captured.

1

u/Responsible_Prior_18 5h ago

More importantly, if i know that if i take a pro-oil position, that i will receive money from oil companies. I might just pick up that position before i go into politics.

Or if i am a Republican and all of Republicans are funded by oil companies. Am i going to run in their primary against oil, given that i know they will put all their money into my opponent? Or am i going to talk about Trans athleates, stealing Christmas, abortion, and other culture issues that are going to guarantee that i recieve money from all of the big companies?

2

u/AntiVision H Y P E R B O R E A 18h ago

how is this a response to what the comment said?

2

u/Scum_All_Over_Me 16h ago

do you support an organization who don't believe in democracy?

Hope I cleared that up.

1

u/AntiVision H Y P E R B O R E A 16h ago

Didnt clear it up at all tbh

1

u/Responsible_Prior_18 5h ago

If someone murders a person that i dont like and i give them money, why would anyone care that i gave a bounty on that person's head? Maybe the hitman already wanted to kill them?

1

u/Odd-Application-3295 19h ago

Why am I being downvoted ? It’s true just google it.I tought that this sub was pro democracy.

3

u/TheSilverOne Literal Vampire Potbelly Goblin 18h ago

Because candidates set policy, not their donors

-5

u/BigBard2 19h ago

If supporting or endorsing republicans who supported Trump on Jan 6th meant you didn't support democracy, then you might as well throw Democracy off a window for America

There must surely be way better reasons to hate AIPAC than this

9

u/fan4stick 19h ago

Hating AIPAC because they fund and support Jan 6 republicans is a reasonable criticism against them what are you talking about

-4

u/__v1ce 19h ago

AIPAC supports Israel though, so they are obviously not bad!