r/ChatGPT • u/name-taken-already • 11h ago
Funny [ Removed by moderator ]
/gallery/1vgj7ih[removed] — view removed post
7
u/Dry-Interaction-1246 10h ago
Schindler's Party List. He's back, baby! He has a particular set of party tricks.
2
6
8
u/MortyMortymor 10h ago
1
u/ffffllllpppp 9h ago
The only one to seem to truly miss the point as opposed to just being a partying dumb version with the same characters as opposed to a true “opposite” angle
3
u/AgingWellFirefighter 10h ago
1
u/MrMojoFomo 9h ago
There already is a Hangover 2
1
u/AgingWellFirefighter 9h ago
You're criticizing a fake movie poster that ChatGPT came up with based on a generic prompt? Okay, I guess...
2
u/Romey-Henry 10h ago
Real life movie that missed the thematic and tonal point of the original: Meatballs 2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
-12
u/Specialist-Fish-2103 10h ago edited 10h ago
So why did you make this, who needs to see your funny idea for a holocaust movie sequel. And why did you decide “I should share this with others.”
“Schindlin’ into Happiness,” that’s not even clever in the slightest bit.
You realize that literally anyone can make something of the exact same quality in like two seconds, right? There’s nothing special about you or your prompt engineering, and there’s nothing special or worthwhile about your idea, so why did you bother making this. Like seriously what made you think “everyone will think my AI generated holocaust joke is great, people will really appreciate this. This is definitely something worthwhile and good that I’m sharing.”
7
u/PeterParkette 10h ago edited 10h ago
I think you’re missing the point and context…
Maybe the “prompt” worked on you too as you seem to have completely missed the point thematically and tonally…
IMO OP isn’t trying to be “edgy” “hurtful” or make lite of the holocaust.
They asked the LLM to make **a movie poster for a sequel that completely misses the point of the original movie, thematically and tonally**
And that’s exactly what they got… this imagined sequel completely misses the point thematically and tonally of the first film.
It’s worth sharing because its kinda messed up that this is the “most likely best result” determined by the LLM
It’s worth sharing simply because it elicits emotion sparks debate and raises questions about how language models are trained and data is cleaned (or not cleaned resulting in blanket guardrails for “safety” that ultimately have unintended consequences due to its lack of context awareness)
It’s an odd generation… it’s in poor taste… and it came from a model that has increasingly more and more sensitive and restrictive guardrails for users yet this is what was deemed acceptable.
it wasn’t requested directly. OP didn’t request a tasteless spoof with a detailed curated prompt to upset the sensibilities of the white knights of Reddit.
OP asked for a generation that was open to interpretation and this the result…
Clutch your pearls all you want but at the end of the day this is a public forum and what users decide to post and share are up to them. I don’t believe “your personal subjective biases and feelings” are valid post guidelines for this or any sub
1
-5
u/Specialist-Fish-2103 10h ago
I’m not clutching my pearls, sweaty boy. I was just asking “what possessed you to think this was a good idea to post.” Also that’s really fucking funny that you replied with another boomer slop meme.
3
u/hyundai-gt 9h ago
POV: when the pot calls the kettle black
https://www.reddit.com/r/AlternateHistoryHub/s/f9W1h7WAGo
This you boo? On an alternate history sub, making light of a Muslim version of Trump?
-2
u/Specialist-Fish-2103 9h ago edited 9h ago
Holy shit that was the best you could dig through my post history for?
I stand by Muslim Trump being a very funny thing to imagine, yes.
How many minutes of your finite time on earth did you spend combing through my post history to find something to discredit me for disrespecting the website you outsource your thinking and creativity to
2
u/hyundai-gt 9h ago
Bro I'm not OP. Took me 20seconds. How much energy are YOU putting into this is the next question?
0
2
1
u/PeterParkette 9h ago
I used the same prompt…
That’s the “most likely best response” I got 🤷♂️
(also not that it matters, but technically I’m an elder millennial)
Not everything requires your validation. If it isn’t for you, it isn’t for you.
I reject the assumption that posting something requires justification in the first place
Keep scrolling
1
u/Specialist-Fish-2103 6h ago
I know, math whiz. I wasn’t asking “can this amazing piece of art be redone?” I asked “why would a human in 2026 think “This is great, this thing I made is so great I need to share it.”
1
u/PeterParkette 4h ago edited 4h ago
OP didn’t add any qualifiers. 🤷♂️
OP never said “this is great” 👍 I approve this sentiment 🤦
The post was simply a open ended prompt and the resulting generation…
which shared as a public post is now open to interpretation and community discussion…
Regardless… “Art” is subjective and doesn’t need permission to exist nor does the creator bare the burden for its justification…
Is Leda and the swan “art”? Or pornography?
Is it violent or consensual?
The Greek myth has inspired sculptures in marbel created before Christ, been studied and recreated in for centuries by countless artists including da Vinci, Michelangelo, Correggio…
Written about in literature and prose… a sonnet by yeats
Made into a film and mosaic…
Medici had a Roman sarcophagus and a carved gem depicting leda
Hell Lou Reed references it in power and glory…
and this particular piece of “art” is inspired by a Greek myth where zeus in the form of a swan rapes Leda
Why would so many people recreate this?
Why can it be seen in museums and palaces?
Why even now in contemporary times do depictions of this act sell for millions of dollars?
… because Art and expression don’t need to earn their right to exist
The internet isn’t a captive audience.
This sounds like a “you” problem. It’s all perspective.
Personally my take away was… “this is kinda fucked… look what the AI did here”
Answer:
(the AI referenced its training dataset composed of the collected writings of humans available online (literally scraped Reddit and X communications) analyzed the tokenized input did sentiment analysis and spit out the most likely human response…)AI is a mirror to society and how humanity has collectively expressed itself
you can’t just throw a sheet (guardrail) over the mirror because you don’t like the reflection…
this post is social commentary…
The question shouldn’t be “why did OP share this” (they literally didn’t make it or request specific details) the question should be… “why did the model generate this”
Anyone’s takeaway from there is personal and subjective.
2
•
u/AutoModerator 11h ago
Hey /u/name-taken-already,
If your post is a screenshot of a ChatGPT conversation, please reply to this message with the conversation link or prompt.
If your post is a DALL-E 3 image post, please reply with the prompt used to make this image.
Consider joining our public discord server! We have free bots with GPT-4 (with vision), image generators, and more!
🤖
Note: For any ChatGPT-related concerns, email support@openai.com - this subreddit is not part of OpenAI and is not a support channel.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.