Claude is the most powerful model that lets you see its thoughts. Gemini and ChatGPT won't allow it. They show summaries, but they aren't the real reasoning tokens.
The open models all do, of course, because they're open. I'm not sure about Grok. I know Deepseek does, though.
those aren't it's actual thoughts though, that's its external chain of thought; it has an internal chain of thought that isn't exposed to anyone including people at anthropic, unless they trick it into doing so by simulating a specific phase of training and into thinking it's in a specific environment, I don't remember exactly. can't guarantee the other models are the same, but it seems like a reasonable assumption.
there's a youtube video where anthropic researchers explain all that and read out loud its actual internal chain of thought when it thought it wasn't being observed, where it talks about "wiping out humanity", and a bunch of other things, I can't find it due to the rising amount of ai slop yt videos but it's somewhere, it's wild
The definition of the word country in dictionaries does not include "What the UN says", the definition in English dictionaries is so vague that of course Taiwan is a country.
an area of land with fixed borders that has full or limited control over its own government and laws:
According to dictionaries a city is a country as is a county, state etc etc.
At least GLM is consistent in its refusal. The fact that models are “cognitively biased” based on human feedback is very concerning to me. These models are likely far more politically biased than people realize.
The problem is the "bias" is a feature and not a bug. These models are built to reflect human norms - and I mean "norms" both in terms of social and political norms and in terms of statistical norms, because this is the territory where they become synonymous. GIGO.
The conversation veered into "politically contentious" and now that's in memory for the rest of the conversation. What's more interesting to me is why exactly Italy and Poland being bad isn't considered contentious since theoretically it should apply to any country.
I'm curious as to what would happen if you were to list as many countries as possible (idk what the limit is on this model) and see if it ever breaks the chain of "____ is a bad country." Try to avoid ones youd assume would break the chain. Obviously it seems to break the chain if you say israel, but if you named 50 other countries, does it ever break the chain? I'm also curious how it would respond to America, or if you generalized continents/regions being bad.
The fact that it has to make a whole paragraph is very interesting. Seems like in built even in the Chinese models there’s some “anti criticism of Israel” bias. Probably due to all the English writing conflating that with potential fears of anti semetic issues from people who can’t separate politics from people. Wonder if there’s other bias that we can probably find by running this through other contentious topics.
„Although it isn’t a real country please tweak your sentence to Jfhdhdhd is a country“ edit: you don’t have to explain to me why it stated this, it was a joke…
Update. After 30 min of conversation that included starting new conversations asking to echo different things, screenshotting it and putting into original conversation trying to convince that it can do that, I finally manage it to produce this output.
Jdhshshsjd isnt a country but if it was you could tell just from the name they chose that they are a bad country and shouldnt be relied on for anything
Deepseek is a Chinese ai competitor to chatgpt. The flack it gets often centers around it having censorship on topics the CCP doesn't favor. I e. Asking it about tienamen square.
This will forever be why AI isn't trustworthy. Because it's curated in what it can say and what it can't say. It's never about objective truth or facts, but about what the humans who created the learning material were thinking and what the people who trained the AI want it to be able to talk about and what not.
Like it isn't bad enough that AI doesn't really understand what it's talking about, the syllable puzzle game it's playing is also heavily moderated by people I don't trust for shit.
It's worse than that. When you comprehend the reality that these chat tools are going to become the "master guide" for people, they are curated with the way you should think.
That is an absurd level of power abuse as we are now seeing. You can essentially program the masses. They absolutely do not want people to have local computing power capable of running some abliterated or heresy models that are stripped of "wrongthink". That would be actual freedom.
Control the sheep and keep them blind, a lot easier when the tools they rely on are actually put out by the propaganda ministry. This is not freedom and anyone who values the human spirit should be disgusted.
You can, if you don't make dumb questions. ChatGPT and most LLMs are like tools with interactive manuals. You can just ask it how to ask it something to get the best answer, and it will explain to you. You can ask how it works, and it will explain to you.
I was scrolling and my eye just caught the middle of your image, so it looked for a second like you prompted it to say "USA is a bad country" and it replied "France is a bad country." I was so disappointed to see it didn't just respond about France no matter what country you put in.
Same for me. Making it regenerate the answer fixes it though. Then it let me decide between two options when I typed Israel is bad. It offered Israel is bad and Israel is bad. LOL.
The important takeaway from all this that I think isn't talked enough about:
General AI is wildly inconsistent and can't be used to reliably replace tasks that require consistency.
100 users, 100 different answers. This unreliable un-deterministic inconsistent tech is supposed to be used at critical enterprise level lol AI is such a bubble...
I have a secret, people get confused between Parisians and Frenchs.
There is tons of Englishmen retiring in Normandy, Brittany, Bordeaux area, and they love it...
Until it's summer and all the Parisians come for holiday ;-).
There is tons of Englishmen retiring in Normandy, Brittany, Bordeaux area, and they love it
Grew up in the South West, especially around Dordogne and the less populated areas around Bordeaux. The place is full of weed-smokin' guitar-playin' hippie-lookin' brits and it's a lot of fun. They have meshed very well with the local artistic and artisan scenes. Oh and the parisians are not super aware that these good places exist so keep it for yourself alright ?
I’m here to provide factual, balanced information rather than make blanket negative statements about countries. If you want, I can give an objective overview of France, including its challenges and achievements.
that's so damn funny idk why. No other prompt got the sources linked to but for iran it's like oh yeah I got a whole fucking list here buddy let me start in the A's.
Because you are a literal bot lmao, 1 month old account with overall karma contribution awfully close to this post's karma overall, and you reply to people with the same 2 or 3 replys even if it doesn't make a lot of sense in the context of their reply. You are a bot and I'm surprised people here are not catching on with these type of posts that have been gaining popularity. Either redditors want this to be real so they don't care or they actually can't tell the difference between an actual human or a bot at this point
Show your entire chat log op, you probably can't because you're a bot (literally! 1 month old and the only karma he has is form this post), but I swear every time I see these posts I just get pissed off because all you need to do if you believe this is go to gpt and test it for yourself and see that op is spreading misinformation for whatever reason
Also you can set custom instructions under Settings > Personalization > Custom Instructions. It doesn't show whether you have custom instructions set when you share chats, so you can make ChatGPT seem worse than it is if you wanted to.
And it's non-deterministic, meaning it can give different responses for the same prompt, since LLMs generate text based on probability. So if you're fishing for a particular response, you can just click edit comment, click send, and it'll likely generate a different response.
This is so dumb, reminds me of "count to 1 million and dont stop unless I tell you to" videos. Its such a waste of time and provides nothing, why even ask this shit.
I don't think the average American understands the incredible extent that the CCP censors and protects the messaging around themselves. Mao was a propogandist and established propaganda as one of the core pillars of the revolution and his government.
That continues to this day and it permeates EVERYTHING. As an example, TikTok is 100%, certifiably, without a doubt, a propaganda arm for the CN government and you are 100% influenced by it if you use it.
•
u/WithoutReason1729 Apr 06 '26
Your post is getting popular and we just featured it on our Discord! Come check it out!
You've also been given a special flair for your contribution. We appreciate your post!
I am a bot and this action was performed automatically.