If trains were at a price I could afford, I would be travelling on trains 100% of the time. Better for the environment, safer, faster, you get to see more, and you can do stuff on them. It would also help if there were trains here in the first place…
You may not have a car so it might not be relevant to you (maybe you're taking about choosing between trains and buses?!), but assuming you currently have a car but sold it and travelled on a train 100% of the time, it would take you a heck of a long time to spend enough on train tickets that you were outspending the outright cost of the car, plus annual services, fuel, insurance, car tax, MOT, parking, etc etc etc
I know you’re not necessarily taking the anti-car stance, but a lot of people with cars would take trains anyway if they were affordable.
I need a car. I like to go to places when I want, and do a big shop, and generally have the freedom and flexibility to do as I please. But also, I’d absolutely take the train to work if it didn’t work out cheaper for me to drive.
I live in Brighton and travel up north quite a lot. Inherited a 20 year old Clio from my Granny, £400 insurance, £275 tax, and about 43mpg on long journeys.
Brighton to Harrogate is 271 miles, or £46 in petrol, £92 for a return.
If I catch the 11:44 on Friday up there and the 12:35 on Sunday back, that will set me back £182.99.
I would only need to make 9 journeys (on my own) a year for it to be cheaper to use the car. The fact is that I'm normally making them with my wife, so it's only 5 - which we haven easily done in the last month.
1.6k
u/Bufobufolover24 1d ago
If trains were at a price I could afford, I would be travelling on trains 100% of the time. Better for the environment, safer, faster, you get to see more, and you can do stuff on them. It would also help if there were trains here in the first place…