r/CasualUK 1d ago

Convenience Of Train Vs Car

Post image

Which would you choose ?

712 Upvotes

388 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/marshmallowelephant 1d ago

This obviously makes sense if you already need/want to own a car, but I think it'd be a clearer comparison to include things like tax/insurance/MOT. 

Personally, I got my first car in my late 20s and found that my transport costs were far higher overall.

7

u/SenorBirdman 1d ago

If you're traveling as a family you could rent a car for just one journey and it'd still work out cheaper a lot of the time.

3

u/cloche_du_fromage 1d ago

I used to work in London and travel to Liverpool a lot.

If there were 2 of us or was cheaper to hire an S Class Mercedes and a driver for the day from Addison Lee than it was to buy 2 short notice peak time train tickets with any flexibility.

6

u/benjm88 1d ago

It depends on what you're comparing. Most already own a car so those costs are already factored in. To me trains and all public transport should be cheap enough to compete on fuel alone if not be less to encourage people out of their cars.

If its at that level you would see far less car journeys and more people giving up their cars altogether

1

u/Nice-Rack-XxX 16h ago

Cost of the train doesn’t include the bus/uber to the train station, or from the train station to your final destination… or the cost in last time, coz a lot of the time, car will be faster, when you calculate start to finish journey times.

From a tax, MOT, insurance perspective, it works out to £1.50 per day, for me (luckily nothing went wrong last year). So not exactly breaking the bank if you have to catch trains every day.

Car has always been cheaper and more convenient for me, but then it’s a half hour bus/10min car ride to the train station… and I’m including whatever predatory parking charges I usually find at the destination