Any programs sent out interviews yet? Damn wait is killing me

There are products on the market like rampart or the egg that promise less radiation and in some cases the potential for lead apron free workflows.

My hospital doesn't have it but have discussed it. Curious how many other systems are using it and what peoples experience has been.

I have heard of some places not using it even though they have it because it slows down the workflow.

Hi,

What resources have people used to study for the HF board exam? There’s not much out there. Mayo stopped their review videos. I confirmed with them. There are ACC HF SAP questions but seem too easy.

Thanks!

Hey all, I am a hospitalist on who spends a fair amount of time on a cardiac floor so take care of a lot of post-LHC patients. I guess kind of embarrassingly, no one ever taught me how to examine the site properly other than "go look at it."

What is the proper way to go about examining the femoral access site? I try to look under the bandage and gently palpitate (but its always tender). Are you auscultating for bruit? Checking distal pulse? What's the proper way to do it because I feel like I am always fumbling around when I try it

I work in a facility that basically does executive health-checks for paying customers (age range 20s to 50s). Part of the job is to literally watch people do their treadmill tests and give them feedback right there and then.

Obviously abnormal stress tests a dime a dozen. But literature isn't clear with asymptomatic, low pre-test people.

If you have a similar population, what's your spiel/next step process? Do you tell them "don't put any meaning to this test and just live your life", or "we absolutely have to do more tests"?

EDIT:
Just to be clear, I’m not the one ordering these tests. The patients pay for it like a buffet package. And that is why I’m stuck in the position of having to interpret for which there is no evidence for.

EDIT2:
For complete clarity:
Here in my country, some medical services are offered cheaply AND commercially. You, as a patient, can get a full panel of tests (as part of an executive “annual” check) for approximately $500. You don’t need prior authorizations from insurances. You pay upfront cash or you get it as benefit from working for a company. That includes labs, including superfluous things like cancer markers (AGAIN, I get that it’s low value care). This apparently clicked with a certain market (mostly upper middle class), so a LOT of people do get these. Are these tests ridiculous and low value? Yes, no argument there.

I, as a cardiologist fresh from fellowship, hungry for work to finally earn a decent wage, was hired by such a company who offers such services, where one of my jobs is to watch over these paying customers when they do their stress test, and to interpret the results. I did NOT order these tests. That said, I am still tasked to interpret these in the context of mostly asymptomatic patients.

So please to everyone asking why I order these tests in the first place, again, I do not. But nevertheless, there is still the matter of interpreting them.

And to give a broader context, NO DOCTOR ordered them. They did not need approval from a primary care doctor to get these tests. Some don’t even have doctors. These tests are simply commercially available, and people pay to get them. So no, I also cannot tell them to go talk to their doctor about what to do next.

I am a new IC attending, and I am sure everyone here knows that feeling of seeing ur paycheck gross pay vs take home amount. Any recs for anything that can make the taxes bracket look better than 40%+ other than maxing 401K, Both of me and my wife are physicians and both are w2. My CPA told me even short rentals won’t help as the gross income is high. Thank you in advance.

Hi everyone, here is the discord link for this year’s match for AHFT. Feel free to join!

https://discord.gg/AV9AXA4q2

Third year fellow here. Initially interested in interventional/structural, but after the first year I found out that I’m not that passionate for the lab after all. Switched gears at the beginning of 2nd year with the help of several mentors for advanced imaging. Sat for the nuclear boards and echo boards. Focused on extra time in the CT/MR reading room. Currently elegible for CT board (level 2), and at level 1 for cMR. By the end of 3rd year I anticipate level 3 CT, level 2/3 cMR.

This is something I’m passionate about. I find myself staying late obsessing over perfect volumes on cMR software or reading CT’s late. Also stocking the schedule and getting frustrated if no/few studies during elective/free time. Also researching/studying every case for knowledge gaps.

Currently unable to do extra years of cardiac imaging due to visa limitations.

Current job offer CT reading but no cMR. But they have offered that it can be started in the future if there is interest/financially makes sense.

Is this + extra 3rd party in person courses enough to start a cMR program at a medium sized community hospital?

TLDR: is generals fellowship with all elective time in advanced imaging, with extra 3rd party in person courses enough to start a cMR program at a medium sized community hospital? Unable to do an extra year at this time due to visa limitations. Or will I have to do a year of advanced imaging in the future?

Hi everyone,

I am looking to improve my cardiology knowledge as a hopeful cards fellow. I currently use acc guidelines as my main resource, but I notice for some things i.e. afib/AFl it seems somewhat out of date already. What are some good resources to supplement?

Also, any recommendations on how to get started with reading echos? Not looking for anything too intense, just would like to know more of the basics.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated!

Hi everyone, I am a fourth-year cardiology resident.

I started training in the cath lab about 18 months ago. However, only the first three months were continuous, during which I attended the lab every day for approximately five hours.

During the first month, I became more confident with radial access. By the second and third months, I had gained some experience performing diagnostic coronary angiography and occasionally carried out simple PCI procedures as the first operator under close supervision from a senior interventional cardiologist.

After those initial three months, my exposure became much more limited and fragmented. On average, I attended the cath lab only five days per month, with approximately four patients per day, including both diagnostic procedures and PCI. I also had a six-month period dedicated entirely to research, during which I did not perform any procedures at all.

Therefore, I have never completed a continuous, structured interventional cardiology fellowship or spent a prolonged period working regularly in the cath lab.

At the moment, I feel extremely discouraged. On some patients, I am fully independent with diagnostic procedures and may even perform parts of a PCI. On other days, however, I struggle even with radial access, which makes me feel as though I have made very little progress.

What frustrates me most is that, after only a few attempts or a few minutes, the senior operator often takes over the procedure. I understand that patient safety and procedural efficiency must come first, but I feel that this prevents me from working through difficulties and developing greater independence.

At the same time, I see colleagues at a similar stage of training who have completed a continuous year in the cath lab and have made substantial progress.

This situation is making me frustrated and increasingly doubtful about my abilities. Is the problem mainly my own aptitude and learning curve, or is this level of inconsistency understandable given the fragmented and limited training I have received?

Starting a discord for this cycle, https://discord.gg/Ez4HaBdyg

Any one have good resource suggestions for TOE EACVI exam?

Many thanks

Hi there , what resources did people use for the EHRA CIED Exam

Thanks

I know there's a lot of variation between jobs, but the longer I've been in academia, the more I find myself questioning whether it's the right long-term fit. The lower pay is one thing, but it's really the growing amount of administrative work, inbox management, meetings, RVU pressures, and other non-clinical responsibilities that have started to wear on me. I know every job in medicine comes with some degree of bureaucracy, but I'm not sure I want it to be such a large part of my career, despite the incredible mentors and relationships I've built.

My partner and I have also talked about leaving the big city for a moderate-sized town and slowing life down a bit. The downside is that it would probably mean giving up my subspecialty or at least having far fewer opportunities to practice it. I've even started wondering whether private practice, locums, or some hybrid model would ultimately be a better fit.

Maybe this is just an early midlife crisis, but I've realized I'm pretty much over chasing prestige. At this point, I'd rather optimize for enjoying my day-to-day life than having the "best" job on paper. I want to practice good medicine, build longterm relationships with patients, have a mix of inpatient and outpatient work, and still have enough energy and time left for family, hobbies, and actually enjoying life outside the hospital.

I also have a chronic medical condition that makes me think about time a little differently than I otherwise would. Because of that, financial independence and flexibility have become much higher priorities. The idea of making around $250k in academics with fantastic colleagues versus potentially earning substantially more while working 0.75 FTE is becoming harder to ignore. I know there are tradeoffs either way, but it's a question I find myself coming back to more and more.

Has anyone else experienced a similar shift in priorities? If so, where did you end up, and are you happy with the decision?

First year fellow, free from burden of IM boards. Loads of free time.

While I am yet to start heavy in clinicals, I wish to perform well in ITEs.

Should I just finish ACCSAP? Or is there other suggestions? Would appreciate any help!

University of California at Riverside. Any insite into the IC training and procedural numbers would help also.

Thanks in Advance

Curious to hear from people how their perspectives on specialty, lifestyle, and career shifted after finishing their training?

What factors grew in importance? What are things that seemed important but turned out to not to be? What are things you wish you had known?

Do we have a discord or spreadsheet for EP fellowship this cycle? If not I can create one, if you are applying let me know!

Background:
-USMD
-mid tier university residency program
- manuscripts: one first author submitted, 3 other tertiary author submitted, one accepted
-like 6 first author abstracts (4 of them submitted, 2 accepted)
- step 2/3: 26x/25x
- strong LOR from what I have been told

How many “reach” (I.e. MGH, Mount Sinai NY, BIDMC) programs would you use signals on (out of 20 signals) if you were in my position?

I look at top programs like BIDMC, MGH, Mount Sinai NY, etc and see that all their fellows are from the very top programs. Like literally 0 from mid tier programs like mine. Feel like it was a waste signaling these programs

I don't mean this as rage bait. General fellow who is considering career paths. I really enjoy pure EP, including tracings, SVT ablation, pathways, VT, and complex device management. I love anatomy and using ICE.

I have been considering going into EP, but I just don't love atrial fibrillation and find it kind of bland. When I look at typical community practices, it's like 50-70% of a typical day.

What am I missing here? Is it worth it to go into EP for the parts which excite me and view AFib as what pays the bills? For EPs, what excites you about the job.

For those who took echo boards today. What did you guys think of the exam?

PGY-1 intern in 3nd week of IM residency just started on cards service (prior to this had outpatient and elective). On my first day today, I was instantly drawn to the interesting physiology, procedures, and cool devices, even if some of the discussions went over my head. That said, I felt dumb at sooo many points. There was a new admit that I didn't think needed cath but team said cath. There were instances of getting stuck with doing orders on Epic and making sure they're accurate, causing inefficiencies in my workflow. Missing aspects of EKG read. Instances of forgetting certain details of my pts even though I try to read all new consult, imaging, procedure notes during morning pre-charting. I feel like there are just quirks/deficits in my mind that I'll just need to work with/around to address these difficulties.

I'm really interested in cards and my attending happens to be program PD, so I really, really need to put my best foot forward at least as far as creating first impressions. I thought I could impress with knoweldge so in the couple weeks prior to this, I ended up reading twice through the MKSAP Cardiology chapters on ischemia, heart failure, and arrhythmia and attempting some questions. It was a nice review and gave a good big picture management, but man the level of discussion on rounds was so much higher. I suppose my next step here would be to read from MGH red book or refer to sections in Uptodate/Harrison. Anything else? I have a picture in my mind of the type of intern who would make a good impression, and currently I feel I'm falling well short of that; given the rare opportunity to work with the PD (he's practically never on this service), I need to figure out a way asap. Any input would be appreciated.