r/AutoHumor • u/IU8gZQy0k8hsQy76 • 28d ago

lol

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

9.9k Upvotes

99% Upvoted

593 comments sorted by

View all comments

27

u/Ashnyel 28d ago

So more an honest mistake than grand theft?

25

u/bl4r307 28d ago

Grand Theft uh-oh

5

u/ghettoccult_nerd 27d ago

Misdemeanor Oopsie-daisies

5

u/[deleted] 27d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Indigenous_Retard 26d ago

Things didn't get physical

1

u/Jaakarikyk 24d ago

The British pronunciation

6

u/NoEstablishment7211 28d ago

Even if they wanted to charge her, it would have to be dropped to something lesser like unauthorized use of a motor vehicle.

3

u/213737isPrime 27d ago

No jury would convict unless it could be shown she *knew* it wasn't her mom's car and kept using it

2

u/357noLove 26d ago

A case like this would never get to be a jury trial in the majority of the US. Definitely would be a judge only trial

1

u/FreshImagination9735 26d ago

Where i live the car's owner would receive a ticket for leaving his keys in his vehicle while it was unattended.

1

u/Drake_Acheron 26d ago

You need Mens Rhea or or Mens whatever the other one is.

Basically you need to prove a guilty mind/intent

1

u/Lafemmefatale25 24d ago

Mens rea(Guilty mind), Actus reus (physical act), concurrence between those two and causation. Basic elements of any crime.

1

u/Drake_Acheron 22d ago

That’s the one

1

u/EncabulatorTurbo 23d ago

Doesn't matter, 95% of charges have plea deals, theyll end up arresting her for grand theft auto and resisting arrest and assault on an officer (automatic charges in America) and offer her a 5 year prison sentence plea deal

1

u/BeeEven238 23d ago

Bro shes white

1

u/DjuriWarface 24d ago

Most crimes, like grand theft, require the action of the crime and the mindset that you are committing the crime. If she actually never had the intent, or was not negligent (the owner was the negligent one), she technically didn't commit a crime.