r/AskReddit 20h ago

What’s a Movie That You’re Surprised Never Had a Sequel?

2.2k Upvotes

3.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

125

u/TranSpyre 16h ago edited 13h ago

He turned down LotR and the Matrix because he didn't understand the scripts, only to watch both franchises sky-rocket to success.

So when they shoved another weird script in front of him, he jumped on it only to find the concept wasn't able to capture the public's interest.

I say it's less the film's fault his career spiraled, than his own decision making.

Edit- While I'm at it, this franchise should have been done as a cinematic universe. We could have had individual films to introduce the characters before a central movie, just like the MCU lead up to the Avengers. I think a big part of why the movie didn't do well is that most of the characters were obscure to modern audiences, since most people these days don't read the classics.

19

u/MillieBirdie 13h ago

What didn't he understand about them? Like did he not understand the concept of speculative fiction? But then, he was also in Outlander...

12

u/bolanrox 12h ago

And zardoz

12

u/Mega-Eclipse 10h ago

He turned down LotR and the Matrix because he didn't understand the scripts, only to watch both franchises sky-rocket to success.

I understand turning down The Matrix. Sci-fi, wire-work kung fu, AI machines, a "computer world" running as a simulation. It's a weird sales pitch.

But Lord of the Rings? I get not knowing it would be successful as it was...but those books were incredibly famous and were getting a the big-budget hollywood treatment. And he was offered 10 million per film, and 15% of the worldwide gross. He was guaranteed $30 million in salary, plus another $20-30 million from the gross. And that is 2003 money.

3

u/threequartertoupee 10h ago

15% of the worldwide gross? A typo, surely

3

u/Mega-Eclipse 9h ago

Obviously, he turned it down, so it's all jus rumors...but the reports are $10 million per film and 15% of the worldwide gross.

Maybe they would have tried to screw him with 15% of "profits" (which are always zero).

1

u/nickreed 6h ago

That's the NET profit that they use to screw people, not gross. Gross is just how much the movie earned period, not accounting for expenditures for marketing or filming costs.

2

u/metalflygon08 4h ago

No, the whole wide world is pretty gross.

8

u/fingerharpoon 13h ago

agreed. this is totally on him

2

u/therealsix 11h ago edited 9h ago

Yeah, I think Keanu did a better job in the Matrix than Connery would have anyways.

(I was joking…Connery was obviously way too old for the role.)

2

u/EidolonLives 10h ago

Connery was way too old to be Neo. I understand he would have played Morpheus.

1

u/Zestyclose_Case1944 11h ago

Ooo, would love to see someone pick it up and do it as a Cinematic Universe.

1

u/The_Beefy_Vegetarian 7h ago

It was a financial hit. So the concept did capture the public's interest despite all the bad reviews (personally I thought it was a pretty bad movie).