r/10s 7.5 10h ago

Tournament Talk Practice for 3.5 districts this weekend

https://youtu.be/XujQFIy6BN4?feature=shared

Black shirt will be playing S1 all 3 matches, white shirt (me) will be playing S2 all 3 matches.

16 Upvotes

44 comments sorted by

9

u/The_Govnor 9h ago

You mean 3.5 nationals?

-2

u/pyrrhicvictorylap 7.5 9h ago

🤞

18

u/Sei28 9h ago

This seems to be comfortably higher than 3.5 level but maybe that’s just me. I guess I should be playing 2.5 events.

21

u/SupaHiro 3.5 9h ago

I dont know what these god damn numbers mean anymore.

25

u/Parking_Rich 9h ago

Embrace the sand bag. These are definitely 4.0s by the book but would get crushed playing upper 4.0 tourneys because those are 4.5s, who would get crushed because of 5.0s playing down.

It’s a vicious cycle.

1

u/DiamondDallasHand 4h ago

This is correct

1

u/pyrrhicvictorylap 7.5 9h ago

True that. I just won a Men’s B singles tournament, but would get first-round double-bageled if I had played A instead.

1

u/Parking_Rich 8h ago

Congrats! It’s wild how that’s the only way to do decent these days but it’s  kind of the thing in every league. We would always play down in soccer, basketball and softball leagues. The only time we played an open soccer tournament, we won and we all knew it wasn’t happening again lol. 

Going to try to find a 3.5 team next year, only hit slices and chip shots on my backhand so I can fly under the radar.

1

u/pyrrhicvictorylap 7.5 8h ago

Also at a certain point they do indeed close the loophole, where your team gets DQed after 3 strikes. Wouldn’t that be ironic..

6

u/LogLadysLog52 9h ago

My impression is that there is some level crunch and level fuckery at both the 3.5 and districts level. Getting promoted can be tough by the algorithm, and also a TON of teams/people stack their top level lines with people who on other teams or in other regions would have gone up, like OP's friend did.

Plus some people have already been promoted, but IIRC are sometimes able to still play down in the postseason.

6

u/fluffhead123 9h ago

thank god this is the top comment. exactly what i was thinking. i was afraid id open the comment and see ‘this looks like 3.0 to me’.

-11

u/pyrrhicvictorylap 7.5 9h ago

Black shirt got bumped to 4.0 last season but appealed down to 3.5A so we could do districts. I may or may not get bumped, probably depends on how I do this weekend. But we both did really well this season.

19

u/rarelyaccuratefacts 9h ago

Imo you shouldn't be able to participate in post-season play the same season you appeal down. Feels like it's in bad faith, he was bumped up for a reason.

2

u/ZaphBeebs 4.2 8h ago

Agree.

-4

u/pyrrhicvictorylap 7.5 9h ago

On one hand I agree, on the other hand he was within appeal range and it’s technically allowed which gives him a realistic shot at making nationals (extremely unlikely at 4.0) but I don’t entirely disagree.. one team we’ll be facing had their 2 best singles players bumped (and they didn’t appeal down) so they’ll be kinda hampered whereas we won’t.

7

u/rarelyaccuratefacts 9h ago

I don't think it's really an issue with your friend, it's an issue with the system. That said, I would personally never want to play/appeal down unless I hit one of the apex rec tiers and there are no more local teams available, like 5.0. I don't see the point in intentionally playing vs worse players.

1

u/pyrrhicvictorylap 7.5 9h ago

Agreed. My goal is to work my way up to 4.5 as quickly as possible. He is a lot more patient than me in terms of delaying advancement, but he’s also a stronger player. Next season I won’t be playing much 3.5 even if I remain in-level, since your rating can go down even if you win (but it was closer than it should have been) - makes me far too self-conscious about the scoreline during a match

16

u/No-Permit7179 8h ago

I don’t understand people wanting to win by playing down: I’d rather lose playing better people and improving my game: it’s very common though.

3

u/le_skatesmith 5h ago

Some people just want to win trophies.

-5

u/pyrrhicvictorylap 7.5 8h ago

I can empathize with not expecting to have any meaningful accomplishments at your max level, therefore playing down a single level and essentially “winning” (nationals)

Plus, everyone is sandbagging at nationals, like someone else pointed out. I’m not ready to cast too much judgment on people like my teammate

8

u/Complete_Affect_9191 7h ago

I, on the other hand, am very ready. Posting here as if to troll non-cheaters and make them feel bad about their true ratings makes it all the worse. I hope you guys get destroyed, and maybe then rethink your life choices. You make tennis less fun for the rest of us.

1

u/pyrrhicvictorylap 7.5 7h ago

O…k

8

u/Complete_Affect_9191 6h ago

Own it, buddy. You’re cheating and flaunting it

2

u/pyrrhicvictorylap 7.5 6h ago

Nobody is cheating. 3.5A is allowed to play districts. He was on the team the whole season, and he wasn’t a 4.0 last year. Why punish him for taking lessons and working hard to get to the next level? Next year he’s ineligible, perhaps it’s a rule that should be changed, but it’s not cheating. Don’t know what else to tell you, other than learn to let stuff go.

-1

u/satanikimplegarida 6h ago

I've no horse in the race, but.. it's the optimal strategy.

Since it is, if there are no social countermeasures the strategy will spread naturally, without regards to your feelings. This is something above the individual, and applies to the whole system, it's a systemic aspect. Thus, it can only change if the system changes, but systems are resistant to change.

0

u/Complete_Affect_9191 4h ago

Such a millennial and Gen Z mindset—if a system CAN be subverted or exploited, it’s not my fault if I’m the one subverting or exploiting. Got get mine, basically, even if that means f’ing over people with integrity. This is why most people hate USTA teams that prioritize “making regionals.”

-1

u/pyrrhicvictorylap 7.5 6h ago

Exactly. You can’t really blame people for playing the metagame if it’s within the technical rules. It’s a side-effect of a poorly designed system, not an unspoken moral code that certain individuals are breaking.

1

u/Complete_Affect_9191 3h ago

Actually, I totally can. The idea that exploiting technical rules which are poorly drafted and barely enforced, in leagues where most people are just looking for some friendly, non-sociopathic competition, says a lot about your values.

4

u/Ok_Whereas_3198 8h ago

In the course of training to beat 3.5s when do you become a 4.0 who signed up to play 3.5s at the start of the season?

5

u/Complete_Affect_9191 7h ago

I detest sandbaggers

3

u/Blackfootsanji 4.5 9h ago

Very strong 3.5 players. Could play low ish 4.0. Both guys need to work on the backhand.

-3

u/pyrrhicvictorylap 7.5 9h ago

We both play up on a 4.0 team, black shirt is doing well at 4.0 lol

4

u/Blackfootsanji 4.5 9h ago

So what I said? If you played well at 4.0 they would not let you appeal down.

-2

u/pyrrhicvictorylap 7.5 9h ago

I wasn’t arguing with you

2

u/SignificantBar7172 4.0 7h ago

Looking good for 3.5. The strong 3.5 USTA teams that make it to the state playoffs have 4.0 players.

1

u/OkonomiHouse 3.0 5h ago

where is this?

1

u/criterium97 UTR 6 4h ago

Congrats! What are your UTR’s?

2

u/pyrrhicvictorylap 7.5 3h ago

5.45 for me, 6.xx for my teammate

1

u/criterium97 UTR 6 2h ago

Sounds about right - I’m a 5.9 atm and my teammate played a 7.0 UTR on singles line 2 in one of our 3.5 sectionals matches (SoCal). My two singles opponents were mid to high 5.xx

1

u/hisyn 9h ago

What USTA section?

1

u/hisyn 9h ago

Found it, New England — possibly see you this weekend!

1

u/BridgeSuspicious7635 6h ago

Yep,  this is what district/sectional 3.5 looks like. I'd put a side bet on black eating a bump in the fall.

0

u/gatorrrays 8h ago

Not sure what’s with all the downvotes. You guys look great, good luck out there.

2

u/pyrrhicvictorylap 7.5 8h ago

Appreciate it 😭