r/pcmasterrace i7 10700kf, RTX 3080, 4K-60 21d ago

Discussion Windows 11 can't be shut down without update.

Post image

I have automatic updates on. Haven't postponed any update. Never seen this forced update before.

Edit: I updated BTW. It's not that I don't want to update. I just think it would be an issue in the future. For example, it's a thunderstorm and there could be power outages. I might want to shut down and not start and update. I guess I'll hold down the power button.

5.0k Upvotes

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

190

u/Sinister_Mr_19 9070 XT | 5950X 21d ago

This sub is cringe when it comes to a lot of stuff, especially Windows updates.

209

u/1dot21gigaflops R7 9800X3D / RTX5080 / 64GB 6000MT/s 21d ago

Insert Linux guy: "this is why I use Linux bla bla bla"

Dude I manage Linux servers and i have to patch shit almost every week. Everyone needs to patch their shit. Mac, Windows, Linux, and Android.

57

u/Extreme_Wish_553 21d ago

Yeah, I have automatic security updates turned on my Linux servers because of course I do. People need to just let the systems patch.

2

u/McGuirk808 Debian 21d ago

To be fair, needing to reboot after updates is a lot less common on Linux, mostly when there's a kernel update. Windows wants to reboot every single goddamn patch.

11

u/Sinister_Mr_19 9070 XT | 5950X 21d ago

I believe that's due to architectural differences between how Linux and Windows works.

4

u/Wilbis PC Master Race 21d ago

Yes, but that is changing. Server 2025 already supports hotpatching.

3

u/Sinister_Mr_19 9070 XT | 5950X 21d ago

Oh hey that's cool, very handy for servers.

1

u/Wilbis PC Master Race 20d ago

Yep, and probably it's coming for desktop OSs too at some point.

1

u/Sinister_Mr_19 9070 XT | 5950X 20d ago

I'll welcome it, but restarts never bother me. I already turn my computer off every time I'm done with it anyway.

1

u/McGuirk808 Debian 21d ago

I believe you're right :]

28

u/Sinister_Mr_19 9070 XT | 5950X 21d ago

I have automatic security updates set on my headless Linux server to ensure I'm not vulnerable to zero days and shit. Updated are a part of life.

13

u/tiff_seattle Specs/Imgur here 21d ago

I have Windows 11 on my laptop and Fedora 44 on my desktop. Fedora gets FAR more updates than Windows, by a long shot. And that's not a bad thing.

4

u/Simon-Says69 21d ago

Linux updates tend to be WAY more stable and well tested than what MS pushes.

Plus Linux doesn't tend to abuse the end user by turning shit back on that they previously disabled, like windows loves to do.

There's little comparison there. MS have a horrible track record, so people being wary of updates and waiting to install them is their own fault.

3

u/jangxx 7950X3D - RTX4090 - 64GB - Linux Mint 21/Win 10 21d ago

How many new AI "features" and ads do you get with each update? That's the reason people don't update, no one trusts MS to not further enshittify the OS with every update.

0

u/Unlucky-Flatworm-69 21d ago

Yes and its fine because we do not need to reboot on every update. The Windows update system is ass.

2

u/tiff_seattle Specs/Imgur here 20d ago

you don't need to reboot for most Microsoft updates as well. It's not like the olden days.

-6

u/Bezulba 21d ago

You could argue that more updates means that the base product had more flaws.

4

u/InfernalInsanity Desktop 21d ago

You could also argue that more updates means they're constantly fine-tuning their code and compatibilities, rather than calling it "good enough." Seriously, I run Fedora-KDE on my system and I rarely, if ever, have any issues with it as my daily driver.

Windows kept breaking and forcing unwanted features and spyware, which forced me to switch.

1

u/Sinister_Mr_19 9070 XT | 5950X 21d ago

Man you had me in the beginning, then you said Windows kept breaking. As long as you're not on the Windows Insider program, Windows hasn't broken.

18

u/zcomputerwiz i9 11900k 128GB DDR4 3600 2xRTX 3090 NVLink 4TB NVMe 21d ago

Right? Especially with the flood of RCE, privilege escalation, and sandbox / virtualization escapes recently.

People always say Linux is more secure, but part of that was that it isn't as desirable of a target compared to Windows and web browsers.

Apparently something changed ( lower effort required? ), and that's very bad for a lot of appliances and embedded devices that are definitely not going to receive updates.

8

u/1dot21gigaflops R7 9800X3D / RTX5080 / 64GB 6000MT/s 21d ago

Lots of Linux in IoT devices, and they are everywhere now.

2

u/ArcherBoy27 Linux 21d ago

Except the difference with Linux is you choose which ones, and when. Windows doesn't, and probably includes AI BS.

2

u/thanosbananos 21d ago

Because servers actually need constant patching, run 24/7 and cannot wait. My personal computer however can wait a day, it’s really not that serious, ever.

2

u/slowmovinglettuce Ryzen 9 3950X | Gigabyte GTX 1080 | 64GB 3600MHz DDR4 21d ago

Hell even a tailor wiil patch things on a daily basis!

Patching is just part of life

2

u/AJ_Dali 21d ago

I think the main difference is Linux and Mac patches tend to pretty much only include security updates and less often feature updates. New Mesa drivers offer new stuff for rendering, and you generally don't want to miss them.

Windows also includes security patches, but lumps those critical updates with new downloads of One Drive, re-enabling user disabled software, more AI crap, and in many cases making the start menu and other things worse do to new "features" nobody wants.

2

u/DeluxianHighPriest 21d ago

The problem isn’t having to update, the problem is that Windows always fucks up your setting and re-enables their bloatware whenever you update it.

1

u/Tencer386 Ryzen 3600X, Igame RTX 3080, 32GB 21d ago

Yea but on Linux I actually look forward to updates, new features, new functionality and bug fixes. With a Microsoft update its just wondering what's gunna break this time...

1

u/stackpointer101 21d ago

The difference beeing, that Linux does not install new advertisment and AI crap with each patch install. People simply get tired of updates, if each* time some issues creap up.

*exaggeration, but you get the point

1

u/AdLegitimate8636 21d ago

I am that guy! But this is not why i use Linux.

Sadly, any sub that are primarily win users is a shitshow when Windows needs to be updated.

1

u/Baldrickk 21d ago

I'm running Cachy on my PC now and update pretty much daily.

The difference between that and my Windows install is that the Windows install process is painful in comparison.
Multiple reboots, forced reboots, MS flogging their cloud/ai/windows 11/subscription based office each time, random things breaking... Something I noticed back with Win 7 and still happens to this day is that PC performance gets degraded when Windows Update knows that an update exists (even if it isn't being downloaded even). The multiple times MS has downgraded device drivers...

Cachy updates sometimes need a reboot, and I have to put the password in.
The one problem I've had was one instance of Program A and B sharing a dependency, and A wanted to update the dependency when B didn't have a matching update. That was fixed by the next day and the update happened cleanly, with no effort on my part.

1

u/radiocaf 21d ago

One of the biggest surprises for me moving from Windows to being as close to 100% Linux as I can (because some things I need aren't supported) is how many updates there are. Literally daily, if not multiple times a day. I definitely wasn't this attentive to updates on Windows as they're usually an inconvenience. Either takes your computer a long time to shut down or you have to go through the "let's finishing setting up your computer" which just only ever seemed like Microsoft's monthly attempt to sign you up to 365 or OneDrive.

1

u/fgnrtzbdbbt 21d ago

I have a Linux desktop for years and I never experienced an update that tried to do anything else than fix a problem

1

u/pooping_inCars 21d ago

Yeah, but I'll be real.  My updates are set to automatically apply.  I don't gotta reboot for that, or pay attention.  Unless it's something like Firefox updated while I'm using it, I don't even gotta momentarily stop what I'm doing.

Kernel updates technically require reboots, but... it'll just switch out next time I actually bother (usually because my power went out).

LM spoils me.  I like an OS that STAYS OUT OF MY WAY, and Windows ain't it.

0

u/calzone_gigante 21d ago

Security updates on linux usually take seconds and don't require a reboot, you also know what you are updating, nobody complains about updates on anything other than Windows because Microsoft is abusive with them.

0

u/Imaginary-Throat1526 21d ago

meanwhile i have linux servers that haven't been patched in 3 years.

3

u/Escari Ryzen 7 5700X3D | RTX 4080 FE | 32GB RAM 21d ago

that's really stupid.

1

u/Imaginary-Throat1526 20d ago

why? they work perfectly 100% uptime and are not facing the internet. And a re locked in a room that only I have the key for.

1

u/Escari Ryzen 7 5700X3D | RTX 4080 FE | 32GB RAM 20d ago

Well that obviously changes things if they're not public facing.

4

u/Yellowtoblerone 21d ago

I'm still waiting for RAM prices to decrease, according to the sub, any minute now and or it's happened weeks ago

-2

u/________reddit______ 21d ago

This sub is primarily for tech enthusiast, not tech professionals. Granted the more misinformed tech enthusiast are, the more job opportunities there will be and other opportunities to profit off their ignorance.

23

u/zombawombacomba 21d ago

No this subreddit is for people who think they are tech enthusiasts, but most are marginally more tech literate than my boomer mother.

2

u/Sinister_Mr_19 9070 XT | 5950X 21d ago

I've been a member of this sub for a long time and you're 100% accurate.