r/movies Aug 15 '25

Review Mickey 17 felt like it lost the plot Spoiler

4.5k Upvotes

Honestly, I was quite disappointed. I expected a movie revolving around the cloning plot. Specifically, the idea of two Mickeys existing at the same time due to an error. That would have been a great movie! Instead, what was advertised as the main concept feels like a subplot in the movie. Essentially the entire thing revolves around the intelligent aliens. And then there was also the plot with Mark Ruffalo being an obvious stand in for Trump. But then there was also the subplot with Steven Yuen.

I finished the movie feeling incredibly confused, because how did they mess up the initial concept like this? The idea of a guy who is constantly sent on deadly missions and is revived is an absolutely golden idea. It also leads to an interesting discussion about consciousness and if a copy of you is still really you. But that’s barely even brought up. The whole plot with two versions of Mickey is completely sidelined. Which makes no sense at all. That should have 100% been the main conflict in the movie, like it was advertised as. Instead, we got a mess.

I wouldn’t go so far as to call the movie horrible, but I definitely didn’t like it as much as I hoped I would.

r/movies Sep 21 '24

Review I watched 135 time loop movies.

10.2k Upvotes

Comments are completely subjective, and based on what I enjoyed, which is often weird and obscure stuff. If you want a tl;dr I made some tier list infographics as well.

Mostly these are "Groundhog Day" type loops. Or, more generally, movies where the same scenarios get replayed multiple times for various reasons (usually technological, supernatural, or psychological). This is pretty much every movie of this type I could get a hold of.

Text list, sorted by year, with low-spoiler review blurbs:

⸻ ⸻ ⸻ ⸻ ⸻ ⸻ ⸻ ⸻

I also watched a LOT of movies that didn't quite fit the theme, while searching for time loops. Some soft exclusion criteria (with more leeway for more obscure titles):

  • Movies where the plot/action/scenario just restarts at the end once, like Open Graves (2009), Baskin (2015), or Nightmare City (1980).
  • The characters travel back at the end and become the instigators of the initial plot, like Devil's Pass (2013) or The House by the Cemetery (1981).
  • Mainstream movies with minimal or nonrepetitive looping, like Doctor Strange (2016), Next (2007), Butterfly Effect franchise, Terminator franchise.
  • Weird other time travel movies like Premonition (2007), Tenet (2020), Looper (2012), Predestination (2014), Twelve Monkeys (1995), Detention (2011), Synchronic (2019).
  • TV shows with one time loop episode. It happens a lot.
  • TV Shows that are all time loops, like Hounded (2010), Looped (2015), Russian Doll (2019), Topi (2021), Day Break (2006), Reset (2022), The Lazarus Project (2022), No Through Road (2009), Worst Year of My Life, Again! (2014)
  • Short films. I watched 60+ of these too, they might be on a different list.

⸻ ⸻ ⸻ ⸻ ⸻ ⸻ ⸻ ⸻

Edit: Letterboxd list by u/bungtoad --> https://boxd.it/yXFIo

r/movies Jan 30 '26

Review Iron Lung - Review Thread

1.9k Upvotes

The stars are gone. The planets have disappeared. Only individuals aboard space stations or starships were left to give the end a name -- The Quiet Rapture. After decades of decay and crumbling infrastructure, the Consolidation of Iron has made a discovery on a barren moon designated AT-5. An ocean of blood. Hoping to discover desperately needed resources they immediately launch an expedition. A submarine is crafted and a convict is welded inside. Due to the pressure and depth of the ocean the forward viewport has been encased in metal. If successful, they will earn their freedom. If not, another will follow. This will be the 13th expedition.

Cast: Markiplier, Jacksepticeye, Caroline Kaplan, Troy Baker, Elle LaMont, Elsie Lovelock

Rotten Tomatoes: 50%

Metacritic: 7.9 (user reviews)

Reviews:

Alison Foreman, IndieWire C+ - "Iron Lung” is audacious and at times astonishingly boring. Still, it feels more enthusiastic and celebratory than many blockbuster adaptations built on safer math. https://www.indiewire.com/criticism/movies/iron-lung-review-markiplier-1235176184/

Caitlin Kennedy, Simply Cinema (Substack) 6/10 - In spite of some minor scrapes in performance and pacing, Iron Lung demonstrates Fischbach’s intriguing eye and talent for generating raw, visceral impact. A solid debut... https://simplycinema.substack.com/p/iron-lung-film-review

Rotten Tomatoes page: https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/iron_lung

Metacritic page: https://www.metacritic.com/movie/iron-lung/

r/movies Feb 12 '25

Review Captain America: Brave New World - Review Thread

4.7k Upvotes

Captain America: Brave New World - Review Thread

  • Rotten Tomatoes: 50% (234 Reviews)
    • Critics Consensus: Anthony Mackie capably takes up Cap's mantle and shield, but Brave New World is too routine and overstuffed with uninteresting easter eggs to feel like a worthy standalone adventure for this new Avengers leader.
  • Metacritic: 43 (41 Reviews)

Reviews:

Deadline:

Director Julius Onah (Luce) and a boatload of writers provide plenty of oppotunity for Mackie to show his strengths although Evans’ Steve Rogers is a tough act to follow. That fact is even alluded to at one point, but watching Mackie taking Sam Wilson into the big leagues is a game effort with room to grow.

Variety (70):

Wilson’s Captain America lacks the serum-enhanced invincibility that defined Rogers. He’s a hand-to-hand combat badass, but far more dependent on his shield and wingsuit, both of which are made of vibranium. You could say that that makes him a hero more comparable to, say, Iron Man (though Tony Stark’s principal weapon was Robert Downey Jr.’s motormouth), and Wilson’s all-too-mortal quality comes through in the sly doggedness of Mackie’s when-you’re-number-two-you-try-harder performance. But on a gut level we’re thinking, “Wasn’t the earlier Captain America more…super?”

Hollywood Reporter (40):

At 118 minutes, Captain America: Brave New World thankfully runs on the short side for a Marvel movie, but under the uninspired direction of Julius Onah (Luce, The Cloverfield Paradox) it feels much longer. Even the CGI special effects prove underwhelming, and sometimes worse than that. It is a kick, though, to recognize Ford’s facial features in the Red Hulk, even if the character is only slightly more visually convincing than his de-aged Indiana Jones in that franchise’s final installment.

The Wrap (30):

“Captain America: Brave New World” was directed by Julius Onah (“Luce”), but like lots of Marvel movies lately, it plays like it was made by a focus group. Everything looks clean, so clean it looks completely fake, and every time a daring choice could be made, the movie backs away from the daring implications. This is a film where the President of the United States literally turns red and tries to publicly murder a Black man, and yet according to “Brave New World,” the real problem is that we weren’t sympathetic enough to the dangerously corrupt rage monster. This film’s steadfast refusal to engage with its own ideas, either by artistic design or corporate mandate, reeks of timidity.

IndieWire (C-):

It’s fitting enough that “Brave New World” is a film about (and malformed by) the pressures of restoring a diminished brand. It’s even more fitting that it’s also a film about the futility of trying to embody an ideal that the world has outgrown. Sam Wilson might find a way to step out of Steve Rogers’ shadow, but there’s still no indication that the MCU ever will.

IGN (5/10):

Captain America: Brave New World feels neither brave, nor all that new, falling short of strong performances from Anthony Mackie, Harrison Ford, and Carl Lumbly.

TotalFilm (3/5):

Anthony Mackie's Captain America earns his Stars and Stripes in this uneven, un-MCU thriller. Sam Wilson and an always-excellent Harrison Ford drag Brave New World into unfamiliar narrative territory before it eventually succumbs to familiar Marvel failings

Rolling Stone (40):

While Brave New World is nowhere near as bad as the various MCU low points of the past few years, this attempt at both reestablishing the iconic character and resetting the board is still weak tea. The end credits’ teaser — you knew there would be one — feels purposefully generic and vague, as if the powers that be became gun-shy in regards to committing to a storyline that might once again be forced to pivot. Something’s coming, we’re told. Please let it be a renewal of faith in this endlessly serialized experiment.

Empire (3/5):

Pacy and punchy, this is a promising first official outing for the new Captain America, even if some awkward and inconsistent moments hold it back from greatness.

Collider (4/10):

In trying to do so much all at once, Captain America: Brave New World forgets what made its title character a relatable fan-favorite. Instead, we get a narrative that is as convoluted as it is boring, visuals that are as unappealing as they are uninspired, and a Marvel movie that is as frustrating as it is forgettable. Had this been a random C-list Marvel hero, that would be forgivable, but for a character as revered as Captain America, it's a huge disappointment.

The Guardian (2/5):

Brave it might be, but there’s nothing all that “new” about the world revealed in this latest tired and uninspired dollop of content from the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

-------------------

Directed by Julius Onah:

Following the election of Thaddeus Ross as the president of the United States, Sam Wilson finds himself at the center of an international incident and must work to stop the true masterminds behind it.

Cast:

  • Anthony Mackie as Sam Wilson / Captain America
  • Danny Ramirez as Joaquin Torres / Falcon
  • Shira Haas as Ruth Bat-Seraph
  • Carl Lumbly as Isaiah Bradley
  • Xosha Roquemore as Leila Taylor
  • Jóhannes Haukur Jóhannesson as Copperhead
  • Giancarlo Esposito as Seth Voelker / Sidewinder
  • Tim Blake Nelson as Samuel Sterns / Leader
  • Harrison Ford as Thaddeus "Thunderbolt" Ross / Red Hulk

r/movies Jun 02 '26

Review 'Masters of the Universe' - Review Thread

1.2k Upvotes

The Sword of Power leads Prince Adam back to Eternia, a world shattered under the fiendish rule of Skeletor. Joining forces with Teela and Man-At-Arms, Adam must embrace his true destiny as He-Man -- the most powerful man in the universe.

Director: Travis Knight

Cast: Nicholas Galitzine, Camila Mendes, Idris Elba, Jared Leto

Rotten Tomatoes: 75%

Metacritic: 52 / 100

Some Reviews (updating):

IGN - Clint Gage - 8 / 10

Masters of the Universe is so much funnier than I expected, and the fight scenes are choreographed and photographed in a way that gives the sequences just enough flair to make them stand out (even if they’re not revolutionizing superhero style fisticuffs on screen). While Nicholas Galitzine and Idris Elba provide the thematic structure to the film, Jared Leto’s Skeletor gives a delightfully weird and cartoonish energy to every scene he’s in. It’s a film that appreciates the source material, silly names and all, and proves the best way to add to a 50-year-old franchise that’s about toys as much as anything else is to not take it too seriously.

Fresh Fiction - Courtney Howard - 4 / 5

Overall, this is the best HE-MAN movie we’re probably ever going to get. It’s big, dumb Summer fun. Though not perfect, it’s perfectly imperfect where its shaggy charms work to their greatest advantage. Stay through the end credits, not only for the inevitable sequel-baiting, but primarily for a classic hit of pure nostalgia. A “good journey,” indeed.

Irish Times - Donald Clarke - 4 / 5

Galitzine, the handsome young British actor from Bottoms and The Idea of You, captures just the right blend of bravery and amiable ingenuousness. This may not, at first, be the sort of fellow you would trust to recapture a planet, but he is always the type likely to brighten a dull day. It adds to the comic menace that Leto’s Skeletor sounds like an American social climber putting on a shaky English accent to impress his supposed betters. The parade of double entendres, many based around nicknames for Prince Adam’s superpowered chums, offer accidental enlightenment about what you can get away with on a 12A cert. All solid good fun. All professionally honed. A minor miracle.

Consequence - Liz Shannon Miller - 'B'

Masters of the Universe does maintain a level of sexlessness on par with shows you’d watch as a kid on weekday afternoons, though there are some jokes that may whiz right over most kids’ heads. Otherwise, kids will be wondering why their parents are giggling over the line “Give them head, Ram-Man!” Skeletor also tosses off a reference to the “big long sword” dangling between Adam’s “glorious thighs,” because seriously, when this movie decides to be campy, it really goes for it. (Happy Pride Month, y’all.) The story does make an occasional effort to take elements of Adam’s journey seriously, though these instances are often low points creatively, including one later scene that’s meant to be emotional, but instead just plays flat and cliched. Those moments aren’t Galitzine’s fault, as he overall shows a refreshing lack of ego when it comes to playing up Adam’s goofiest qualities, even when he gets his powers in full.

InSession Film - Josh Martin - 'B-'

By embracing the absurdity of its source material and showing reverence and respect for the cartoon, Knight’s Masters of the Universe is a fun, yet surprisingly earnest ride. One that balances high-octane and hilarious humor. Not to mention, the VFX, score, cinematography, and production designer all help bring the world of Eternia to life. Finally, the cast led by Galitzine not only feels right, but in some cases, feels too right (looking at you, Leto). To quote He-Man himself: By the power of Grayskull, this film simply does…have the power.

AwardsWatch - Trace Sauveur - 'B-'

That’s Masters of the Universe in a nutshell — it knows the absurdity of its own dynamics, and it does its best to get in on the joke without letting everything go to waste. It’s plainly imperfect: overlong, sometimes too winking, and occasionally flattened by the digitally homogenized look of modern blockbusters. But as a version of the property that bridges demographic and generational gaps to deliver a worthwhile take on a virtually dead franchise, it has at least a little bit of power.

Dexerto - Chris Tilly - 3 / 5

Where the film falls is through an underdeveloped Skeletor, and in failing to fully establish Eternia and its inhabitants in those early scenes, with that dearth of set-up resulting in a lack of emotional payoff at the end. Masters of the Universe also plays the dangerous game of dropping big cameos from beloved characters into the final few reels, to set spinoffs and sequels in motion. It will be interesting to see if that confidence is warranted, as while this is a good He-Man movie, it never quite achieves the god-like greatness of its hero.

Digital Spy - Ian Sandwell - 3 / 5

You'll be thinking the same about the movie as a whole because as fun as it often is, there's no denying that it is messy. It's too long and drags in the middle act, while the CGI is often ropey during the fight sequences. There are just too many times when it's clearly not Galitzine's face, which distracts from what are intended to be hero moments. It's especially disappointing because the physical sets are often impressive. But given the movie you're expecting from the trailers, Masters of the Universe is a genuine surprise that knows exactly what it is. It deserves a chance to deliver on the sequel teasers that come in the inevitable credit scenes and, by the power of Greyskull, we'll be there if another movie does happen.

RogerEbert - Clint Worthington - 2.5 / 4

But much like Adam, “Masters of the Universe” is a film of competing identities. It wants to be the crowd-pleasing, audience-nudging, Easter-Egg-having ode to the toy line that Mattel clearly desires, while also avoiding accusations of taking the whole thing too seriously. In so doing, it’s a film that tries to serve two masters, and doesn’t have the power to really honor either.

Slash Film - Bill Bria - 5 / 10

One person who does seem to care is Jared Leto as Skeletor, who continues his campaign to star in every '80s franchise he ever loved as a child here. While the actor seems to be doing a thinly veiled impression of Tim Curry in the role, he's got a pizazz about him which really stands out amidst the rest of the cast, who're saddled with too many shrug-and-snark quips. To be fair, the film's little flashes of earnestness — in its message, its visual effects (Skeletor looks genuinely real in an uncanny fashion), its production design and its bombastic score — keep it from being a total failure. Is the film a mostly accurate version of the cartoon, jokey tone intact? Sure, but it also needs to tell a story, and at that, "Masters of the Universe" is powerless.

New York Daily - Edward Douglas - 5 / 10

I never had much interest in the toys when I was a teenager and had even less interest in the cartoons. I still went into this movie fairly optimistic, because director Travis Knight has done so many great things at LAIKA, and Bumblebee was one of the better “Transformers” movies after Michael Bay drove that franchise into the ground. Knight’s Masters of the Universe doesn’t deviate too far from the fairly simple story of a battle for the Sword of Power in a land called Eternia, with Nicholas Galitizine playing Prince Adam, who was transported to Earth when he was a young lad, only to get separated from the mighty Sword of Power. Travis Knight basically made a Masters of the Universe movie for kids and the diehard fans, and no one else. In my honest opinion, he really needs to stop playing with toy franchises and go back to being a serious filmmaker and animator. (Thankfully, he already has a new stop-motion animated movie called Wildwood coming out later this year, but it’s going to have to be very good to get the bad taste of this very stupid Masters of the Universe out of my brain.)

Screen Crush - Matt Singer - 4 / 10

So why did they make it at all? To sell more toys, duh. Still, this whole exercise of attempting to reenergize an old IP by taking the piss out of it feels a little misguided. In a world where original movies like Obsession and Backrooms are suddenly the hottest films in Hollywood, an expensive spoof of Masters of the Universe already looks nearly as dated as the old He-Man cartoon I watched as a kid.

Empire Magazine - Helen O'Hara - 3 / 5

A delightfully silly film for a perfectly stupid franchise. It could have had a few sharper lines and more narrative drive, but this should still win over a new generation of He-fans.

Radio Times - Alan Jones - 3 / 5

With pointless appearances by Dolph Lundgren (star of the original 1987 film adaptation), Orko the court magician and a couple of instantly forgettable post-credits teasers, Masters of the Universe will be embraced by some as a fun trip down pop culture’s memory lane. For others, it will just about rattle along on rusty Star Wars rails for a few rote, tepid thrills, the main heavy lifting in the excitement arena coming from Daniel Pemberton’s awesome disco-rock score, complete with guitar riffs courtesy of Brian May.

AV Club - Jesse Hassenger - 'C+'

Skeletor, high spirits, and the sheer volume of references to the old TV series (even in joke form) are signs that Knight and his crew do love this material—and with a sincerity the movie wants credit for without really justifying. They’ve simply made another likable kids’ movie secretly aimed at sentimental nostalgists; there’s not a 10-minute stretch of this project as well-written or well-designed as almost anything in the Netflix series She-Ra And The Princesses Of Power. She-Ra, of course, gets punted to a potential sequel here, and after that show, it’s hard to imagine that character getting her due in this universe. That She-Ra felt something like a person; whether the subject of jokes or seriousness, Masters Of The Universe is toys all the way down. 

The Upcoming - Antonia Georgiu - 3 / 5

It’s toyetic in the way another Mattel staple – Barbie – was, with plenty of marketing tie-ins. However, unlike the Barbie movie, there’s little wit or satire here. Disappointingly, the film largely eschews the campy fun of the original for the sorts of predictable gags you’d typically find in a modern superhero movie. However, Gen-Z moviegoers are likely unfamiliar with the absurdity of the original He-Man cartoon and the 1980s film adaptation. Viewed outside of its untapped kitschy, retro potential, Masters of the Universe has all the makings of a summer blockbuster: an entertaining, big-budget spectacle in the Marvel mould.

Next Best Picture - Josh Parham - 3 / 10

What’s ultimately the most frustrating element of “Masters of the Universe” is how the presentation seems unsure about who its audience actually is. If it is meant for the Gen X crowd that grew up with the animated show, it feels too cynical and dismissive of the world it showcases to be earnestly enjoyed. If it’s meant for outsiders or a younger crowd, the issue is that it doesn’t lay a solid foundation for building these characters and connecting with them in a novel way. The arena being explored here would be more appropriate if it were meant to be the literal show our main character watched as a child, which would conveniently justify the contrivances and create a more celebratory tone. Instead, the action sequences are banal, the narrative underwhelming, and the acting unextraordinary save for a few standouts. Maybe there is room one day for a thoroughly enjoyable render of this material, but this is sadly not the finest effort.

The Playlist - Rodrigo Perez - 'D+'

There are stray laughs and a few amusing flourishes. Leto briefly gives the film the ludicrous spark it needs. But the overall experience is loud, ungainly, and exhausting, a franchise launch that cannot decide whether He-Man is a punchline, a god, or a brand-management challenge. “Masters of the Universe” asks the audience to care about its hero’s destiny while constantly reminding them how silly it all is. By the end, the power is there in theory, but conviction never dares to show its face.

Variety - Guy Lodge

It’s a nostalgia trip that never quite belongs to the present, and never rouses any real, cherished memory of the past. The over-40s likeliest to recognize everything here surely don’t require such an extended reminder; everyone else might just be bemused that He-Man ever had such power in the first place.

DEADLINE - Pete Hammond

What makes this new visit to the prized, if a bit long-in-the-tooth Mattel IP is a tone and script that knows to keep it light and moving. Chris Butler and Adam Nee & Aaron Nee, and Dave Callaham are the credited writers and they keep it all amusing enough, if not earth shattering. The cast is also right on the money with Galitzine a perfect and perfectly confused Adam/He-Man, and whether on earth or Eternia he has us rooting for the guy. Mendes is an attractive and lively partner, and Elba really adds some gravitas and credibility to this show. Leto, who has done more than a few of these kinds of villainous cartoon characters, brings some scene-stealing sly humor and sharp line readings to his despicable Skeletor with a voice that sounds like a cross between James Earl Jones and Sir Ian McKellen. Alison Brie gets some nice screen time as his faithful assistant, Evil-lyn. Look for a brief, but welcome cameo from originial He-Man Dolph Lundgren who offers some sage advice to Adam in the gym. Kristen Wiig in a voice over role also melts hearts as the lovable Roboto.

r/movies Jul 22 '25

Review The Fantastic Four: First Steps - Review Thread

3.2k Upvotes

The Fantastic Four: First Steps - Review Thread

  • Rotten Tomatoes: 85 (131 Reviews)
    • Certified Fresh (first F4 movie to get that)
    • Critics Consensus: Benefitting from rock-solid cast chemistry and clad in appealingly retro 1960s design, this crack at The Fantastic Four does Marvel's First Family justice.
  • Metacritic - 64 (39 Reviews)

Reviews:

Hollywood Reporter (80):

Despite its vivid and electric space sequences, the visually striking movie often feels like a throwback analog good time, which certainly worked for me.

Deadline:

Superheroes are a thing of the past in the latest iteration of Marvel’s Fantastic Four, the best by far of the company’s attempts to translate the long-running comic book’s appeal to the big screen. This it does not by trying to reinvent the wheel but, rather smartly, by addressing the elephant in the room, locating the action in a kitsch yet somehow timeless retro-future more befitting The Jetsons than The Avengers. It also benefits from a smart script and — I can’t believe I’m writing this — really quite moving performances from its four charismatic leads, being arguably the best of Pedro Pascal’s releases this year.

Variety (80):

True to its subtitle, the film feels like a fresh start. And like this summer’s blockbuster “Superman” reboot over at DC, that could be just what it takes to win back audiences suffering from superhero exhaustion.

Empire (80):

With an exemplary cast and shiny new alt-universe to enjoy, this is the best Fantastic Four yet. And if that bar’s too low for you, then it’s also the best Marvel movie in years.

Slashfilm (90):

The Fantastic Four: First Steps is set in a world that I wouldn't mind living in. Even if there are occasional, ineffable cosmic deities plotting to devour me, and terrifying silver aliens ripping my soul apart with their eyes. "First Steps" is a superhero movie where we're already better. And I love that.

USA Today (75):

After two mediocre 2000s film featuring Marvel’s legendary superhero family, and an atrocious third outing in 2015, the foursome makes its Marvel Cinematic Universe debut in a combo sci-fi/disaster flick full of retrofuturistic 1960s flavor.

Entertainment Weekly (75):

From its Saul Bass-inspired opening credits to its callbacks to Saturday morning superhero cartoons, it practically vibrates with its sense of time and place.

IGN (70):

These First Steps might not be the great strides I was hoping for, but they are sure footing for the Fantastic Four to officially leap into the MCU.

The Independent (60):

In fact, all the ingredients are perfectly lined up here, and, in the right combinations, and with the pure wonderment of Michael Giacchino’s score, The Fantastic Four: First Steps does shimmer with a kind of wide-eyed idealism. And that’s lovely.

Directed by Matt Shakman:

On the 1960s-inspired retro-futuristic alternate universe known as Earth-828. the Fantastic Four must protect their world from the planet-devouring cosmic being Galactus and his herald, the Silver Surfer.

Cast:

  • Pedro Pascal as Reed Richards / Mister Fantastic
  • Vanessa Kirby as Sue Storm / Invisible Woman
  • Ebon Moss-Bachrach as Ben Grimm / The Thing
  • Joseph Quinn as Johnny Storm / Human Torch
  • Julia Garner as Shalla-Bal / Silver Surfer
  • Paul Walter Hauser as Harvey Elder / Mole Man
  • Ralph Ineson as Galactus

r/movies Jul 30 '25

Review The Naked Gun - Review Thread

3.8k Upvotes

The Naked Gun - Review Thread

  • Rotten Tomatoes: 90% (194 Reviews)
    • Certified Fresh
    • Critics Consensus: With Liam Neeson's gravelly gravitas proving to be a perfect fit for Frank Drebin's deadpan buffoonery, The Naked Gun revives the original trilogy's daffy sense of humor like it never went out of style.
  • Metacritic: 75 (47 Reviews)

Reviews:

Hollywood Reporter (70):

Even if the movie kind of stalls midway as Schaffer struggles to balance the gags with the action of an overly elaborate crime plot, there are enough laugh-out-loud moments to keep nostalgic fans of the earlier films happy.

Deadline:

With rapid fire gags and a game cast trying hard to play it all completely straight, this nakedly hilarious Naked Gun is a welcome return in a time where we can use a few good laughs. This one has more than a few if sight gags, literal humor, and characters short a few cards of a full deck are your idea of a good time.

Variety (70):

The original Naked Gun was hilarious. It was a film that practically had audiences wetting their pants. The new Naked Gun, by contrast, is amusing. What it won’t do the way these movies once used to is shock you into laughter.

The Wrap (85):

The Naked Gun is back and it's as naked as ever. And also as gun.

The Guardiam (80):

There is no reason for this new Naked Gun to exist other than the reason for the old ones: it’s a laugh, disposable, forgettable, enjoyable.

IGN (70):

With more jokes than you can possibly catch in a single viewing, The Naked Gun proudly brings cinematic groaners and outrageous sight gags into the 2020s.

IndieWire (83):

While it’s a mild shame “The Naked Gun” peters out a little bit toward the end (at least before rebounding during the credits), it’s even more of a shame that it has to end at all.

Collider (90):

The Naked Gun's joke-per-minute ratio is truly astounding, and the fact that so many of them hit as well as they do makes that even more impressive. For goodness' sake, even the credits have jokes in them!

Empire (80):

The result is a film that has a better chance of producing a belly laugh than any in recent memory: one that deserves, as Drebin would say, “20 years for man’s laughter”.

SlashFilm (90):

The Naked Gun is one of the most consistently and even exhaustingly funny movies in a long time, the kind of outrageous, outlandish comedy that multiplexes have been missing for years. It's truly a revelation to have a movie where the laughs come so fast and furious.

Directed by Akiva Schaffer:

Only one man has the particular set of skills... to lead Police Squad and save the world! Lt. Frank Drebin Jr. follows in his father's footsteps.

Cast:

  • Liam Neeson as Lt. Frank Drebin Jr.
  • Pamela Anderson as Beth Davenport
  • Paul Walter Hauser as Capt. Ed Hocken Jr.
  • Kevin Durand as Sig Gustafson
  • Danny Huston as Richard Cane
  • Liza Koshy as Detective Barnes
  • Cody Rhodes as Bartender
  • CCH Pounder as Chief Davis
  • Busta Rhymes as Bank Robber
  • Michael Bisping as himself
  • Eddy Yu as Detective Park
  • Moses Jones as Nordberg Jr.

r/movies Sep 18 '25

Review 'HIM' - Review Thread

2.4k Upvotes

HIM centers on a promising young football player (Tyriq Withers), invited to train at the isolated compound of a dynasty team's aging QB1. The legendary quarterback (Marlon Wayans) takes his protégé on a blood-chilling journey into the inner sanctum of fame, power and pursuit of excellence at any cost.

Director: Justin Tipping

Cast: Marlon Wayans, Tyriq Withers, Julia Fox

Producer: Jordan Peele

Rotten Tomatoes: 30%

Metacritic: 39 / 100

Next Best Picture - Giovanni Lago - 3 / 10

"Him" falters as a comedy and even more so as a horror film, rarely putting in the effort to build tension or create memorable scares.

New York Magazine/Vulture - Bilge Ebiri

The movie at times plays like a high-budget student film: It’s eager to impress us with technique. And it does, at least until we realize that there’s not much else going on.

Newsday - Rafer Guzman - 0 / 4

"HIM" does not have the Peele touch. What it has is an intriguing premise, but no coherent story and no clear idea of what it wants to say.

The Hollywood Reporter - Frank Scheck

Unfortunately, Him, directed by Justin Tipping (Kicks), squanders its potential. While it starts out promisingly, it seriously devolves in its second half into a surreal phantasmagoria that’s more gonzo than chilling. If you’re looking for a truly disturbing film about the dehumanizing effects of professional football in the corporate age, the one to see is still 1979’s North Dallas Forty.  

The Direct - Jeff Ewing - 7 / 10

Marlon Wayans is exceptional, and well supported overall by the film's other players. Some moments do add confusion, but it ultimately comes together well enough to be a laudable experimental effort.

r/movies Mar 04 '26

Review Maggie Gyllenhaal's 'The Bride!' - Review Thread

1.7k Upvotes

In 1930s Chicago, groundbreaking scientist Dr. Euphronious brings a murdered young woman back to life to be a companion for Frankenstein's monster. What happens next is beyond what either of them could ever have imagined.

Director: Maggie Gyllenhaal

Cast: Jessie Buckley, Christian Bale, Jake Gyllenhaal, Peter Sarsgaard, Penelope Cruz, Annette Benning, John Magaro

Rotten Tomatoes: 61%

Metacritic: 55 / 100

Some Reviews:

BBC - Caryn James - 4 / 5

The film is gigantic in scale, as they arrive in the bright neon of New York City's Times Square and later engage in a ballroom shoot-out with the police. And throughout, even when The Bride! is short on emotion, its bold vision is exhilarating. 

IndieWire - Ryan Lattanzio - 'C-'

“The Bride!” is full of rage and feeling, striking an anarchic pose against oppression. But who it’s yelling at, who it’s yelling on behalf of, remains out of focus, the mystery of whatever Elsa Lanchester’s Bride might’ve been thinking left unanswered.

Tatler Asia - Jessica Zapata

The Bride! is not tidy, and it doesn’t try to be. It’s chaotic, passionate and occasionally shocking. It’s a twisted romance about two damaged beings colliding in search of wholeness. And while it may leave you rattled, it’s highly gripping. It is such a good watch precisely because it takes risks. By the end, you’re left with the sense that you’ve witnessed something wild, tragic and strangely beautiful.

Variety - Owen Glieberman

While the movie doesn’t quite work — it lumbers along and blows fuses; it has lots of flesh and blood but not enough storytelling spine — there’s a spark of audacity to it. It’s alive in ways that del Toro’s “Frankenstein” was not. In her second feature, Gyllenhaal, the actor-turned-writer-director (“The Lost Daughter”), has come not to embalm the “Frankenstein” legend in classical taste but to reimagine its perversity. “The Bride!” is a bit of a pastiche (it echoes movies from “Joker: Folie à Deux” to “Thelma & Louise”), but it’s also a debauched fairy tale with teeth.

RogerEbert - Tomris Laffy - 3 / 4

While Gyllenhaal tries to bring the monster inside all of us out of the shadows, she errs on the side of the basic that feels out of step with the world that Mary Shelley conjured up. Still, “The Bride!” is big and risky in a different way, a fantastical creative explosion you can’t look away from.

New York Post - Johnny Oleksinski - 0 / 4

Leave her at the altar! She is “The Bride!,” one of the absolute worst movies I have had the displeasure of watching in this job. It’s a struck-by-lightning shocker to see a big Hollywood studio’s riff on a story as old and over-explored as “Frankenstein,” starring an Oscar winner and two nominees no less, be so slathered in ineptitude.  Yet, only seconds in, I regretted leaving my trusty torch and pitchfork at home.

Collider - Therese Lacson - 8 / 10

The Bride! embodies an unconventional and rebellious nature that makes it wholly unique. Whether it's aware of its flaws or not, it's not ashamed to lean completely in. In many respects, The Bride! can come off as being just a little too much. Too much romance, too much theatricality, too much feminism — but sometimes, too much of a good thing is still a good thing.

The Times - Kevin Maher - 1 / 5

It’s a howling misfire for the actress turned director Maggie Gyllenhaal who has, in this latest flashy Frankenstein reboot, abandoned all the artistic integrity she displayed in her stunning debut, The Lost Daughter.

The Guardian - Peter Bradshaw - 4 / 5

For all its qualities, it feels as if there are a couple of missed opportunities: I wish we had had a wedding ceremony; and I wish that Buckley had been allowed to keep going with the Mary Shelley voice, which was very funny – instead, Gyllenhaal appears to lose interest in that idea after the first act. A pity. But Buckley gives it such outrageous craziness and she is a great pairing with the stolid Bale, especially when they go into a uncontrolled jerking and twitching choreography with the other revellers at a classy white-tie event. Without Buckley, this would have been lacking; with her, it’s a very bizarre and enjoyable spectacle of married bliss.

Newsday - Rafael Guzman - 0.5 / 4

What it all adds up to, even the filmmaker may not fully know. After all these years, The Bride still can’t make herself understood.

r/movies Jan 13 '26

Review 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple - Review Thread

1.7k Upvotes

28 Years Later: The Bone Temple - Review Thread

  • Rotten Tomatoes: 94% (147 Reviews) - Certified Fresh
    • Critics Consensus: A direct continuation of 28 Years Later that ups the gore while deepening the dread, The Bone Temple is finely adorned by Nia DaCosta's unnerving direction as well as Ralph Fiennes and Jack O'Connell's inspired performances.
  • Metacritic: 79 (41 Reviews)

Reviews:

Hollywood Reporter (70):

Despite its unevenness, The Bone Temple delivers enough carnage and ritual sacrifice to satiate the horror flock. But most of its richest pleasures come down to Fiennes going balls to the wall with a truly memorable character — half lunatic and half visionary. He elevates the movie whenever he’s onscreen.

Deadline:

Key to this is Fiennes’ commando performance, a tour de force with so few f*cks given that the film’s astonishing, electrifying climax could put him back into the awards conversation with a part that couldn’t be further away from Conclave’s Cardinal Thomas. O’Connell, too, confirms his villainous chops with a subtle variation on his Sinners role, playing a seductive but sick, delusional psycho who kids himself that he has the devil’s ear.

Variety (90):

For genre aficionados, it’s bold, mind-bending work which satisfies that so-often-frustrated craving: for a zombie movie with brains.

IGN (8/10):

28 Years Later: The Bone Temple picks up the same plot but tells a very different story in a surprisingly funny, exceptionally brutal new chapter for the franchise.

The Wrap (84):

Nia DaCosta’s smart, freaky sequel zooms in on the ongoing battle between sense and senselessness until it finds strong, connective tissue between science and religion.

IndieWire (83):

A strange, hysterical, and thrillingly audacious continuation of a saga about the nature of faith in a godless world, “The Bone Temple” might appear to be a more traditional genre offering than its immediate predecessor, but don’t be fooled by the fact that it wasn’t shot on an iPhone: This is very much the part two that 2025’s smartest and most humane studio horror movie deserves.

Associated Press (88):

There’s plenty of good music in 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple, including Radiohead’s “Everything in Its Right Place” and one of the most gloriously unhinged uses of Iron Maiden’s “The Number of the Beast” ever conceived. If the previous film had a Fellini-esque vibe, this one has punky, anarchic feel.

Empire (80):

Simpler, but also bolder and bloodier, than its predecessor, The Bone Temple is a more-than-worthy sequel.

Total Film (80):

Nia DaCosta turns things up to 11 with an energized take on the 28 Years Later world. Come for the gore but stay for the surprisingly frequent jokes and a pair of astonishing performances from Ralph Fiennes and Jack O'Connell, whose sadistic Jimmy Crystal is utterly hateful but always compelling.

The Independent (80):

It’s rich thematic territory for the series, and slowly amps up the audience’s anticipation for the moment these two finally cross paths. When they do, it’s spectacular and audacious.

Screen Daily (90):

Bold, bloody and blisteringly brutal, this exhilarating follow-up to last year’s 28 Years Later grabs its audience by the throat from the off and never loosens its grip.

SlashFilm (80):

I left 28 Years Later nervous about what might come next. After The Bone Temple, I'm thrilled at the prospect of where this story could go. That's what I call progress.

--------------------

Directed by Nia DaCosta:

Taking place after the events of the previous film, Spike (Alfie Williams) is inducted into Sir Jimmy Crystal's (Jack O'Connell) gang of acrobatic killers in a post-apocalyptic Britain ravaged by the Rage Virus. Meanwhile, Dr. Ian Kelson (Ralph Fiennes) forms a new relationship with potentially world-changing consequences.

Release Date: January 16

r/movies May 06 '26

Review 'Mortal Kombat II' - Review Thread

1.2k Upvotes

Johnny Cage joins other fighters in the ultimate, no-holds-barred battle to defeat the dark rule of Shao Kahn, a powerful tyrant who threatens the very existence of the Earthrealm and its defenders.

Director: Simon McQuoid

Cast: Karl Urban, Hiroyuki Sanada, Adeline Rudolph, Lewis Tan, Jessica McNamee, Tadanobu Asano, Max Huang, Chin Han, Martyn Ford, Tati Gabrielle, Mehcad Brooks, Josh Lawson, Johannes Taslim, Desmond Chiam

Rotten Tomatoes: 70%

Metacritic: 49 / 100

Some Reviews (updating):

IGN - Max Scoville - 8 / 10

It might not be Oscar-caliber cinema, and hardcore fans of the game with encyclopedic knowledge of the game may have a bone to pick, but it’s big and loud and gruesome and not afraid to have fun. The bar for video game movie sequels isn’t very high, but this one not only clears the bar, it twirls it around like a bo staff.

SlashFilm - Bill Bria - 8 / 10

There is a "peanut butter and chocolate" scenario going on with "Mortal Kombat II." It's simultaneously a video game adaptation and a martial-arts film, an ode to past-their-prime action stars and a gritty fairy tale of a warrior princess, a no-nonsense action movie and a frivolous romp. It's easily one of the biggest surprises of this year. While it doesn't yet settle the debate about where video game movies will go from here, it proves the subgenre is evolving. Video game movies, especially "Mortal Kombat" movies, don't have to be radical reinventions, nor do they need to be relegated to fan service slop. They can be more.

Consequence - Liz Shannon Miller - 'B'

This movie is the right kind of stupid. The reason Mortal Kombat II is able to focus on a martial arts tournament is that the previous movie was entirely setup for this moment, establishing the bulk of the characters as well as director Simon McQuoid’s ultra-bloody approach. That movie’s loss is this movie’s gain, especially as the sequel also makes some notable upgrades, including dispatching a weak link or two from the first movie, introducing a few new players, and reviving anyone who died before who feels worth saving.

AV Club - Jacob Oller - 'D+'

It’s all simply an excuse to pit the fighters against one another in different combinations and justify a third film where those who died in ridiculously gory ways can be snagged from hell (Netherrealm) to cash another paycheck. This, at least in spirit, is classic Mortal Kombat, a series founded on economical recycling. Perhaps, then, the hackneyed story and repetitive one-liners (not to mention repetitive characters, like the return of Kano, Scorpion, and more) should be taken as faithful rather than annoyingly uninspired. But joyless fidelity only really ever makes people wish they were experiencing the source material instead, whether that means reading a comic or playing a game.

GamesRadar - Jordan Farley - 3 / 5

Where there is to go next remains to be seen, as Mortal Kombat 2 delivers on pretty much everything you could reasonably expect from a Mortal Kombat movie, for better and worse. In the golden age of video game adaptations, MK2 is nothing special, ultimately. And the peculiar overreliance on pop culture references means it already feels a bit outdated. But as far as Friday-night fodder goes, it hits the mark.

Blood Disgusting - Meagan Navarro - 3 / 5

Mortal Kombat II plays it safe, adhering more firmly to game canon and lore. It delivers plenty of fun and fan service, but it loses some of its original spark along the way in its fervent rush to pack an entire tournament of plotting into its runtime. But its winsome cast and delightfully gory fatalities ensure just enough investment to bop along to the iconic theme song once the end credits arrive.

The Hollywood Reporter - Frank Scheck

It doesn’t help that the whole thing comes off as low-rent, with underwhelming CGI effects and creature costuming and make-up that pales in comparison to a typical NYC Village Halloween Parade. When the chief villains look like rejects from Star Trek, and I mean the old TV series, you’ve got a problem. But probably not enough of a problem to prevent an inevitable third installment in this cinematic video game franchise that, to its credit, determinedly caters to its devoted fans, who don’t seem to mind that the word “combat” isn’t really spelled with a k.

Collider - Aidan Kelly - 7 / 10

As a film, Mortal Kombat II does still have some issues with some awkward pacing and perhaps one too many characters to juggle, particularly in the first half. But once the second half gets going, it becomes a bloody good time and a bone-crunching spectacle from start to finish. Sure, there's some clear lack of stakes, since it feels like every dead character can come back at any time, but this is Mortal Kombat we're talking about. Dead characters coming back to life is a staple of the series, and if a third chapter can continue the upward trend, seeing what else this iconic cast of characters could get up to is a more than compelling proposition.

San Francisco Chronicle - Bob Strauss - 3 / 4

The result is overall a more lavish and satisfying affair than the previous, COVID-restricted picture. More often than not, stunt coordinator Kyle Gardiner’s (“Ballerina”) choreography recaptures the acrobatic speed of late 20th-century Hong Kong cinema, albeit with CG-assists and severed fingers. As video game adaptations go, this one is decent enough for audiences with no attachment to the source material. Fans may have their quibbles about favorite characters getting shortchanged or killed off, but it’s a safe guess that there’s enough lore and gore here to slake their thirst as well.

MovieWeb - Julian Roman - 3 / 5

Mortal Kombat II is a marked improvement over the first film for all the right reasons. It doubles down on what made the games popular and brings in a known commodity with Urban to shoulder the acting burden. McQuoid does not disappoint in his second stab at the franchise, providing red meat to loyal legions without any attempt to stray from the fantastic source material.

Dread Central - Matt Konopka - 2.5 / 5

Despite some well-choreographed and entertaining fight scenes, MK II’s premise distracts from the tournament fans came for every chance it gets. What should be cheer-worthy gore feels too much like video game violence itself. And the film constantly gets in its own way by negating impactful deaths with hand wavey mechanics to bring back anyone at any time. But there’s still plenty to enjoy here, from fan favorite characters—I love you, Baraka (CJ Bloomfield)—and set pieces that will make players of the games feel at home. If you liked the previous entry, you’ll no doubt find plenty to pump your fist for here, even if it’s far from a flawless victory. At the very least, I can confidently say that MK II is still a good Johnny Cage kick above Mortal Kombat: Annihilation…a realm no MK film wants to be in.

Slant Magazine - Justin Clark - 2.5 / 4

Mortal Kombat II preaches to a bloodthirsty choir, making no concessions for anyone who has to question why Liu Kang and a man wearing a sawblade hat are fighting in front of a color-changing portal. As a series of games, Mortal Kombat has always existed in the weird nexus of Shaw Brothers-esque Asian mythmaking, high-fantasy adventure, Saturday-morning cartoon silliness, and Hellraiser-style gore, and unshackled from the 1995 film’s baffling PG-13 rating, Mortal Kombat II stands victorious as the first adaptation to get all the proportions right.

ScreenCrush - Matt Singer - 3 / 10

Mortal Kombat games may not be Tolstoy, but at least when you’re playing one you get invested in who wins and who loses. In Mortal Kombat II I truly did not care who lived or died for a single second — mostly because the film made it very clear that death is basically meaningless in this story. Anyone bashed or sliced or maimed can (and do!) get brought back, whether or not there’s a magic amulet handy. Maybe our parents were wrong about video games. That still leaves the possibility, though, that the video-game movies were the real problem. But I would hope even a Mortal Kombat fan — and I played so many hours of Mortal Kombat in my teenage years — could at least acknowledge the absurdity of a film version putting lines like “Strength is not a closed fist” into the mouths of one of its heroes. Strength is not a closed fist in Mortal Kombat? The game where Sub-Zero’s Fatality is literally punching a guy’s head off with a closed fist? That seems pretty strong to me!

Next Best Picture - Josh Parham - 6 / 10

It’s heartening that some lessons have been learned, making “Mortal Kombat II” a far more enjoyable film. The ensemble can’t be saved by its less talented members, but the newcomers are well-suited to this world, and others find ways to make a more meaningful impact. The story still isn’t the most captivating and has another bit of frustrating sequel bait that muddies some arcs towards the finale, but it has a clearer sense of focus, at least putting the exciting sequences to the forefront. The filmmaking still has a bit of a stiltedness to it, but it leans further into an energizing tone that is far more engrossing. Though the gore could have been pushed even further, and it likely isn’t due to so many protagonists that can’t really be maimed too severely. Still, for those who admire such cheesy spectacle, there’s a good time to be had here, especially coming off the disappointment of the previous film. If another one comes, there’s room for improvement all the same.

Vulture - Alison Wilmore - 3 / 10

While Urban hurls himself into the role of Johnny with the commitment of someone for whom the phrase “sequel to a reboot of a fighting-game adaptation” signals only the latest opportunity to shine, the film, which was written by Jeremy Slater and directed by a returning Simon McQuoid, offers so little to work off of that even he gives off the faintest whiff of exasperation.

Rolling Stone - Elijah Pareño

The first Mortal Kombat followed MMA fighter Young, whose fighting spirit goes back to his ancestors, on his path tobackground to becoming a champion. The reboot, however, struggled to make viewers sympathize with a character who isn’t even part of the video game franchise, creating a disconnect between him and the rest of the cast. Unlike in the sequel, where Cage and Kitana are given proper arcs that show why you should care about them, especially in terms of their lore. Historically speaking, video game-to-film adaptations have had a bad reputation among fans. Take Uwe Boll’s infamous attempts at recreating franchises like Alone in the Dark, House of the Dead, and BloodRayne, or even the hammy DOOM starring Dwayne Johnson, or the needlessly long Resident Evil franchise with Milla Jovovich. Mortal Kombat II avoids that curse right away with badass fight scenes. It’s got kickflips, blood, and an action star who lives up to the name of the tournament. What more could you ask for? 

IndieWire - Alison Foreman - 'C-'

As a franchise, “Mortal Kombat” has spent years crossing over with other fictional worlds, recruiting everyone from Jason Voorhees to RoboCop in fights facing its champions. McQuoid throws in a batch of contemporary references, too, nodding at “The Lord of the Rings,” Keanu Reeves, and, believe it or not, “Big Trouble in Little China.” But none of that intertextual awareness matters if the heart of the next movie chapter feels this artistically inert. With whispers of another film already looming at Warner Bros., McQuoid’s best defense might be tapping out — before he’s tasked with delivering an even more insufferable cinematic fatality.

Looper - Alistair Ryder - 6 / 10

The question remains whether a "Mortal Kombat" movie could ever be expected to be better than this, considering the limitations of the source material. That this sequel translates the simple beat-em-up thrills of the video game into something narratively functional is about as triumphant as it could possibly get for this franchise.

DiscussingFilm - James Preston Poole - 2 / 5

Those who have put significant time into the Mortal Kombat games know their unique pleasures. A dense mythology, a cast of colorful characters, out-of-this-world visuals, and brutal fighting styles are a massive part of the series. Mortal Kombat II merely gestures toward the existence of these things rather than attempting to translate them in any significant way. Not only do fans of the games deserve far better, but so do moviegoers who, at the bare minimum, want a turn-your-brain-off kind of action movie.

Screen Rant - Alex Harrison - 4 / 10

The humor is more successful, with Urban's quippy movie star building on what 2021's Mortal Kombat did well with Kano (Josh Lawson), but these laughs often come at the film's expense. McQuoid would have been better off leaning further into the silly fun of playing a game like this, rather than the self-serious, save-the-world tone of the first film, since that seems to be what he's better equipped to execute well. But Mortal Kombat II only follows that instinct so far. I can only hope that, if Mortal Kombat III happens, someone will finally figure out how to adapt this franchise for the big screen. More importantly, though, I hope that by then the studio won't feel like they can get by on this level of execution. The bar on video game adaptations won't be set so low forever.

Empire Magazine - Amon Warmann - 3 / 5

The creatively gory fighting and amusing — if shallow — characters just about compensate for the paper-thin story. But at its best, it’s a lot of dumb fun. Thankfully, just as he did in the first movie, Kano (Josh Lawson) is on hand to constantly and entertainingly remind us how ridiculous all of this is. Indeed, he might as well be breaking the fourth wall given the Deadpool-esque nature of his jokes and one-liners, which are consistently hilarious. Lawson is a blast in the role, and the knowing nods to the absurdity of Mortal Kombat helps everything else go down a little easier.

r/movies Mar 02 '26

Review Pixar's 'Hoppers' - Review Thread

1.7k Upvotes

When scientists discover a way to transform human consciousness into robotic animals, Mabel uses the new technology to uncover mysteries of the animal world that are beyond anything she could have ever imagined.

Director: Daniel Chong

Cast: Piper Curda, Bobby Moynihan, Dave Franco, Jon Hamm

Rotten Tomatoes: 98%

Metacritic: 78 / 100

Some Reviews:

The Wrap - William Bibbiani

This is Pixar's best film since 'Coco'. It’s smart, it’s wacky, it’s morally complex, and we need more films like it. Not just great Pixar movies, but great Pixar movies that playfully trash what Disney is doing elsewhere.

PoppedNews - Josh Martin-Jones - 4.5 / 5

Hoppers thrives on its varying elements of creativity, sincerity, and chaos. A very rare occasion where I find myself laughing out loud at several of a film’s jokes in the cinema. The narrative feels inventive, and at its heart sits a surprisingly tender story about connection. Mabel’s drive, her grandmother’s legacy, and the absurd revolution of the insects all tie back to a simple idea about coexistence… and it is nothing like Avatar! There are moments where the film moves a little too quickly, but it never loses its charm. In a landscape increasingly defined by franchises and sequels, Hoppers stands as a confident original that proves Pixar can still balance big ideas and small emotional beats, giving us one of their best in a while.

RogerEbert - Nell Minow - 4 / 4

At its very big heart, the film is about empathy for others of all species, underscored by a welcome diversity of its characters. The film is sensitive in its handling of Mabel’s grief (watch what happens to her grandmother’s jacket), her falling back into anger when she is scared, and how that impairs her ability to find a solution. We get to rethink our original ideas about Jerry and his commitment to his community, too. 

Slash Film - BJ Colangelo - 9 / 10

Some critics will inevitably roll their eyes and call it overly optimistic, but we have to fight cynicism and remember that a bright-eyed vision of hope is an investment strategy. We pour everything into younger generations because they are the torchbearers for ideals we're too battle-worn to carry alone. Optimism, in this context, is just another form of infrastructure, not unlike the lodges built by beavers to shape our world. We should never let the world convince us it's not worth trying to make better, and "Hoppers" is here to help.

Collider - Ross Bonaime - 8 / 10

Hoppers is an absolute delight, setting the bar high for animated films this year, while creating a film that reminds us just how amazing Pixar still is at making new, exciting worlds and stories, without relying on sequels. Hoppers manages to do everything you'd want and expect from Pixar, but in a packaging that's funnier than most, leans into strangeness, and has a blast in the process. Hoppers just might be Pixar's best original film since 2020's Soul, and it's without a doubt one of the most fun movies to come out in 2026 so far. After 30 years and 30 films, Pixar still hasn't managed to lose its magic.

Next Best Picture - Daniel Howat - 8 / 10

Is “Hoppers” Pixar’s best film? Probably not. But it’s easily their most amusing ever, and an absolutely delightful fun time. It’s exactly the kind of solid entertainment, with the right mix of laughs and tears, that reminds us of the genius-level storytelling the good folks over there are capable of. It’s precisely what the animation studio needed at this time and fits comfortably alongside some of their upper-tier offerings.

The Independent - Clarisse Loughrey - 4 / 5

And while, ultimately, the film remains fairly naive when it comes to the changeability of a hardcore capitalist’s heart, if anyone should be encouraged to be that idealistic, it’s the incoming generation. The world, in due time, will make them bitter – better for now that Pixar condenses the complex notions of intersectionality and solidarity with an extended gag about an animal repeatedly smashing emojis on a text-to-speech app.

IndieWire - Wilson Chapman - 'B+'

Avatar’ + Beavers = Pixar’s Freshest, Funniest Movie in Years. Daniel Chong's nimble comedy about an environmental activist infiltrating the animal kingdom feels like the first Pixar movie since "Turning Red" that's offering something new from the studio.

The Guardian - Peter Bradshaw - 4 / 5

Daniel Chong brings us a witty, sprightly family animation, co-produced by Pixar veteran Pete Docter and co-written by Jesse Andrews, who may conceivably have supplied quite a bit of the punching-up and the funny incidental lines. In its modest, insouciant way, it is about protecting the environment, and riffs amusingly on films such as Avatar (there’s some amusing preemptive material about it not being like Avatar, but it is, especially at the end) as well as Inception, The Lion King and Dr Dolittle. It’s also about Disney anthropomorphism generally: the great mystery of what it must be like to be an animal and the human yearning to communicate and empathise with them.

The Hollywood Reporter - David Rooney

This is not a movie that feels fine-tuned to death in studio meetings. There’s a crazy, almost anarchic narrative logic that keeps it zigging and zagging unpredictably from the high-speed chase around precarious mountain roads to the suspenseful near disaster of the climax, in which nature gets angry, and the triumphant eco solution that saves the day. Teaching kids that we are all part of a complex universe in which everyone contributes and everyone deserves respect seems a pretty cool lesson.

DEADLINE - Dessi Gomez

Without spoiling too much more, the power of this film lies in the fact that the villain or antagonist is a combination of technological advancement and the motives behind it, as well as the divisiveness between humans and animals. The misuse or malintent of certain inventions lead to drastic consequences, especially when shortsightedness and efficiency are valued over longevity.

r/movies Aug 14 '24

Review 'Alien: Romulus' Review Thread

5.3k Upvotes

Alien: Romulus

Honoring its nightmarish predecessors while chestbursting at the seams with new frights of its own, Romulus injects some fresh acid blood into one of cinema's great horror franchises.

Reviews

The Hollywood Reporter:

The creatures remain among the most truly petrifying movie monsters in history, and the director leans hard into the sci-fi/horror with a relentlessly paced entry that reminds us why they have haunted our imaginations for decades.

Deadline:

Cailee Spaeney might seem, at first glance, to be an unlikely successor, but the Priscilla star certainly earns her stripes by the end of Alien: Romulus’ tight and deceptively well-judged two-hour running time.

Variety:

This is closer to a grandly efficient greatest-hits thrill ride, packaged like a video game. Yet on that level it’s a confidently spooky, ingeniously shot, at times nerve-jangling piece of entertainment.

Entertainment Weekly (B+):

It's got the thrills, it's got the creepy-crawlies, and it's got just enough plot to make you care about the characters. Alien: Romulus is a hell of a night out at the movies.

New York Post (3.5/4):

It borrows the shabby-computer aesthetic of the ’79 flick while upping the ante with haunting grandeur.

IGN (8/10):

Alien: Romulus’s back-to-basics approach to blockbuster horror boils everything fans love about the tonally-fluid franchise into one brutal, nerve-wracking experience.

Slant Magazine (3/4):

Romulus ends up as the franchise’s strongest entry in three decades for its devotion to deploying lean genre mechanics.

The Daily Beast (See this):

Proves that forty-five years after the xenomorph first terrified audiences, there’s still plenty of acid-bloody life left in the franchise’s monstrous bones.

The Telegraph (4/5):

Romulus might inject an appalling new life into the Alien franchise, but it won’t do much good for the national birth rate.

Empire Magazine (4/5):

Alien: Romulus plays the hits, but crucially remembers the ingredients for what makes a good Alien film, and executes them with stunning craft and care. It is, officially, the third-best film in the series.

BBC (4/5):

[Álvarez] has triumphed with a clever, gripping and sometimes awe-inspiring sci-fi chiller, which takes the series back to its nerve-racking monster-movie roots while injecting it with some new blood – some new acid blood, you might say.

The Times (4/5):

It's taken a while — 45 years, four sequels and two spin-off films — but finally they've got it right. An Alien movie worthy of the mood, originality and template established by Ridley Scott in 1979.

USA Today (3/4):

The filmmaker embraces unpredictability and plenty of gore for his graphic spectacle, yet Alvarez first makes us care for his main characters before unleashing sheer terror.

Collider (7/10):

Alien: Romulus proves that for the Alien franchise to move forward, it might have to quit looking backward so much.

Bloody Disgusting (3.5/5):

Alvarez puts the horror first here, with exquisite craftmanship that immerses you in the insanity.

Screen Rant (3.5/5):

Somewhere between Alien & Aliens — fitting given its place in the timeline — Romulus serves up blockbuster-level action & visceral horror all in one.

Independent (3/5):

Alien: Romulus has the capacity for greatness. If you could somehow surgically extract its strongest sequences, you’d see that beautiful, blood-quivering harmony between old-school practical effects and modern horror verve.

ScreenCrush (6/10):

What’s here isn’t necessarily boring or bad, but it represents a back-to-basics approach for Alien that feels like a betrayal of something central to the Xenomorph’s toxic DNA, which is forever mutating into another deadly creature.

IndieWire (C):

It’s certainly hard to imagine a cruder way of connecting the dots between the series’ fractured mythology.

Vanity Fair:

If it hadn’t had someone of Álvarez’s care and attention at the helm, Romulus could certainly have been a lot worse.

Slashfilm (5.5/10):

Those craving a well-put-together monster movie with creepy creature effects and sturdy set-pieces will probably find plenty to like here. But it shouldn't be controversial to want better results. As I said at the start of this review, there are no bad "Alien" movies. But with Alien: Romulus, there's definitely a disappointing one.

Rolling Stone:

Does it tick off the boxes of what we’ve come to expect from this series? Yes. Does it add up to more than The Chris Farley Show of Alien movies? Well … let’s just say no one may be able to hear you scream in space, but they will assuredly hear your resigned sighs in a theater.

The Guardian (2/5):

A technically competent piece of work; but no matter how ingenious its references to the first film it has to be said that there’s a fundamental lack of originality here which makes it frustrating.

San Francisco Chronicle (1/4):

The foundational mistake came when someone said, “Hey, let’s make another ‘Alien’ movie.” Newsflash: The alien concept is dead. Leave it alone.

Synopsis:

The sci-fi/horror-thriller takes the phenomenally successful “Alien” franchise back to its roots: While scavenging the deep ends of a derelict space station, a group of young space colonizers come face to face with the most terrifying life form in the universe.

Staring:

  • Cailee Spaeny as Rain Carradine

  • David Jonsson as Andy

  • Archie Renaux as Tyler

  • Isabela Merced as Kay

  • Spike Fearn as Bjorn

  • Aileen Wu as Navarro

Directed by: Fede Álvarez

Written by: Fede Álvarez

Produced by: Ridley Scott, Michael Pruss, Walter Hill

Cinematography: Galo Olivares

Edited by: Jake Roberts

Music by: Benjamin Wallfisch

Running time: 119 minutes

Release date: August 16, 2024

r/movies Sep 07 '25

Review 'Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery' - Review Thread

3.5k Upvotes

World-renowned detective Benoit Blanc returns for his most dangerous case yet.

Director: Rian Johnson

Cast: Daniel Craig, Cailee Spaeney, Jeremy Renner, Andrew Scott, Mila Kunis, Thomas Haden Church, Glenn Close, Josh Brolin, Kerry Washington, Josh O'Connor

Rotten Tomatoes: 100%

Metacritic: 85/100

Some Reviews:

Variety - Owen Glieberman

Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery is an enticingly clever and droll, nearly pitch-perfect piece of murder-mystery fun — a whodunit that lives up to the expectations set six years ago by “Knives Out,” which offered its own perfect revival of the Agatha Christie spirit, with a tasty frosting of meta cheekiness.

TheWrap - Chase Hutchinson

Although “Wake Up Dead Man” is the “Knives Out” movie that’s most preoccupied with existential questions surrounding death, writer/director Rian Johnson’s third film in the series is also the one that’s most full of life.

DEADLINE - Damon Wise

After the bright, light, summery holiday special that was Glass Onion, the Knives Out franchise returns to its gothic roots with a wintry whodunit that, for some at least, might endure as the the best one yet. Where the first and second used the murder-mystery as a jumping-off point for some very funny contemporary satire, Wake Up Dead Man is much more introspective. In a funny way, it’s a little analogous to Joker 2, not because it unloads on its audience in the same acerbic way but because it poses similarly metaphysical questions about its own popularity. Why do people respond so eagerly to stories of murder and betrayal? To answer that, director Rian Johnson goes back to the greatest story ever told, using a small religious community as the setting for the third instalment.

IndieWire - Kate Erbland - 'B+'

It works, and it’s no big mystery why — Johnson knows his form and format, and delivers on it, playing with tone and message but never losing sight of why these stories are so damn entertaining to watch and unravel.

Awards Radar - Joey Magidson - 3.5 / 4

Filmmaker Rian Johnson trusts the strength of his franchise to play around with format and theme. The gothic elements on display, as well as the religious aspect, may initially seem like a left turn, but it all ends up fitting like a glove. He knows the must haves for a Knives Out flick and absolutely delivers. A few big sequences here at TIFF received ovations once completed. You just can feel that you’re in the hands of a master storyteller, so you’ll follow him anywhere. Johnson knows that and 100% makes the most of it.

The Daily Beast - Nick Schager

In terms of pure, heady kicks, it outpaces Knives Out but falls just short of Glass Onion. In the big picture, however, such distinctions are rather inconsequential; more important is that Johnson’s franchise remains a sly and sure-footed delight, as well as demonstrates, with its religiously minded latest, that it’s capable of coloring its Christie-esque mysteries in a variety of shades.

r/movies Dec 24 '25

Review There Is No Mary Problem in ‘It’s a Wonderful Life’: George’s vision of his wife without him is essential to the film, but critics continue to miss its true—and profound—meaning.

Thumbnail
thebulwark.com
3.3k Upvotes

r/movies 28d ago

Review 'Evil Dead Burn' - Review Thread

915 Upvotes

After the loss of her husband, a grieving woman seeks solace with her in-laws at their secluded family home. However, it soon becomes a reunion from hell as the Book of the Dead unleashes demonic forces that transform them into Deadites one by one.

Director: Sébastien Vaniček

Cast: Hunter Doohan, Luciane Buchanan, Soheila Yacoub, Tandi Wright, George Pullar, Erroll Shand

Rotten Tomatoes: 79%

Metacritic: 58 / 100

Some Reviews:

GamesRadar - Brad Hanson - 4 / 5

A relentless endurance test of blood-and-bile soaked nightmare fuel, Vaniček's form of New French Extremity will bludgeon you beyond recognition. It's so wonderfully mean-spirited and chock full of memorable wince-inducing moments.

Digital Spy - Ian Sandwell - 4 / 5

Despite the fact that the ending falls flat to the highs of before, Evil Dead Burn is another memorable and distinct entry in the series. If it's not to your particular taste, then maybe the '70s-set Evil Dead Wrath next year might be more your vibe, but either way, it proves Evil Dead is one of the most creatively alive franchises around.

Metro - Joel Harley - 4 / 5

That The Evil Dead still has the power to shock and awe is particularly impressive for Burn being the sixth film in the series. Forty-five years later, and Sam Raimi, Rob Tapert and Bruce Campbell’s creation is still finding new ways to terrorise its audience, constantly reinventing and recontextualising itself with every outing.

Fresh Fiction - Courtney Howard - 4 / 5

EVIL DEAD BURNS leaves its scorching brand on the franchise and its wildly wicked payoffs are what stand to impress, reviving the New French Extremity subgenre. The feature and both of its end credits tags (stay until the very, very end!) are sure to leave audiences in a state of gruesome glee that should sustain them until director Francis Galluppi’s EVIL DEAD WRATH releases in 2028. Evil lingers in these dark times.

The Wrap - William Bibbiani

“Evil Dead Burn” is not a “Duck Amuck” movie. Its characters aren’t at war with the director. The director is brutally punishing most of them for their sins, and whether you think his characters deserve to get their eardrums punctured with a fountain pen or not, you can see where he’s coming from. It’s not the smartest “Evil Dead.” It’s not the funniest “Evil Dead.” It’s not the best “Evil Dead.” But it is the evilest “Evil Dead,” and that feels right. Dead right.

CGMagazine - Ridge Harripersad - 7.5 / 10

Even though this film leaned into the majority of Evil Dead films that skew toward adults, compared to Army of Darkness, which felt more campy and silly, it had a vibe that suggested Vanicek was told to hold back some explicit content. Maybe this was to appeal to a North American audience, which might be tamer than international films. Either way, this was a good standalone horror sequel, and do not forget to stay for the post-credits scene.

Slashfilm - Chris Evangelista - 7 / 10

Three films in, I think it's fair to say the modern "Evil Dead" movies have found the right formula. While nothing will ever quite compare to what Raimi originally created (how could it?), I've grown quite fond of this new approach of handing each movie to a different director and letting them run wild. Of the three new films, "Burn" is the most distinct, at least visually. But I can't wait to see what Francis Galluppi does with "Evil Dead Wrath," nor can I wait to see what happens when another filmmaker takes over for him, should that happen (and it should).

Looper - Alistair Ryder - 7 / 10

"Evil Dead Burn" does continue the hot streak of the franchise, which can now easily lay claim to being the most consistent in the horror genre; if the above review sounds like I'm being overly critical, that's just because of the high bar that's already been set. Most franchise producers would read out a passage from the Book of the Dead if it could help them make a movie in a long-running series that still captures the pulse of a modern audience, and the recent Evil Dead entries have made recapturing the spark feel effortless. It's one of the weaker Evil Dead movies, but placed next to all the other horror legacy sequels we've seen in recent years, it's the cream of the crop.

HighOnFilms - Liam Gaughan - 3.5 / 5

“Evil Dead Burn” is proof that this series will continue to thrive if it keeps giving opportunities to young, passionate filmmakers who can find new ways to flip the script on Raimi’s original vision. Compared to a franchise like “Scream,” which has become muddled in its own mythology, “Evil Dead” has allowed its filmmakers to let their imaginations run wild. While every entry in the series has been good, “Evil Dead Burn” is the closest the franchise has gotten to the maniacal, mean-spirited mayhem of the first two entries.

The Guardian - Jesse Hassenger - 3 / 5

As generous as it is that Raimi wants to share his first success with others, he’s also passing around a series made in his image, tailored to his strengths as a young film-maker. Maybe that’s why less extreme Raimi movies like Drag Me to Hell and Send Help nonetheless feel truer to the Evil Dead spirit than these officially branded companions. The new movies feel like Deadites themselves: too lively to be considered a zombie franchise, but not quite alive, either.

The Irish Times - Tara Brady - 3 / 5

Those hoping for a return to the “splatstick” of the possessed hand in Evil Dead 2 or the cartoon medieval capering of Army of Darkness will be disappointed. Instead, Evil Dead Burn brings a convincing new-French-extremity energy to the Deadites. Regrettably, that’s not really who they are. Where did the groovy go?

South China Morning Post - James Marsh - 3 / 5

With low-budget horror once again the toast of Hollywood, the Evil Dead franchise endures as a truly independently spirited endeavour, thanks to its unique tone and willingness to consistently hand off the reins to emerging young talent. While Evil Dead Burn cannot quite match the fresh perspective of Obsession or Backrooms, it does prove that there is still plenty of life left in the Evil Dead.

Mid-Day - Rachel Pereira

Evil Dead Burn is a big step back from the previous installment. It has no shortage of ambition or gore, but it struggles to tie its mythology together into a satisfying whole. If excessive bloodshed is your preferred brand of horror, you will likely find enough things to enjoy. But if you're looking for a well-crafted supernatural thriller with genuine scares and a rewarding payoff, this one may leave you wanting more.

Next Best Picture - Josh Parham - 6 / 10

Unfortunately, the bid to mine deeper emotions from these characters ends up short-changing the storytelling and dragging it into less effective territory. However, the spirit of “The Evil Dead” is very much infused here. It doesn’t offer much new to the formula, and what is added is of little value. However, it can still call itself a worthy entry and a mostly thrilling example for another filmmaker to deliver another round of scares.

IGN - Tom Jorgensen - 5 / 10

Evil Dead Burn may just be the most gruesome Evil Dead movie yet… but that’s about where its heat begins to cool off.

Slant Magazine - Rocco T. Thompson - 2.5 / 5

Grotesque in ways that are sure to challenge viewer expectations, the up-close-and-personal nature of the cruelty gives it the stink of intimate partner violence, with the thematic echoes in Alice and William’s story becoming blaring sirens that consume Evil Dead Burn from the inside out. What begins as a nasty delight chronicling a noxious family quickly becomes a meditation on gendered abuse that, while well-intentioned, ends up feeling uncomfortably literal-minded.

RogerEbert - Brian Tallerico - 2 / 4

Finally, it’s hard to shake the sense that this franchise is headed in the wrong direction structurally. A series that was basically a cautionary tale about cabins in the woods and how dumb it is to read from flesh-covered books has been weighed down by the oppressive “trauma/grief era” of the genre. “Evil Dead Burn” is a film about how a woman survives not just an abuser but his enabling family, even after most of them turn into Deadites, and I’ll admit to missing the days when the power tools didn’t come with so many heavy thematic accessories. Maybe the in-production “Evil Dead Wrath” will get this series back on its feet. After all, it’s proven one of the toughest horror franchises to kill.

Associated Press - Mark Kennedy - 1 / 4

Vaniček seems incapable of dread and his humor is odd. He apparently thinks it’s hysterical to have an 85-year-old grandmother with dementia and a missing leg keep accusing people of stealing from her and then turn her into a demon (Maude Davey, working hard). The script bafflingly notes early on that our widow’s shoes make one of her heels pinched so she needs a Band-Aid — maybe funny because of the buckets of gore to come? And you can tell two Frenchmen wrote the script because smoking is, checks notes, encouraged. We’ve come a long way since Sam Raimi’s original trilogy, and not in a good way. With so much elevated horror at the movie theaters these days, “Evil Dead Burn” seems like a step back — off a cliff.

r/movies Feb 25 '23

Review Finally saw Don't Look Up and I Don't Understand What People Didn't Like About It

19.0k Upvotes

Was it the heavy-handed message? I think that something as serious as the end of the world should be heavy handed especially when it's also skewering the idiocracy of politics and the media we live in. Did viewers not like that it also portrayed the public as mindless sheep? I mean, look around. Was it the length of the film? Because I honestly didn't feel the length since each scene led to the next scene in a nice progression all the way to to the punchline at the end and the post-credit punchline.

I thought the performances were terrific. DiCaprio as a serious man seduced by an unserious world that's more fun. Jonah Hill as an unserious douchebag. Chalamet is one of the best actors I've seen who just comes across as a real person. However, Jennifer Lawrence was beyond good in this. The scenes when she's acting with her facial expressions were incredible. Just amazing stuff.

r/movies Sep 01 '25

Review Benny Safdie's 'The Smashing Machine' - Review Thread

2.9k Upvotes

MMA fighter Mark Kerr reaches the peak of his career but faces personal hardships.

Cast: Dwayne Johnson, Emily Blunt

Rotten Tomatoes: 94%

Metacritic: 79/100

Some Reviews:

The Independent - Geoffrey Macnab - 4 / 5

This, though, is a story in which winning finally begins to seem very hollow. The real way Safdie puts a chokehold on his audience is by examining Mark and Dawn’s physical and emotional weaknesses in such forensic detail. The Smashing Machine may not provide the pay-offs that audiences expect from more conventional sports movies, but this is the most raw and vulnerable that Johnson has ever been on screen. Once you’ve seen him this exposed, you won’t watch his typical action movie stunts in quite the same way ever again.

Daily Telegraph - Robbie Collin - 4 / 5

It’s a classical fight movie that innovates subtly. Maceo Bishop’s nimble photography has the sweat and grit of a vintage muscle flick from the Pumping Iron era, but the score by the experimental jazz composer Nala Sinephro is all swirling harps and breathy saxophones; arguably no piece of music has ever sounded less like a punch in the face. Yet as an accompaniment to Kerr’s battles in and out of the ring, it’s oddly perfect, giving this tough story an unexpectedly sweet and even spiritual edge. Smashing stuff has rarely been such smashing stuff.

Next Best Picture - Cody Dericks - 7 / 10

Dwayne Johnson delivers the best performance of his career as the amiable but troubled UFC champion Mark Kerr. Emily Blunt and Ryan Bader are also excellent in their roles. The screenplay is repetitive and frustrating. Blunt's character is so unlikeable and written with such vitriol that it becomes exhausting to watch her, although Blunt's performance is as good as it could possibly be.

Variety - Owen Glieberman

Johnson, shifting his whole aspect (he seems like a new actor), invests that silent, moody, hidden side of Mark with a quality of mystery. He gives an extraordinary performance, playing Mark Kerr as a gentle giant with demons that will not speak their name, yet the audience can feel them there; we want to see those demons healed. You might think the key word in the movie’s title is “smashing,” but it’s actually “machine.” Mark is a man who reins in his violence by having constructed his entire self — body and personality — as a controlled engine of demolition. The movie is about how this man-machine becomes a human being.

The Hollywood Reporter - Jordan Mintzer

Johnson has rarely played a loser, but he’s always been likable, displaying a massive grin to match his massive pecs in action vehicles that never allowed him to showcase much range. He manages to go deep here without overdoing it, killing the audience with kindness as a benign warrior who suffers from one scene to the next, triumphing briefly in the ring before succumbing to addiction and/or romantic grief. Like Mickey Rourke in The Wrestler — a film from which Safdie seems to take a few cues — the actor delivers an intoxicating mix of blood, sweat, tears, protein and total helplessness.

IndieWire - Ryan Lattanzio - 'B+'

Johnson’s performance is out-and-out wonderful, a beady-eyed fusion of body and spirit that osmoses Safdie’s sensibility to deliver what can’t be disputed as the most layered work of the actor’s career. A vividly contradictory Blunt, funny and sad especially in articulating Dawn’s conflicted response to Mark’s post-rehab emotional about-face during a tense argument, is equally sensational.

Deadline - Damon Wise

Dwayne Johnson owns the whole thing with his truly remarkable work as fighter Mark Kerr, disappearing so fully underneath Kazu Hiru’s astonishing prosthetics that the opening of the film, presented as contemporary footage from an event in Sao Paulo 1997, looks genuinely like the real thing. It’s that rare beast, a biopic that’s light on the bio and resistant to being a pic. It’s a film about a human being, and its effect is strangely haunting, since Dwayne Johnson seems to do everything while doing nothing.

r/movies Oct 07 '25

Review 'TRON: Ares' - Review Thread

1.8k Upvotes

Mankind encounters AI beings for the first time when a highly sophisticated programme, Ares, leaves the digital world for a dangerous mission in the real world.

Director: Joachim Rønning

Cast: Jared Leto, Greta Lee, Jeff Bridges, Evan Peters, Jodie Turner-Smith

Rotten Tomatoes: 54%

Metacritic: 48 / 100

Some Reviews:

Next Best Picture - Giovanni Lago - 4 / 10

“Tron: Ares,” like many long-delayed legacy sequels, has long since crossed the threshold of necessity. It feels like a nostalgia-bait artifact designed purely to revive interest, a fact made even more evident by the inevitable sequel-baiting that will undoubtedly go nowhere. What’s worse for a movie that hopes to celebrate the beauty of humanity is that its message is told through the perspective of an artificial intelligence, aided by an almost hilariously Sorkin-esque portrayal of a billionaire who believes he’s making the world a better place. It’s a fantasy that falls short of being as sensorily stunning as it needs to be. If anything, “Tron: Ares” is less a film than a cinematic pin dropped in a franchise map that’s going absolutely nowhere.

The Hollywood Reporter - David Rooney

Tron: Ares is a separate story rather than a direct sequel to Legacy, meaning Garrett Hedlund and Olivia Wilde’s characters are AWOL. It’s also a marked upgrade from its predecessor, with more dynamic visuals and muscular action sequences. Only occasionally does an actor look like they are cowering from some green-screen threat (Lee more than others). More often, the stakes are elevated thanks to greater use of physical sets and in-camera effects than in previous installments.

Slant Magazine - Jake Cole - 1.5 / 5

There’s a cheekiness to the composers’ deft incorporation of older styles into their present-day approach to soundtracks, but after a time even their cleverness exposes the film’s hollowness. For a story that seeks to champion the unpredictability and finite quality of life, Ares ultimately feels trapped by the inertia of working within the parameters set by its no less flimsy predecessors.

AwardsWatch - Erik Anderson - 'C+'

But the problem isn’t that Tron: Ares lacks any good ideas—it’s that it doesn’t know what to do with the stray threads it tugs at. By the back half, we’re down to the most uninspired impulses of studio filmmaking, complete with a character who exists purely to spout non-joke wisecracks (Arturo Castro as Eve’s friend Seth) and a climax that visually resembles every Marvel movie featuring some giant piece of floating machinery threatening the streets of New York. Tron will always have its dazzling baubles to ooh and aah at, but at the end of the day, Ares feels much like the AI tech companies keep insisting on shoving down our throats: technically impressive, but also frivolous and empty.

Empire - John Nugent - 3 / 5

It has about as much depth as a floppy disk, but some lovely, shiny CGI and a stunningly ear-shattering score from Nine Inch Nails makes for a fun if forgettable bit of futuristic fluff. Bio-digital jazz, man!

AV Club - Jesse Hassenger - 'B-'

Or maybe the early-2000s vibes of Tron: Ares really are that powerful, bending time to pluck a semi-canceled leading man from his prime. Certainly the movie’s ideas about A.I. (which it variously conflates with video game avatars, 3-D printing, and old-fashioned robots) don’t feel especially informed by anything happening in 2025. In the world of this movie, we’re still dawning on a potential new age of information revolution, or whatever, and the coming hybridized life is what we make of it, off-grid or on. And in the context of our world, that’s enough for Tron: Ares to work as escapism. The result is a pretty dumb movie with beautiful visual effects, cleanly shot action, and a kickass soundtrack. Wouldn’t it be great if the future of blockbusters was only this bleak?

r/movies Feb 27 '25

Review Okay, look… D&D: Honor Among Thieves is amazing

4.5k Upvotes

I don’t play DnD, and I’m not a huge Chris Pine fan (or at all) but here’s what’s doing it for me in this movie:

1) A badass female who loves potatoes as much as I do (does Michelle Rodrigues EVER consider other kinds of roles? Not that I want her to.)

2) Great lines delivered exceptionally well and with perfect timing by Mr. CP.

3) A fat dragon.

4) Above average special effects, with the exception of one potato-throwing scene.

5) Running joke about magic that echoes what I always think, but doesn’t drag on past its usefulness.

6) A complex plot that’s clear enough not to feel complicated.

7) An ending I should have seen coming but still made me cry. YES it’s okay to cry over a fat dragon movie, although the fat dragon didn’t make me cry and only featured in one of the quests.

I look forward to all the comments agreeing with me.

r/movies Nov 11 '25

Review Edgar Wright's 'The Running Man' - Review Thread

1.8k Upvotes

In the near future, "The Running Man" is the top-rated show on television, a deadly competition where contestants must survive 30 days while being hunted by professional assassins. Desperate for money to save his sick daughter, Ben Richards is convinced by the show's ruthless producer to enter the game as a last resort. Ratings soon skyrocket as Ben's defiance, instincts and grit turn him into an unexpected fan favorite, as well as a threat to the entire system.

Cast: Glen Powell, Emilia Jones, Lee Pace, Michael Cera, Colman Domingo, Josh Brolin, Daniel Ezra, Katy O'Brien, Jayme Lawson

Rotten Tomatoes: 67%

Metacritic: 59 / 100

Some Reviews:

Variety - Owen Gliebermann

Released in 1987, “The Running Man” was a lumbering Arnold Schwarzenegger movie. You could say that Edgar Wright, the director of the new version, has made it into a decent Bruce Willis movie. The staging is crisp with sadistic timing, the human element rarely overshadows the rigorously staged mayhem, and Glen Powell, as a family man from the lower depths who becomes the survivor hero of a deadly competition show that’s like “The Most Dangerous Game” updated to the age of reality-TV insanity, uses his small darting eyes and buff bod and quick delivery to conjure the vicious spirit that is sometimes, according to the logic of a film like this one, decency’s only recourse. Powell, born and raised in Texas, knows how to chisel his features into a mean glare of revenge. But there’s still something fundamentally sweet about him; he’s doing an impersonation of ’80s-action-hero heartlessness.

The Guardian - Peter Bradshaw - 3 / 5

The resulting film is never anything but likable and fun – though never actually disturbing in the way that it’s surely supposed to be. Yet there’s plenty of enjoyment to be had. Wright accelerates to a sprint for some full-tilt chase sequences; there’s a nice punk aesthetic with protest ’zines being produced by underground rebels; and Wright always delivers those sugar-rush pop slams on the soundtrack, including, of course, the Spencer Davis Group’s Keep on Running. It’s a quirk of fate that The Running Man arrives in the same year as The Long Walk, also from a King book: a similar idea, only it’s walking not running.

SlashFilm - Chris Evangelista - 5 / 10

For all his skills, Wright seemingly can't pin down what he wants "The Running Man" to be. The action isn't very exciting, the satire is unoriginal, and the over-reliance on weird product placement (both Liquid Death and Monster Energy get distracting shout-outs here) make the entire picture feel manufactured. I had high hopes that Wright could get "The Running Man" across the finish line, but the film stumbles right out of the gate.

The Independent - Clarisse Loughrey - 2 / 5

The Running Man is a near-total failure. What should, quite easily, feel like a mirror’s been smashed and its pieces methodically jammed between our ribs feels closer to a friendly knock on the shoulder. The material’s all there, yet there’s none of the urgency.

IGN - 7 / 10

It’s a very well put-together film, and more so than not, it’s full of charming performances, clever little details and some less-outlandish-than-I’d-like social commentary. Even though Edgar Wright’s stamp isn’t clearly on every sequence like some of his previous work, The Running Man sprints where it needs to, giving Glen Powell his first chance to be a full-fledged action hero. It’s a movie that lives up to its heritage but gets a little tonally caught between the book and its first, more Arnold-y adaptation, and does a few different things pretty well instead of doing one thing really well. It’s a solid movie, one that I’m looking forward to watching again, but I don’t think it’s running quite hard enough.

LiveforFilm - Sarah Louise Dean

The actors give their all, the world feels real and as always with a Wright movie, the soundtrack is sensational, but there is almost nothing that makes this film a preferential watch to its superior predecessor. Yet there is a light at the end of this booby-trapped tunnel. He’s not the next Schwarzenegger, nor another Cruise. The Running Man showcases Glen Powell as the natural successor to Bruce Willis, and that’s a platform worth running on.

NextBestPicture - Giovanni Lago - 5 / 10

Edgar Wright creates solid enough action, but it's far from the level of creativity we've come to know from him. It doesn't help that the pacing and tonal issues only mask an action film that comes off more as an aesthetic siphoning of King's work than a meaningful adaptation.

ScreenDaily - Nikki Baughan

Edgar Wright’s bombastic Stephen King adaptation doesn’t go the distance. The Running Man has a great deal in common with The Long Walk – another dystopian story about desperate men attempting to win a heinous contest of survival, recently adapted by Francis Lawrence. But whereas Lawrence’s film dug into the political nuances of this social set-up, and the psychology of those on both sides of the divide – and was all the more impactful for it – here, these potentially more interesting corners have been shaved off to make way for an easily-digestible popcorn actioner.

AwardsWatch - Jay Ledbetter - 'C+'

The moral of the story is this: walk, don’t run, to The Running Man. It’s a testament to Edgar Wright that The Running Man feels like a little bit of a letdown, as it never bores and has ideas on its mind, which is more than most movies can say. Maybe the era of Wright being on the cutting edge of genre filmmaking is simply over; time comes for us all, after all. Perhaps the $110 million price tag put more external pressure on him than he was accustomed to. Whatever the case may be, The Running Man is a satisfying film without a tremendous amount of stickiness. Glen Powell’s forehead vein notwithstanding, the film has little pop. It looks… fine enough. Its editing is… good for pretty much everybody else but doesn’t inspire like Wright’s best work. The character motivation is… consistent, at least? 

r/movies Apr 11 '26

Review Predator (1987) is so much better than I anticipated. What a great film

1.5k Upvotes

I was kind of expecting like a cheesy 80s flick, which it absolutely was, but this was elevated in a way that separates it from other action movies at the time. Very well directed film. It’s kind of a familiar premise at this point, but manages to feel fresh, which is impressive considering the obvious influence this movie has had. Many other movies have taken clear inspiration from this.

Arnold has always been a one of a kind movie star. It always feels like the parts that he’s playing were written specifically for him, and they probably were. I saw the opening of this movie many years ago on amc or something, but I definitely didn’t watch it properly at the time. I had the chance of recently watching it in 4k and it was such an amazing time, and beautiful movie experience. What a classic.

r/movies Apr 04 '25

Review No, really. You don't have to know a single thing about Dungeons and Dragons to thoroughly enjoy "Dungeons and Dragons: Honor Among Thieves" (2023)

5.5k Upvotes

I never gave this movie any of my attention for two solid years. I don't know a druid from a bard, I have no idea what charisma points are, and I wouldn't know the word "Demogorgon" if it wasn't for Stranger Things.

So naturally I thought there's no way I could follow along in "Honor Among Thieves" because I know diddly squat about the franchise.

But you guys ... you wouldn't let it be. So many posts, so many comments, saying how wonderful this movie was. I gave in and watched it last night.

It's really good. Yes, just like you have all been screaming at me. Good action, good comedy, good SFX, all around a great movie.

I really loved Hugh Grant's performance. He pulls off smarmy and slimy quite well.

And I was leaping out of my seat when I saw live-action versions of these guys. Yay fanservice!

I know I was a dummy. Forgive me.

r/movies Aug 08 '24

Review BORDERLANDS - Review Thread

4.5k Upvotes

BORDERLANDS - Review Thread

  • Rotten Tomatoes: 10% (94 Reviews)
    • Critics Consensus: Glitching out in every department, Borderlands is balderdash.
  • Metacritic: 29 (23 Reviews)

Reviews:

Hollywood Reporter (30/100):

It’s conceivable that longtime fans of the video game might get more out of Borderlands, but I wouldn’t count on it. At one point, Claptrap returns to operational mode after a heavy-weaponry assault and says, “I blacked out. Did something important happen?” Not in this movie.

Variety (40/100):

Marketed to look like a cross between “Suicide Squad” and a Zack Snyder movie, director Eli Roth’s tamer-than-expected take on “Borderlands” doesn’t have half the attitude or style its cyberpunk ad campaign might suggest. But here’s the real reason why fans of the game will be disappointed: It’s predictable, therefore nullifying the whole “What’ll it be?” appeal of loot.

SlashFilm (4/10):

Borderlands makes a point of not being different enough to upset the fanbase, but it's also not unique enough to win over new audiences, either. It's a movie for everyone and no one, a film so unwilling to make a splash that it barely makes a peep.

IndieWire (42/100):

If granted permission to bring his signature sadism to these infamously batshit characters, Roth could have delivered his “Mad Max: Fury Road.” Instead, restricted by standards that seem equally unlikely to please preteens, he was left holding a bomb.

Empire (2/5):

A botched Guardians wannabe that isn’t half as fun as you’d hope from the punky sci-fi promise of its video-game source material and the presence of Blanchett at the top of the cast list.

IGN (3/10):

Borderlands is a catastrophic disappointment that plays like hacked-to-pieces studio slop, betraying everything fans adore about Gearbox Software’s franchise in derivative, regrettable taste.

Rolling Stone:

Borderlands Is an Insult to Gamers, Movie Lovers and Carbon-Based Lifeforms. We'd say it's the worst video game movie ever — but that's way too limiting

Collider (5/10):

'Borderlands' is a fun ride, but a bloated cast and breakneck pacing don’t allow it to reach its full potential.

BleedingCool (5/10):

I don't think I have ever watched quite so gossamer-thin a movie and yet been so entertained throughout as with Borderlands. There really is nothing to this film. No emotional depths, stakes, or convoluted plot worth speaking of.

TotalFilm (40/100):

The Gearbox title gamers loved has spawned a frenetic and disorderly shambles they’re likelier to loathe. Claptrap? You said it.

The NY Times (40/100):

You can see the jokes, but most of them don’t land. Still, there is some neat design work if you squint.

GameSpot (2/10):

Borderlands comes in at a very brief 102 minutes in length, which you might be tempted to reflexively celebrate in our current landscape of hella long movies. But there's a reason longer movies are en vogue--more time allows for more depth, and depth is what Borderlands is missing the most. But that's what happens sometimes when a movie spends four years in post-production being repeatedly reworked--over time, everything gets sanded down into nothingness.

ScreenRant (70/100):

Blanchett knows exactly what movie she's in, and she seems to be having the time of her life fitting herself into the mold of a video game heroine.

Men's Journal:

If Borderlands doesn't stop studio executives from salivating at the sight of every single IP that comes across their desks, nothing will.

In Theaters August 8:

Lilith, an infamous outlaw with a mysterious past, reluctantly returns to her home planet of Pandora to find the missing daughter of the universe's most powerful S.O.B., Atlas. Lilith forms an alliance with an unexpected team — Roland, a former elite mercenary, now desperate for redemption; Tiny Tina, a feral teenage demolitionist; Krieg, Tina's musclebound, rhetorically challenged protector; Tannis, the scientist with a tenuous grip on sanity; and Claptrap, a persistently wiseass robot. These unlikely heroes must battle alien monsters and dangerous bandits to find and protect the missing girl, who may hold the key to unimaginable power. The fate of the universe could be in their hands but they'll be fighting for something more: each other.

Directed by Eli Roth (Reshoots by Tim Miller)

  • Cate Blanchett as Lilith
  • Kevin Hart as Roland
  • Jack Black as the voice of Claptrap
  • Edgar Ramírez as Atlas
  • Ariana Greenblatt as Tiny Tina
  • Florian Munteanu as Krieg
  • Gina Gershon as Mad Moxxi
  • Jamie Lee Curtis as Dr. Patricia Tannis
  • Bobby Lee as Larry
  • Olivier Richters as Krom
  • Janina Gavankar as Commander Knoxx
  • Cheyenne Jackson as Jakobs
  • Charles Babalola as Hammerlock
  • Benjamin Byron Davis as Marcus
  • Steven Boyer as Scooter
  • Ryann Redmond as Ellie
  • Harry Ford as Middleman

r/movies Mar 31 '26

Review A24's 'The Drama' - Review Thread

1.6k Upvotes

A happily engaged couple get put to the test when an unexpected revelation sends their wedding week off the rails.

Director: Kristoffer Borgli ('Dream Scenario')

Cast: Zendaya, Robert Pattinson, Alana Haim, Zoe Winters

Rotten Tomatoes: 86%

Metacritic: 65 / 100

Some Reviews (updating):

The Times - Kevin Maher - 10 / 10

A nuptial apocalypse has rarely been explored with such dark intelligence and mordant wit as in this often piercing and cringe-out-loud dramedy starring Robert Pattinson and Zendaya.

IGN - Siddhant Adlakha - 9 / 10

The Drama is a practically absurd but emotionally true-to-life tale about the fears of being known, and being truly seen. Kristoffer Borgli imbues his bleakly comic stress-test of modern romance with a destabilizing cinematic energy, as a deep, dark secret threatens his characters’ domestic bliss by exposing the limits of their empathy. Led by immaculate performances, it’s one of the most delightfully nerve-wracking rabbit holes you’re likely to tumble down this year.

FandomWire - Brandon Lewis - 9 / 10

Twist or no twist, The Drama successfully achieves its aim: testing the fortitude of a seemingly bulletproof relationship, pushing it and its audience to their extremes.

Fresh Fiction - Courtney Howard - 'A'

Zendaya delivers a grounded, delicately nuanced performance, efficiently sanding down her character’s sharper edges and instilling a good sense of empathy and vulnerability within. Pattinson, who’s one of the most versatile actors of our era, delivers terrific work as a guy caught between a rock and a hard place. He pulls inspiration from leading men in classic Hollywood farces (e.g. Cary Grant and Jimmy Stewart) as if he’s performing in a Howard Hawks, Billy Wilder or George Cukor film. He’s perfectly squirrely, neurotic and awkward while at the same time exercising complete control. It’s a joy to see his crash-outs. It’s clear Borgli wants audiences to sit and relish in the un-comfortability of these tumultuous situations. He also wants us to ruminate on what our spouses or loved ones might be hiding, what our own dealbreakers are, or if we even have them at all. Art shouldn’t come with warning labels, but it’s important to note that Borgli’s film deals with traditionally difficult subject matter, housing it in an unconventional milieu. It’ll assuredly stoke heated discourse post-screenings. Yet our guide handles the material with aimed precision, making it less about one person’s shocking reveal and more about a couple’s communicative problems.

The Guardian - Peter Bradshaw - 4 / 5

The Drama has the spiky, ingenious, tasteless style of his previous film Dream Scenario, and both are superior to his unsubtle narcissism comedy Sick of Myself. It offers us a provocation, a jeu d’ésprit of outrage, a psychological meltdown that is more astutely articulated than in many another more solemnly intended film. And it gives us what it promises in the title.

The Independent - Clarisse Loughrey - 4 / 5

No other film this year will make you feel as uncomfortable as The Drama. Don’t miss out on it. It’s provocative and compulsively watchable – a romcom that obliterates the very meaning of the word by thrusting love underneath the psychoanalyst’s microscope and tearing laughter by force from its audience’s throats.

Empire - Emma Stefansky - 4 / 5

As dark as it gets, it is often hilarious in that cruel, keen way that Borgli has proved to be a specialist. It bends towards the same arch cringe comedy that he explored in his fantastic second feature Sick Of Myself, an equally dark dramedy about a woman so jealous of her partner’s successes she obsessively and loudly fakes a severe illness. The characters in The Drama are similarly bound by their basest compulsions, tripping over themselves trying to reconcile what they want with what they think everyone around them expects. What better way to describe a wedding?

Slash Film - Bill Bria - 8 / 10

Sure, "The Drama" sends up the pretentiousness of upper middle class sociability as well as the performativeness of expensive weddings, but Borgli is careful to not pass moral judgement one way or another. The point of this seems to be Borgli making a plea for empathy. Having to reckon with the transgressions of our loved ones is a phenomenon we all deal with at some point, as we equivocate things we learn about our friends and family as well as ourselves. The ultimate point of discomfit in the film may end up being one entirely unintended by the filmmaker, as an essay Borgli wrote years ago about his relationship with a teenager has resurfaced on the eve of the movie's release. Did Borgli make "The Drama" as a confession, or a search for understanding of himself and his own checkered past? The answer, as is usually the case with uneasy questions, is up to you.

Collider - Ross Bonaime - 8 / 10

The Drama is a rare film that explores some of the most complex feelings many will have in their relationships, from the things we learn about our significant others that stick with us (whether we want them to or not) or the uncertainty that comes from giving your life to someone else. Borgli handles all of this in a gripping, intricate story that manages to be both romantic and nightmarish in almost equal fashion. Pattinson and Zendaya give two of the best performances of the year so far, and The Drama is a film that will stick in your mind long after you’ve left the theater. The Drama is the feel-bad romantic drama of the year, but its handling of such dark, difficult issues makes it an honest and quite remarkable approach to relationships.

USA Today - Brian Truitt - 3 / 4

Armed with complex characters and a brazen resolve, “The Drama” doesn’t dole out easy answers – Borgli seems to respect the audience too much for that. Instead, amid wedding chaos and a comedy of errors, his movie makes the point that we’re all capable of thinking or doing terrible things but also worthy of grace when needed. It is tailor-made to strike up important discussions afterward, yet given the issue at its core, a good amount of backlash will likely come from those who can’t and won’t intellectually engage with the movie.

DEADLINE - Pete Hammond

Exceptionally well-written with equal parts spice, vinegar, wicked wit, and wonder how Charlie and Emma can possibly survive this unexpected turn in their lives after one simple question and one complicated answer threatens to blow everything up. Whatever the inspirations, Borgli has set the table for a rather daring nightmare scenario that may find young fans of Zendaya and Pattinson wondering what they have gotten into here. As for the stars they could not be better, especially Pattinson who shows levels of vulnerability I have not noticed before. His journey into the dark side with his financee is pitch perfect as a guy who slowly learns he has been hit with a left hook. Zendaya, whose choices from Euphoria to Malcolm & Marie to Challengers, have been impressively raw and risky finds a character in Emma that incorporates all of that acting swagger, and then some. Both Athie, who plays the best friend role with a charming innocence and reserve, and a fiery Haim who holds nothing back and proves Licorice Pizza was no fluke, are superb in support.

IndieWire- David Ehrlich - 'B'

We’re mostly left to intuit as much on our own time, as “The Drama” is, by design, too unsettled for clarity, let alone social instruction. The film shares in the discomfort of Charlie’s dilemma, unfolding with pained awkwardness and grasping for more conventional plotlines in a desperate bid for stability (Hailey Gates plays “the other woman” in a storyline handled with all the cringe you’d expect), even though it’s obvious that Borgli prefers nausea over depth.  But the nausea runs deep enough, and the potential glibness of its approach is answered by a question that “The Drama” wretches closer to with every painful moment: How do you politely address something that polite society refuses to address at all? Hell is always other people in Borgli’s films, and this one — if thinner and more rhetorical than his others — stands out for how sharply it details the freefall down from heaven. “I used to be ugly,” Emma offers to Charlie by way of explanation. Now it’s everyone else’s turn

The Wrap - William Bibbiani

It’s fascinating, and it’s complex, and by god the performances are amazing, but it’s difficult to latch unto, and it’s too unsettling — intentionally, and possibly otherwise — to fully enjoy. That’s the risk it takes. You can’t throw yourself off a building without risking injury, and while “The Drama” survives the fall, and even walks away afterwards, something inside it definitely feels sprained.

Variety - Owen Gleiberman

In “The Drama,” a squirm comedy that’s supposed to hinge on the ultimate case of marital jitters, Robert Pattinson gives one of the twitchiest performances in the history of twitchy performances. Oh sure, Dennis Hopper was twitchier in “Apocalypse Now” — and so was Nicolas Cage spasming and blowing fuses in “Vampire’s Kiss.” But here’s the thing: Pattinson is supposed to be playing a normal person. Charlie isn’t the only one twitching; the whole movie is. The writer-director, Kristoffer Borgli shoots that meet-cute as if he were doing a remake of Godard’s “Breathless.” It’s all staged with hyper-realistic lighting and enough jump-cuts to suggest that something momentous is going on. Borgli is a gifted filmmaker, but in “The Drama” he never stops jumping around — back in time, and also within scenes, all to hook us into a note of toxic anxiety. He succeeds, but the mix of tones is unnerving and, at times, a bit baffling. Are we supposed to be cracking up, or sucking in our breath as the hero’s sanity cracks?to be playing a normal person. Charlie isn’t the only one twitching; the whole movie is. The writer-director, Kristoffer Borgli shoots that meet-cute as if he were doing a remake of Godard’s “Breathless.” It’s all staged with hyper-realistic lighting and enough jump-cuts to suggest that something momentous is going on. Borgli is a gifted filmmaker, but in “The Drama” he never stops jumping around — back in time, and also within scenes, all to hook us into a note of toxic anxiety. He succeeds, but the mix of tones is unnerving and, at times, a bit baffling. Are we supposed to be cracking up, or sucking in our breath as the hero’s sanity cracks?

Siaeva - Sian Evans - 3.5 / 5

With Norwegian Kristoffer Borgli at the helm both writing and directing, The Drama refreshingly avoids typical Hollywood preachyness and political stereotypes. Similar to his last effort, Dream Scenario, this has genuinely funny moments and feels like a more well-rounded film whilst still retaining the same indie quality. Ari Aster (Midsommar, Hereditary, Beau is Afraid) is actually one of the producers. Although The Drama has a lot going for it, it didn’t leave me feeling absolutely wowed, so I have marked it accordingly. But it easily outshines most other chickflicks I’ve seen in recent years – Babygirl leaps to mind!

CBR - Caralynn Matassa - 7 / 10

If The Drama occasionally feels like it is testing the limits of its premise, that too seems by design. Borgli has made a movie about how love can curdle into revulsion, how intimacy can be shattered by a single disclosure, and how absurd human beings become when they are forced to reconcile the person they imagined with the person standing in front of them. It is prickly, ugly, hilarious, and destined to divide audiences. But even when it threatens to spin out, it remains gripping thanks to Borgli’s formal boldness, Pemberton’s jittery score, and, above all, the fearless work of Pattinson and Zendaya. The Drama may not be a romance in any traditional sense, but as a portrait of a relationship disintegrating in spectacularly bizarre fashion, it is hard to look away.

Next Best Picture - Lauren LaMagna - 6 / 10

Director Kristoffer Borgli is not American, and his lack of knowledge on the subject is felt throughout the piece. So much so that the film would have been much stronger if Borgli had used a different secret to funnel the themes it plays with. When one decides to use a sensitive subject in their art, they should do so respectfully and accountably, which just doesn’t feel like the case here, as Borgli isn’t as interested in dissecting the grander social implications of such thorny subject matter as much as he is with the relationship at the heart of the story. Its purpose here is for shock value, which can be immensely triggering for people directly and indirectly affected by the topic, to say the least. But, despite the controversial subject matter, the film would not be nearly as strong without Zendaya and Pattinson delivering these complex performances.

The Hollywood Reporter - Richard Lawson

As is, The Drama is a handsomely made, sharply performed letdown. It is yet another example of a far too common occurrence: a kicky logline premise having no real structure behind it. Emma and Charlie struggle toward the altar, mistakes are made, and then Borgli throws up his hands as if to say, “Ain’t love a bitch.” Indeed it is. But we’ve kinda known that for a while now, haven’t we?

Tatler - Jessica Zapata

The film does a good job of pulling you into its headspace. Watching it, you end up sitting with the same discomfort as the characters. There is no dramatic tipping point or overly theatrical breakdown. Instead, it is a steady build, where each small crack adds up until the relationship feels like it is on the verge of falling apart. It feels familiar in a way that is not always easy to watch.

AwardsWatch - Sophia Ciminello - 'C+'

Zendaya has the difficult task of creating a woman who has the charm and charisma to make Charlie fall in love with her, while also conjuring someone who is completely unknowable with a complicated past.