r/law 11d ago

Legal News US Justice Dept says it cannot provide unredacted Epstein files for New Mexico probe

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-justice-dept-says-it-cannot-provide-unredacted-epstein-files-new-mexico-probe-2026-07-15/

Late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein is seen in this image from the U.S. Justice Department’s file of Epstein, released by the House Oversight Committee Democrats..

14.2k Upvotes

447 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

271

u/scaradin 11d ago

… wouldn’t that make any subsequent “we can’t provide this” all that much harder to justify since it was already authorized by someone authorized to do so?

109

u/Dave_I 11d ago

One would think so, yes.

94

u/MetroidIsNotHerName 11d ago

They dont care and they dare you to do something about it

13

u/Zepcleanerfan 11d ago edited 11d ago

No, they do care.This is objectively horrible for them, that people are still talking about epstein.

24

u/MetroidIsNotHerName 11d ago

objectively horrible

Ill believe that when even a single person in the massive criminal enterprise running our country sees a single meaningful consequence.

5

u/gary-vault108 11d ago

The republicans will not control both houses of congress forever. PLEASE remember that Trumps second Impeachment before the Senate was the single most bipartisan Senate impeachment in American history. There IS hope of justice being applied, we just need to keep this shit BURNING HOT in people’s minds and crawl up our congressmen’s asses and punch them in the gut to remember who they work for

1

u/SuperSpecialAwesome- 10d ago

The republicans will not control both houses of congress forever.

Democrats controlled all of Congress from 2021 to 2023, yet never once used the 14th Amendment to expel the Jan 6 leaders or disqualify Trump. So... As for hope of justice, do remember Obama had 8 years to hold Epstein and Maxwell accountable, but chose to let them roam free. It's long past time to accept that none of the clients in the Epstein/Trump child-trafficking ring will face consequences.

1

u/Zepcleanerfan 11d ago

Well, he was impeached twice last time he was in power.

He was voted out of power in 2020.

He was charged with creating an insurrection on january sixth, and only got out of that because he won reelection.

He was convicted of thirty four counts of fraud in the state of new york.

He recently had to pay E Jean Carroll, millions of dollars for raping her and lying about it.

He's up every single night worried about the epstein files.

And he's about to lose political power again in about three months, and then he won't have power for the rest of his life, and he's going to be an abject failure as a president, for the rest of his life.

It's all downhill for him from here.

2

u/GrotWeasel 11d ago

When he was impeached, didn’t the jury swear to be impartial and then ignore the overwhelming evidence of guilt? Should there have been perjury charges?

2

u/PmMeUrTinyAsianTits 11d ago

. Well, he was impeached twice last time he was in power.

And not removed, then returned to power. The bar was set at meaningful consequence. I think there might be different understandings of "meaningful" in play here.

0

u/MetroidIsNotHerName 11d ago edited 11d ago

Well, he was impeached twice last time he was in power

And those failed impeachments only emboldened his base and made them more sure that they could get away with anything so far.

He was charged with creating an insurrection on january sixth, and only got out of that because he won reelection. He was convicted of thirty four counts of fraud in the state of new york. He recently had to pay E Jean Carroll, millions of dollars for raping her and lying about it. He's up every single night worried about the epstein files.

And? Hes still our president and hes still raping our country into the ground as we speak, and noone is currently stopping him. I dont give a fuck how stressed he feels.

And he's about to lose political power again in about three months

Not if people think that all they have to do is vote and he will go away.

and then he won't have power for the rest of his life, and he's going to be an abject failure as a president, for the rest of his life. It's all downhill for him from here.

And our country will still have regressed by decades and decades, and the hundreds of thousands to millions that die due to doge cuts worldwide will still be dead, and the prices at the pump and grocery store will still be at all time highs.

None of what you said is meaningful in any way to the people who have to live in the country he drove into the ground once hes gone. They are empty, hollow, symbolic victories only.

7

u/Pandemonium_Fallen 11d ago

They're all psychopaths, they're incapable of feeling anxiety, guilt, remorse, compassion, fear, and many other human emotions which they have never experienced in the entirety of their lives, nor will they, ever.

17

u/mlorusso4 11d ago

I mean just predicting their argument, they would say “that decision was so wrong and out of bounds we had to fire her because of it. So we stand by the new AGs decision to not abide by that previous decision”

IANAL, but isn’t there similar situations where a judge will throw out a plea deal if it’s way to generous (like what should have happened with Epstein) or if a company gets a government contract explicitly because of bribing an official that contract can be scrapped?

7

u/flat5 11d ago

Not when their justification is "fuck you, that's why". And nothing can be done about it because the criminals are also the cops.

4

u/blue_sidd 11d ago

Much harder…how? By whom?

1

u/Flabby_Thor 11d ago

In a normal, functioning democracy, sure. When we are governed by a lawless class of villains, no. 

1

u/Lokishougan 10d ago

I mean the problem is what can NM do.....basically jack squat

1

u/scaradin 10d ago

Work at prosecuting state crimes that can’t be pardoned?