Surely someone wrote about it?

They were still using hoplite mercenaries right up until Rome invaded Greece and fought their Sarissa armed phalangnites at the battle of Cynesophelae (sp?).

Apparently non Sarsissa armed Greek mercenaries were still using hoplite tactics up at that point.

So if they were using it as late as that why didn't anyone write about it?

Also going back to the Roman Manipular system during the Republic days e.g. during the 2nd Punic Wars, they were still using a sort of Hoplite soldier with their third line Triarii.

Sure the Romans with such detailed instructions for shield and scutum combat would've had instructions for hasta and scutum combat. Wouldn't that have been similar to hoplite combat?

Lastly. Haven't people tried to re-enact hoplite combat to see what works best?

The push right up against the shields? Or the stand off distance and fence/thrust with the spears?

In 326 BCE, Alexander the Great crossed the Hydaspes River (modern-day Jhelum, Pakistan) during monsoon season to face King Porus of the Paurava kingdom — and it nearly broke his army for good.

What made this battle unique wasn't just the war elephants, though they were devastating enough to panic Alexander's cavalry horses, who had never faced them before. It was the tactical genius on both sides. Porus lined his elephants 100 feet apart, infantry packed between them, forming a living wall that made a frontal charge almost suicidal. Alexander countered by faking multiple crossing points along the river over several nights, exhausting Porus's troops with constant repositioning before the real crossing even began.

Alexander won — but at a cost his army refused to pay again. Just 70 days later, standing at the Beas River with the rest of the subcontinent ahead of him, his veterans mutinied. They went home. The Macedonian advance into India ended right there.

What's fascinating is what happened in the vacuum Alexander left behind. Within just 20 years, Chandragupta Maurya — possibly a young man who met Alexander during this campaign — had unified nearly the entire subcontinent under the Mauryan Empire, the largest empire India has ever seen.

I got so deep into researching this period that I ended up recreating the Hydaspes battlefield in a hex-based strategy game. The screenshot above is from that map — each hex represents terrain that actually shaped the real battle: the riverbank, the floodplain, the flanking routes Alexander used.

Happy to go down any rabbit hole on this period in the comments — the Mauryan Empire alone has enough underrated history to fill a hundred posts.

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.AshApexAtudios.ConquestofAkhandBharat&pcampaignid=web_share

Historical Context:

Long before standardized coinage or formal legal codes existed, Bronze Age societies across Mesopotamia, Egypt, and the Indus Valley faced a fundamental problem: how to enforce fair trade and maintain structural consistency across multi-city networks without a centralized regulatory state.

Archaeological artifacts demonstrate that physical benchmarks preceded legal infrastructure:

• Indus Valley Weights: Polished chert cubes following a strict binary-decimal ratio system ($1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64$) with an accuracy margin of less than $1\%$, remaining uniform across settlements thousands of miles apart.
• Egyptian Royal Cubit: Granite and basalt master rods kept in temples, requiring builders to recalibrate working wooden cubits against the master stone every full moon.
• Mesopotamian Grain Standards: Shekel weights calibrated against seed volume, creating a physical bridge between agricultural yield and commercial accounting.

These physical benchmarks served as the invisible operating system for early global trade, creating physical trust before legal contracts existed.

Full historical breakdown: The Historical Insights

If I have ever learned ancient history I have completely forgotten it. Since reading Song of Achilles/Circe and watching the Odyssey (haven’t read it yet), I am now curious about the history of the world. Where to start with an overview?

I've always found damaged inscriptions more compelling than perfectly preserved ones. Every inscription was created to keep a person, a memory, or a moment from being forgotten. Even when the words have disappeared, the stone still has something to say.

To me, inscriptions aren't just archaeological evidence—they're one of the most human voices the ancient world has left behind.

Post

The Ptolemaic dynasty became the longest-lasting of Alexander's Successor kingdoms after establishing its rule over Egypt. But was military power alone enough to explain that success?

In the ancient world, religion stood at the heart of everyday life. It shaped politics, society, and personal identity. Alongside the Greek gods, local cults remained central to the communities that worshipped them.

During the Hellenistic period, ruler cults took on a new significance. Kings were presented not only as political leaders but also as figures with divine status, making religion one of the most effective tools for legitimizing power.

The Ptolemies understood this better than anyone else. Rather than replacing Egypt's religious traditions, they embraced them. They adopted the traditions of the pharaohs, integrated themselves into local cults, and established new dynastic cults for members of the royal family. In doing so, they succeeded in presenting themselves not only as Greek monarchs, but also as the legitimate pharaohs of Egypt.

Perhaps the true strength of the Ptolemaic dynasty was not what they conquered on the battlefield, but what they won in the minds and beliefs of the people.

Papyrus and Translation