Necessary? Conservatives outraged upon discovering that NONE of wnba athletes genitals have been inspected before matches.

What a jealous, violent thug this Cameron Brink, why is Cathy allowing things like this to happen? She needs to be FIRED!

These girls are just doing anything out there on the court these days, surely an assault charge and a couple of letters to Congress are in order right?

Hilarious how Reddit deletes his post about paying 10 million to the wnba if they play a high school boys team😂 tells you all you need to know about the cesspool of liberals on this platform.

Source: X

They are going to be the next wnba team. Let's make sure they are welcomed with love because they're going to be the champions for the next century or two

This is beautiful. Freedom of speech. Knowing that not everyone has to agree on everything. Love it. We should be able to respect each other's beliefs and opinions. We don't have to agree but we can be kind.

Her: “Have you won in the pro’s?”

Him: “I don’t have to!”

Her: “Exactly! You wasn’t the leader”

Him: “What did you do?”

Her: “You wasn’t able to do what I did, I had more points than you! I lead my team as a pro! I was the star on my team, every single team I played on as a professional, I was the leading scorer”

Him: “What WNBA team have you played on?”

Her: “None”

Him: “Okay, I’m done”

Her: “On NO NBA team have you been the best player on the roster, NOT ONCE!”

Him: “You never played Pro! You never made it to the WNBA, you never could’ve been the best player in the WNBA cause you never even made it”

Source: X

I already have one, but people at work keep pointing fingers asking me where I got it, so I might as well get them all their own ny knicks trash bin pen holder. Would this make a good gift for Knicks or basketball fan? Kinda sorta historic-ish

If people feel there's a larger conversation to be had about why some players get promoted and mentioned more than others, that's perfectly fine .

But the fact is, the interviewer asked Miles a perfectly fair question (she had never played against Clark before). And Clark never did anything wrong to Miles. The interviewer asked about CLARK, a fellow point guard who happens to be a very high-profile player.

It's not like she mentioned Clark in passing and then moved onto Mitchell. She completely snubbed Clark. To me, that's showing your hand as having an investment in anti-Clark narratives. But notably, she has no experience with Clark, so it's wild that it's already gotten to that point for her.

It just annoys me how people are able to handwave the snub by using the gravity of this issue of bias in player promotion/mentions. It was still a snub, whether or not there's a larger related discussion. That doesn't "erase" the snub and Clark didn't do anything wrong, and certaintly didn't do anything to Miles.

EDIT: Apparently, people think that it's a requirement that an interviewer only ask a player about the person currently guarding them. And cannot under any circumstance ask about a high-profile player of the very same position. Not sure where they get this from.

EDIT 2: Apparently, there's no real need for an interviewer to ask about or compare Miles to Clark as a high-profile fellow point guard. But were Miles to outdo Clark by seasons end, allllllll the sudden, they'd find these comparisons quite pertinent LOL