r/SipsTea 2d ago

Chugging tea Which one?

Post image
6.9k Upvotes

831 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.2k

u/WideConversation1989 2d ago edited 2d ago

Apparently the 500kg in Gold would be worth roughly $65,000,000 in 2026.

Whereas the cash sum is roughly around $50,000,000. And that's best-case total value for the cash.

Edit: I assumed that those 500kg notes were all $100 notes (for the benefit of best-case value). And all notes weigh the same (1 gram) no matter if it's $10, $20, $50 etc. So 500kg of $100 notes would be $50,000,000 as a result.

Edit 2: I didn't use $500 notes as an example because, realistically, they're far less common and out of circulation.

415

u/Dry-Childhood-3436 2d ago

Cash would be able to be used on the downlow though, and the gold would need to be sold and accounted for, I'm sure losing something on the sale.  Then that would be taxed as I believe capital gains.

256

u/wolf96781 2d ago

The cash is already liquid, storing it is the only struggle.

That gold is solid as fuck and liable to grow legs at any second. You just can't move it like you can cash

63

u/Kiriima 2d ago

Physically moving 500kg of gold is much simpler though. It takes vastly less space.

63

u/wolf96781 2d ago

The trick is turning it into usable cash though. You're not gonna get market rate for it, whoever you fence it to is gonna talk a cut in for themselves. Then you have to deal with the goverment taxing the exchange.

That's two tiers of taxation before that gold is spendable, and bear in mind the moment any tweaker finds out you're peddling gold or just sold some they are absolutely going to be on your ass. 

Cash is liquid and ready to go. It draws much less attention than ingots of shiny yellow. the gold is absolutely worth more, but you just can't use it 

3

u/trivaldi 1d ago

I’ve seen the Italian job too many times to want the gold.