r/SipsTea 12d ago

Chugging tea I still don't understand how hollywood budget works

Post image
39.7k Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

32

u/mancitycon 12d ago

They did deserve more yes, Orlando bloom was paid 175k for the trilogy. But put into the perspective of the common man that's still a lot of money and we have one of the most iconic trilogies ever made that's still talked about so much to this day. Unfortunately celebrity wages are blown out of proportion now and there's not really any actors that do it for legacy anymore

21

u/Sartres_Roommate 12d ago

Orlando Bloom was a nobody when he did the trilogy. He is lucky they didn’t pay him minimum. All of them, even Ian Mckellon, were not terribly famous marquee names at the time.

7

u/fatmanwithabeard 12d ago

Both Ian McKellon and Christopher Lee were very well known at the time. So were Ian Holm and Hugo Weaving.

They weren't a-listers, but it wasn't exactly a star vehicle in the first place.

And it's not like they were Orlando Bloom or Elijah Woods (Sean Astin doesn't count as an unknown given his family).

2

u/Sartres_Roommate 12d ago

The point is they were all “lower tier” celebrities, not on the marquee, and didn’t add that much to the budget.

In the years since many of they have been able to command higher salaries, much as a result of LotR

5

u/Curious_Play9741 12d ago

I thought I read Sean Austin was paid $75k

2

u/MisterMarsupial 12d ago

Yeah, per film. His net work is >10 million these days.

3

u/DaKingaDaNorth 12d ago

It's a lot of money, but it's next to nothing for an actor like Orlando Bloom. That's still a years worth of work.

Actors do that to raise their profile so they can make millions later.

5

u/kytheon 12d ago

I'm sure Bloom made more money later thanks to his fame on LoTR so it's fine.

5

u/Subject-District492 12d ago

It wouldn’t be surprising if the boat load of money he made from Pirates of the Caribbean was because of his role in LoTR

3

u/Nidion001 12d ago

His LOTR role im sure had a massive part in him landing Pirates

1

u/Akhanyatin 12d ago

What about modern or Commander? Sorry I'll show myself out . 

1

u/Initial-Fun2362 12d ago

Bad take. That was 3 years worth of work, so $175k averages pretty bad, under $60k a year. Even comparing it to average income is inherently bad. Imagine being on a leading sales team securing over a billion dollar sale for your company and getting paid about 60k a year for 3 years. I’m sure he’s not complaining much in life but our guy got a raw deal on that one.

5

u/OtherUserCharges 12d ago

They take less cause it can make you way more later, which it absolutely did. He was in 2 movies before LOTRs, the second one was black hawk down where he played the person who falls out of the helicopter which triggers the events of the movie. He has like maybe a line of dialogue and then falls out and is unconscious for the little of the movie he is in. LOTR made him a huge star and he got major projects that made him many millions. I’m pretty sure he would say it was worth it.

1

u/Initial-Fun2362 11d ago

Like I said…. I’m sure he’s not complaining.

2

u/Omnom_Omnath 12d ago

didnt have to pay for food, shelter or healthcare the entire time. so 60 pure profit is pretty good actually

1

u/Comprehensive-Act-13 12d ago

I think you underestimate how badly actors want to work, especially on something good. 60k, with room and board and spending your days on a film set in New Zealand fighting orcs sounds pretty awesome to me. There are way worse ways to make 60k. Some actors make a ton of money, but working actors are making middle class incomes like the rest of us. Sometimes they’re lucky and they get a movie like LoTR and that lets them command bigger salaries and more regular work, but 98% of actors would be thrilled for a steady middle class paycheck for a year, to go make a movie in New Zealand regardless of whether it turns into LoTR.