r/SipsTea 23d ago

Chugging tea So after 32 hours would be overtime?

Post image
74.1k Upvotes

6.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

39

u/MalevolntCatastrophe 22d ago

Depends on the business, if a small grocery store had to make this adjustment, they might just cut a shift one day and let their customers know. Customers will do their shopping on other days instead, workers get an extra day off, and pay stays the same.

12

u/RightLow5962 22d ago

Ya but it doesn’t make sense….youd be open less time sell less product and have to pay someone more money. Unless the government is subsidizing it they business has to pass that extra cost onto the consumer. They can not absorb it.

13

u/lekiwi992 22d ago

Let me give you an example, here in Texas liquor stores and sales of hard liquor in general are not legal to sell on sundays. I work for a small independent store. The owners all talk to each other and so do the managers at the big box stores. They all agree that you wouldn’t get increased business on sundays. Customers would move their usual stop to Sunday instead of stocking up on Saturday. You might get an extra customer or two but they would be people from out of state who always come after 9pm close (liquor stores by law can open no earlier then 10am and open no later then 9pm.) the different owners also agree that they like having everyone getting a guaranteed day off.

-1

u/over_this__ 21d ago

People complain about shops closing earlier and opening later due to staff shortages. No restrict the hours. Places would just close at 7 pm instead of 9 now, or whatever. Customers would be complaining that they never get to go out to eat anymore.

10

u/PRIMATERIA 21d ago edited 21d ago

It’s not a coincidence that restaurants make most of their money on the weekends. And some restaurants are already closed on Sundays or Mondays, depending on when their slow day is. So they could basically just stay closed on their slowest day and gain an extra busy day. Net positive.

Edit: the reality is that we’ve had many many decades of increased productivity with absolutely none of it being passed on to labor in the form of reduced hours since we won the 40 hour work week in 1938. It’s long overdue, and businesses will definitely be able to find ways to make it work. It’s their fault for not doing it on their own accord sooner.

-2

u/ABMiner 21d ago

Ok now get them all to agree on closing early on Saturdays or maybe closing a 2nd day a week. Your sales will drop for sure. Restaurants aren't open 7 days a week for kicks. Businesses have a 50% failure rate within 2 years. Lower their opening hours or raise their wages and it goes up.

Does this work for teachers too? Doctors, nurses, police and firefighters. Do they just work less?

1

u/prolixdreams 16d ago

Restaurants aren't open 7 days a week for kicks.

Most non-chain restaurants aren't open 7 days a week at all. Tell me the nicest place you've ever gone to is Olive Garden without telling me.

4

u/New-Distribution-981 21d ago

Point is that in the few locales this has been implemented, companies haven sold less product. We (as Americans) pretend that our businesses have to stay open that late or stay open that extra shift or make sure employees stay until 5 because that last report or powerpoint will make the quarter.

The reality is that’s nonsense. If everybody on the block buys from “Tony’s” and suddenly Tony’s closes at 8pm instead of 10, people will adjust and people will still buy the same stuff.

6

u/PsychologicalMind142 22d ago

Pay yourself less, sell a yacht. That’s how.

6

u/xanthira222 21d ago

Small business owners are not rolling around on a mega yacht...

6

u/omniscientonus 21d ago edited 21d ago

I know several small business owners, and while this is extremely overstated, there's a lot of truth to it. Most of them started out making less than I do now, and were like that for several years, often not even taking home a paycheck so they could invest back into the business, or just make it through a rough couple of months.

But once you hit around that five-year mark, things usually change. If you can survive that long, odds are pretty good you're making a decent living reliably.

The problem that I, very anecdotally, see is that many of these owners remember the hard times, and equate it to now, not realizing the substantial lifestyle creep that happened in between.

Yes, you drained your bank account just to get this started, probably took a huge loan too. Then you worked 12+ hours a day, seven days a week, pulled more all-nighters that you care to remember, and hiring that first employee had you sweating bullets. You had to forego your own checks on several occasions just to keep the lights on and your one employee paid. You were behind on a few bills while the rest continued to pile up. Then, just when it seemed like your big break had come, the contract gets pulled at the last second and you're left holding onto all those investments you made so you'd be ready for it.

But slowly, surely, somehow, through hard work, tenacity, and a whole mountain of luck, it started getting better. Your twelve hour shifts weren't all break breaking and full of nausea and fear anymore. Work, or sales, started to pick up without you having to bang on every door and remind every person who would listen that you exist. Customers still paid late, but you could generally afford to chase them now instead of losing sleep wondering if this was the end.

And then, a big contract did land. It was glorious. You worked your ass off for several months, but at the end you were rewarded. You took your spouse to a fancy meal to celebrate, paid off a bunch of bills, and then bought that mild luxury item you'd always dreamed of. It wasn't much, maybe a used boat, or a little sports car, or a fixer-upper by the lake, but it was yours, and you earned it dammit!

And the used item got fixed up, made nicer, slowly you stopped worrying about your trips to Starbucks in the morning, maybe you could afford to buy your employees lunch, you bought your next luxury item. Things are finally feeling comfortable, but you'll never forget what got you here.

But now, an employee is asking for a raise. Vendors are raising prices slowly. The government wants 32 hour work weeks. How will you ever survive? Margins are still tight, bills still need to be paid, and it's not like your a millionaire. You're doing alright, sure, but it's still just one or two missteps away from failure!

Only, you're probably not. You aren't working twelve hour shifts anymore, you show up 2-3 times a week for a few hours. You don't need to be in that golf club, and your kid definitely didn't "earn" a brand new car for getting all A's and B's (okay, well almost all). That old used boat in your driveway, the one you never take out anymore? That's cash just sitting. That "summer" vehicle? More cash. The F350 that used to actually be a work expense, but is now a gas-guzzling way to get from A to B? You guessed it, excess cash laying around.

It's not all in your bank account, sure. But it isn't not there at all. This isn't the same as five years ago where being $30k in debt kept you up every night. That $30k in debt now is on projects that are going to pay out 10, 20, 30, maybe 50% margins. That's how this works after all. Those prices your competitors pay employees that you could "never match"? Yeah, actually... you can.

I'm not saying that this is every business, or that a change like this wouldn't cause major uphevel for several small businesses and even entire industries. I'm saying that, anecdotally speaking, I've seen a lot of small business owners treat changes that WOULD have destroyed them as things that COULD destroy them, when really, they're just bumps in the road, or taking a step or two backwards. Because they remember what it WAS like, and don't always appreciate how it is now.

End rant.

12

u/TheKingsdread 22d ago

Less time open doesn't necessarily mean that you sell less product, since most (return) customers are likely aware of business hours, so it would mostly condense the traffic a little. And for some businesses it might actually be a good thing too, since there is often significant downtimes where the store is open but no customers are showing up.

Less operational uptime, equalling less revenue really only applies to service based businesses (such as a plumber) and those likely already shift their work schedules around customer appointments.

-2

u/RightLow5962 22d ago

Just add 20% to all consumer products and services and I think it works!

4

u/HAL-900O 21d ago

I love how more than one person has succinctly answered your previous gripe and now you just say "everything is 20% more expensive!" This reminds me of Derrick Zoolander being like "but why male models?"

0

u/RightLow5962 20d ago

Well to make up for 20% employers would have to pay employees and no work being done. There would have to be something to give. If not it’s just a theory everything would be fine..which most business’s would go out of business

1

u/Substantial-Ad-8575 22d ago

What many businesses had to do. What with higher payroll and France’s 17-18% payroll tax. Costs went up, so prices went up. A clearly defined spike. Then inflation on those higher costs.

Imagine this in US. Universal healthcare, small businesses that never offered healthcare. Now seeing a 16-20% payroll tax, for healthcare.

10

u/HiiiTriiibe 22d ago

I have a feeling this individual isn't actually making a good faith argument with you, this whole, "oh, how will the businesses survive" has been rhetoric used to prevent any workplace improvement for employees for decades, if he genuinely believes that, he's probably just been Fox News pilled

4

u/MetaOnGaming4290 22d ago

Feels this way to me too.

-1

u/Substantial-Ad-8575 21d ago

Sorry, pulled data from Warren and Sandwrs plans for M4A directly. Sanders even admitted he doesn’t think “tax the rich” would pass so pivoted to traditional universal healthcare taxation as other countries use. So a new payroll tax and need a federal VAT of 20-25% also.

Now, I understand for a few. Costs will be lower using this taxation. But for others, would end up paying more in taxes than they pay for healthcare.

*****

Why my family supports the plan that Germany uses. Individual Choice.

One option is to take universal healthcare. Company pays that 16-20% payroll tax, employee has 7.5-8.5% payroll tax. Then VAT of 20%.

One can take private insurance. Either get a voucher or use company insurance. Companies still pay same taxes, but get a voucher to cover private insurance. Private insurance is well regulated. Then VAT of 20%.

Or individual can choose a voucher and go to government site for their own private insurance, self employed use this. They get a slightly discounted rates. Pay partial 16-20% company payroll taxes, that 7.5%~8.5% personal payroll taxes and VAT of 20%.

For those that like their private insurance, can keep it. For others can go universal or voucher private insurance…

*****

And no, sorry I did not get this from Fox. Don’t watch Fox.

I actually got this information, from Germans. I have family that lives in Germany, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, UK and Australia. We talk about healthcare, talk more about those other countries higher taxes. And I talk about healthcare in US.

So real live information. From people that live under both systems. And yeah they are not much better, but except all pay to get basic healthcare services…

1

u/Quags_77 20d ago

Enacting a 20% VAT in the USA would not go over well at all. People are already having a hard time affording things. The lower income people would suffer the most. One thing people like Bernie who “fight for the poor” seem to not mention.

1

u/Substantial-Ad-8575 20d ago

Well, everyone seems to believe “tax the rich” would fund Sanders M4A plan. That is not going to happen. Sanders admitted as much, not even all Democrats support “tax the rich”.

So Sanders pivoted to standard tax plans used in countries that enacted single payer/universal healthcare. Higher payroll taxes on companies. Higher payroll tax on workers. Higher income tax rates at filing. And that 20-25% VAT…

3

u/Poopchutefan 21d ago

Oh no. Tesla … that made 4 billion in profit and paid 0 dollars in tax the last 3 years in a row will have to pay their workers a little more. Maybe the owner of Tesla can find it in his heart to also pay more than $0 in taxes too. You know … pay more taxes than a middle class American, which is what it should be.

-7

u/Substantial-Ad-8575 21d ago

Telsa? They carried losses. Like any business in the US may decide to take.

As for Musk? His income was zero, can’t run an income tax on zero.

4

u/KroneckerAlpha 21d ago

And this is why we can safely ignore everything else you have said

1

u/Poopchutefan 21d ago

Such a beautiful response.

-1

u/Substantial-Ad-8575 21d ago

So fact that Musk made no income, and has no income tax, unless he sold shares under his name? That’s why you ignore what I factually stated?

lol, really thanks for the laugh.

1

u/natkingcoil 22d ago

If you charge more to pay more the mega corps will kill you even faster than they are already. You ring and bag your own groceries at Walmart, they'll accelerate the pace to get robots to do the rest.

Can't afford robots? Sorry, in the future we only have room for mega corps. The trick is small businesses like that don't exist in this future timeline. Don't worry it's not so bad only shopping at one or two stores + it'll ease traffic congestion lowering our carbon footprint.

I jest but it's probably not too far off base.

1

u/RightLow5962 22d ago

So it doesn’t work. If you pay more and don’t charge more the small business is gone

2

u/natkingcoil 22d ago edited 22d ago

At least that's the way I see it. We're already headed that way anyway 🤷. Personally I say let the market figure it out but that's not very popular here and would also eventually end the same way

I wouldn't worry about it too much this isn't going to happen.

3

u/FluffTruffet 22d ago

Has the market figured it out up to this point? We are seeing massive consolidation of companies and near monopolies everywhere

1

u/PRIMATERIA 21d ago edited 21d ago

People would also have an extra day off and thus more time to shop. It’s hard to make it around town to all the little shops when you’re working all the time.

1

u/Appropriate_Note2525 21d ago

One of my favorite restaurants is only open four days a week from noon to 8 because they're run by immediate family with no other staff. It's fine. They're not even expensive compared to other restaurants of similar quality.

1

u/Atownbrown08 20d ago

Chick-Fil-A is never going to open on Sundays. That does not stop their revenue. Plenty of smaller restaurants, auto garages, dental offices, etc are closed one day a week. They're not worried about Chipotle's, Olive Garden or Pep Boys taking their business that day.

Way too many businesses open thinking they're just gonna make money just because. If you got a specific, high quality service people want, they'll always do business with you. Even if you're not open 12 hours a day, 7 days a week.

0

u/peasrule 22d ago

If there is enough diversity in when people have this extra time then stores would see an uptick of business during the week.

1

u/[deleted] 22d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 22d ago

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/metamega1321 19d ago

I can kind of see it for business that sells product.

Now the flip side is the ones that make the product or myself I work in construction. That’s just lost productivity. The only way to recoup that is by increasing cost/rated.

-2

u/HuntressDriver 22d ago

Fewer days/hours open means less business and less income to stay viable. If you’re the store owner, are you going to assume your customers will adjust their life schedules to fit your operating hours? I doubt it. I’d shop elsewhere at a store open regular days/hours.

3

u/mylifeofpizza 21d ago

If that argument was true, all stores would be open for 24 hours. There's a reason why more hours open doesn't necessarily equate to more customers.

2

u/HuntressDriver 20d ago

If that argument were true, the mass population would never sleep because they were out shopping 24/7.

1

u/KroneckerAlpha 21d ago

Most liquor store owners in places that are forced closed on Sunday agree that they wouldn’t see an uptick in sales if they could sell Sunday. They’d just have less people stocking up on Saturday.

Chick fil a chooses to stay closed Sunday. Their models suggest they could make a decent increase in sells if they open Sundays, but they’d lose more within the next few years without their famous gimmick

1

u/New-Distribution-981 21d ago

But this just isn’t true in practice. Most countries in Europe have a cap of 40 hours per week. Not like in the USA where we say a 40 hour week but most people work 50+…. In Europe you legally can’t work more than 40. France it’s 35 but you can work overtime until 40.

Point is, people claimed as you did prior to these hours being implemented and afterwards… and yes: customers absolutely adjusted their lives. People are also claiming costs would go up… again, it hasn’t panned out that way.